Tuesday, June 16th 2015
Radeon Fury X Outperforms GeForce GTX Titan X, Fury to GTX 980 Ti: 3DMark Bench
AMD's upcoming $650 Radeon R9 Fury X could have what it takes to beat NVIDIA's $999 GeForce GTX Titan X, while the $550 Radeon Fury (non-X) performs close to the $650 GeForce GTX 980 Ti, according to leaked 3DMark 11 and 3DMark (2013) benches by Korean tech publication ITCM.co.kr. The benches see the R9 Fury X score higher than the GTX Titan X in all three tests, while the R9 Fury is almost as fast as the GTX 980 Ti. The cards maintain their winning streak over NVIDIA even with memory-intensive tests such as 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (4K), but buckle with 5K. These two cards, which are bound for the market within the next 30 days, were tested alongside the R9 390X, which is not too far behind the GTX 980, in the same graphs. The R9 Nano, however, isn't circulated among industry partners, yet. It could still launch in Summer 2015.
Source:
ITCM (Korea)
100 Comments on Radeon Fury X Outperforms GeForce GTX Titan X, Fury to GTX 980 Ti: 3DMark Bench
Based on the shader increase only the Fury X should be competitive to NVidias highest end cards.
I do think 4GB is not really enough, objectively 4GB for 4K with future games, it's not realistic. I understand that AMD may not have the R&D down for 8GB HBM so they may not have the choice. I hope DX12 will help with future-proofing the 4GB HBM, only time will tell.
I have a 1080p monitor and getting a min framerate of 60fps in every game at max graphics is my goal so I don't mind the 4GB of VRAM but that's just me.
For all the critics of the Hawaii release, AMD appear to have put a shit load of work into this design. On that alone, we should all applaud AMD for their work.
As for performance I'll wait and see the reviews and not pander to rumour so close to its release. But c'mon people, the Fury X design brief is top fucking notch. Pardon my French.
But if you have a lot of spare cash and don't care, all the better you buy it since that does help the companies and that does help the people who are more sensible with their money :)
As for the need for more RAM, they do have that direct system RAM mapping and fast transferring, and streaming textures, and their newish compression techniques for textures which is suppose to fix the need for a lot of RAM in newer games. Suppose to I say, but will it work out?
It's a tricky thing because MS and sony also thought they were alright with their consoles, but even at E3 and with fancy demo videos I notice some poor resolution on textures on a regular basis, so that illustrates that whatever the experts predict is perfectly fine might not be quite that fine.
But as you say, that is for if you actually use 4K displays/future VR headsets and are a bit nitpicky
As for 8GB HBM, I think it's too tricky (low yield/heat issues/cost?) to start with that I would guess. But it does feel odd that my 2011 GFX card has 3GB and 4GB would be enough for now. Plus I didn't even touch on the non-game uses graphics cards have these days through directcompute and OpenCL and such. But oh well.
The deal here is that they cut down costs from buying memory chips,
cutting down costs from the complex pcb/larger pcb, e.t.c.
That's why an 8-core Arm soc costs like 5$ and
while an 8-core Arm cpu and a dGPU and a dModem and a dWifi module e.t.c. will cost each 5$ plus the cost to design the pcb and put them together.
Companies are integrating Ram controllers, southbridges, northbridges, networking staff, accelerator and many other things into 1 piece of silicon... because it's dirty cheap.
Sorry to burst your bubble, live with it.
videocardz.com/56711/amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-official-benchmarks-leaked
I never knew that Nvidia was planning on a mini version of the Titan. Is that even true ?
I also believe that AMD put a lot of time and effort into the new Fury, looking forward to its release and some benchmarks.
Batman, AC:U, FC4, and others are Nvidia titles.
www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/far-cry-4-nvidia-gameworks-trailer
www.geforce.com/whats-new/guides/assassins-creed-unity-graphics-and-performance-guide
www.geforce.com/whats-new/guides/batman-arkham-origins-graphics-and-performance-guide
But whatever you like to think so you sleep better at night.
If you ask me, in the technology world it seems like everyday is April fools day. Drivers every April and everyone is a fool. :)
But they really should launch normal simple tubes, same as on CORSAIR H100i example.
Without this bad and cheap sleeve. Everything else is great.
I even think that reference R9-390X 8GB from pictures are best designed AMD reference cards ever.
Much better than last year and HD7970.
ASUS will probably decide to offer something ROG from Fury X and R9-390X 8GB.
Probably Poseidon models. But maybe even they improve AIO design and invest little more money in that.
But OK they want to offer for 550-650$ same as TITAN X for 1000$ and they save little money.
Radiator could be cubic as Coolstream PE, some similar type, normal tubes, but that would be probably more expensive cards.
Anyway I think many people will decide to buy Air model, Fury X for 550$.
At least card will offer excellent gaming for 1080p and 1440p resolution. Than when become possible AMD will launch and Fury X 8GB, immediately, same as R9-290X.
For same price only little later.
That's some other politic little than NVIDIA. NVIDIA completely trained their fans, now poor people even justify sabotage of 1 years old premium card.
They say "NVIDIA need to earn somehow money"... Poor NVIDIA, they will bankrupt probably if big part of people who bought 780Ti decide to keep card longer.
Because of that they need to sabotage fps on 780Ti and for people that's OK. Like only NVIDIA want profit, as AMD and Intel don't need but didn't done something like that.
It's not always question who make better chip, in theory GTX780Ti is better chip than Hawaii, I mean full GK110.
But NVIDIA spoil own chip to force people forward... Hawaii now have and 8GB and higher fps than GTX780Ti... and what AMD don't need money...
Rumors say they will bankrupt max at 2020-2021 if something not change. Much worse financial situation, much less hype, much harder earn money and didn't done that.
AMD everything what they earn is on hard work, but NVIDIA big part is hype, and rich gamers allow to NVIDIA experiment with Shield, Tegra, etc...with their money.
Situation is now... GTX980Ti should cost 50$ less than Fury X, custom GTX980Ti models can't be more expensive than Fury X custom models.
TITAN X worth maybe 100-150$ more than Fury X. But only if benchmark tests are real. We don't know still.
24h after NVIDIA presentation people could look 10 unboxing video clips with different models and performance in details for most important models, even pictures for custom cards are available soon.
Now after 4 day, still very little about whole series.