Friday, December 5th 2008

Phenom II at 6+ GHz: How AMD May Have Done It

A couple of weeks ago, at the AMD Austin Tech Day event, the company stunned the computer enthusiast community, by presenting to the press, the overclocking capabilities of the upcoming Phenom II X4 processor. The enginners managed to boot the machine at CPU speeds in excess of 6 GHz, 6.213 GHz to be precise. A close-up snap of a portion of the CPU-Z window showing the overclock, made its way to AMD's own photostream at Flickr, among other pictures related to the event.

The picture reveals the clock speed at 6213.6 MHz, bus speed at 200 MHz, FSB multiplier at an unreal 31.0x and resulting HyperTransport link speed at 1002.2 MHz. This would mean that they may have dropped down the HT link multiplier (normally 200 x 10.0 for the Phenom II X4 940) to 5x. We already know from previous reports that the vCore was set around 1.90 Volts, and that a copper pot with liquid nitrogen was used to cool the chip. The motherboard used, from the pictures, appears to be Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H, which is based on the AMD 790GX + SB750 chipset. For more pictures, browse through the photostream. More pictures could be added to the stream once the NDA lifts on December 14.
Add your own comment

88 Comments on Phenom II at 6+ GHz: How AMD May Have Done It

#76
Chicken Patty
BluesmanHere is a quote from an attendee at the San Francisco event Friday. SOURCE
:rockout:
wow, just awesome. Thanks bluesman. Looks like it might have a run at the i7, of course, the i7 on 4 threads. i7's on air can do 6 second passes on wprime, but with 8 threads. Although AMD clearly won't be at the top with this chip, it is definitely back in the game. Lets see what AM3 has for us.
Posted on Reply
#77
CDdude55
Crazy 4 TPU!!!
''Side by side DDR2 and DDR3 setups clocked to the same 4 gig, virtually a tie for performance, so save some hard earned, DDR2 will perform rather nicely.....''

Yay!,(even tho i don't OC):)
Posted on Reply
#78
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
I just did a 10.1 sec run of WPrime @ 4.2ghz with 3 firefox windows open, MSN, and F@H running after my i7 has been on for 18 hours folding. I don't know if that's good :rolleyes:
Posted on Reply
#79
Chicken Patty
BingeI just did a 10.1 sec run of WPrime @ 4.2ghz with 3 firefox windows open, MSN, and F@H running after my i7 has been on for 18 hours folding. I don't know if that's good :rolleyes:
Hey binge, remember thats with 8 threads dude. I mean compare it to current gen phenoms. The importance here is not kicking intels ass, but to me its just the fact that the overclocking capabilities of the Phenom now suck ass, in exception of a few chips that have gotten up to 3.7 3.8 Ghz, but then again, only a handful.

Im sure the i7 would be quicker even on 4 threads, but its a big step forward for AMD who struggled miserably lately. hey binge, by the way, did you get that PM i sent ya?
Posted on Reply
#80
Binge
Overclocking Surrealism
Chicken PattyHey binge, remember thats with 8 threads dude. I mean compare it to current gen phenoms. The importance here is not kicking intels ass, but to me its just the fact that the overclocking capabilities of the Phenom now suck ass, in exception of a few chips that have gotten up to 3.7 3.8 Ghz, but then again, only a handful.

Im sure the i7 would be quicker even on 4 threads, but its a big step forward for AMD who struggled miserably lately. hey binge, by the way, did you get that PM i sent ya?
That score is with 4 threads. My 8 thread score is around 6.0xx. I'm glad for AMD... I really am, but I'll be excited when I see them match gaming marks at platforms $100s of dollars below Intel's systems.

Yeah I got your PM. My FS thread is updated all the time and is up to date. It's always in my sig.... Everything that is priced is what I have available.
Posted on Reply
#81
Chicken Patty
BingeNo, that score is with 4 threads. My 8 thread score is around 6.0xx.
darn you, at least lie and just say it was 8 hehehe. Well like I said in my previous post, Phenom II is not going to be as quick, but its a big step for AMD dude, huge if you ask me. Lets see what AM3 has for us.


So did you get the PM binge????
Posted on Reply
#83
Bluesman
Gaming Performance for Phenom II

For those of you interested. This was posted on XtremeSystems' AMD section today.
iocedmyselfNow as i know some were wondering about gaming performance i'll just paste in what i was explaining to my uncle when i was telling him how his little gift was faring

the 9850 would let me run the game in 1920x1200 with rendering options maxed out and draw/detail distance at 15/100 and the ingame benchmark reported those settings used 94% of the video card memory, 88% of all 4 cores on the cpu, 85% of the system memory With Average of 25 Frames per second

That was with cpu overclocked to 3.4ghz and memory speed @ 1066mhz

The phenom 2 lets me run 1920x1200 with rendering options maxed out and draw/detail distance at 32/100 and the ingame benchmark reported those settings used 98% of the video card memory, 64% of all 4 cores on the cpu, 65% of the system memory With Average of 58 Frames per second with cpu at stock speed of 3.0 Ghz and memory speed @ 800mhz
And further info on his testing routine. Please note that he is comparing a 3.4Ghz Phenom I (oc'd 9850) to a 3.0Ghz Phenom II (940):
iocedmyselfYes gaming performance seems to be quite impressive, the CPU is actually fast enough to feed data to the GPU now. As for the benchmark, it's the in game GTA IV benchmark, which aside from being surprisingly detailed seems like a good consistent performance comparison.

Also note that the phenom II aside from being 400mhz slower then agena also had the draw/detail distance more than doubled when attaining double the frame rates. So i'm very impressed with real world performance so far, and am preparing to run crysis/warhead, farcry 2, Call of duty 4/5, Mass effect, Fallout 3, 3Dmark06/Vantage and Pcmark vantage starting with stock speeds. Any other gaming bench requests let me know, i probably have it. So look forward to seeing realworld numbers which i'll post ASAP.
Posted on Reply
#84
Bluesman
News from Chicago Phenom II AMD Event

Here are results reported by Sampsa with Team Finland (Sampsa & SF3D). (NOTE:"3DMark05 & 06 CPU-tests were ok @ 6 GHz + We were able to run Crysis @ 6,1 GHz (2 loops CPU-test)"!!! :D) XtremeSystems.Org
SampsaHi everyone, I got back home from Chicago last night where AMD organized Dragon platform preview event.

First of all huge thanks to AMD (Macci, Simon, Pete and everyone) for inviting Team Finland (Sampsa & SF3D) to the Dragon event. It sure was a nice opportunity to run some first tests with Phenom II X4 and LN2 cooling.

Chilly system running full steam



Gigabyte's 790GX retail board



Kingpin's F1 EE full of LN2, this was so sweet :D



Typical Vcore we used



Here is a CPU-Z shot after some minutes of testing ;)

Quick summary:

- All the Phenom II X4 CPUs me and SF3D tested had no cold bug at all
- All the chips we tested could do +6,1 GHz CPU-Z
- We tested with AMD's 790GX reference board and Gigabyte's retail 790GX
- Both mobos worked fine under cold, +6 GHz and +1,95V vcore
- Vcore ~1,95V was optimal for +6 GHz clocks
- 3DMark05 & 06 CPU-tests were ok @ 6 GHz
- We were able to run Crysis @ 6,1 GHz (2 loops CPU-test)
- Max CPU-Z screenshot and validation we got with 4 cores was 6280 MHz (no dirty tricks)
- With air cooling (Cooler Master Z600) highest we got Crysis stable was @ 4,13 GHz (1,58 V)

We tested couple different revisions (ES and newer ones) but lets see how it turns out when retail chips will be launched.

I don't want to make any promises but I encourage everyone to go ahead and test yourself.

These results were definitely not maximum numbers possible to achieve.. and there might be some extremely cool (literally) numbers coming soon :up:

More pics, ss and video coming soon :)

If you have any questions, I'm more than happy to answer (no peformance numbers because of NDA).
Posted on Reply
#85
HTC
- Max CPU-Z screenshot and validation we got with 4 cores was 6280 MHz (no dirty tricks)
Something doesn't add up, here: according to CPU-Z's hall of fame, max OC on K10.5 is still 4.4 GHz. How could they validate it without it being in hall of fame?

Other then that, sweet!
Posted on Reply
#86
Bluesman
HTCSomething doesn't add up, here: according to CPU-Z's hall of fame, max OC on K10.5 is still 4.4 GHz. How could they validate it without it being in hall of fame?

Other then that, sweet!
Hi HTC. I believe the hall of fame recognition is lacking because the chip has not been officially released. Thus, the chip is not available yet to everyone so it does not qualify for oc recognition?

Here is a streaming video of the event as well as other goodies: AMD Streaming Video
Posted on Reply
#87
HTC
BluesmanHi HTC. I believe the hall of fame recognition is lacking because the chip has not been officially released. Thus, the chip is not available yet to everyone so it does not qualify for oc recognition?

Here is a streaming video of the event as well as other goodies: AMD Streaming Video
I don't think so because there's already a 4.4GHz one there.

Cool stream, dude :rockout:
Posted on Reply
#88
Bluesman
AMD Phenom II Event in Boston

The Boston event was held last night and confirmed many of the results from the SF and Chicago events. This participant has reported an astounding result comparing Phenom II 940 to i7 965:
EnJoY....Lastly, it's important to mention that in the Core i7 965 system vs Phenom II 940 BE Crysis comparison, I was able to verify that both systems were running the exact same graphical settings, with the same cards. Phenom II had 4GB of ram, dual channel while the Core i7 had 3GB in triple channel on an X58 Intel reference board. The Phenom II had higher frame rates throughout the majority of the gameplay.
All in all, awesome night with some great swag given away by AMD. Thanks so much for having us guys.
SOURCE
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 6th, 2024 11:26 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts