Thursday, January 23rd 2014

AMD A-Series "Kaveri" Performs Better with Dual-Rank DIMMs: Report

AMD's A-Series "Kaveri" APUs perform tangibly better on system with dual-rank memory modules, according to an investigative report by ComputerBase.de. According to the report, the chip yields its best memory bandwidth when both its memory channels are populated with 2-rank DIMMs each. Either that, or four modules with one rank each. The report also found out that Kaveri can take advantage of DDR3-2400 as advertised. There was a 15.2 percent jump in performance between DDR3-1866 and DDR3-2400.

An unreliable way of checking whether a DIMM has two ranks is by looking at whether both sides of its PCB has DRAM chips; a reliable way of doing that, however, is using software such as AIDA64 (Motherboard\SPD tab), which lists out number of ranks, and number of banks per rank; and of course, looking up the specs sheet. The reason visual inspection of a DIMM is not reliable these days is because of the way modern DRAM chips are designed. There are instances of DIMMs with chips on just one side, yet 2 ranks. Find more performance numbers at the source.
Source: ComputerBase.de
Add your own comment

31 Comments on AMD A-Series "Kaveri" Performs Better with Dual-Rank DIMMs: Report

#26
grndzro7
PatriotI see that, still doesn't make sense. They also need to show 4x DR ... I will read more on their testing methods and the other ram attributes.
lol MK1 failure.
Posted on Reply
#27
Steevo
lmgtfy.com/?q=rank+interleave


So what many of us know to do already is now what we should do..........
medoWhat ???

Sorry but i am IT personnel for 2 years, and i always know that Single RANK RAM is much better + stable + pricier + best option for servers, cause the data flow circuits only one lap instead of 2.

And another way of finding out single RANK, is looking at the spec for this term 1Rx8 (single rank, 8 chips so if its an 4 GB, each chip will be 512MB ), while Dual RANK will be 2Rx16 (16 chips with 256MB)

So sorry this report done by ComputerBase.de is load of bullocks, cause dual rank RAM are cheaper, and are preferred for desktop people, and most manufacturers use dual rank, the maximum single rank single DIMM currently is 4 GB, and bare in mind most 4 GB are dual RANK, you need to search really hard for Single RANK, also Single RANK RAM sticks to its stable non oc freq, so is will be DDR3 1333 1.5 9-9-9-24, cause you wont be able to find OC single rank more than 1600, trust me, and if you dont head to Kingston website, and to a detail reading on there DImms, they have great support and PDF file for each DIMM.
Congratulations on being IT personnel for 2 years. What kind of IT? Networking, security, database, user support, server hardware, server software, acquisitions, client hardware, client software, performance builds for your brother, total IT department for small companies, you read a PC mag in the crapper once?
Posted on Reply
#28
Xajel
LeonVolcove+1 Thanks buddy, i stick with 2 stick 4 GB 1866MHz for now until have enough money for upgrade
Nope this is not this article means...

Imagine the memory module as a paper... 1 rank means only one side of the paper is printed... 2 ranks means both sides of the paper is printed... return to the RAM module.. 1 rank is where the actual memory chips are in one side only like a paper with one side printed... 2 ranks means the actual memory chips are on both sides of the module, like a paper with both sides printed... this mean in 1 rank modules you will see memory chips on one side.. the other side will have no memory chips... in 2 ranks both sides have memory chips...

What this article means, that with Kaveri, you will get more performance if you use a memory that has memory chips on both sides of it (2 ranks).. as some of them might have them in one side only while the other side is empty (1 rank)
Posted on Reply
#29
Sihastru
PopocatepetlWhy do you even bother posting nonsense like this ? Dual rank modules use separate chip select si9gnals for each rank. This allows them to avoid contention for the memory bus (by driving these signals out of phase with one another), thereby allowing for (slightly) better performance.
Are you sure you're not confusing "single/double data rate" and "single/dual rank"? Increasing the number of ranks per channel (a way to increase density per channel) will always decrease the measured speed of that channel, since the rank selection operation is always an extra step in accessing a certain address. So in this case the performance should decrease (very slightly). Single rank populated channels can skip this extra step, therefor should be faster then dual+ rank populated channels. Memory controllers these days are very efficient, so the single rank vs. dual rank channels should not be in any measurable way faster or slower. There must be something wrong with the way they tested or with the test platform.
Posted on Reply
#30
NeoXF
ensabrenoir......yeah......next amd will announce that their apu's operate better /faster/longer/cooler when used with closed loop water coolers as opposed to the standard h.s.f.
And the award for the most ignorant and useless comment of the thread goes to...
This isn't Reddit either, FYI.


Anyway, I have 2x8GB sticks of DDR3-2400, I guess that pretty much means dual rank guaranteed (I can't really peek behind the headspreaders, they're pretty massive and all-over). Weird find, I don't know what to make of it, logically, this shouldn't happen, but as grndzro7 stated, they way Kaveri's IMC works is really something that (on x86 PCs at least) hasn't been done before... So I do expect oddities like these...

Edit: Here's a crazy idea... if it'd be possible to disable 1 rank from each channel, so essentially halving your memory... shouldn't one be able to test this in the best most optimum 1:1 fashion possible (well, almost, but I doublt there are many apps and games that woiuld "feel" the diference between say 8GB and 16GB of system RAM)? I'd do it myself if it was possible, but my rig is still waiting for some components.
Posted on Reply
#31
ensabrenoir
NeoXFAnd the award for the most ignorant and useless comment of the thread goes to...
This isn't Reddit either, FYI.


....naaahhhh.......I said i'd behave myself ....and your not worth it....next time bro
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 5th, 2024 04:04 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts