Tuesday, March 13th 2012

GeForce GTX 680 Up To 40% Faster Than Radeon HD 7970: NVIDIA

GPU vendors tend to give out their own performance figures of the products they're launching, compared to competitors' products. In one such comparison, allegedly of the GeForce GTX 680, doing rounds on the internet, NVIDIA's new GPU was evaluated by its makers be be over 40% faster than the Radeon HD 7970 in some tests. Keeping Radeon HD 7970 as a baseline, NVIDIA presented its performance figures for the GeForce GTX 680's leads over it, and Radeon HD 7950's trails under it. Results of as many as 15 tests were presented, from 7 games/benchmarks. All benchmarks were run with and without AA. The one test that caught the eye is Battlefield 3 with "4xAA". Experts we spoke to think NVIDIA could be using FXAA algorithm. In any case, NVIDIA looks to be confident of taking back the fastest-GPU crown from AMD.
Source: NGF Community
Add your own comment

192 Comments on GeForce GTX 680 Up To 40% Faster Than Radeon HD 7970: NVIDIA

#151
TheMailMan78
Big Member
beck24And made ten times the profit of AMD doing it , duh.
10 times? Link? Because all I see is a loss.

Posted on Reply
#152
beck24
TheMailMan7810 times? Link?
Nvidia financials from last quarter
(in millions except per FY12 FY11 FY12 FY11
share data) GAAP GAAP NON-GAAP NON-GAAP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revenue $3,997.9 $3,543.3 $3,997.9 $3,543.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross margin 51.4% 39.8% 51.9% 45.1%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating expenses $1,408.2 $1,153.3 $1,245.7 $1,096.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income $581.1 $253.1 $734.4 $476.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings per share $0.94 $0.43 $1.19 $0.81
------------------------------------------

AMD Graphics (2) for all 2011
Net revenue

1,565 million

Net Operating income
51 million
ir.amd.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=74093&p=quarterlyearnings
Nvidia vacated IG for several reasons, but one is there was very little profit for them.
Posted on Reply
#154
PsiAmp
According to Steam stats the desktop discreet DX11 video card share with price above $100 is:
AMD ~55%
Nvidia ~45%

A year ago numbers were:
AMD ~65%
Nvidia ~35%

So the situation is better now for Nvidia, but it doesn't have a leadership in gaming segment. 600 series can change the situation, but atm all we know is that the cards won't hit the market for at least a month. And such a rough start doesn't help Nvidia and is not beneficial for all customers.

Nvidia is very successful in workstation video card and HPC segment.
Posted on Reply
#159
TheMailMan78
Big Member
beck24Bottom line Nvidia earned 581 million last full year reporting on 2.75x the revenue.. AMD graphics earned 51 million,
so let's be kind and call it 10X the profit.
But its not 10x the profit.
Posted on Reply
#162
TheMailMan78
Big Member
beck24You're right. Nvidia makes MORE than 10x the profit of AMD graphics.
How in the hell is 14.54% vs 7.48% profit margin "10x" the profit?
Posted on Reply
#163
EarthDog
Profit margin /= total profit. ;)
Posted on Reply
#164
beck24
TheMailMan78How in the hell is 14.54% vs 7.48% profit margin "10x" the profit?
You need a doctor. AMD graphics division made 51 million in profit. Read their OWN financials, please.
Nvidia graphics made 581 million. It's not complicated. Profits are counted in dollars.
Posted on Reply
#165
TheMailMan78
Big Member
beck24You need a doctor. AMD graphics division made 51 million in profit. Read their OWN financials, please.
Nvidia graphics made 581 million. It's not complicated. Profits are counted in dollars.
You apparently do not know how finances work. 14.54% vs 7.48% is not 10 times. I'm done schooling you.
Posted on Reply
#166
beck24
TheMailMan78You apparently do not know how finances work.
Go get an MBA and so you can understand what net income is, LOL. Apparently the concept mystifies you.
Posted on Reply
#167
EarthDog
TheMailMan78You apparently do not know how finances work. 14.54% vs 7.48% is not 10 times. I'm done schooling you.
Profit MARGIN is not TOTAL profit. He is going off TOTAL profit numbers while you are stuck on margins.

Profit margin = Nvidia over ATI by almost 2x
Total profit = Nvidia over ATI by alomst 10x.

Done doing what? :slap: :D

EDIT: This is High School level stuff beck (sorry MM)!
Posted on Reply
#168
TheMailMan78
Big Member
beck24Go get an MBA and so you can understand what net income is, LOL. Apparently the concept mystifies you.
So first we defy they lost market share which is what the argument was about. When I proved you wrong we went to profit. When I showed you the profit margin wasnt "10 times" we went to total profit. You changed the argument base until you "won". Enjoy.
EarthDogProfit MARGIN is not TOTAL profit. He is going off TOTAL profit numbers while you are stuck on margins.

Profit margin = Nvidia over ATI by almost 2x
Total profit = Nvidia over ATI by alomst 10x.

Done doing what? :slap: :D
This isnt what the argument was about.
Posted on Reply
#169
beck24
EarthDogProfit MARGIN is not TOTAL profit. He is going off TOTAL profit numbers while you are stuck on margins.

Profit margin = Nvidia over ATI by almost 2x
Total profit = Nvidia over ATI by alomst 10x.

Done doing what? :slap: :D

EDIT: This is High School level stuff beck (sorry MM)!
:) Thanks. Couldn't be simpler. cheers mate
Posted on Reply
#170
TheMailMan78
Big Member
EarthDogProfit MARGIN is not TOTAL profit. He is going off TOTAL profit numbers while you are stuck on margins.

Profit margin = Nvidia over ATI by almost 2x
Total profit = Nvidia over ATI by alomst 10x.

Done doing what? :slap: :D

EDIT: This is High School level stuff beck (sorry MM)!
Are you going by the consolidated net income to get that 581m in profit?
Posted on Reply
#171
Benetanegia
Mailman you are talking about gross margin, not profits. Profits = revenue - expenses. And Nvidia did have 10x the profits last year.

EDIT: I see it's been said already, I didn't want to go through all the posts. Sorry.
Posted on Reply
#172
cowie
Declining discrete sales over all dont forget.
Nv is the world leader in discrete cards its not even a race really
Also Its not like just cus a few guys got 7970's or 4 amd is gaining it back
$375+USD cards are less then 1% of the market so even if amd or nv sell twice that card market then noarmal it will not bring market share at all.

But i dont know what that has to do with the new nv card at all, same as people going into say a cod thread and say it sucks or bf3 is better?
Posted on Reply
#173
TheMailMan78
Big Member
BenetanegiaMailman you are talking about gross margin, not profits. Profits = revenue - expenses. And Nvidia did have 10x the profits last year.

EDIT: I see it's been said already, I didn't want to go through all the posts. Sorry.
Yeah and Im looking at all the market reports and Im not seeing the 10 times as much. This is why Im asking how they are getting these numbers.
Posted on Reply
#174
cowie
Amd does not separate between vga/cpu division so its really hard to say whats whats,i feel it has no bearing at all anyway.
Does it make a differance?
The Yankees sold the most tickets last year it does not make them the best baseball team right?
oh wait it does lol j/k
Posted on Reply
#175
Benetanegia
TheMailMan78Yeah and Im looking at all the market reports and Im not seeing the 10 times as much. This is why Im asking how they are getting these numbers.
How so? They have told you several times. $581 million vs $51 million, is more than 10x.

pcper.com/reviews/Editorial/NVIDIA-Reports-Q4-and-FY2012-Earnings-Tegra-3-28nm-Kepler
FY2012 was a strong year overall for NVIDIA though. They say gross revenue rose to $4 billion with a net income of $581.1 million, which is over double that of FY2011. Gross margins went from 39.8% in FY2011 to 51.4% in FY2012. The company appears steady in how they handle business and keep costs down. It was a good year with solid growth across all divisions.
And market share:

techreport.com/discussions.x/22543
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 2nd, 2024 20:28 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts