1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Strange GTX260

Discussion in 'Folding@Home' started by [Ion], May 10, 2010.

  1. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    So I got the GTX260 yesterday, and I have it installed and running F@H. However, even with the shaders at 1404mhz (highest I can go in MSI Afterburner) with the core at stock and the memory slightly OCed, I'm topping out at ~6800 PPD (450pt WUs). Now, this is a good ~3k ahead of the 8800GTS, and considering it was a free upgrade, I'm not going to complain. However, I was hoping for more like ~7500 or so. I'll try to get a GPU-Z SS at some point (on the laptop currently). Has anyone else experienced this sort of behavior?
    Crunching for Team TPU
  2. Aleksander

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,254 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    304
    What about drivers?
  3. mlee49

    mlee49

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2007
    Messages:
    8,477 (3.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,103
    I hope not, I'm about to buy a 260 for F@H myself.

    I'll see what happens and let ya know.
  4. bogmali

    bogmali Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2008
    Messages:
    6,642 (2.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4,124
    Location:
    Olympia, WA USA
    192 or 216 SP?
  5. Bot

    Bot

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Messages:
    584 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    105
    it also depends in WU's but i'd say between 6500 and 7500 sounds about right
  6. sneekypeet

    sneekypeet Unpaid Babysitter Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    21,525 (7.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,046
    yeah my 275 and 285 pretty well OC'd got like 7500-8000 and 8000-9000 respectively (WU dependant of course) I say your 260 is about right.
  7. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    192:
    [​IMG]
    On 353s, I can get up to ~7800 PPD, as low as 6300 on 548s, 6800 on 450s.
    197.45 drivers

    EDIT: The card:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    EDIT2: On average, I'm getting between ~2500 and 3500 PPD more than the 8800GTS :)
    Last edited: May 11, 2010
    Crunching for Team TPU
  8. theonedub

    theonedub habe fidem

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    7,131 (3.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,658
    Those numbers look to be pretty close to what I remember getting on my 260 c216. My 275s get 9700ppd on 450WUs with shaders at 1584, so 6800-7500 is about right with 192 and 14xx shaders I think. Maybe be more aggressive on those clocks :D
    [Ion] says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    I can OC the core and mem more, but MSI Afterburner won't let me go past 1405mhz on the shaders...should I try Rivatuner/EVGA Precision?
    Crunching for Team TPU
  10. theonedub

    theonedub habe fidem

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    7,131 (3.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,658
    You know with a stock clock of 1080 and with that look, that card is an OE pull. I remember reading that some OE cards have limited abilities. I am pretty sure the stock shader on a normal 260 is 12xx. Try Precision, but the limitation might be in hardware. (OR I could be completely off base :laugh:)
    [Ion] says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  11. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    It is an OEM, it came from my grandfather's Dell (he ordered a dedicated GPU so he could run the native res of his 22" LCD without realizing what a GTX260 was, so I swapped him for my 8800GTS G80) :laugh:
    I bumped it up to the 147x shaders (using EVGA Precision), and it had a ~250 PPD increase (average), I'm now looking at ~7200 on 450s and about 7800 on 587s.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  12. theonedub

    theonedub habe fidem

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    7,131 (3.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,658
    That's about the clock I was using and I got better PPD. Are you using the tray or the console client (the console client looks like a DOS Command Prompt and the tray client has the viewer you can open). You should be using the Console Client, the other one uses resources to draw the proteins, which is cool, but impacts PPD (or so I have heard). Try using the console client and see if the PPD goes up :)
    Crunching for Team TPU
  13. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    Tray...I'll switch over this evening and see if it makes a difference

    EDIT: Did you have a c192 or a c216?
    Crunching for Team TPU
  14. thebluebumblebee

    thebluebumblebee

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    2,926 (1.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,447
    Okay, I'm confused. GPU-z says that it's 192 shaders but 55nm process??? I thought only the 216's were 55nm. It's OEM though, so I know that means that all the rules can go out the window.
  15. theonedub

    theonedub habe fidem

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2009
    Messages:
    7,131 (3.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,658
    Mine was a 216 and I know yours is a 192, but it still seems lower than what I would expect. I would try the console just to see if it helps, otherwise I am at a loss and would have to chalk it up to being a cut down OE card.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  16. johnspack

    johnspack

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    4,358 (1.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    850
    Location:
    Nelson B.C. Canada
    Those number are close to what my 216 55nm and 65nm 260s get. It goes up and down depending on the wu. 352s might get close to 7.5k.
  17. RX-7

    RX-7

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2009
    Messages:
    265 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Location:
    Wichita,KS
    that card does not look right for a gtx 260
  18. johnspack

    johnspack

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2007
    Messages:
    4,358 (1.73/day)
    Thanks Received:
    850
    Location:
    Nelson B.C. Canada
    It looks almost identical to my PNY 260 216sp 55nm model. I'll monitor my ppd tonight, but I'm still pretty sure those are 260 numbers....
  19. hertz9753

    hertz9753

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,079 (0.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    471
    Location:
    Bismarck, ND
    Do I have this right? core 518 shaders 1008 memory 1080@stock.:eek:
  20. BraveSoul

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    987 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    164
    im getting 7800ppd with 587point unit. EVGA 260 216sp OC edition, stock speeds, not a console version, however using RealVNC, no monitor, as soon as i start browsing/moving things around or lunching gpu-z ppd drops to 6200...give or take
    _____________________________
    [​IMG]
    Antec1200 filter project
  21. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    Yeah? Is this bad? I've never had anything new than G92 before :eek:
    I tried the console client, it had no change in PPD so I'm sticking with the tray client so I can watch the viewer occasionally (yes, I know this kills PPD, but it looks cool)

    On a 353pt WU, I'm typically getting exactly 8026 PPD. Woot! :rolleyes:
    Crunching for Team TPU
  22. NastyHabits

    NastyHabits

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,073 (0.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    613
    Location:
    Oakland, CA
    Those stock clocks are low. My GTS 260 (EVGA) is 575 core/12xx shaders /999 memory. (Sorry, I'm at work and don't remember the exact stock shader settings.) It's wierd how your memory settings are higher. Your PPD looks about right for a 192 core card. They just a little bit below my 216's PPD. I wouldn't worry about it. Use EVGA precision to set the core a wee bit higher (about 25 should do), lower the memory back to stock, sit back and fold.
    [Ion] says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  23. [Ion]

    [Ion] WCG Team Assistant

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2009
    Messages:
    11,787 (6.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    10,889
    Location:
    North Carolina, United States
    Will do, I'll OC it a bit more tonight (not at home ATM). Unfortunately, my PPD is going to drop, especially over this weekend, my parents are complaining about the power usage so the computer is going to be off more :(
    Crunching for Team TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page