Wednesday, June 7th 2006
Gigabyte shows off i-RAM successor
The new version of the i-RAM has moved from a PCI slot to a 5.25 inch drive bay. The DDR of the previous i-RAM has been replaced with DDR2 and a maximum of 8GB is now supported. The new i-RAM gets its power from the PSU directly.
Source:
DailyTech
109 Comments on Gigabyte shows off i-RAM successor
My claims are not false nor 'heated' its an old topic to me.
Edit: said read test, meant write test.
Edit: just so that people know, the 2T picture blatantly shows 'CR2' which means 2T timing is in effect. DDR speed as well as other timings are visible and un-changed between tests.
29% performance drop, case closed.
Edit 2: I forgot to say, these are on 2x1GB sticks, not the 4x512 i mentioned earlier.
Like sisoft sanda and everest, i'm not some noob, that might work on some of teh newbies but not me.
case it not close, u haven't proved anything.
Show me a game taking a 30% hit running 2t?
i'm not asking for alot.
I am not discussing this further, as you seem to not give a shit and wish to live in your own little world. Let's allow this topic to get back on track.
I don't know about u but I don't play everest and Si soft sandra. I use real applications.
that fact that u can't show me a real world appication seeing a 30% hit just shows i'm correct.
Thanks for coming out. The only one living in a little world is u my friend.
here is a great article showing what i'm talking about.
www.xbitlabs.com/articles/memory/print/2gb-ram.html
Just found another good link
techreport.com/etc/2005q4/mem-latency/index.x?pg=1
enjoy the read, maybe you will learn something.
www.anandtech.com/memory/showdoc.aspx?i=2560&p=2
You can read there for more information.
The case is close, he proved that is original statement is correct, and I just proved that it then translates to a gaming performance hit. If you are going to call someone out on something at least make sure you know what you are calling them out on.
Also, my statement about more then 2GB of RAM making A64 rigs buggy was made because there are almost no 2GB sticks that have decent latencies and that are not ECC, both of which are performance killers. So the only real option a gamer has for more then 2GB of memory is to use 4 sticks, which is why I made my statement that over 2GB of memory and A64 rigs get buggy. If you use 2 sticks then you have to deal with the slow-down of ECC and high latencies, if you use 4 you have to deal with the slow-down of 2T and worse overclocks. Either way you go more then 2GB requires you to make other sacrifices.
Processes :30 | CPU Usage: 0% | Commit Charge: 328/1927
the last peice of info is the amount used/amount total of space for programs to use, aka ram (1024mb) + pagefile (1000mb-1500mb). when you turn the pagefile off it will show somewhere around (current ram load)/1024-1050 as windows needs some hdd space for system temp files and things that cannot be lost if power is lost before shutdown. no matter what you do there will always be a pagefile in windows. the only thing you can do is set weather windows will use it or not.
now on the 1t - 2t question. 2t causes a hit in performance end of story. in memory only benchmarks it can be up to a 30% hit end of story. will there ever be a 30% hit in app performance or games? no end of story. you dont seem to get that when you are running a game more things impact it then just you command rate. but i garentee if u have a 2500+ running with a x1900xtx and set everything at lowest grfx settings it will make a hell of a lot more difference then if u crack the res all the way up and turn everything on max.
now on the more then 2gb makes a a64 buggy question. in reality it doesnt matter what system u have today more then 2gb will get buggy end of story. there are not good timings yet on 2gb sticks. also if u run 4x512 its still gonna be buggy due to lots of despersed memory addresses, and maby one of the mem chips is a litter slower then the rest on the stick.
so before you call anyone a n00b or newb or noob just shut the fuck up as u dont know what you are talking about. if u did you wouldnt bitch at those who know less then you.
Which he didn't so I still stand by my post!
And kenny please explain to me what your definition of buggy is? I do know some users with 4x1GB sticks in athlon 64 system that are as stable as my 2GB system. u care to explain why thier rigs aren't buggy.
And if you were to re read my post I never once called him a liar or a newb.
I just wanted proof of his claims.
You can't run a x1900xtx in a AGP motherboard first of all.
And if you happen to be lucky enough to own one these cards who the hell would be playing at the lowest possible settings anyways.
I think your the one that needs to STFU.
Buggy, in my definition, is anything undesired. It don't have to be unstable, it is unstable at 1T, and forcing me to run at 2T is something undesired. Buggy does not always mean unstable. Oh and besides that, why are we forced to run at 2T? Because it is unstable at 1T, so even your "buggy has to mean unstable" argument is fulfilled.
Oh and by saying you think his statements are false, you are calling him a liar. To bad he backed up his statement word for word.
Do not call that guy a noob over the XP2500/1900xtx example. IT WAS AN EXAMPLE. He matched an old CPU with the fastest vide card around, for the specific purpose of making a point. He did not suggest they were compatible in the real world. He did not tell you to buy that combination, so please just shut the hell up and stop whining.
Hmm you didnt happen to have edited your post did you?
Last edited by Makaveli : 06-09-2006 at 11:07 PM.
"And if you were to re read my post I never once called him a liar or a newb.
I just wanted proof of his claims."
If you want us to beleive you, dont edit your damn posts.
Then there is the whole smartass, and obviously the jackass remarks about the other poster, not to mention that implying that people are liars and then trying to put words in their mouth to try and make it look like you are right. So, while not directly saying n00b, you have resourted to childish name calling because you probably realized that you know the least out of anyone in this discussion about the subjects at hand.