Thursday, October 7th 2010

OWC Readies SF-2000 Based Mercury Extreme PCI-Express SSDs

Following today's launch of the SandForce SF-2000 series SATA/SAS 6 Gb/s SSD processors, Other World Computing (OWC) announced its first enterprise-grade Mercury Extreme PCI-Express SSDs making use of these controllers. The first products in the company's next-generation Mercury Extreme lineup will start shipping early next year. These include a PCI-Express x16 card with eight SF-2000 series-driven SSDs in an internal RAID, totaling 3.2 TB in capacity, 4,000 MB/s sequential read, and up to 480,000 IOPS. A PCI-Express x8 model is also in the works, perhaps with lesser number of internal SSDs. There's scope for enterprise-grade features making use of SF-2000 series feature-set. SF-2000 series controllers enable features such as native 256-bit AES data encryption, and native command queuing with 32 concurrent operations. Applications of OWC's SSDs include I/O intensive enterprise servers, storage arrays, and high-end workstations in the financial, telecom, web/mail, gaming, public security, retail, and professional media creation/editing industries, according to the company.
Source: Legit Reviews
Add your own comment

31 Comments on OWC Readies SF-2000 Based Mercury Extreme PCI-Express SSDs

#26
Disparia
^ Giving up so easily? :D

Software RAID, with what's need to boot on another drive/flash stick.
Posted on Reply
#27
IceCreamBarr
Goodbye RAM?

Are we seeing the first baby step towards replacing RAM with the hard drive? DDR400 had read/write of 6,000 and an access time of 50ns... 0.1ms is 100,000ns so certainly not there yet but i imagine for an SSD, the access time doesn't make much of a difference anymore at 0.1ms; not until it is re-purposed as "RAM" or until SATA/PCIe can accommodate such speeds.

Exciting time... we've reached an era of diminishing returns on hardware so the software guys are going to have to step it up hard in the near future.
Posted on Reply
#28
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
IceCreamBarrAre we seeing the first baby step towards replacing RAM with the hard drive? DDR400 had read/write of 6,000 and an access time of 50ns... 0.1ms is 100,000ns so certainly not there yet but i imagine for an SSD, the access time doesn't make much of a difference anymore at 0.1ms; not until it is re-purposed as "RAM" or until SATA/PCIe can accommodate such speeds.

Exciting time... we've reached an era of diminishing returns on hardware so the software guys are going to have to step it up hard in the near future.
Triple DDR3-1333 is 32,000 MB/s. So no, RAM is here to stay.
Posted on Reply
#29
OneCool
Completely BonkersBig problem: can't RAID it for extra speed. LOL ;)
I dont see why they couldnt put some type of connection on it to make a array.

Crossfire,Sli are just 2 that come to mind.
Posted on Reply
#30
tkpenalty
btarunrTriple DDR3-1333 is 32,000 MB/s. So no, RAM is here to stay.
hmm... 32 terabytes per second...

DDR3 RAM drive raided....

-drools-

that is naughty fast.
Posted on Reply
#31
KaelMaelstrom
tkpenaltyhmm... 32 terabytes per second...

DDR3 RAM drive raided....

-drools-

that is naughty fast.
you mean 32 GB not TB.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 20:31 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts