Thursday, August 19th 2010

Intel Corporation to Acquire McAfee

Intel Corporation has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire McAfee, Inc., through the purchase of all of the company's common stock at $48 per share in cash, for approximately $7.68 billion. Both boards of directors have unanimously approved the deal, which is expected to close after McAfee shareholder approval, regulatory clearances and other customary conditions specified in the agreement.

The acquisition reflects that security is now a fundamental component of online computing. Today's security approach does not fully address the billions of new Internet-ready devices connecting, including mobile and wireless devices, TVs, cars, medical devices and ATM machines as well as the accompanying surge in cyber threats. Providing protection to a diverse online world requires a fundamentally new approach involving software, hardware and services.

Inside Intel, the company has elevated the priority of security to be on par with its strategic focus areas in energy-efficient performance and Internet connectivity.

McAfee, which has enjoyed double-digit, year-over-year growth and nearly 80 percent gross margins last year, will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Intel, reporting into Intel's Software and Services Group. The group is managed by Renée James, Intel senior vice president, and general manager of the group.

"With the rapid expansion of growth across a vast array of Internet-connected devices, more and more of the elements of our lives have moved online," said Paul Otellini, Intel president and CEO. "In the past, energy-efficient performance and connectivity have defined computing requirements. Looking forward, security will join those as a third pillar of what people demand from all computing experiences.

"The addition of McAfee products and technologies into the Intel computing portfolio brings us incredibly talented people with a track record of delivering security innovations, products and services that the industry and consumers trust to make connecting to the Internet safer and more secure," Otellini added.

"Hardware-enhanced security will lead to breakthroughs in effectively countering the increasingly sophisticated threats of today and tomorrow," said James. "This acquisition is consistent with our software and services strategy to deliver an outstanding computing experience in fast-growing business areas, especially around the move to wireless mobility."

"McAfee is the next step in this strategy, and the right security partner for us," she added. "Our current work together has impressive prospects, and we look forward to introducing a product from our strategic partnership next year."

"The cyber threat landscape has changed dramatically over the past few years, with millions of new threats appearing every month," said Dave DeWalt, president and CEO of McAfee. "We believe this acquisition will result in our ability to deliver a safer, more secure and trusted Internet-enabled device experience."

McAfee, based in Santa Clara and founded in 1987, is the world's largest dedicated security technology company with approximately $2 billion in revenue in 2009. With approximately 6,100 employees, McAfee's products and technologies deliver secure solutions and services to consumers, enterprises and governments around the world and include a strong sales force that works with a variety of customers.

The company has a suite of software-related security solutions, including end-point and networking products and services that are focused on helping to ensure Internet-connected devices and networks are protected from malicious content, phony requests and unsecured transactions and communications. Among others, products include McAfee Total Protection?, McAfee Antivirus, McAfee Internet Security, McAfee Firewall, McAfee IPS as well as an expanding line of products targeting mobile devices such as smartphones.

Intel has made a series of recent and successful software acquisitions to pursue a deliberate strategy focused on leading companies in their industry delivering software that takes advantage of silicon. These include gaming, visual computing, embedded device and machine software and now security.

Home to two of the most innovative labs and research in the high-tech industry, Intel and McAfee will also jointly explore future product concepts to further strengthen security in the cloud network and myriad of computers and devices people use in their everyday lives.

On a GAAP basis, Intel expects the combination to be slightly dilutive to earnings in the first year of operations and approximately flat in the second year. On a non-GAAP basis, excluding a one-time write down of deferred revenue when the transaction closes and amortization of acquired intangibles, Intel expects the combination to be slightly accretive in the first year and improve beyond that.

Intel was advised by Goldman Sachs & Co. and Morrison & Foerster LLP. McAfee was advised by Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.

HIGHLIGHTS:
  • Purchase of all of McAfee's common stock for $48 per share in cash, valuing the deal at approximately $7.68 billion. McAfee will operate as a wholly-owned subsidiary, reporting into Intel's Software and Services Group.
  • Acquisition enables a combination of security software and hardware from one company to ultimately better protect consumers, corporations and governments as billions of devices - and the server and cloud networks that manage them - go online.
  • Intel elevates focus on security on par with energy-efficient performance and connectivity. The acquisition augments Intel's mobile wireless strategy, helping to better assure customer and consumer security concerns as these billions of devices connect.
  • Intel has made a number of software-related acquisitions of leaders in their respective industries that also rely on great silicon, including Wind River, Havok and now McAfee.
Add your own comment

52 Comments on Intel Corporation to Acquire McAfee

#26
niko084
beyond_amusiaIf AMD buys Panda Intel is f*cked!
Panda.... Are you kidding me?
If AMD buys Panda I will never buy another AMD/ATI product as long as I live!

I think I would rather have Norton at least it functions.... If you feel like waiting.
Posted on Reply
#27
a_ump
I don't know about the retail panda, but the free version is rated as the best free antivirus and in prevention(not removing) beats out qutie few of the retail AV's out.

#1 free AV
#4 retail
#3(retail) on this one
that's a hell of a lot better than Mcafee. lol
Posted on Reply
#28
niko084
a_umpI don't know about the retail panda, but the free version is rated as the best free antivirus and in prevention(not removing) beats out qutie few of the retail AV's out.

#1 free AV
#4 retail
#3(retail) on this one
that's a hell of a lot better than Mcafee. lol
Well from my own tests which come from just under 1TB *I mean just under 1000gb not it fits on a 1TB drive* of various viruses sitting on my server Panda is full of fail, minus the free aspect.

And I WISH I was paid to say that, and I'm certainly not "consumer reports" idiots.
Posted on Reply
#29
a_ump
hmmm well :P for some reason it was chosen otherwise.
Posted on Reply
#30
niko084
a_umphmmm well :P for some reason it was chosen otherwise.
It's all fairly nominal most independent groups have large collections of viruses they test with as well... Although I really start to wonder sometimes because they say stuff like "Norton Fast"....
Posted on Reply
#31
Wile E
Power User
KainXSwell its not like its worst than . . . . norton antivirus
Actually, yes it is.

I, like most everyone else here, just don't get it. The only thing worse than McAfee is the free no-name AVs. Hell, I'd pick AVG free over McAfee any day.
Posted on Reply
#32
RejZoR
This was interesting. Mostly because Intel already made large investment into AVG Technology (former Grisoft) some time ago. And now they've acquired McAfee entirely. Hm.

Btw, McAfee and Norton (Symantec) aren't as bad as many want you to think.
Norton had it's bad days during the 2008 year, but current releases are far from bad in pretty much all aspects. If you're of course willing to pay for an antivirus. Same goes for McAfee.
Sure they had false positives but then again i've seen them in pretty much ALL products. They all had one big in their time.
Posted on Reply
#33
TheGuruStud
Intel has a history of wasting billions. I hope this is another failed venture.
Posted on Reply
#34
Kitkat
Wile EActually, yes it is.

I, like most everyone else here, just don't get it. The only thing worse than McAfee is the free no-name AVs. Hell, I'd pick AVG free over McAfee any day.
AVG is no better or worse than MS Essentials with that being said id pick either over norton and Macafee both are QUITE horible. Get a router already
Posted on Reply
#35
Wile E
Power User
KitkatAVG is no better or worse than MS Essentials with that being said id pick either over norton and Macafee both are QUITE horible. Get a router already
Sorry, but you are wrong. Norton now ranks with NOD32 and Kaspersky in both detection and performance. And it's been that way since Norton 2009. AVG ranks below MSE. MSE is actually decent for a freebie.
Posted on Reply
#36
TheGuruStud
Wile ESorry, but you are wrong. Norton now ranks with NOD32 and Kaspersky in both detection and performance. And it's been that way since Norton 2009. AVG ranks below MSE. MSE is actually decent for a freebie.
What good is norton if it already let the virus infect the system and can't remove it ;)
Posted on Reply
#37
Wile E
Power User
I doesn't let the virus in. That's what people don't seem to understand. They did a ground up rewrite for 2009. It works great now.
Posted on Reply
#38
Kitkat
Wile ESorry, but you are wrong. Norton now ranks with NOD32 and Kaspersky in both detection and performance. And it's been that way since Norton 2009. AVG ranks below MSE. MSE is actually decent for a freebie.
Acording to someone someplace like any OTHER benchmark. Too much faith in ranks, All antivrus programs work the SAME way there is nothing special about any of them. Without definitions they are shit they all KNOW and get there info about viruses information and viruses in your system from the same 2 places. Most benchmarks are based upon the time it TELLS you you have a virus... that dosnt mean they haven't all found it at the same time. Also MSE is far from "cheep freebe status" now Its legit and it works just as well. I dont use my Keperskys because i dont need to be alerted everytime a file coughs. This entire industry works on fear. Super Edtitions with "extra security" are entirely useless.
Posted on Reply
#39
TheGuruStud
Wile EI doesn't let the virus in. That's what people don't seem to understand. They did a ground up rewrite for 2009. It works great now.
Too late, though. I still wouldn't be caught dead installing it. Same reason I'll never drive (even if free) a "domestic" car.
Posted on Reply
#40
Wile E
Power User
KitkatAcording to someone someplace like any OTHER benchmark. Too much faith in ranks, All antivrus programs work the SAME way there is nothing special about any of them. Without definitions they are shit they all KNOW and get there info about viruses information and viruses in your system from the same 2 places. Most benchmarks are based upon the time it TELLS you you have a virus... that dosnt mean they haven't all found it at the same time. Also MSE is far from "cheep freebe status" now Its legit and it works just as well. I dont use my Keperskys because i dont need to be alerted everytime a file coughs. This entire industry works on fear. Super Edtitions with "extra security" are entirely useless.
No, good anti virus programs don't rely on just definitions. They also rely on heuristics. Norton is simply better at stopping, detecting and/or removing infections than AVG or MSE, and takes less resources than both in the process. Those are the plain and simple facts. Fear mongering and other industry tactics have nothing to do with it's actual effectiveness.

Besides, I recall saying that MSE is pretty darn good for a free product. It's still not as good as Norton, Kasperskty, or NOD32.
TheGuruStudToo late, though. I still wouldn't be caught dead installing it. Same reason I'll never drive (even if free) a "domestic" car.
That's a personal preference. Doesn't make it a bad product. Some of today's domestic cars are better than many imports as well. Times change.
Posted on Reply
#41
laszlo
i really don't care why they bought it,they have enough money to buy whatever company they want

i think somebody from intel big dogs has a lot of mcaffe shares ....and he need the cash
Posted on Reply
#42
7mm
robnMcAfee eats processor time, so Intel sells you a faster one. Simple plan!
:laugh: Yeah... right..., None need support from each other. Yet, technology from both leaders can bring some serious security. don't know about the others but, surely Intel's thinking the same way, they're having a better vision so they took the step forward & got McAfee ;).
Posted on Reply
#43
LAN_deRf_HA
They did what now? They could have made their own lighter weight, better performing anti-virus and built their own brand recognition while making use of their existing business partners to wedge out McAfee. All for a tenth the money, so turning the whole business into a more profitable move much sooner. Yet another example of how unqualified corporate leaders are. They side step their way into positions because of their connections, and when they do get fired ritually for a public blunder they just shuffle into another leading position in another company. The only reason these morons don't totally wreck these companies is due to the massive inefficiency of consumer spending. People don't properly research most things they buy so there's massive waste spending on the consumer end which supports the inefficiency/incompetence of major companies and retailers.
Posted on Reply
#44
TheMailMan78
Big Member
Wile EThat's a personal preference. Doesn't make it a bad product. Some of today's domestic cars are better than many imports as well. Times change.
Mustang anyone?

Anyway I enjoy MSE. Smallest footprint and great protection. Honestly I have no idea why you would use anything else.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Security_Essentials
Posted on Reply
#45
inferKNOX
McAfee totally sucks as an antivirus!
At least buy something good...like Avira or Kaspersky...:shadedshu
Well I guess Intel can leave the good ones for AMD to buy once they catch wind of Intel's strategies (if they have a point that is).

Weird buy though. I look forward to seeing the purpose for this.
Posted on Reply
#46
phanbuey
Is Avira any good? I like that one. Just wondering
Posted on Reply
#47
braydenalex
McAfee best free antivirus ?

Reply for a_ump
McAfee the best free antivirus ? You should get a second opinion, the McAfee is not even rated by allot of Free Antivirus Reviews websites , is not even listed, I test allot of antivirus application for my clients (I am a computer repair technician) but every time when I install McAfee to my clients , the client came back in one week disappointed about his computer protection , There are allot of free antivirus applications better than this one , AVG is probable the best,others examples : Avast, Avira, Panda, BitDefender Free Edition, etc. And for people that can afford to buy an Antivirus software I recommend Kaspersky , Bit Defender, Norton, and want to mention something else , viruses are usually came from Torrents and pornographic websites , so if non of this are accessed you are safe even without an antivirus installed, however I always recommend to anyone to use a free or non free antivirus program.
Posted on Reply
#48
a_ump
braydenalexReply for a_ump
McAfee the best free antivirus ? You should get a second opinion, the McAfee is not even rated by allot of Free Antivirus Reviews websites , is not even listed, I test allot of antivirus application for my clients (I am a computer repair technician) but every time when I install McAfee to my clients , the client came back in one week disappointed about his computer protection , There are allot of free antivirus applications better than this one , AVG is probable the best,others examples : Avast, Avira, Panda, BitDefender Free Edition, etc. And for people that can afford to buy an Antivirus software I recommend Kaspersky , Bit Defender, Norton, and want to mention something else , viruses are usually came from Torrents and pornographic websites , so if non of this are accessed you are safe even without an antivirus installed, however I always recommend to anyone to use a free or non free antivirus program.
If you actually went to the links i posted, then you'd realize i was saying some of the best free AV's are better than Mcafee, not that it's the best free antivirus or anything close to that.:toast:
Posted on Reply
#49
Kreij
Senior Monkey Moderator
My guess would be direct, processor based competition to MSE.
Posted on Reply
#50
Frick
Fishfaced Nincompoop
You realise this thread is like 8 months old right? :P
KreijMy guess would be direct, processor based competition to MSE.
haven't that been in the works for some time now? Or does it exist already maybe? I think I recall reading something about it ages ago..
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 31st, 2024 10:27 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts