| Wednesday, February 27 2008 |

VR-Zone informs that the upcoming GeForce 9800 GX2 launch will be delayed again till March 18th. No reasons was provided by NVIDIA, but the delay is probably due to driver issues. Right now, according to unconfirmed reports the card is scoring about 14k+ in 3DMark06, which is lower than Radeon HD 3870 X2.
Source: VR-Zone
Source: VR-Zone
User comments
wow ... "totally kills an X2" ... guess they were all wrong ... as suspected nvidia was going to have driver problems ...
GeForce 7950 GX2 ver 2.0 ? :shadedshu
Please NVidia, a consumer should be in a position to buy two of these cards on March 18, and install them in SLI right then. If it's another 7950 GX2 fiasco, then 9800 GX2 = epic fail. I aleady begin to lose goodwill after yesterday's articles on the 9800 GTX specs which seemed more like 8801 GTS (G92) to me.
Please NVidia, a consumer should be in a position to buy two of these cards on March 18, and install them in SLI right then. If it's another 7950 GX2 fiasco, then 9800 GX2 = epic fail. I aleady begin to lose goodwill after yesterday's articles on the 9800 GTX specs which seemed more like 8801 GTS (G92) to me.
7950 GX2 part 2. :toast:
by: malware;677602Lolz, a single 8800GTS scores more than that, never mind two of them, they need to sort their lives out, amazes me that manufacturers cannot still figure that hardware is nothing without drivers to support them ffs.
VR-Zone informs that the upcoming GeForce 9800 GX2 launch will be delayed again till March 18th. No reasons was provided by NVIDIA, but the delay is probably due to driver issues. Right now, according to unconfirmed reports the card is scoring about 14k+ in 3DMark06, which is lower than Radeon HD 3870 X2.
Source: VR-Zone
I thought SLi was supposed to multiply performance, not divide it.
ATi Crossfire: Multiply and Conquer
nVidia SLI: Divide and Conquer
nVidia SLI: Divide and Conquer
Am I right in thinking....thats only a 1 week delay? sao just an extra week to get the drivers ready......hmmmm get the staff working in shifts thru the night 24/7 and dont delay I say!
by: Tatty_One;677762thats not yoda talk :(
Am I right in thinking....thats only a 1 week delay? sao just an extra week to get the drivers ready......hmmmm get the staff working in shifts thru the night 24/7 and dont delay I say!
I wonder how much heat it'll put out? I remember the old 7950x2 was treacherously hot.
by: malware;677602I thought the 14k score was for the 9800GTX and not the GX2?!
VR-Zone informs that the upcoming GeForce 9800 GX2 launch will be delayed again till March 18th. No reasons was provided by NVIDIA, but the delay is probably due to driver issues. Right now, according to unconfirmed reports the card is scoring about 14k+ in 3DMark06, which is lower than Radeon HD 3870 X2.
Source: VR-Zone
As for the delay, I think its a little early to assume that the delay is due to driver issues. For all we know it could be something completely difference (like the 9600GT's voltage problem).
Even if it is a driver issue, at least they are delaying the product's release until it is fixed.
by: newtekie1;677785FIXED
Even if it is a driver issue, at least they are delaying the product's release until they give up trying to fix it.
In all fairness its still speculation, for all we now it can end up faster or even slower. You guys should stop believing in every rumor, as much fun as it is telling a fan boy "I told you so", it kinda sucks when it backfires. Anyway what ever the outcome at least the 9800x2 can double as an oven.
Well, what else is new. There is always delays in new tech and new designs or old designs that are rehashed. This shouldnt come as a surprise. A show of mouse pointers, who is gonna grab a 9800 GX2 when its released?
by: WarEagleAU;677855*moves mouse pointer offscreen*
Well, what else is new. There is always delays in new tech and new designs or old designs that are rehashed. This shouldnt come as a surprise. A show of mouse pointers, who is gonna grab a 9800 GX2 when its released?
by: [I.R.A]_FBi;677771No I am just a poet that didnt know it :D
thats not yoda talk :(
by: Tatty_One;677762You really want drivers written by developers who have been working 24/7 ?!? :eek:
Am I right in thinking....thats only a 1 week delay? sao just an extra week to get the drivers ready......hmmmm get the staff working in shifts thru the night 24/7 and dont delay I say!
I say, let them take their time.
a weeks delay has to be about drivers.. it does suggest desperation thow..
its possibly a kludge.. too heavy.. too hot.. not being able to crank the speed up enough cos its too hot and last minute driver tweaking to eak a little extra performance in 2006 out of it.. he he
i hope they succeed cos i dont want to see the price of the red x 2 go up..:)
once again ati act nvidia re-act..
trog
its possibly a kludge.. too heavy.. too hot.. not being able to crank the speed up enough cos its too hot and last minute driver tweaking to eak a little extra performance in 2006 out of it.. he he
i hope they succeed cos i dont want to see the price of the red x 2 go up..:)
once again ati act nvidia re-act..
trog
by: WarEagleAU;677855The silence speaks volumes. :laugh:
Well, what else is new. There is always delays in new tech and new designs or old designs that are rehashed. This shouldnt come as a surprise. A show of mouse pointers, who is gonna grab a 9800 GX2 when its released?
While I prefer the red camp, an 8800 GT's not a bad card, but nVidia's higher-up offerings are increasingly not worth it.
dont forget the 8800gt is now the new 9600.. double the performance of the old 8600.. easy aint it.. :)
trog
trog
by: DanishDevil;677756
ATi Crossfire: Multiply and Conquer
nVidia SLI: Divide and Conquer
i am gonna use that as a quote in my sig :D thx.
like i said before , revisions and dellusions from the green camp for now.
lulz, we will see :p
by: ITman;677916If you noticed my post.....I said working 24/7 in shifts, that means there are always people working but not always the same ones :rolleyes:
You really want drivers written by developers who have been working 24/7 ?!? :eek:
I say, let them take their time.
by: trog100;677930
a weeks delay has to be about drivers.. it does suggest desperation thow..
its possibly a kludge.. too heavy.. too hot.. not being able to crank the speed up enough cos its too hot and last minute driver tweaking to eak a little extra performance in 2006 out of it.. he he
i hope they succeed cos i dont want to see the price of the red x 2 go up..:)
once again ati act nvidia re-act..
trog
perhaps they want to avoid the instance you had with your brand spanking new HD3870 where they just had to put something together on a CD outside of Catalyst........technically that would count as no "official" driver support at all :D
psh one week isn't long enough to fix much more than a sticker, a one week delay would seem to be more supplier related than anything else. Drivers will definetly be a problem, but the best driver fixes never come out before the product. Thats because the product needs to be "live tested" before all of it's bugs can be discovered and then fixed. all in all a one week delay doesn't seem to get me speculating about anything, now a 2 month delay that'd be something to talk about.
by: Tatty_One;678094.
perhaps they want to avoid the instance you had with your brand spanking new HD3870 where they just had to put something together on a CD outside of Catalyst........technically that would count as no "official" driver support at all :D
definitely no XP driver suport.. but i aint gonna stand up for the green team.. smoke mirrors and dirty tricks right from when the mysterious amazingly cheap 8800gt popped up..
they are still getting credit for that one when it was just a brought forward 9xxxx series card with one simple purpose.. take the credit from where it belonged.. they have had too much good press so far.. time for a reality check i recon..
trog
how is it slower? 2 8800gts are faster than 2 3870's..... wierd.
by: tvdang7;678427Hell one gts can compete w/ and x2, so that has got some serious problems if the gx2 cant get 50% better than the x2 at least.
how is it slower? 2 8800gts are faster than 2 3870's..... wierd.
by: farlex85;678449one gts is actually a 9series...one gt is actually a 9series...
Hell one gts can compete w/ and x2, so that has got some serious problems if the gx2 cant get 50% better than the x2 at least.
3870 is still a r600...8800gt brought forward because nvidia wanted to take away ati's shine.
now the real 9 series are having trouble outperforming the old *8800* series...
now fanbois are upset....i ask Y????
i prefer ati but im no fool...i have both a gt and a 3870...but i will continue to preach that i believe atis new gpu design was superior to nvidias.
If nVidia is really having a hard time bumping the performance for their GF9 series, we're gonna see a major change over once ATI's 4000 series roll out stouting the RV770, and I think that lead will continue to the 5000 series, unless nVidia gets their new GPU to market.
it truly seems the way these two companies are going. ATI has realizes they have a major edge over nVidia with mulit-GPU setups, and are going to start rubbing that in nVidia's face. I still think the 3870x2 is really more of a test-bed, ATI just testing the waters. It was more successful than people thought it would be, so they've made plans for the 4870x2. If that card goes over well . . . the 5870x2, if it's stouting the dual-core R700 as I forsee that it will, will be a technological, double handed bitch slap to nVidia.
by: DanishDevil
ATi Crossfire: Multiply and Conquer
nVidia SLI: Divide and Conquer
it truly seems the way these two companies are going. ATI has realizes they have a major edge over nVidia with mulit-GPU setups, and are going to start rubbing that in nVidia's face. I still think the 3870x2 is really more of a test-bed, ATI just testing the waters. It was more successful than people thought it would be, so they've made plans for the 4870x2. If that card goes over well . . . the 5870x2, if it's stouting the dual-core R700 as I forsee that it will, will be a technological, double handed bitch slap to nVidia.
by: DanishDevil;677756so the fact that 8800GT SLi beats 3870 crossfire is obviosly of no consequence to you.
ATi Crossfire: Multiply and Conquer
nVidia SLI: Divide and Conquer
by: wolf;679121
so the fact that 8800GT SLi beats 3870 crossfire is obviosly of no consequence to you.
The 8800GT in SLI does NOT beat the 3870 in Crossfire!
http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/26/hd-3870-crossfire-vs-8800gt-sli/
by: calvary1980;679341Yeah and all the games they tested on are either part of the TWIMTBP programme or in some way NVidia favourable.
http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=716
- Christine
by: springs113;678658I am a bit of a fanboi I admit although I do buy ATi from time to time but I am not upset, on the contrary, if I can get 8800GT and 8800GTS performance a few months earlier than NVidia origionally planned then thats all good for me, I think the fact that there is also the 8800GS and 9600GT already out never mind the GX2 and 9800GTX that might be disappointments will only really effect that 5% of the market who always go for the top end cards and who change cards regularily. For me, getting a G92 8800GTS in December that gives me 8800GTX performance (in my resolution) for half the price can only be a good thing.
one gts is actually a 9series...one gt is actually a 9series...
3870 is still a r600...8800gt brought forward because nvidia wanted to take away ati's shine.
now the real 9 series are having trouble outperforming the old *8800* series...
now fanbois are upset....i ask Y????
i prefer ati but im no fool...i have both a gt and a 3870...but i will continue to preach that i believe atis new gpu design was superior to nvidias.
If an ATi owner cares to call themself a "fanboi" then fine, they may care to remember that before the 2900XT came on the shelves, all the reviews were aweful, citing poor AA performance, could not compete against meer 8800GTS 320MB blah blah, once the card did arrive and after a little driver development is was very good for the price IMO, I sometimes wonder why many tend to forget these little details which is why, I judge a card by it's performance once released with drivers that actually support it..............just my thoughts.
by: btarunr;679419Thats a bad excuse, most games are part of the TWIMTBP programme period.
Yeah and all the games they tested on are either part of the TWIMTBP programme or in some way NVidia favourable.
:laugh:glad i bought a 3870x2:roll:
by: mandis;679336Good review! If you read it throughly though, the 8800GT's in SLi win! It does say that the efficiency of the 3870's is better but the speed of the 8800GT's make them have to recommend the SLi setup ahead of Xfire as tthe GT's win most of the real world gaming tests :). personally, I would prefer personally one HD3870x2 rather than two 8800GT's in Sli but thats mainly because I am lazy!
The 8800GT in SLI does NOT beat the 3870 in Crossfire!
http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/article.php?cat=grfx&id=580&pagenumber=1
by: Tatty_One;679460But have they fixed the 3870X2's problems yet? Particularly the one where only one core is used in Crysis?
personally, I would prefer personally one HD3870x2 rather than two 8800GT's in Sli but thats mainly because I am lazy!
by: Tatty_One;679460
Good review! If you read it throughly though, the 8800GT's in SLi win! It does say that the efficiency of the 3870's is better but the speed of the 8800GT's make them have to recommend the SLi setup ahead of Xfire as tthe GT's win most of the real world gaming tests :).
The ati 3870 wins in crossfire when AA is disabled, and the sli 8800gt wins with AA enabled. AA is the very last thing I would turn on. If I have the option I'd much rather go up in resolution then turn on AA.

by: mandis;679619AA goes back to the days when we all played games at 640 x 480.. back then it made sense but as the resolutions go up it makes less sense.. the original idea was to lose the jaggies without the need to go up a resolution.. sadly the performnce hit back then was too great.. today i think AA is pretty meaningless at higher resolutions..
The ati 3870 wins in crossfire when AA is disabled, and the sli 8800gt wins with AA enabled. AA is the very last thing I would turn on. If I have the option I'd much rather go up in resolution then turn on AA.
trog
by: mandis;679619I am not denying that, my point was, that the link you posted in that earlier post suggests the opposite in many case and you posted that to evidence that the XFire was quicker but to my eyes your evidence shows the opposite, in that link you posted out of all the games tests, even if we ignore AA and just as you have said....concentrate on the non AA then by my calculations out of 10 game benches SLi wins 7 and XFire wins 3!!!! Now thats the review you posted to prove the XFire was quicker.....am I reading something wrong here? because that link you posted clearly shows that across the board SLi is quicker?? :confused:
The ati 3870 wins in crossfire when AA is disabled, and the sli 8800gt wins with AA enabled. AA is the very last thing I would turn on. If I have the option I'd much rather go up in resolution then turn on AA.
Even more strange is out of those 10 game benches, you have now posted a chart that shows ONLY the 3 out of 10 benches that the XFire does win in, the 7 that SLi wins are not even mentioned there????
Have a look again at your origional link here:
http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/articl...0&pagenumber=1
by: trog100;679733I agree, but see my post above, in the link that Mandis provided earlier it clearly shows that without AA, the sli rig wins 7 out of 10 benches. I am not saying either is better than the other, just pointing out that there seems to be very conflicting info here, non of which (for a change) have I posted :D
AA goes back to the days when we all played games at 640 x 480.. back then it made sense but as the resolutions go up it makes less sense.. the original idea was to lose the jaggies without the need to go up a resolution.. sadly the performnce hit back then was too great.. today i think AA is pretty meaningless at higher resolutions..
trog
by: trog100;679733very true - but nowadays, though, even with higher screen resolutions, AA has become a means of exacting a better looking image, as compared to abating a need for higher resolutions. As long as the hardware can manage it, it's possible to run a game where little to no line jaggedness is visible, thus increasing realism.
AA goes back to the days when we all played games at 640 x 480.. back then it made sense but as the resolutions go up it makes less sense.. the original idea was to lose the jaggies without the need to go up a resolution.. sadly the performnce hit back then was too great.. today i think AA is pretty meaningless at higher resolutions..
trog
But, truth be told, even with most modern gaming hardware and rig setups, we can really only accomplish this level of image quality with high screen resolutions and playable performance with older titles. Newer games are still too hardware heavy for any eye candy to really be worth the performance hit.
by: btarunr;679419so Nvidia wants there hardware supported, you forget AMD is able to also get in on programs ever look at HL2 EP2, TF2 or Portal, all 3 say runs best on ATI. Both compaines are free to enter programs like this, and neither program ensures the game can not be run on the others hardware. For instance look at HL2 EP2 preformace between the ATI cards and NVidia cards and tell me who wins though its got ATI's program?
Yeah and all the games they tested on are either part of the TWIMTBP programme or in some way NVidia favourable.
by: Tatty_One;679771http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/26/hd-3870-crossfire-vs-8800gt-sli/
I am not denying that, my point was, that the link you posted in that earlier post suggests the opposite in many case and you posted that to evidence that the XFire was quicker but to my eyes your evidence shows the opposite, in that link you posted out of all the games tests, even if we ignore AA and just as you have said....concentrate on the non AA then by my calculations out of 10 game benches SLi wins 7 and XFire wins 3!!!! Now thats the review you posted to prove the XFire was quicker.....am I reading something wrong here? because that link you posted clearly shows that across the board SLi is quicker?? :confused:
Even more strange is out of those 10 game benches, you have now posted a chart that shows ONLY the 3 out of 10 benches that the XFire does win in, the 7 that SLi wins are not even mentioned there????
Have a look again at your origional link here:
http://www.tbreak.com/reviews/articl...0&pagenumber=1
I accidentally posted the wrong link. It is sorted now though. My point however was not to prove that the 3870 Xfire was faster than the 8800GT SLI but rather that it was on par in terms of performance. There are a lot of games out there with architecture specific optimizations which renders them unsuitable for benchmarking different architectures. Personally i prefer nvidia over ati (just check my system specs) but this does not mean that I'll try to discredit and burry the opposite team by making false accusations. I'm nobody's fanboy and I simply think that credit should go where it's due.
Cheers
actully, to be honest, Nvidia's is alot easier to program for because the thread dispatch processor is less complex to program for. This is why an ATI card preforms closer to a 64-128 SP card than a 320 SP card
by: mandis;679336Erm yes it does?!
The 8800GT in SLI does NOT beat the 3870 in Crossfire!
http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/26/hd-3870-crossfire-vs-8800gt-sli/
COD4: http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/13967/6
HL2:EP2: http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/13967/7
ET:QW: http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/13967/8
Crysis & UT3: http://www.techreport.com/articles.x/13967/9
Of course which is correct?! This is a problem I have with alot of reviews lately, the results vary so greatly that as a consumer I am left thinking :wtf:
by: Xaser04;681206Erm NO it doesn't! Just read my previous post...
Erm yes it does?!
by: Xaser04;681206There is indeed a lot of confusion because of that. It seems that many websites out there are picking sides thus trying to polarize the market.
Of course which is correct?! This is a problem I have with alot of reviews lately, the results vary so greatly that as a consumer I am left thinking :wtf:
by: mandis;681165All credit to you, but it does not change the fact that that link clearly shows us that even without AA enabled, the SLi setup wins 7 to 3 in 10 gaming benchmarks across multiple resolutions so your point about equal performance is only correct and relative dependant on what review you read, my point is, despite what you say, the majority of reviews and benches (that I have read) do show that in fact, the SLi setup with two 8800GT's is faster than XFire with two HD3870's but TBH this discussion is fairly immaterial in the greater scheme of things, because less than 5% of all users run XFire or SLi and there is no way in getting away from the fact that put simply, the 8800GT is the faster card, the fact that the HD3870 itself is only a fairly mild upgrade from the 2900XT just goes to show IMO how good the 2900XT actually was/is.
http://en.expreview.com/2007/11/26/hd-3870-crossfire-vs-8800gt-sli/
I accidentally posted the wrong link. It is sorted now though. My point however was not to prove that the 3870 Xfire was faster than the 8800GT SLI but rather that it was on par in terms of performance. There are a lot of games out there with architecture specific optimizations which renders them unsuitable for benchmarking different architectures. Personally i prefer nvidia over ati (just check my system specs) but this does not mean that I'll try to discredit and burry the opposite team by making false accusations. I'm nobody's fanboy and I simply think that credit should go where it's due.
Cheers
by: mandis;681277Agreed totally! :toast: which was kind of my point in the other post in as much as we can all find evidence to support our theories because there is in many case distorted info out there.
Erm NO it doesn't! Just read my previous post...
There is indeed a lot of confusion because of that. It seems that many websites out there are picking sides thus trying to polarize the market.
i see, distorted mind looking for distorted info ...
by: newtekie1;679496I wasnt aware it had a problem but i dont have that game.Have you tried high details because i know in counterstrike source if you run it with low details it doesnt need the 3d clock speeds runs great at 2d i recon if it starts struggling which i havent seen yet lol Then the 3d clocks would probably kick in i maybe wrong.But running full detail you get the full 825mhz 3d clock speeds but the game even on high only utilizes around 60% max of the gpu.
But have they fixed the 3870X2's problems yet? Particularly the one where only one core is used in Crysis?
I found this out running dual monitors one for the game and other to monitor clock speeds / system temps.
If the 3870x2 is doing well against the 9800gt just think what the 4870x2 can do. Especially in crossfire :eek:
by: [I.R.A]_FBi;681385TBH my mind is pretty distorted tho not thru computing :laugh:
i see, distorted mind looking for distorted info ...
