Thursday, March 18th 2010

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Reference Design Card Final Design Pictured

Many would be familiar with these pictures of a generic graphics card based on NVIDIA's GF100 GPU which was spotted at this year's CES. A company slide sourced by DonanimHaber reveals the final iteration of NVIDIA's reference design GeForce GTX 480 graphics accelerator, and what it looks like from the outside. A set of slightly more recent pictures showed its cooling assembly from inside. The protruding heat pipes intrigued us as they were inconsistent with the cooling assembly on the card NVIDIA showed off at CES, which we then believed to be the top-end GTX 480 part. The company slide confirms what the cooling assembly looks like when it's all put together.

The cooler is highly ventilated, with vents all over the cooler's shroud. There are vents on the top, on the sides, apart from the usual obverse fan air intake. To increase its intake, the PCB is further cut to help draw air from the reverse-side of the PCB. The cooler's four large (we reckon 8 mm thick) heat pipes protrude about a centimeter out of the card's periphery, increasing its height by that much. The cooler itself respects the 2-slot thickness limit which is most conventional. A table in the slide also confirms some details we already know: the card has 1536 MB of GDDR5 memory across a 384-bit wide interface. It has a TDP of under 300W, which a recent report reveals to be a hairbreadth under 300W, at 296W. Power is drawn in from an 8-pin and a 6-pin PCI-E power connector. The card is 10.5 inches long, the same length as its reference-design GeForce GTX 280. The card supports 3-way SLI. It will be unveiled on the 26th of March.
Source: DonanimHaber
Add your own comment

137 Comments on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Reference Design Card Final Design Pictured

#76
Zubasa
newtekie1No, ATi advertises the HD5870 as having a TDP of 188w, in reality it pulls ~212w under load, if you don't believe me go look at some reviews.

I'm assuming max power draw possible here with the GTX480 of 300w to get an 88w difference, however the article and leaked information actually put it in the 395w range. And 212w is just the reference design, we have already seen partners release HD5870s that are pulling over 230w.

For those of you that don't like to be bothered to read real reviews:
tpucdn.com/reviews/Powercolor/HD_5750_Go_Green/images/power_maximum.gif
newtekie1It could be, but that would serioulsy over stress the PCI-e power specs. Maybe 305w, but I would say that would be the very maximimum, any higher and they would have put two 8-pin connectors on the card.
Do you realize that the GTX 295 rated at 289W TDP is already pulling 320Ws in that graph?
Both nVidia and ATi rate their TDP by typical use, not "power virus" draw. ;)

Unless the only thing you do is looking at the furry dounut the whole day, this is the graph to look for:
Posted on Reply
#77
DeathByTray
Hm.. maybe the power measurement isn't accurate. AFAIK I've seen other reviews where the 5870 was under its TDP of 188W.
Take a look at the GTX 295 for example. According to tpu it draws a max of 320W while its tdp is 289.
So, either all the TDPs are false or it has not been measured accurately.

Doh, Zubasa beat me 8(
Actually, don't Nvidia and ATI use Futuremark for their TDP?
Posted on Reply
#78
BraveSoul
that heatsink with direct touch and pipes sticking out looks amazing, like a muscle car ,,reeks of power, gasoline and oil

_____________________________
Posted on Reply
#79
Steevo
BraveSoulthat heatsink with direct touch and pipes sticking out looks amazing, like a muscle car ,,reeks of power, gasoline and oil
us4.pixagogo.com/S54Wv7ew067bsBv!HhwNPiX7Ry0v5d7rnOewkGb6XD9b4stE1TbiyRH-Y2nSBviTmFSjqpWlHvAl4f2y29Xt3SFv8sKPt5qlY9bLTvKi2tPQqArlqjHyHDdGOp8MCM80FVkFnu!x51YPo_/The_fast_and_the_furious_muscle_car.jpg
_____________________________
stats.free-dc.org/cpidtagb.php?cpid=59693a2ed1d0ab4f24e571d332537dfb&theme=9&cols=1
Burning oil from overheating, 1MPG Pinto with bald tires and one brown door, merging onto the information superhighway like the Titanic into a iceberg.


You can dress up a turd all you want, but at the end of the day it's still a turd.
Posted on Reply
#80
Fourstaff
Fermi, now with 3 slots for more cooling power?

I can almost hear it "With occupying 3 slots instead of the standard two, we can deliver exceptional cooling capabilities to keep the temperatures down and prolong the lifespan of the GTX480"
Posted on Reply
#81
bobzilla2009
FourstaffFermi, now with 3 slots for more cooling power?

