OCZ EL DDR PC-4800 Platinum Elite Review 0

OCZ EL DDR PC-4800 Platinum Elite Review

Value and Conclusion »

Test Setup

Test System
CPU:AMD Athlon64 3000+ Venice
Motherboard:DFI LanParty NF4 UT
Memory:2x 512 MB OCZ EL DDR PC-4800EL Platinum Elite
Video Card:ATI Radeon X850 Pro PCI-E
Harddisk:Maxtor Diamondmax 160GB
Power Supply:HEC PurePower 475
Software:Windows XP SP2, Catalyst 5.8

OCZ says the memory modules have been tested to run at 2T. We tested only at 1T since this is where the performance is. Why would you buy an "Elite" memory, and not run it at the fastest setting?

Performance

The first test we did, was test how the memory performs at a stock frequency of 200 FSB. We tested both 2-2-2-5 and 2.5-4-4-10 timings. Here you can clearly see how big the performance difference between both timings is.
After this, we tested how far we could overclock the memory at 2.6V. The CL2 timings could only go 6 MHz faster, to 206 MHz, which is not much. However, at CL2.5 the overclocking increase was substantial, at 2.6V, which is 0.2V below OCZ's recommended default voltage, we could gain an extra 45 MHz.
Now we increased voltage in several steps to 2.8V, 3.1V and 3.3V. More voltage does not help the CL2 setting at all which is a bit dissapointing. The lowered maximum clock at 3.3V seems to be caused by the extra heat generated of the memory - we did not use any active cooling.
At CL2.5 the results are completely different, overclocks scale nicely with voltage. The maximum of 282 MHz at 3.3V is quite good.

The last test "JEDEC DDR-400A" is for comparison with a generic DDR module running at JEDEC standard timings.

OCZ EL DDR PC-4800EL Platinum Elite
CPU Clock &
Memory Ratio
Memory
Speed
Memory
Timings
Everest
Read
Everest
Write
Everest
Latency
Quake 3
Timedemo
3DMark
2001SE
SuperPi
Mod 1M
9 x 200 1:1200 MHz2-2-2-5 2.6V5345 MB/s1999 MB/s45.2 ns247.3 FPS2100145.77 s
9 x 206 1:1 206 MHz2-2-2-5 2.6V5413 MB/s2011 MB/s45.5 ns251.5 FPS2115044.92 s
9 x 206 1:1 206 MHz2-2-2-5 2.8V5413 MB/s2011 MB/s45.5 ns251.5 FPS2115044.92 s
9 x 206 1:1 206 MHz2-2-2-5 3.1V5413 MB/s2011 MB/s45.5 ns251.5 FPS2115044.92 s
9 x 198 1:1 198 MHz2-2-2-5 3.3V5276 MB/s1982 MB/s45.6 ns243.9 FPS2064646.28 s
9 x 200 1:1200 MHz2.5-4-4-10 2.6V5145 MB/s1986 MB/s53.7 ns240.7 FPS1999246.77 s
9 x 245 1:1 245 MHz2.5-4-4-10 2.6V6303 MB/s2296 MB/s43.8 ns293.6 FPS2361438.27 s
9 x 260 1:1 260 MHz2.5-4-4-10 2.8V6819 MB/s2461 MB/s41.3 ns312.0 FPS2472336.02 s
9 x 275 1:1 275 MHz2.5-4-4-10 3.1V7084 MB/s2541 MB/s39.2 ns329.2 FPS2603634.30 s
9 x 282 1:1 282 MHz2.5-4-4-10 3.3V7245 MB/s2715 MB/s37.5 ns337.8 FPS2642133.27 s
JEDEC DDR-400A200 MHz2.5-3-3-8 2.6V5246 MB/s2197 MB/s50.6 ns243.4 FPS2035546.22 s

Running this memory at CL2 timings does not make much sense in my opinion, since your overclocks are rather limited there. You specifically buy TCCD memory for high clocks at less aggressive timings. If you want tight timings you should look at memory which uses Winbond's BH-5 chips, for example OCZ's 3500 Gold Gamer eXtreme.



For easier comparison with other modules, we set a maximum voltage of 3.1V and tested until we found the highest clock frequency and fastest timings for this memory. The benchmarks Everest Read, Everest Write and Quake 3 were run. We then calculated the performance increase in percent compared to some standard DDR-400 memory running at JEDEC standard timings (2.5-3-3-8). The average percentage of the three benchmarks is listed in following table:

Next Page »Value and Conclusion
View as single page
Apr 30th, 2024 05:56 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts