1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

5870 QUADFIRE user video!!

Discussion in 'AMD / ATI' started by Bodar, Oct 26, 2009.

  1. Bodar

    Bodar New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    33 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    Location:
    Austin
  2. mlee49

    mlee49

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    Messages:
    8,477 (3.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,103
    Meh runs at 1024x768... lame. He should max it all out and got big or go home!

    Edit, watched a few more seconds and see more resolutions benchmarked.
  3. AphexDreamer

    AphexDreamer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    7,085 (2.70/day)
    Thanks Received:
    913
    Location:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
    It still rapes.
  4. Bodar

    Bodar New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    33 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    Location:
    Austin
    Yeah.. I did all resolutions with heaven.. up to 6144 x 1152 with eyefinity.. Also the other benchies as well.. :) Thanks!
  5. Velvet Wafer

    Velvet Wafer New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Messages:
    5,123 (2.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    990
    Location:
    North of Germany
    big LOL. it doesnt even scale after the third. bad driver^^
    ATI was fast with their cards, but not with their programming.
    but so far, the results are very pleasing for me;)
    i look into the 5850 beeing available for me.
  6. SonDa5

    SonDa5

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2008
    Messages:
    1,645 (0.74/day)
    Thanks Received:
    344
    :respect: Sweet RIG.
  7. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,982 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,751
    Location:
    PA, USA
    A real treat for everyone here at TPU, thanks a lot for your effort in compiling the data into video.
  8. A Cheese Danish

    A Cheese Danish

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Messages:
    2,963 (1.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    413
    Location:
    your local vending machine
    Damn dude! Very awesome! Can't wait to get my hands on that kind of components!
    The last one was just lol
  9. wiak

    wiak

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2004
    Messages:
    1,743 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    198
    Location:
    Norway
    more like a CPU bottleneck :laugh:
  10. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,982 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,751
    Location:
    PA, USA
    stick to facts, drivers are extremely premature and his CPU is beefy enough to handle that setup. :shadedshu
  11. Corrosion

    Corrosion New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    821 (0.27/day)
    Thanks Received:
    74
    Location:
    Maplewood, Mn
    i7 is able to handle QUAD 5870s? dont think so.
  12. 1Kurgan1

    1Kurgan1 The Knife in your Back

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    10,321 (4.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,371
    Location:
    Duluth, Minnesota
    Amazing setup you have Bodar, that Heaven bench score is just unreal.

    Its nice to see that in a lot of games going to a 3rd card actually scales well and sometimes better than the jump to 2 cards, 4 seems to be the line though.
  13. KieranD

    KieranD

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    8,006 (3.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Glasgow, Scotland
    jealous :D
  14. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    mmmm awesome video dude thanks for sharing, and its nice to see trifire starting to get ahead a bit, however its pretty obvious 2 cards is the sweet-spot.

    Still, TPU isn't about the sweet-spot, TPU is about the most shit-hot setups, and boy you got one :toast:
  15. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,982 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,751
    Location:
    PA, USA
    an i7 975 @ 4.5GHz has more than enough bandwidth
  16. niko084

    niko084

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    7,636 (2.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    729
    I am tempted to agree with that statement...
    You shouldn't be noticing any cpu limitation especially on a graphics benchmark with that kinda cpu at that kinda clock..

    I wouldn't expect to see a hard limitation like that on my cpu at it's current clock.
  17. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,982 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,751
    Location:
    PA, USA
    If people think I'm full of sh!t they can just look at how an i7 can handle as many nVidia cards in SLI as are available with at least some gain while the 4870x2+4870 had extremely similar numbers to 2x4870x2.

    [​IMG]
    niko084 says thanks.
  18. Scrizz

    Scrizz

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,877 (1.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    385
    Location:
    Florida, US
    4.7 isn't enough need 6 :D
  19. niko084

    niko084

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    7,636 (2.71/day)
    Thanks Received:
    729
  20. kid41212003

    kid41212003

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,584 (1.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    533
    Location:
    California
    Bottlenecked and pre-mature driver are the problem... for quad-setup

    http://www.hardware.info/forum/showthread.php?t=201199

    Core i9 with quad-sli ... going from 3.5GHz to 4.7GHz give him over ~15FPS (~15%) in Vantage GPU test...

    And everyone knows Vantage doesn't depend much on CPU (very well optimized for multi-threads).
  21. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,982 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,751
    Location:
    PA, USA
    I have to stop you right there... You are right that drivers are the issue here, but scaling like what we're seeing in the 5870s is not because of a CPU bottleneck. The OP is running his 975 at 4.5+GHz, and I know you've owned an i7. What happens when you raise the BCLK? You also raise the dram frequency! Everything gets faster. Higher QPI and more uncore probabaly did more than the increase in cpu frequency.

    There was a Gigabyte overclocking competition and Fugger was the winner of the competition with dual overclocked 295s and an overclock of the i7 extreme at 4.3GHz. That was it, and other teams had worse results with higher OCs. One thing he did was increase the uncore more than he had to. Small tweaks like that change vantage scores more than you have tried to experience.

    Earlier I posted a gaming benchmark because unlike vantage... most games get shafted when it comes to support in crossfire. This is most definitely a driver issue and that was the reason I posted that benchmark. Here's another bench. By the way... these tests are not done with immature drivers. These benchmarks were done well after the 4870x2s had been on the market... wow scaling

    [​IMG]
    kid41212003 says thanks.
  22. 1Kurgan1

    1Kurgan1 The Knife in your Back

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    10,321 (4.95/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,371
    Location:
    Duluth, Minnesota
    Those links are all broken now :( I want to see
  23. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,982 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,751
    Location:
    PA, USA
    reposting for anyone who couldn't see:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
    wolf says thanks.
  24. REVHEAD New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2005
    Messages:
    300 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    28
    Location:
    Sydney/ Australia
  25. Bodar

    Bodar New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    33 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    Location:
    Austin
    That first resident evil bench is good, but you need to really let the cpu fly at max overclocked settings to really see these gpu's scale. Although that was an average of 250 fps..
    Still overclocking the cpu to 4.72ghz really helped re5 reach 280. I love trubritar lots, but for the current tech, you need as much cpu power as possible to scale these cards. cheers you guys!! :)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page