Tuesday, August 22nd 2023

ASUS Unveils 32-inch 4K OLED ROG Swift PG32UCDM Gaming Monitor

For many gamers, 32-inch displays might be the perfect size. They're large enough to immerse you in a sweeping vista of pixels, yet not too large to fit comfortably on a standard-sized desk. Today, we're ready to announce a 32-inch monitor that's loaded with OLED luxuries. Meet the world's first 32-inch 4K OLED gaming monitor: the ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM. Primed for excellence with a 4K QD-OLED panel, a premium ROG cooling solution, and blazing-fast 240 Hz refresh rate, this monitor proves that you can have it all.

QD-OLED panels make a stunning first impression. You won't have to sit in front of the ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM for more than a moment to see the difference that this panel technology makes. Since each pixel in an OLED panel is its own light source, you can get true, inky blacks. The PG32UCDM employs second-generation Quantum Dot OLED tech that goes a step further to give you even more vibrant colors, an optimized subpixel layout for improved text clarity, and bright, eye-catching highlights.
Great cooling makes sure that you get the most out of this otherworldly display tech. As our work with high-end graphics cards, gaming laptops, and AIO liquid coolers demonstrates, we have extensive experience when it comes to designing cooling solutions. We brought that full expertise to bear on the ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM. To help ensure a long product lifespan, we've equipped this monitor with a custom heatsink that keeps its mainboard cool without the need for a distracting fan.

But there's more. A graphene film behind the entire panel keeps it cool and comfortable. The thinnest yet strongest nanomaterial in the world, graphene has a thermal conductivity coefficient of up to 5,300 W/mk - a figure more than a hundred times greater than silver, copper, gold, or aluminium can offer. The lower operating temperatures offered by this cooling solution allow the display to produce and sustain high peak brightness levels. It can reach 1000 nits of peak brightness with perfect black levels for an incredible HDR experience. The PG32UCDM's premium cooling tech also gives you peace of mind that your monitor will go the distance, as it helps minimize the risk of burn-in.

4K and 240 Hz are better together
Year after year, we've pushed the boundaries for gaming monitors to deliver incredible gaming experiences. With our high-refresh-rate gaming monitors, starting with the world's first 144 Hz display back in 2012, we blazed a trail for the rest of the industry to follow. Now, we're ready to raise the bar for gamers who love the lifelike detail they get when gaming on a 4K display.

The ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM gives you an unbeatable combination of specs with its OLED panel, 240 Hz refresh rate, and 4K resolution. With the lifelike detail that comes with high-resolution gaming and the fast, responsive animation offered by the 240 Hz refresh rate, you'll get the best of both worlds. The panel's superlative 0.03 ms response time complements high framerates by all but taking motion blur out of the picture - you'll have impressive detail, fluid animation, and pristine image clarity, all at once. The cherry on the top is G-SYNC compatible tech, which ensures tear-free visuals while keeping latency low.

Previous-gen connectors couldn't offer the bandwidth necessary to make this combination a reality, but the ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM makes it happen with its extensive connectivity options. Equipped with the latest HDMI 2.1 ports and DisplayPort 1.4 ports with Display Stream Compression (DSC), the PG32UCDM is prepped to give you an exceptional 4K gaming experience.

Easy multiple device management with Smart KVM and USB-C
As a gamer, you likely have many different devices that you could connect to the ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM. Through Smart KVM, you can easily control two of them with this one monitor. The PG32UCDM lets you use picture-in-picture (PIP) mode to see the display outputs of two devices simultaneously. Through a simple keyboard hotkey, you can toggle which device you're currently controlling with the mouse and keyboard.

The PG32UCDM's USB Type-C port makes it easy to use Smart KVM with a wide range of devices - and it has a few other tricks up its sleeve, too. This port is configured to function as a USB hub, too, and it can recharge a connected device, like the ROG Ally, with USB Power Delivery.

In the past, gamers often had to pick and choose which specs mattered to them the most as they picked their next monitor. With the ROG Swift OLED PG32UCDM, you don't have to compromise. You can enjoy gaming at 4K with a high refresh rate, an ultra-low average response time, lifelike colors, and exceptional contrast, all at the same time.

Currently, we plan to make this monitor available for sale early in 2024.