I can almost hear it "With occupying 3 slots instead of the standard two, we can deliver exceptional cooling capabilities to keep the temperatures down and prolong the lifespan of the GTX480"
it's only a matter of time. Nvidia don't care about being efficient, they will just make behemoths to say they have the better card. I can't wait for one day when ATi decides 'screw it, our very top end mono gpu card can have the same die size and TDP as nvidias, now lets pack the punch and leave the rest of the lineup efficient and resource friendly'. That would be the day nvidia dies.
Posted on Reply
#82
the54thvoid
Intoxicated Moderator
Aren't we all mostly missing something....

GTX480 = ~300W TDP and price of £450*
HD5870 = max 212W TDP and price of £310+
Thats about >40% increase on both counts.

(* based on Fudzilla's quoted 450 euros which will translate to 450 british quid.)

So, performance aside (because we dont know what it really is) why is everyone comparing these two cards? They are not in the same ballpark. It's like comparing a 2 litre engine car to a 1.4.

If this card, the cream of NV is to be classed as the best perfoming single GPU, it's performance needs to be classified towards the HD5970 end. And for those saying Dual GTX 480, what planets do you live on? It has TREMENDOUSLY bad power issues (512 cut to 480 cores) and an NV - not custom - cooling solution straight out the blocks.

This will beat the 5870 but the margins need to be justified. Can we not start being realistic and bring in more logistical arguments like

yo mommas gonna kick yo ass when she sees her power bill, assuming the house hasnt been burned down.

From a working technological position, ATI have won this round. Now if drivers were put aside many more NV folk would switch.

And remember, before i get called an ATI fanboi, I went to red because i foresaw Fermi being delayed way back in September, going on all those rumours. So NV lost my custom.
Posted on Reply
#83
bobzilla2009
the54thvoidAren't we all mostly missing something....

GTX480 = ~300W TDP and price of £450*
HD5870 = max 212W TDP and price of £310+
Thats about >40% increase on both counts.

(* based on Fudzilla's quoted 450 euros which will translate to 450 british quid.)

So, performance aside (because we dont know what it really is) why is everyone comparing these two cards? They are not in the same ballpark. It's like comparing a 2 litre engine car to a 1.4.

If this card, the cream of NV is to be classed as the best perfoming single GPU, it's performance needs to be classified towards the HD5970 end. And for those saying Dual GTX 480, what planets do you live on? It has TREMENDOUSLY bad power issues (512 cut to 480 cores) and an NV - not custom - cooling solution straight out the blocks.

This will beat the 5870 but the margins need to be justified. Can we not start being realistic and bring in more logistical arguments like

yo mommas gonna kick yo ass when she sees her power bill, assuming the house hasnt been burned down.

From a working technological position, ATI have won this round. Now if drivers were put aside many more NV folk would switch.

And remember, before i get called an ATI fanboi, I went to red because i foresaw Fermi being delayed way back in September, going on all those rumours. So NV lost my custom.
They're being compared because the hd5970 stomps all over it. Plus people like to compare the single gpu's from both parties. We all know fermi is the hd2900 of 2010, but we just want to see how much of a fail it truly is, to see if there's something to be salvaged.

Also, i bought my hd5870 in October :) epic card for the past 6 months! now fermi got kicked in the head by ridiculous power consumption! I don't want an easy bake oven with built in hairdryer. I want a gaming machine where i can still hear the game over the fan!
Posted on Reply
#84
Imsochobo
bobzilla2009it's only a matter of time. Nvidia don't care about being efficient, they will just make behemoths to say they have the better card. I can't wait for one day when ATi decides 'screw it, our very top end mono gpu card can have the same die size and TDP as nvidias, now lets pack the punch and leave the rest of the lineup efficient and resource friendly'. That would be the day nvidia dies.
Its already happening.
5970 is faster....
Nvidia fan boys are tired of waiting.
Their drivers isnt as good as they were, ati's drivers are improving at a rapid rate.
Ati is getting more acceptance by the open source community.
Ati is getting more out to the community, and developers.

Nvidia is:
Holding their prioritary standards close.
Delaying.
Showing off wood.
renaming.

With fusion comming, intel with their "igp" on die and so on, nvidia's chipset business AND low low end graphics solutions is obsolute, core 2 duo generation is dead very very soon.
Nvidia's chipset business started failing already at 6 series.

Nvidia's tegra is doing great.
Their tesla is doing great.

yeah...

I can only see intel buying nvidia when its stocks falling.
Posted on Reply
#85
HalfAHertz
The only way a dual fermi gpu is comming is if it's two 470 chips undervolted and underclocked
Posted on Reply
#87
kora04
isn't that as much power as the GTX 295?
and this should be as fast as a GTX 295, so....Nvidia is justified to do so?


but really. that much power, and that much heat, and that much possible price, why is nvidia even bothering with it?
Posted on Reply
#88
newtekie1
Semi-Retired Folder
ZubasaDo you realize that the GTX 295 rated at 289W TDP is already pulling 320Ws in that graph?
Both nVidia and ATi rate their TDP by typical use, not "power virus" draw. ;)

Unless the only thing you do is looking at the furry dounut the whole day, this is the graph to look for:
tpucdn.com/reviews/ASUS/EAH_5830_DirectCu/images/power_peak.gif
Yep, and the HD4870x2 is pulling well over 380w, despite the 300w limit it should be adhering to.

So where does that leave us? Where we started, knowing nothing about the actual power consumption of the GTX480.
Posted on Reply
#89
OneCool
Seems we have another 5800 on our hands.

The new and improved DUST BUSTER!!! :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#91
bobzilla2009
OneCoolSeems we have another 5800 on our hands.

The new and improved DUST BUSTER!!! :laugh:
at least the hd5870 doesn't need it at 100% (actually not even 60%) when under load :S the gtx480 looks like it'll need all that jumbo has got!
Posted on Reply
#92
MKmods
Case Mod Guru
SteevoBurning oil from overheating, 1MPG Pinto with bald tires and one brown door, merging onto the information superhighway like the Titanic into a iceberg.


You can dress up a turd all you want, but at the end of the day it's still a turd.
That made me really laugh... Thanks
Delta6326this should cover 3sli right?

img.techpowerup.org/100318/Capture0100.jpg:rockout:
LOL, as long as you dont OC anything....

This will be interesting to see the real card and real specs..
Posted on Reply
#93
aCid888*
A sad day has come when an SLi/i7 rig uses more power than my fucking microwave. :shadedshu
Posted on Reply
#94
Zubasa
OneCoolSeems we have another 5800 on our hands.

The new and improved DUST BUSTER!!! :laugh:
Oh here it comes again :laugh:
Posted on Reply
#95
MKmods
Case Mod Guru
aCid888*A sad day has come when an SLi/i7 rig uses more power than my fucking microwave. :shadedshu
Thing is with 3 of them and a i7 ur comp can now pop popcorn just by resting the bag on the top of ur case...
ZubasaOh the here it comes again :laugh:
www.expreview.com/img/news/2010/03/08/DSC_3684.jpg
LOL, ether they put the decimal in the wrong place or that is a 10K rpm fan (I bet its really quiet ):laugh:
Posted on Reply
#96
CDdude55
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
MKmodsThing is with 3 of them and a i7 ur comp can now pop popcorn just by resting the bag on the top of ur case...
:laugh::roll:
Posted on Reply
#97
MKmods
Case Mod Guru
I call Global Warming Alarm!!!!! Nvidia is killing the polar bears..

(lol, ok now il stop)
Posted on Reply
#98
aCid888*
MKmodsThing is with 3 of them and a i7 ur comp can now pop popcorn just by resting the bag on the top of ur case...
I'll even be able to shove it outside in the winter and melt the snow in the -30'C weather and watch the steam rise.....I'll be the talk of the neighbourhood with my "Fermi Sauna"! :laugh: :roll:
Posted on Reply
#99
Zubasa
MKmodsLOL, ether they put the decimal in the wrong place or that is a 10K rpm fan (I bet its really quiet ):laugh:
You are evil :roll:
The only other way that they can put the decimal point is to the right, and that will make it an 18.0A fan. :p
I am sure we humans will not hear the fan itself anymore. The noise is most likely ultrasound :nutkick:

Edit: fixed.
Posted on Reply
#100
jasper1605
The way I see it is that nvidia is going for a multipurpose card. Much like acid and mkmods have said. If you said up fermi as a cruncher you can turn off your water heater and place the tank near the exhaust vents of the card. Voila you now have no gas bill for heating water and you get hot showers! Is your house cold in the winter? Buy the fermi and heat your house WHILE killing people in BC2 for the cost of JUST killing people in BC2. Awesome :)

I'll stick w/ my 5850 toxic though. I lovez it :toast:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 08:14 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts