Tuesday, July 8th 2025

Microsoft Edge UI Now 40% Faster on Average, Key UI Elements Load Up to 4x Quicker

Microsoft has launched a major update for its Edge browser, reducing key feature load times to achieve a global First Contentful Paint (FCP) of under 300 ms. FCP refers to the time between when a user initiates navigation and when the browser displays the first part of the content from the Document Object Model (DOM). Studies show that delays exceeding the 300 to 400 ms range can lead to noticeable drops in user satisfaction, so reaching this new threshold should make the browser feel more fluid and engaging for everyday use. To meet the target, the Edge team leveraged its proprietary WebUI 2.0 architecture instead of React. By emphasizing native web components, such as HTML templates and CSS styling, rather than relying heavily on JavaScript at startup, they achieved a 40% average reduction in load times across thirteen core features.

Microsoft tested the settings UI with the new update, showing a 4x improvement in that specific case with WebUI 2.0, compared to the older React page. Users can now access the Settings page, invoke Read Aloud voice playback, switch between Split Screen views, and manage Workspaces with minimal delay, even on lower-end devices. This release builds upon the significant improvements delivered in May 2024 with Edge 122, which produced launch times 42-76% faster, depending on hardware, and a February 2025 optimization targeting fourteen interface subsystems. Internal tests confirm that the settings panel, which was once a slight performance bottleneck, now consistently renders in under 300 ms across a wide range of machines. Microsoft also plans to extend these enhancements to Print Preview, Extensions management, and other elements through the remainder of 2025. Below is the 4x improvement in the Settings page UI.
Source: Microsoft
Add your own comment

42 Comments on Microsoft Edge UI Now 40% Faster on Average, Key UI Elements Load Up to 4x Quicker

#26
Caring1
JermelescuI'd rather use IE8 than Firefox.
We wont judge you for your S&M kink.
Posted on Reply
#27
Rightness_1
Microsoft should focus on getting windows 40% more performant, especially the UI. Their focus is all over the place, and not on logical things at all.
Posted on Reply
#28
Shihab
Dr. DroFirefox is always dead last in pretty much every HTML and web scripting benchmark, no matter the host machine's spec, though. It's shtick is that it was extensible, and that Mozilla embodied the spirit of open source - all are welcome, nobody to pry, nobody to tell. This no longer exists, even in the FOSS world anymore. I'm only not going into depth to respect the no politics rule of the forum.
Again, it is not "slow as molasses." And it's definitely not always dead last, it does edge ahead in some benchmarks. But that's not what I was going for. Synthetic benchmarks are nice, but having an n% slower "score" does not translate to practical and perceivable speed difference.

There are no doubt some issues with sites implicitly (or explicitly. Staring at you, Youtube) favouring chromium over ff, but A. This is not the norm. And B. this counts for FF, not against it. Monopoly is bad, and all that.

Mozilla is very flawed, but they would need to pull a PRISM-grade scandal to even come close to Google, Microsoft, and co. Netizens should be critical of them, but let's at least first take a look at these mires we call markets that we've driven ourselves into.

Edit: Speaking of forum rules, I really need to stop derailing threads. :|
Posted on Reply
#29
A&P211
lexluthermiesterMy input? Edge is the very first thing I forcibly remove from my Windows install. This news doesn't change that.
I dont remove it in case some websites, like a bank website, doesn't play along with firefox. I dont remove it, I just dont update it.
Posted on Reply
#31
star-affinity
Wonder if that improvement is for Windows only or MacOS too?
I guess I can download and try…
Posted on Reply
#32
redeye
JermelescuI'd rather use IE8 than Firefox.
why, may i ask?
ShihabI suppose using what you [are forced to] have around is a sensible approach, but did you ever consider masochism Ungoogled Chromium or even vanilla Chromium?
no. Firefox is preinstalled on linux, so i am use to it. installing Chrome or Chromium, to much trouble for any benefits i might get.

i just decided to use Edge for “DualShock calibration GUI”… i use google search in safari and firefox, so google “knows” me… lol.
so given a choice i will not use Chrome.
Posted on Reply
#33
lexluthermiester
A&P211I dont remove it in case some websites, like a bank website, doesn't play along with firefox.
That's when you use Brave or Iron or something else NOT made by microsoft and tightly integrated into the OS in a way that is designed to intrude on your privacy.
Rafi2022github.com/ShadowWhisperer/Remove-MS-Edge
I use the portable version of CCleaner to do it, but that works too!
Posted on Reply
#34
A&P211
lexluthermiesterThat's when you use Brave or Iron or something else NOT made by microsoft and tightly integrated into the OS in a way that is designed to intrude on your privacy.


I use the portable version of CCleaner to do it, but that works too!
You might not trust Edge, but I dont trust ccleaner.
Posted on Reply
#35
lexluthermiester
A&P211You might not trust Edge, but I dont trust ccleaner.
There's a difference between microsoft being very untrustworthy in an ongoing basis and the folks at CCleaner having made a mistake over 10 years ago. One must choose one's battle carefully.
EDIT: Also, I specifically stated the portable version, not the installed version. The portable version runs as is described, portable. Nothing is installed or alters your Windows config in any way you do not choose.
Posted on Reply
#36
A&P211
lexluthermiesterThere's a difference between microsoft being very untrustworthy in an ongoing basis and the folks at CCleaner having made a mistake over 10 years ago. One must choose one's battle carefully.
EDIT: Also, I specifically stated the portable version, not the installed version. The portable version runs as is described, portable. Nothing is installed or alters your Windows config in any way you do not choose.
The portable version works on PC?
Posted on Reply
#37
lexluthermiester
A&P211The portable version works on PC?
You might confusing the mobile version intended for phones and tablets with the portable version of the PC app which runs in-place from where-ever it's placed and needs no installation.
www.ccleaner.com/ccleaner/builds
Scroll down and you'll see it.
Posted on Reply
#38
Athlonite
The only thing Edge is good for is downloading the Browser you really want to use after that it's abandonware so it really doesn't matter how fast they make the UI it'll never be used again
Posted on Reply
#39
chrcoluk
All they need to do is make it either a firefox fork, or their own code, then I might consider it.
Posted on Reply
#40
lexluthermiester
chrcolukAll they need to do is make it either a firefox fork, or their own code, then I might consider it.
Not me. If it's from microsoft, it's a browser I will not use.
Posted on Reply
#41
texh
Firefox is what I've been using, so no thanks MS
Posted on Reply
#42
Athlonite
chrcolukAll they need to do is make it either a firefox fork, or their own code, then I might consider it.
No thanks I'll stick to Vivaldi
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Jul 18th, 2025 14:58 CDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

TPU on YouTube

Controversial News Posts