Source: ASUS ROG
Add your own comment

73 Comments on ASUS Unveils 32-inch 4K OLED ROG Swift PG32UCDM Gaming Monitor

#51
Tek-Check
TomorrowYeah display manufacturers (or is it scaler/IC makers?) are using DSC as a crutch
LG and Samsung have in-house display IC solutions, so they are the ones who usually bring new technologies first. LG introduced full speed HDMI 2.1 ports at 48 Gbps in 2019 already and Samsung will be the first to introduce DP 2.1 Neo G9 dual-4K monitor. Others usually source display IC and there are solutions available.
Posted on Reply
#52
Crackong
Nice spec
But we all know what's going to happen to top ROG monitors

ETA: Q2 2024
When it actually available in actual store: Q2 2025
Posted on Reply
#53
Tek-Check
cvaldesRome wasn't built in a day.
Hahaha. We don't want monitors to be build like Rome...
cvaldesThere were no OLED monitors in the 2000s. And no 4K@120Hz models in the mid 2010s. Today we have 4K@240Hz. There is progress happening. Next year someone is going to bitch that there's no 4K@480Hz monitor. Someday there will be someone saying that missing DisplayPort 7.0 support is an outrage because 7.0 cables are already on the market.
Progress is there, granted, but if you offer allegedly premium product, there are floor expectations from such product. Asus cannot cheapen out on DP 2.1 ports on a monitor that can take a full advantage of new VESA's standard. It's terrible what they did here - two steps forward and one step back. Full image on this monitor needs almost 70 Gbps of data. Why on Earth not offer DP 2.1 port to consumers? Beggars belief...
cvaldesGreat. WE KNOW. In the mean time, please take a seat and quietly drink your juice.
If we keep quiet, we get five generations of CPUs with 4 cores...
cvaldesSome people will be disappointed with everything. Hell of a way to go through life.
Not me. I am fully satisfied with many products, for example legendary LG's 4K/120 OLED TV Series 9 from 2019. Fantastic generation that got almost everything enabled what was possible at that time and kept receiving firmware updates for several years.
cvaldesThe Internet wasn't always like this. I've been on the World Wide Web basically since its inception in the early Nineties. The smartphone has turned the Internet into an online ghetto. It gave everyone a voice but it didn't make the 'net any better. It just created more noise.
Not true entirely. You need to plough through and filter out noise and tap into the biggest democratization of knowledge in history of humankind.
Posted on Reply
#54
trsttte
Tek-CheckThere is no single monitor with DP 2.1 ports in the market as yet. Samsung's Odyssey Neo G9 dual-4K will be the first one, in a few weeks.
There is already at least one DP 2.1 monitor, funnily enough, from Asus no less!!!

www.techpowerup.com/303183/asus-and-rog-unveil-innovative-monitors-at-ces-2023
tftcentral.co.uk/news/asus-rog-swift-pg32uqxr-with-32-4k160hz-mini-led-backlight-and-displayport-2-1

I can't find what spec they're using, might be the basic 40gbps for all I know, but that's already a big improvement over DP1.4 - from 32gbps to 40gbps doesn't seem like a lot but due to signalling eficiency it's really from ~25.9gbps to ~38.6gbps
Posted on Reply
#55
cvaldes
Tek-CheckHahaha. We don't want monitors to be build like Rome...
No, we don't. The point is that some people think everything will happen right now. There are some on this forum. And IT DOESN'T.
Progress is there, granted, but if you offer allegedly premium product, there are floor expectations from such product. Asus cannot cheapen out on DP 2.1 ports on a monitor that can take a full advantage of new VESA's standard. It's terrible what they did here - two steps forward and one step back. Full image on this monitor needs almost 70 Gbps of data. Why on Earth not offer DP 2.1 port to consumers? Beggars belief...

If we keep quiet, we get five generations of CPUs with 4 cores...

Not me. I am fully satisfied with many products, for example legendary LG's 4K/120 OLED TV Series 9 from 2019. Fantastic generation that got almost everything enabled what was possible at that time and kept receiving firmware updates for several years.
I never said you. I just said "some people." Read it again. I am one of those people who is satisfied with many things I own. I'm also the owner of an LG C2 OLED, wonderful device.

But for certain, some people are unhappy with everything.
Not true entirely. You need to plough through and filter out noise and tap into the biggest democratization of knowledge in history of humankind.
In 2013, yes, for sure. In 2023, no way. Over-commercializations, scammers, and AI are well on their way to destroying all of that, or at least burying the good stuff so deep it's hard to find.

There is almost as much misinformation on the Internet as there is actual knowledge. Search engines don't know the difference and won't prioritize the good stuff anymore because of SEO and other monetization shenanigans.

And none of this is new. If you know how search engines work (and don't work), it's not difficult to trick them. Remember all of the "weapons of mass destruction" antics? Early episode of that.

Anyhow the point is that this monitor addresses a certain segment of the consumer buying audience. It's not meant to be the end-all device. Like I said, Asus undoubtedly has other prototypes in their labs and they specifically selected this BOM to become a shipping product.

And didn't the Lovelace generation (RTX 40-series) stay at DisplayPort 1.4 anyhow? GeForce RTX is the dominant discrete GPU for the DIY PC gamer community. As far as I understand, if you plug a DisplayPort 1.4 video card into a DisplayPort 2.x monitor, you still only get DisplayPort 1.4 features. Or am I wrong?

Asus -- as an AIB partner of both Nvidia and AMD -- may not be motivated to make their GeForce offerings look sucky on this monitor. They may be waiting on the RTX 50-series for a wide rollout of DisplayPort 2.x.

If you don't like it (and that's fine), go ahead and start your own consumer computing hardware company. It's easy for people like you I'm sure. And you will only make the right decisions for everyone all the time.

Complaining is fine too. Go bitch about it on social media: FB, X, Insta, whatever.

But the senior execs aren't reading TPU. They would be insane to make product line decisions based on what people say here. It gets nuttier and nuttier with each passing week. Toss in this mile-high stack of features, price it at $99 with a 20-year warranty and make it draw 0.01W. And screw your shareholders, we don't give a rat's arse about gross margins. Yes, that's the ticket, sell everything at COGS.
Posted on Reply
#56
Tek-Check
trsttteThere is already at least one DP 2.1 monitor, funnily enough, from Asus no less!!!
Oh, I was not aware that it's already available on the market. Thanks.
Well, there we have it. Asus does have DP 2.1 display IC with two wide bandwidth DP 2.1 ports, so it's even more weird why they decided not to install this or similar display IC chip into the monitor from the article.
Posted on Reply
#57
Metroid
This has to come with DP 2.1 3840x2160= 8.3 million pixels x 10bitcolorx3colours=30=248x240hz=60gb bandwidth is needed and dp 2.1 can give that. I'm interested in the text clarity that this qd-oled 2nd gen will give. Price wise coming from Asus will be expensive, the good thing is that many companies will also release this same 4k 240hz 32inch next year too, the hope is at least one of them will include dp 2.1 and make it true glossy.
Posted on Reply
#58
Scrizz
I want to see a 27" 4K QD-OLED 240Hz
Posted on Reply
#59
Tek-Check
cvaldesAnyhow the point is that this monitor addresses a certain segment of the consumer buying audience. It's not meant to be the end-all device. Like I said, Asus undoubtedly has other prototypes in their labs and they specifically selected this BOM to become a shipping product.
As pointed out by trsttte, Asus has already released 4K/160Hz Swift with DP 2.1 ports, so it's confusing why more advanced 4K/240Hz would not have more advanced ports. I am curious to understand the logic, which I cannot see at the moment?
cvaldesAnd didn't the Lovelace generation (RTX 40-series) stay at DisplayPort 1.4 anyhow? GeForce RTX is the dominant discrete GPU for the DIY PC gamer community. As far as I understand, if you plug a DisplayPort 1.4 video card into a DisplayPort 2.x monitor, you still only get DisplayPort 1.4 features. Or am I wrong?
You are not wrong, of course, but premium monitors are devices kept longer than GPUs. It's an investment for 5-7 years.
cvaldesAsus -- as an AIB partner of both Nvidia and AMD -- may not be motivated to make their GeForce offerings look sucky on this monitor. They may be waiting on the RTX 50-series for a wide rollout of DisplayPort 2.x.
Possibly, but why punish early adopters of this monitor who will buy RTX 50-series anyway?
cvaldesIf you don't like it (and that's fine), go ahead and start your own consumer computing hardware company. It's easy for people like you I'm sure. And you will only make the right decisions for everyone all the time.
I don't need to. It's enough to wait until a proper DP 2.1 monitor for my needs come out. I am waiting for 5K/2K ultra-wide edition. It seems that ultra-wides are stuck forever on 1440p..., which is depressing. I have had one since 2018.
cvaldesComplaining is fine too. Go bitch about it on social media: FB, X, Insta, whatever.
I do not have and do not use any of the above applications/social media. It makes the quality of my life well-balanced. Increasing number of my friends are also getting off those social media and telling me that I have not missed anything essential for good life.
cvaldesBut the senior execs aren't reading TPU. They would be insane to make product line decisions based on what people say here. It gets nuttier and nuttier with each passing week. Toss in this mile-high stack of features, price it at $99 with a 20-year warranty and make it draw 0.01W. And screw your shareholders, we don't give a rat's arse about gross margins. Yes, that's the ticket, sell everything at COGS.
There are quite a few very knowledgeable and experienced members here. At least some employers should read some comments after press releases, to get the 'vibe in the room'. Or engineers to come out in product presentations and explain design and display IC decisions, so that we know the reasoning behind it.
MetroidThis has to come with DP 2.1 3840x2160= 8.3 million pixels x 10bitcolorx3colours=30=248x240hz=60gb bandwidth is needed and dp 2.1 can give that. I'm interested in the text clarity that this qd-oled 2nd gen will give. Price wise coming from Asus will be expensive, the good thing is that many companies will also release this same 4k 240hz 32inch next year too, the hope is at least one of them will include dp 2.1 and make it true glossy.
Exactly. It's even more bandwidth ~71 Gbps
Using CVT-RBv2 video timings by VESA, we get this:
3920x2429 total pixels x 240Hz = 2,285 GHz pixel clock x 10-bit x 3 (RGB) = 68.56 Gbps of unencoded bandwidth
68.56 Gbps /128 x132 encoding = 70.7 Gbps data bandwidth
Such monitor warranties installation of full DP 2.1 port and use of certified DP80 cables. There are no ifs and buts here. Missed opportunity.
Posted on Reply
#60
xorbe
Ooh shiny. Though I'm not having any problems with my Acer X27.
Posted on Reply
#61
Ferrum Master
With that scaler it is a DOA product.

ASUS being ASUS.

32 is the right size for me. Been using that for a decade.
Posted on Reply
#62
thunderingroar
Tek-Check
Can you link this table? Im interested in 1440p
Posted on Reply
#67
Chomiq
trsttteChanged but still kept the same triangular shape instead of simple stripe :shadedshu:
Sadly JOLED that manufactured regular RGB layout OLED had gone bankrupt.
Posted on Reply
#68
ARF
FeelinFroggyBecause of pixel density, 32" is really needed for a good 4k desktop experience. For a 27 or 24", everything is just too small to see.
I don't know about you, but I hate to not use the Windows scaling settings.
Nothing is small, size of texts, images, everything is as ideal as you make it so.

And this is the beauty of 4K UHD, the pixel density makes everything of extremely high quality, not as crap as those 1080p screens of same size.

Posted on Reply
#69
zlobby
ARFI don't know about you, but I hate to not use the Windows scaling settings.
Nothing is small, size of texts, images, everything is as ideal as you make it so.

And this is the beauty of 4K UHD, the pixel density makes everything of extremely high quality, not as crap as those 1080p screens of same size.

Windows 11 now allows for per-application DPI settings, although it's a major PITA to set it. Oh, and you need an edition beyond Pro, so that you have access to the Group Policies. IDFK if it is available through some GUI menu.

Alternatively, you can leave the scaling to your GPU.
Posted on Reply
#70
phanbuey
rv80002024 can’t come soon enough. Probably a 2,000$ panel if I had to guess though.
I've seen some leaks for this panel... it's not that expensive - shockingly.

There have been some price murmurings from a large austin-based monitor supplier, of upcoming products and pricing, and the price is going to be quite good for what this is.
Posted on Reply
#71
Ferrum Master
phanbueyI've seen some leaks for this panel... it's not that expensive - shockingly.

There have been some price murmurings from a large austin-based monitor supplier, of upcoming products and pricing, and the price is going to be quite good for what this is.
Still a grand? Ain't it?
Posted on Reply
#72
oxrufiioxo
Ferrum MasterStill a grand? Ain't it?
Probably around premium ultrawide QD OLED monitor pricing.
Posted on Reply
#73
phanbuey
Ferrum MasterStill a grand? Ain't it?
Less - im sure some will try to charge a grand for it but there will be options with this panel well under 1k
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
May 21st, 2024 02:22 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts