1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD A10-5800K Capable of 6.50 GHz over LN2: Company

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Sep 28, 2012.

  1. chimonow New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    21 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Quite a bit actually! By regrouping their SP's based on a 'newer' architecture they where able to create a 20-50% increase in graphics performance, along with a 10-25% boost computational horsepower! Check out Tomshardware.com for a 5800k review, and also check back to the tech sites for more reviews on the consumer versions! :)
  2. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,615 (0.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    168
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    I am suspicious of this post and its account.
    Mindweaver says thanks.
  3. chimonow New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    21 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
  4. tacosRcool

    tacosRcool

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Messages:
    860 (1.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    71
    must be nice to reach that speed. Now how much power will it consume?
  5. chimonow New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    21 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Please don't be suspicious! lol, I am only here to help!
  6. chimonow New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    21 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    65 watts and 125 watts! But what most people don't realize is that is won't be at that power requirement very long or hardly at all! Remember that when buying a 35w and a 55w ivy bridge CPU!
  7. Jizzler

    Jizzler

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,403 (1.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    635
    Location:
    Geneva, FL, USA
    Thanks, the relative increase is nice. But I was looking more for information on it's overclocking abilities, if available. Juggling some build ideas for the wife and kids.
  8. Mindweaver

    Mindweaver Moderato®™ Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    5,157 (2.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,654
    Location:
    Statesville, NC
    +1 Yea, I'm looking to upgrade my daughters Q9550/GTX285 with this chip, and a touchscreen monitor for Windows 8 if the numbers are there.. If I have to buy a graphics card then I'll probably go with a i3 or i5 22nm.. :toast:
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. chimonow New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    21 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    I am sure it won't be too far off from Bulldozer, Say on air 4.2-4.5 seams reasonable.. What system are you trying to build?
  10. mediasorcerer New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    979 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    225
    Location:
    coast ,melbourne
    There is also this thing called price v performance!!! Thats where these chips may shine over intel!!

    Thats what some folks forget when they compare just performance v intel, like the article implies i think?
    chimonow says thanks.
  11. chimonow New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    21 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    I will only recommend that if you plan on also going with a discrete GPU! A core i3 will be okay I believe... I just highly recommend you go with the very least a 6670 or higher!
  12. chimonow New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    21 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    That is where AMD is looking out for Number 1! This is where they get most of their income! Most people don't need that much power!
  13. Patriot

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2009
    Messages:
    164 (0.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15
    Location:
    Republic of Texas
    Lol ...

    Fixed

    Cherry/ golden chip may hit > 4.5Ghz on air... but most don't, not at temperatures/voltages that have a long term chip lifespan.

    I will agree that 4.5 is painfully easy.
    4.8 on water is quite easy... more requires a good board and good chip... and proper cooling.

    I have seem many a dead SB and IB from those trying to make their chips into golden chips...
    Stable for a few months then not even stable at stock...

    (as a folder I value stable clocks over sky high...though seeing the sky is nice occasionally)
  14. Jizzler

    Jizzler

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Messages:
    3,403 (1.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    635
    Location:
    Geneva, FL, USA
    Going to start with at least one system, who it's built for will depend on how the APU's turn out.

    Might go for a low-profile/low-TDP build with the A10-5700 and my youngest would use that system (nothing more demanding than Open Arena). Or if the A10-5800K can be easily pushed on air, might build it for my wife with an HD 6670 for Crossfire.
    chimonow says thanks.
  15. largon New Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,778 (0.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    432
    Location:
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    I'm sure tacosRcool meant power consumption when OC'ed to the said 6.5GHz, so it's somewhere around or north of 300W.
  16. okidna

    okidna

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2012
    Messages:
    470 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    343
    Location:
    Indonesia
    Jizzler says thanks.
  17. PopcornMachine

    PopcornMachine

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,563 (0.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    459
    Location:
    Los Angeles/Orange County CA
    I remember them making a big show of extreme overclocking of bulldozer a week or so before it's release.

    And as most people here know, clock speed means nothing comparing architectures. That's the lesson we learned then, and I'm afraid will learn again.
    Assimilator and phanbuey say thanks.
  18. phanbuey

    phanbuey

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2007
    Messages:
    5,202 (2.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    973
    Location:
    Miami
    Because AMD always says crap like "Well our processor is better than Intel because of X" and X almost always turns out to be some BS that they made up (remember the "native quad core"?)... Where as intel is a bit more like "Our processor hit 6Ghz. Bam."

    For example:

    "...Overclocking abilities give AMD's sub-$150 chips such as the A10-5800K, A8-5600K, and A6-5400K an edge over similarly-priced Intel chips..."

    So... basically our chips clocking higher = better than intel chips. which is most likely BS.

    Its probably a great chip - just as long as you dont read the shiny box that promises magical super unicorn performance.
  19. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,477 (3.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,140
    But that is just marketing. And I'm quite sure that a madly overclocked sub $150 AMD chip can beat a $150 Intel chip at stock. Marketing is marketing, nothing new.
  20. alwayssts

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    355 (0.15/day)
    Thanks Received:
    77
    As a 2600k user I realize I should shut the front door, but I look at it this way:

    A 2500k will do 4.7ghz and have the graphics power of potentially 6450 (1875mhz) smooth and easy on air for $220.

    A 5800k may do 4.7ghz and have the graphics horsepower of ~6570-6670 (> stock gt640) smooth and easy on air for $150.

    2500k is probably around 15% faster per clock on the cpu.
    5800k is probably around 300% faster (depending on bw dependency) on the gpu.

    It's all relative to what someone is using their computer for and I fully realize that, but as a realistic package for many users, I like those ratios. I can't say I would notice 15% cpu performance most of the time, given when I ran my 2600k stock which would be fairly similar, but certainly recognize how much the iGPU in SB doesn't hack it no matter what you do.

    Add a $50 gfx card to a 2500k, and you have the performance of an OC Trinity.
    Add a $50 gfx card to a 5800k, you have the performance of a $100 graphics card.

    Suddenly the performance/$ is completely skewed, and you have a half-decent gaming setup for less than the price of a 2500k.

    Oh yeah, and from experience if you ever watch a 24fps video using SB, be ready for pain.
    I am happy with the video performance/options of NI, Trinity is probably similar/better.

    I think it is truly difficult to argue against AMD's realistic-usage proposition.
  21. Dent1

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,123 (2.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    899
    AMD never said that. That quote was added by "btarunr" the moderator to hype up the article.

    What makes you think Trinity can't achieve 4.7GHz on air too? (I'm not saying it can or cant)
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2012
  22. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,371 (2.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    562
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    i was temtpted to be sarky ala car comment, but ill stick to just agreeing with you as a usefull Oc shown on water or Air would both impress me more and interest me more:).
  23. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,754 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    I believe Piledriver can easily hit over 5GHz on air. That RCM technology if implemented properly should give you much higher clocks with each increase making a big performance different. We shall see soon enough.
  24. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    6,159 (6.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,022
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    RCM makes the CPU power usage most efficient at the RCM's resonant frequency. It uses charge pumps to use otherwise wasted energy to supply the CPU again. It recycles CPU power, but the further the clocks get from the resonant frequency the more power it will consume. It will run best to the clock speed that the RCM is tuned to. Higher temperatures could also dampen the RCMs resonant frequency. I'm really curious to see how PD works out. I could care less about it outpacing Intel, the architecture is pretty neat and is a step in the right direction.
  25. Ikaruga

    Ikaruga

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    868 (0.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    182
    I think you misunderstood me or just want to pick on me for some reason I have no idea about, but either way, here i go:

    I did not (in any way) say that it's a bad CPU (or it's a bad buy, etc). We could have a conversation where we compare the pros and the cons of the two chips, but that's definitely not what I meant in my post.
    The marketing guy was talking about overclockability, and mentioned the i5-2500k. If you overclock, you do it to gain extra performance, and that's something what we can measure. That chip has significantly larger TDP at 4.7Ghz, not to mention that how much more you gonna need to get 2500k@4.7Ghz-ish benchmark figures, because you gonna need a lot more, and that's not gonna be smooth nor easy for sure, let alone the extra noise and electricity bill what will come with it.

    APUs are not for serious overclocking, it's a product which currently used for entirely different purposes. They might be the future of course, but we are not there yet. AMD knows that the cheaper and cooler i3-3225 with its HD4000 is targeting the same segment and does everything what the target audience is looking for, so they (understandably) try to emphasise on the overclockabilty of their chip to shift focus from the competitor product, so some people might find it harder to "argue against their realistic-usage proposition"

    Again, please don't get me wrong, Trinity APUs are really useful nice products and they can be the better choice in many builds. All I said is that they are hopeless against performance monsters like the SB/IB-K series.
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2012

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page