Monday, September 10th 2018

Intel Core i5-9600K Surfaces on GeekBench Database

With the swanky Core i9-9900K and Core i7-9700K eight-core chips getting all the attention, the less glamorous Core i5-9600K is taking shape, which could bring a little more performance to the $250 price-point. This 6-core/6-thread chip succeeds the current-gen i5-8600K, and has the same 9 MB of L3 cache. With not much in the way of micro-architectural IPC improvements, barring silicon-level hardening against certain vulnerabilities, which could improve speculative execution performance (versus processors with software patches that inflict performance penalties); Intel has dialed up clock speeds. The chip is clocked at 3.70 GHz, with a maximum Turbo Boost frequency of 4.60 GHz, compared to the 3.60 GHz nominal and 4.30 GHz Turbo Boost frequencies of its predecessor.

The higher clocks seem to bring the i5-9600K a touch higher than the i5-8600K in terms of GeekBench scores, although still nowhere close to the i7-8700 (non-K). The i5-8600K, if you'll recall, beat some of its pricier previous-generation siblings such as the i7-7700, in multi-threaded tests. Someone with access to an i5-9600K put it through GeekBench 4. The chip scores 6,015 points in the single-core test or about 3.7 percent faster than its predecessor (the i5-8600K typically scores 5,800 points), coming from the 300 MHz higher single-core boost. The multi-core score is 23,393 points, which is a meager 2 percent faster (the i5-8600K typically scores around 23,000 points). The generational jump in performance for the mid-range hence seems to have stagnated. At best the i5-9600K will repair the uncertain price/performance equation the i5-8600K has against the AMD Ryzen 5 2600X.
Source: GeekBench Database
Add your own comment

26 Comments on Intel Core i5-9600K Surfaces on GeekBench Database

#26
las
aldo5so this is a i5-8600K performance with +300mhz base clock (as i5-8600K is K - you can add +300 or substract any moment you want) - nice "job" intel.
9600K has STIM / Solder. It will OC higher and run cooler.
8600K will never reach same OC unless delidded and this aint free or without risk.

So yeah, it's a nice job. It's what 8600K should have been from the beginning.
We're finally back to solder.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 31st, 2024 22:03 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts