Tuesday, May 19th 2009

Intel to Detail 8-core Nehalem-EX Processor Next Week

Having successfully established the Nehalem architecture-derived Core i7 series as the industry's fastest consumer processors available, and recently propagating the architecture to two-socket Xeon series for servers and high-end workstations, Intel is set to push up parallelism two-fold with the Nehalem-EX 8-core enterprise processor. The company will detail this new line of chips next week, although a commercial-launch can be expected only in late 2009 or early 2010.

The new chip will succeed the company's own Xeon E7000 "Dunnington" series 6-core processors, for having the highest available parallelism per socket. The 8 physical x86-64 processing cores will further feature HyperThreading technology, sending the logical-processor count to 16 threads per socket. Each processor packs 2.3 billion transistors. The processor will further be designed for systems with more than two sockets per board. Currently although server-builders sell 1U and 2U servers with more than two Nehalem quad-core processors, the system is designed by using two (or more) two-socket mainboards interconnected using Infiniband. The announcement will be made on May 26, in an address headed by Boyd Davis, Intel's general manager of Server Platforms Marketing Group.
Source: CNET
Add your own comment

35 Comments on Intel to Detail 8-core Nehalem-EX Processor Next Week

#27
Weer
btarunrAt half the price, I would pick this www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131378

(~$260, common price for "mid-range" Core i7 boards).
:shadedshu

It's just not worth it.
-5x lower multiplier
-twice the motherboard price because I need three PCIe slots
-CPU does not have HT
-Registered RAM - biggest concern
-Does it even support SLi?
-Can you even overclock on a server motherboard?

So, I'd have (at best) 8 threads @ 3.0Ghz. I would be better off with 8 threads where half are logical @ 4.0Ghz and half the price.
Posted on Reply
#28
hat
Enthusiast
moar!
because moar!
Posted on Reply
#30
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
MilesRdzWhat?! 9000?!
THATS IMPOSSIBLE!


lol at SLI and OC support. they're servers, those two arent neccesary.
Posted on Reply
#31
btarunr
Editor & Senior Moderator
Weer:shadedshu

It's just not worth it.
-5x lower multiplier
-twice the motherboard price because I need three PCIe slots
-CPU does not have HT
-Registered RAM - biggest concern
-Does it even support SLi?
-Can you even overclock on a server motherboard?

So, I'd have (at best) 8 threads @ 3.0Ghz. I would be better off with 8 threads where half are logical @ 4.0Ghz and half the price.
That's the cheapest 2-socket board out there :laugh: the one you're looking for will be in the ~$600 price-range. Good luck finding one. Also the 3.20 GHz Xeon is priced at $1600 a chip.
Posted on Reply
#32
Disparia
MelvisTo expensive, to much power usage, to much heat build up id say to? and who is going to use these realy? The FBI or ARMY? and dont you need a whole new mobo for this as well?
One man.
Pappy: What kind of computer power does ray tracing take in respect to the standard game graphics of something like Quake Wars?

Daniel Pohl: For Quake Wars: Ray Traced we have our 24-core machine as mentioned above and get between 20 and 35 fps at a resolution of 1280x720. This is also a good time to point out that real-time ray tracing for games is still in the research phase. We don't expect people going out today and buying these kind of server machines to play QWRT on it. But as the hardware power and the number of cores increase over time we expect there to be a point in the future where people could run real-time ray traced games on their desktop systems.
I'm sure a new 4P/32C/64T monster is on it's way to him. If memory performance on his old Dunnington setup was a problem before, it hopefully won't be one now.
Posted on Reply
#33
Tau
MelvisTo expensive, to much power usage, to much heat build up id say to? and who is going to use these realy? The FBI or ARMY? and dont you need a whole new mobo for this as well?
These would be awsome servers... you could virtualise most enterprises setups on a single box.... makes me lick my lips just thinking about it.

And honestly this makes me want to consider building a dual i7 Worrkstation machine again.... this is bad... especially when I have money to burn :respect:
Posted on Reply
#34
Weer
btarunrThat's the cheapest 2-socket board out there :laugh: the one you're looking for will be in the ~$600 price-range. Good luck finding one. Also the 3.20 GHz Xeon is priced at $1600 a chip.
No, dude. That's not fair.

Fix it.
Posted on Reply
#35
zAAm
MelvisTo expensive, to much power usage, to much heat build up id say to? and who is going to use these realy? The FBI or ARMY? and dont you need a whole new mobo for this as well?
To quote someone with the same pessimism as you:
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." —Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943.
There's bound to be lots of people who will use it, and if they use it, it will become more mainstream and that's how technology progress! Would you rather keep your current cpu for the rest of your life?? :rolleyes:
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 13:36 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts