Monday, June 27th 2011

Core i7-980 Released at US $583

As reported last week, Intel released its new Core i7-980 six-core processor to the retail channel. The new chip is priced at US $583 in 1000-unit tray quantities, displacing the Core i7-970 from this exact price point it previously held. It is expected that the i7-970 could eventually become cheaper while the platform is still in the market. The Core i7-980 is a socket LGA1366 six-core processor based on the 32 nm "Westmere" silicon. It is clocked at 3.33 GHz, with Turbo Boost speeds of up to 3.60 GHz. Unlike the Core i7-980X Extreme Edition, this chip has an upwards locked BClk multiplier, and its QPI link runs at 4.80 GT/s instead of 6.40 GT/s on the 980X Extreme Edition. As a trade off, the new chip is a little over half the price of the 980X Extreme Edition, which retailed for around US $999.
Source: TechConnect Magazine
Add your own comment

34 Comments on Core i7-980 Released at US $583

#26
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
claylomaxBulldozer has been "around the corner" for ages now.
Because they've been jumping their own deadlines for ages now, in fact from 2007.
Posted on Reply
#27
n-ster
Anyone wanna give me their opinion on whether or not prices of used i7 970s are going to drop, and if so, what price is a decent price? Am I correct think that a 4GHZ i7 970 beats a 5Ghz i7 2600K if multi tasking is used?

Also, is it completely not worth it? I will be using a few virtual machines and as many as 6 not very demanding games at the same time. I just bought 24GB for multitasking etc as well (and perhaps sometimes have fun with RAMDisks)
Posted on Reply
#28
Trackr
btarunrBecause they've been jumping their own deadlines for ages now, in fact from 2007.
I definitely agree with that.
Posted on Reply
#29
extrasalty
btarunrBecause they've been jumping their own deadlines for ages now, in fact from 2007.
Just like intel, but probably for different reasons.
Posted on Reply
#30
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
extrasaltyJust like intel, but probably for different reasons.
I can't think of an Intel architecture that shot off its target release by 3~4 years.
Posted on Reply
#31
extrasalty
btarunrI can't think of an Intel architecture that shot off its target release by 3~4 years.
Larabee?
Posted on Reply
#32
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
extrasaltyLarabee?
Larabbee is dead. Doesn't fit into this argument.
Posted on Reply
#33
extrasalty
btarunrLarabbee is dead.
No, it's not.

That's why I said they had different reasons.
Posted on Reply
#34
DaedalusHelios
extrasaltyNo, it's not.

That's why I said they had different reasons.
It will never be released so that is "dead" the way I see it. But maybe we are perceiving "dead" to mean different things. If you are making the loose interpretation to mean its technology will live on in other more advanced versions then I guess I could see that. :confused:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 6th, 2024 17:23 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts