1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Unlocked FX Processors Announced

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Oct 12, 2011.

  1. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,943 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,064
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta

    Did it..got the resposne he's in server, not desktop.


    I am NOT random, dammit!:laugh:

    I just noticed the thread title says "Announced", but not "Released".

    :nutkick:
     
  2. techtard

    techtard

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    930 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    Well, at least you tried.
    You'd figure that a company that is as large as AMD could afford to send out one more review sample.:rolleyes:
     
  3. YautjaLord

    YautjaLord

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    653 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    78
    2cadaveca:

    It is sad for those that expected way too much from this CPU (almost including me, but i took 3 grains of salt with every AMD Dozer news later :)), but you know what? I still gonna buy Sabertooth 990FX & other stuff i said i'll buy; besides, just like with anything new there's some chance that it'll either work like charm or f*** up badly; on bit more than few occasions it looses to it's own predecessor :laugh:, but it also either on par or outperforms (even if by small margin) 2600K. In short - don't expect too much & you won't be dissappointed, Doom3 being otherwise great game thought us that methinks. lol

    P.S. Here's what i promised regarding the samples used in all these reviews posted on your front page:

    Guru3D: CPU-Z v.1.58 FX-8150 listed as FX-8130P|[ES] TDP: 223W?
    HardwareCanucks: same shit
    LegitReviews: CPU-Z v.1.58.7 FX-8150|rev. B2 TDP: 124W
    MadShrimps: same as LegitReviews
    NeoSeeker: same as Guru3D & HardwareCanucks
    Overclock3D: same as 1 above
    OverclockersClub: the trend continues, ES, AMD Processor as CPU's name, CPU-Z version 1.57.2
    Overclocker.com: this gets tiresome, but atleast CPU-Z is version 1.58|same as Guru & Canucks FX-8130P is name
    PureOverclock: it's trend following day with ES revision & CPU-Z 1.58
    Rage3D: same as above it, but atleast Crysis 2 runs @ FullHD|DX11 & actually puts it almost on par with 2600K, both 8150|2600 OC'd & pitted gainst each other
    TechwareLabs: ES
    TweakTown: ES again
    Vortez: surprisingly rev. OR-B2 TDP 124

    The reviews that i didn't mentioned either had no CPU-Z screenie or didn't worked (VR-Zone). Just my 2 cents/pennies/etc.....
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2011
  4. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,943 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,064
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    I actually believe they could not. In the post above, you can see that most reviews are using ES smples, even, and not retail, and near every retailer has sold out now of what little stock they had. This was not a "global launch" with wide retail availability.

    Personally, I detest ES parts, and would much rather do my reviews with retail parts so that the stuff I am using, you guys can get the same results with, with no questions left as to whether the "ES factor" is involved.

    It does piss me off though, that many sites with reviews have far less traffic than we do here @ TPU. It does, however, serve the purpose of highlighting how none of the reviews posted here contain any bias for favortism because whatever marketing department requested it.

    And most of these launch reviews are HIGHLY biased, with most using the exact same benchmarks, and not benchmarks that are all that common, either.

    I due time, I'll be posting in the Bulldozer OC thread, along with erocker, at least, with Crossfire and Eyefinity results with Bulldozer, with retail chips. Although the stock perforamcne isn't "all that", I love to tweak BIOSes, and this is yet another platform that offers some new tweaking.


    I will not say, however, that theere is lots of headroom, or that the FX moniker is appropriate. 4.2 GHz is stock turbo, and most sites are posting reviews with 4.6 GHz, a mere 400 MHz over stock. Fortunately there are some big gains to be had by the extra clocks, but I want to take a look for myself, and see what's what, and what I can do with these chips.

    I took the non-standard position for OC'ing 1155 chips, compared to other sites, so I am looking forward to finding the things that have been missed, for sure.
     
    YautjaLord, _JP_, dumo and 1 other person say thanks.
  5. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,654 (13.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,045
    Become the official CPU reviewer here. Problem solved.:)
     
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  6. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,384 (2.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    565
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    +1 to that

    theres still many a question unanswered im not over awed but i dont think AMDs new baby is as bad as it appears as none of the tests in any of the reviews afaik use all or any of the processors new features , none oc the memory and few run past 1600;) i mean whats that about if your going to oc a system oc it ya lazy tard or do they not bother to oc there own mem at home

    ive been told i oc like a tard and thats fair enough but i deffinately try to push Every bit in my pc
     
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  7. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,943 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,064
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta


    :laugh:


    Done. But that doesn't help with Bulldozer.


    :laugh:


    Or you could. :D


    I was gonna take a long vacation from reviews because of my upcoming surgery, but too many people have asked me to keep going, so I made plans to deal with my downtime, and onward and upward it is.

    I don't even have a staff tag or anything like that; maybe it's time to get one.
     
  8. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Agreed, just a lame attempt to shift blame onto M$ for why their chip didn't meet their hype.
     
    PopcornMachine says thanks.
  9. PopcornMachine

    PopcornMachine

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,563 (0.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    459
    Location:
    Los Angeles/Orange County CA
    Memory scaling tested here. Makes little to no difference.

    http://vr-zone.com/articles/amd-fx-...vestigation--feeding-the-bulldozer/13704.html

    Let's go down the list.

    Bad memory controller.
    Worse per core performance than previous generation Thuban.
    Out of control power usage when overclocked.

    Am I missing anything?

    They'd been better off not releasing this at all.
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2011
  10. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,943 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,064
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Offical announcement(including link to Canadian retailer that says "no such product":laugh:!)

    [​IMG]



    Great marketing!!:roll:

    The Canadian link:

    [​IMG]



    Actually, no, you didn't! :laugh: Good job, AMD!!! :laugh:
     

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Oct 12, 2011
    TRIPTEX_CAN says thanks.
  11. dumo

    dumo

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2005
    Messages:
    671 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    574
    Location:
    NYC
    I still have hope for this cpu:) We never know until we tested (non ES) retail box cpu ourselves

    The first retail batch of FX8150 for US went to Newegg in limited quantity....wonder why:)
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2011
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  12. techtard

    techtard

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    930 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204

    That's more of an Ncix fail. They always have little screwups somewhere in their pages.

    If you have an account there, you can point that out to their staff and get some Ncix points. :)
     
    cadaveca says thanks.
  13. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,943 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,064
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Cool info! Thanks!


    Now the link works....



    but....TWO HUNDRED AND NINETY DOLLARS!!!!!

    and OOS.

    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

    • link.jpg
      link.jpg
      File size:
      58.5 KB
      Views:
      453
  14. techtard

    techtard

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    930 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    That's a double whammy! Out of stock and way over the suggested price.
    Just wait a week and then use Ncix pricematch.
     
  15. Nick89

    Nick89

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Messages:
    1,742 (0.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    176
    Location:
    The Nevada Wasteland
    Its like Pentium 4 all over again.
     
  16. Super XP

    Super XP

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Messages:
    2,754 (0.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    538
    Location:
    Ancient Greece, Acropolis
    Agreed. In the meantime AMD needs to do some massive damage control, tweak the shit out of Bulldozer and get a re-fresh out the door ASAP.

    Nobody wants to see AMD go belly up, or we are all screwed....
     
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  17. Grings

    Grings New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,303 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    Location:
    Blighty
    This is what got my attention, lookit dat price!

    I wonder if these overclock any better than the 8 core models...
     
  18. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,135 (1.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    Unlikely considering they don't even have a decent number of these CPU's available. They just don't have the manufacturing capacity to get anything out the door in a reasonable amount of time...
     
  19. YautjaLord

    YautjaLord

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    653 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    78
    On TweakTown they still use ES, but that's not exactly what captured me in the review; it's the last CPU review of today on your front page & one that particularly of interest for me or any other that games on AMD: FX-8150 gaming perf. Again, they used ES, but they pitted it gainst 2600K & OC'd both; 2600K was @ 5.2GHz, 8150 - 4.76GHz; for ES it was 1-3fps behind 2600K in all scenarios; also they used both CPUs OC'd in AA/AF image quality tests. The way i saw it for ES (i don't even know ES equals what - B0? B1?) it was bit more than just decent.

    Bottom line: i don't find any flaws in this CPU when comes down to gaming, even with fact it's ES; can you proove me wrong? I'll continue looking for other reviews on your front page, but as far as i'm concerned - the only flaw i see is that both reviewers & AMD rushed & started to give (in case of AMD) & bench (in case of reviewers) the f***ing ES samples. That's the only major flaw the way i see it. Hope when the time comes & there are both rev. B2 & C0 versions of 8150 you'll bench both. FX-8150 @ 4.76GHz almost on par with 5.2GHz 2600K & it's ES (8150)? I don't find it that much f***ed up, afterall. :toast:
     
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  20. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,135 (1.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    458
    The "flaw" is that it's an 8-Core CPU with about 2 Billion Transistors that costs ~$250 that performs on par or worse than a 4-Core CPU with about 1 Billion Transistors and costs ~$215. The "flaw" is that per-core performance is worse than their previous--now 2-3 year old--architecture.

    You also keep saying all these sites are using Engineering Samples, which I don't think is true considering almost all of them have picture the retail packaging that their benchmarking samples came in. Are you implying that AMD would seriously take broken Engineering Samples, package them in retail boxes, and tell people to test them for the sake of getting others to buy them? Do you realize exactly how fucking retarded that sounds lol?
     
  21. techtard

    techtard

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2009
    Messages:
    930 (0.51/day)
    Thanks Received:
    204
    This is just pure speculation, but does the whole FX on AM3+ have anything to do with the performance issues these chips are having?
    Would it have been better to have broken compatibility and released on FM2?
    Could be they shot themselves in the foot.
     
  22. YautjaLord

    YautjaLord

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    653 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    78
    2xenocide:

    :laugh:

    I only care for one thing: review of the rev. B2/C0 FX-8150, that's what i'd like to see. Besides, i'm only guessing, but as far as i'm concerned i think it's the case actually: some AMD department is that retarded. :roll: Just guessing; don't tell me i hurt your feelings with this now, or did i? lol jk :toast:

    P.S. Dozer quantites are that small, the way i saw it when i checked yesterday on few etailers/retailer sites: 2 or 3 at most; in Newegg it's 1 FX-8150, 1 FX-8120 & 2 or 3 FX-4100, same was with other e/retailer sites names of which i already forgot; the samples used in reviews i think were not bought but rather were given by AMD methinks; besides, it's launch not final release. Just saying.
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2011
  23. 3volvedcombat

    3volvedcombat New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    Messages:
    1,514 (0.77/day)
    Thanks Received:
    261
    Location:
    South California, The desert.
    Im not even going to read any other opinion's.

    Cause this is fact.

    Great job AMD. <3!!!!

    Thanks for clarifying btarunr!!!!! +1



    For all of you thinking its fail? you go right ahead, i accept everybody's opinion
    But who ever though AMD was going to not compete was stupid, for that AMD is keeping to there trend's and always will. :slap::slap::slap::slap::slap::slap::slap::slap::slap::slap::slap:
    (always will is more like a maybe you never know.
     
    WarEagleAU and JrRacinFan say thanks.
  24. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    13,943 (4.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,064
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Yes, it's retarded. But guess what?


    THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED. Go to the reviews, check CPU-Z screens...you'll see many, if not most sites with "8130P", which is the 8150 ES chip.

    Then look at the TPU front page, and realize that AMD did not send TPU a sample for review.

    AMD's current marketing staff IS retarded. There is no denying it. I wish it wasn't so, but it is what it is. Most sites received the packaging tin and watercooler in seperate shipments, even.

    I had OEMS asking AMD for a chip for me, even...and in the end, I'll probably have to buy my own. As soon as chips are available in retail locally, I'm going to get one, because clearly AMD isn't exactly working well on the marketing side.

    I asked JF-AMD directly, if a new socket would be required to take full advantage of Bulldozer.

    His response:

    YES.

    ;)

    In the end, it doesn't matter. Everyone bitched about backwards compatibility, and now ya got it, and the chip does not meet expectations.

    You can't always have your cake and eat it too, I'm afraid.:(
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2011
    WarEagleAU and JrRacinFan say thanks.
  25. JrRacinFan

    JrRacinFan Served 5k and counting ...

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2007
    Messages:
    19,414 (7.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,483
    Location:
    Youngstown, OH
    @techtard
    I don't think it would have mattered. Methinks, its just a weak IMC rehash like the PHII lineup. It was very close to my expectations tbh.
     
    techtard says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page