1Kurgan1
The Knife in your Back
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2008
- Messages
- 10,421 (1.85/day)
- Location
- Duluth, Minnesota
System Name | My Comp | Fiancees Comp |
---|---|
Processor | i7 5820k @ 4.6Ghz 1.285v| i5 2500k |
Motherboard | MSI x99 SLI Plus | AsRock Z77 Pro 3 |
Cooling | Watercooled |
Memory | 16GB DDR4 2400 @ 2666 | 12GB DDR3 1600 |
Video Card(s) | AMD R9 290x | MSI 5850 OC |
Storage | 128gb SSD + 2x 2TB | 2TB |
Display(s) | Asus 27" LCD | 25" Hanns G |
Case | CM Storm | CM Elite 430 |
Audio Device(s) | Creative Recon 3D PCIe |
Power Supply | Enermax Galaxy 1250W | Rosewill 630w |
Mouse | Logitech G700s | Logitech G100s |
Keyboard | Logitech G901 | Logitech G105 |
Software | Win 8.1 Ultimate x64 | Win 8.1 Ultimate x64 |
Benchmark Scores | 3D Mark - Fire Strike Extreme - 4403 |
Ok a quick unscientific test (just looking at the meter while playing for a bout 10 mins on Lauguna Presa and Atacama) I am actually lower than I thought, like 45-55. Moving to 4X AA got at least another 20 FPS with minimal visual difference, at least on first glances. I swear it was higher before though. Maybe not as high as I claimed earlier but...
The only difference between now and when I FRAPS'd it before is now using the 10.4 previews for load time fix (not 10.4a didn't bother; maybe I should). Oh and the BC2 patch, of course.
What you got sounds about right, 50ish average, like I said with my 4870x2 I ran 4x AA, any higher and it would drop quite a bit.
Very nice setup there kurgan, whats the performance like, Im betting theres a huge difference now.
Not a real huge difference, ran a 4870x2 before, ran all high settings, but 4x AA and 4x AF, not I can max those 2 settings out, haven't tried HBAO on yet, I'm sure it wont be a problem though.