Discussion in 'General Software' started by AthlonX2, Dec 6, 2010.
thats a considerable difference,isnt it?
No this is extremely interesting, completely misses the purpose of a comparative benchmark. Futuremark SHOULD ADDRESS THIS ASAP
yup sure is IF anything 3DMark11 should bypass nVidia's and ATI control panel setting altogether and use/force it's own
Really? I couldn't disagree more.
Perhaps they will make us swear on the holly bible that we will genuinely use the highest settings.... well I would
Which game looks best and have a better multiplayer? i wanna know
This is not new. It happened in Vantage as well.
Sorry Im the wrong one to ask in general.I've responded to that post becasue while Bad Company 2 isnt bad,Graphically its defo not that super duper good and gameplay wise there is nothing much new
Hmm, were is high quality? So that's how they were getting scores in the mid P5500 - P6000 range. Could you also perform extreme benchmark results (high quality vs performance). I want to see if the increase is just as high or minuscule.
Yeah its nothing that new in real,everyday life....but come on,they claim to be the best bench and this is unacceptable.
I was using the Use my preference emhasising and that is 3 settingserformance,Balanced and Quality
Are you saying that nv control panel no longer has HQ? Perhaps I'm not understanding you, do you have a pic of these settings?
Oh, now I see what your using. thanks.
wont let me install it at all. any ideas?
I screw my GTX465 as much as possible and break the 7000 Points barrier.
Helli|GTX465 SLI|860/1005|7001|E5620 @4.3GHz
cadaveca|HD5870|995/1285|5007|i5 760 @ 4.42ghz
Where the heck you got Afterburner 2.1.8 from???
Good Question....actually i can't remember.
Aaah....now i know. Guru3d. It's 2.1.0 Beta 3
Newest build is 2.1.0 Beta 5 from today:
I thought this was always the case, even as far back as 3dm01?
Cheers I knew there was the beta,it just didnt show the specific version on the page..I thought if its beta it will show in Afterburner too,thats why I got confused.
Yeah,you are probably right...but we will never know who is honest and who is cheating...but still would be nice if they could fix this..
Maybe it's the Skin "Blue Kompakter Skin by Gryphon" who shows this (wrong) 2.1.8 Versions number...
There are probably articles out there for past versions of 3dm on how to tweak your system for better results. I can imagine that there are (or will be) articles for the new version, too. However, I really don't consider it cheating, but more as tweaking. There are a lot of people who tweak their system for any other kind of benches, why not this one, too?
If this is going to become an issue we may end up moving to a futuremark validation ONLY system. Any thoughts on this?
I hope not as i just sent off one of my 6870's so can't do any more crossfire runs also would this only be available to users of paid editions?
Separate names with a comma.