- Joined
- Nov 2, 2013
- Messages
- 461 (0.12/day)
System Name | Auriga |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 7950X3D w/ aquacomputer cuplex kryos NEXT with VISION - acrylic/nickel |
Motherboard | Asus ROG Strix X670E-E Gaming WiFi |
Cooling | Alphacool Res/D5 Combo •• Corsair XR7 480mm + Black Ice Nemesis 360GTS radiators •• 7xNF-A12 chromax |
Memory | 2x 32GB G.Skill Trident Z5 Neo RGB @ 6200MHz, 30-40-40-28, 1.35V (F5-6000J3040G32GX2-TZ5NR) |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid X w/ Bykski waterblock |
Storage | 2TB WD Black SN850X ••• 2TB Corsair M510 ••• 40TB QNAP NAS via SFP+ NIC |
Display(s) | Alienware AW3423DWF (3440x1440, 10-bit @ 139Hz) |
Case | Thermaltake Core P8 |
Power Supply | Corsair AX1600i |
Mouse | Razer Viper V2 Pro (FPS games) + Logitech MX Master 2S (everything else) |
Keyboard | Keycult No2 rev 1 w/Amber Alps and TX stabilizers on a steel plate. DCS 9009 WYSE keycaps |
Software | W10 X64 Pro |
Benchmark Scores | https://valid.x86.fr/c3rxw7 |
wow and well
1st,as all see,itsfaster than gtx 1080/vega64....but powerdraw is almost hafl for vega64,....and i never stop amazed how lausy gpu vega64 really are. worst of 10 years!
you mean how lousy of a GPU the Fury X is? vega 64 is just an overclocked fury X. overclock is courtesy of the die shrink from 28nm to 14nm, there was zero improvements to the GPU itself. gamers nexus proved that by downclocking the vega 64 to fury X speeds and showing that they perform EXACTLY the same.
and now AMD made the vega vii, which looks like a cut down but overclock vega 64, which in turn is a fury X. overclock is once again courtesy of the die shrink to 7nm.
Last edited: