Thursday, May 20th 2010

ASUS Gives Rampage III Extreme 4-way SLI Capability with ROG Xpander

ASUS has come up with a Frankenstein solution which enables 4-way SLI on the Rampage III Extreme motherboard with full PCI-Express 2.0 x16 bandwidth, called the ROG Xpander. The device is a daughterboard that sits on the motherboard with connections to its PCI-E 2.0 x16 slots. While it might not fit into cases, it is intended to work on test-benches. The two PCI-E x16 connections from the motherboard are wired to two NVIDIA nForce 200 bridge chips, which give out two x16 links each, driving the four x16 slots on the daughterboard. It takes input from one 6-pin PCI-E power input, and three 4-pin Molex inputs, though not all may be required.

The ROG Xpander ideally would draw 12W of power per nForce chip, and with its own power inputs, will not draw any power from the motherboard for the four PCI-E cards. The point of using this device is that ASUS did not give 4-way SLI capability to the Rampage III Extreme from the factory, even though it already has four PCI-E x16 slots (x8 each when all are populated). A fan seated on the Xpander ensures components on the motherboard under it aren't suffocated of cool air. ASUS ran a 4-way SLI test of four GeForce GTX 480 graphics cards on 3DMark Vantage, where the Core i7 980X @ 6 GHz powered setup scored P52422 points.
And now for the price. For now it's not known, but considering that the two nForce 200 chips and 4-way SLI license from NVIDIA cost close to US $100, this device won't be cheap. Ideally expect it to be under $200, which is still not a bad value proposition considering other 4-way SLI capable motherboards such as the Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD9 cost around US $700, while the Rampage III Extreme goes for "just" $380.
Source: NordicHardware
Add your own comment

47 Comments on ASUS Gives Rampage III Extreme 4-way SLI Capability with ROG Xpander

#26
kaneda
DriedFrogPillsi don't think anyone would have that as crssfire only goes up to 4 gpu's that and the 5970 only has one crossfire finger. So even if you did have 4 5970's in one machine only two cards would be talking to each other in CF
forget gaming, i want to see some number crunching.
Posted on Reply
#27
filip007
Is this for the US Army maybe, they want this hardcore stuff...

Can i ask how you mount this in regular ATX and how do you mount GPU on box?
Posted on Reply
#28
JATownes
The Lurker
DOES NO ONE READ THE POST ANYMORE??????

For the cheap seats: THIS IS NOT INTENDED TO RUN IN A CASE, ONLY FOR TEST BENCHES!!!!

It clearly states this in the article.
Posted on Reply
#29
Delta6326
ehhh looks like the board would break in pear freakishness
Posted on Reply
#30
ebolamonkey3
I thought Quad SLI did not give any benefits over Tri-SLI? Thought I read some benchmark where they did 3x GTX 480 vs 4 and the quad setup actually was a little slower.

Source
Posted on Reply
#31
WSP
JATownesDOES NO ONE READ THE POST ANYMORE??????

For the cheap seats: THIS IS NOT INTENDED TO RUN IN A CASE, ONLY FOR TEST BENCHES!!!!

It clearly states this in the article.
add forceware 197.75 which support 4-way SLI exclusively on GTX470/480 only

I see that this is an upgrade to those existing user of R3E which would run 4-way SLI without buying another mobo
Posted on Reply
#32
cadaveca
My name is Dave
tiggerDefinately a frankenstein solution.Wonder how many people will mod their cases to fit this in.Would be a problem screwing the cards in though.
brandonwh64how do you fit the Video card inside the case with the PCIex slots higher than the normal board?
roastI dont think you can. I think its purely for test benches.
This has to be the stupidest product I've ever seen ASUS release.

However, I much prefer this than 15x boards, all with the same chipset.


I think they'll be lucky to sell 100 pieces.


And benchmarking just became the stupidest thing ever now. Liek really...numbers matter that much that they invest the R&D on this, rather than decent bioses? hire another bios programmer, you silly people! Manpower is needed, not useless benchmark power!


:shadedshu
Posted on Reply
#33
Bravo2Zero
the army uses sgi scalable computer in there war room you can just add a new rack with new system slots so if you want a 200 pci express slots you can have 200 and upto 1000 cpus all connected together with numa flex .
Posted on Reply
#34
cauby
...and then it turns into a motherboard sandwich?no thx.on a side note,could you put one on top of another,like LEGO?
Posted on Reply
#35
SystemViper
I think it is a much better idea, then like gigabyte UD9 which is 700, make it an add on and then it makes the Asus R3E much more affordable
Posted on Reply
#36
cadaveca
My name is Dave
SystemViperI think it is a much better idea, then like gigabyte UD9 which is 700, make it an add on and then it makes the Asus R3E much more affordable
THAt, I can 100% agree with, but that gigbyte board is a bit over the top....

$700 can get you a Crosshair4 Formula, Phenomx6 1090T, and 4GB of ram.

:shadedshu
Posted on Reply
#37
Wile E
Power User
Wonder if this will work on other mobos?
Posted on Reply
#38
MadClown
Were do I put my sound card?
Posted on Reply
#39
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
Wile EWonder if this will work on other mobos?
If there's 4 slots' gap between the x16 slots on the mainboard, yes it could work.
Posted on Reply
#40
Kitkat
The need to make a the ROG-RAM XTENDER for crosshair IV so that ram can GET THE HELL AWAY FROM MY HEATSINK!!! lol
Posted on Reply
#41
HillBeast
That fan is the exact fan from my old Dell laptop. Looks to me like Asus have just been scrounging for parts. Don't see why they didn't just put this whole Quad SLI thing on their board in the first place, oh wait, yes I do: they can sell this as an extra and then make more money off it.

If I wanted Quad SLI, I'd just buy an EVGA 4x SLI Classified or a Gigabyte UD9 (don't know if it does Quad-SLI but it will do Quad Crossfire).
Posted on Reply
#42
stasdm
Good idea.
Absolutly idiotic solution!
Posted on Reply
#43
WSP
MadClownWere do I put my sound card?
don't need soundcard for benchmarking.it's for 4-way SLI anyway
Posted on Reply
#44
stasdm
WSPdon't need soundcard for benchmarking.it's for 4-way SLI anyway
So, it's the idiotic solution for one-time idiotic task?
Posted on Reply
#45
RejZoR
stasdmSo, it's the idiotic solution for one-time idiotic task?
Pretty much :D
Posted on Reply
#46
fatguy1992
WSPdon't need soundcard for benchmarking.it's for 4-way SLI anyway
Don't need a sound card full stop, waste of money :)
Posted on Reply
#47
Wile E
Power User
fatguy1992Don't need a sound card full stop, waste of money :)
Yeah, if you are deaf. :D

No, but seriously, not even the best on-board even remotely compares to even a decent mid range sound card in sound quality. My Audigy 2ZS alone likely beats all on-board solutions in sound quality.

So, the only way a sound card is a waste of money is if you don't care about sound quality, or have speakers and headphones so crappy that it doesn't matter how good your signal is, as they are the bottleneck.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 02:01 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts