Completely Bonkers27", IPS, 3840x2160

Baby, want one of those. I'd even be happy with it's 21" little sister at 2560x2048. WAIT 5:4? Nice

LAN_deRf_HADid anyone else mistake those monitors for speakers?

TurdFergasunprol the same reason studios drop 5-10k on curret 1080p 24-26 ips panels used as confidence monitors. when they want multi feeds on the same 1080p monitor, they can do that with the video distribution amps they use. 4k is nowhere near broadcast now or in the mentionable future considering it's just becoming common in the theatres, let alone close to being aworthwhile broadcast standard, shit ppl barely have the notion of 1080p. this is overpriced for a 24 inch 1080p i'm not denying that, it isn't however for a budding new display technology. it's meant for a completely different demographic that do not share your same demands. if you can read between and on the lines, you'll see that.

WiselnvestorMost OLED suffers fast aging and has a much shorter lifespan than LCD, Plasma.

Whats worst, there's a "differential aging," which causes blue, red, and green luminance to shrink unevenly.

I doubt we will be seeing OLED in our living rooms anytime soon.

This year, LG is going to be bringing a 31 inch 3D capable OLED television in the US and Europe, and they're planning a 55 inch prototype for 2012. By 2013, they're hoping to be mass producing OLED televisions large enough to be welcome in living rooms.

Panasonic has announced it will start construction of a new LCD television factory in August this year that will more than double their production capacity. The new $3 billion factory will be located in Hyogo prefecture’s Himeji city and cover 480,000 square metres.

This factory would also produce OLED TVs, but only after the 2010 opening and once the LCD production lines are fully operational. The confirmation means Sony will have at least a two-year head start in OLED television sales by the time Panasonic gets their models to market.

newtekie1Good: Nothing good.
Bad: The prices...
Even Worse: Sony is back in the Monitor Business.

[H]@RD5TUFFFixed that for you.:D

wahdangundid you know sony are top of the line display manufacture?

And for me sony is one the most inovative company out there

wahdangundid you know sony are top of the line display manufacture?

And for me sony is one the most inovative company out there

pr0n InspectorWhat, did you think every Sony display is a Sony Artisan?

And did you know? Sony buy panels from Real Manufacturers like Sharp, Samsung and various Taiwanese OEMs.

Bo$$yep, i did
QLED is still not fully mainstream yet, but give it some time :)

Most use toxic metals such as Cadmium, selenium, gallium, arsenic, etc. Basically any of the major semiconductor materials (CdS, CdSe, ZnS, GaAs, InP, etc.) are possible QDot emitters.

btarunrSony launched 17-inch and 24-inch Trimaster EL professional-grade monitors, which are based on the organic light-emitting diode (OLED) technology. OLED is not to be confused with LED-backlit LCD, which is merely LCD with LED illumination instead of CCFL. OLED is a kind of a flat-panel display technology in which electroluminescent organic compounds spread across a film generate images. Hence, OLED provides far greater picture clarity, and eliminates pixellation, a problem encountered with low pixel-density LCD displays. OLED-generated images are more CRT-like in terms of fidelity. Sony’s new Trimaster OLED monitors are targeted at the broadcasting industry and professional studios that seek bleeding-edge image quality.

Both Trimaster OLED monitors feature resolutions of 1920 x 1080 (full-HD), with 10-bit drivers, 100 cd/m² brightness, and 178° viewing angles. Display inputs include HDMI, DisplayPort, and SDI, which is used in professional development houses. Carrying the model numbers BVM-E250 and BVM-E170, they will cost $28,900 and $15,710, respectively.

www.techpowerup.com/img/11-02-21/83a_thm.jpg

Source: FlatPanels HD

WiselnvestorMost OLED suffers fast aging and has a much shorter lifespan than LCD, Plasma.

Whats worst, there's a "differential aging," which causes blue, red, and green luminance to shrink unevenly.

I doubt we will be seeing OLED in our living rooms anytime soon.

BumbleBeefighting the future didn't work out for Mulder and Scully.

Completely BonkersNice link to examples of use of technology. Only downside, many of those photos are "concept-photos". Faked. And very obviously fake.

Completely BonkersAt those prices we should have seen 2560x1600 at 17" at a minimum, and finally have high pixel density displays just like we are seeing on mobile phone devices. But 1920x1080 is just laughable, esp. at those prices.

laszlooled is thinner than lcd

btarunrMany Thanks to BumbleBee for the tip.

ped1. These OLED monitors are only 10% more expensive than the LCD ones they're better than and replacing.

2. 1920x1080 is the highest broadcast-quality signal for HDTV, and that's the purpose of these monitors, not to sit on your desktop and run Windows.

pr0n InspectorAnd of course you didn't bothered to address the gaudy colors, obvious banding, broken gamma and white point. Stuff that are actually important for professionals.

pedIf you think any of that is true then make the case. All in heard in that video was people ooh'ing and ahh'ing over the quality of the OED displays.

pr0n InspectorAnd, every single OLED device ever tested have inferior picture quality compared to their LCD competitors.

TAViXSurely you cannot be serious.
I really want to see the proof of that, honestly...