- May 22, 2015
- 10,977 (3.98/day)
|Motherboard||Asus H670 TUF|
|Cooling||Arctic Freezer 34|
|Memory||2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V|
|Video Card(s)||EVGA GTX 1060 SC|
|Storage||500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 2TB Crucial MX500|
|Display(s)||Dell U3219Q + HP ZR24w|
|Audio Device(s)||Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D|
|Power Supply||Seasonic 620W M12|
|Mouse||Logitech G502 Proteus Core|
|Software||Arch Linux + Win10|
Google Music was great indeed (Google lost me when they turned on YouTube Music). But it wasn't an option when I started my collection, back in the '90s.CD's or digital stores that sold high bitrate. Google Music(RIP) was excellent for this. I have half my digital library from Google Music. 100% DRM free MP3's. Loved it!
And that's what I expect many people will do. I was just saying, there's convenience in streaming service and I think it's worth the small fee. I'm not saying everybody must subscribe, I was just explaining how Spotify is worth the cost for me.I might be missing some context. Still, don't care. I always have access to my library because I can take my collection with me regardless of an internet connection and I don't have to pay a monthly fee to have access to it. 64GB & 128GB MicroSD cards are useful indeed. And they're inexpensive.