Monday, February 18th 2008

Mtron Develops New 128GB 1.8-inch High Capacity SSD

South Korean SSD manufacturer Mtronstorage Technology announced today that it has completed the development of a new 1.8-inch ZIF-type SSD (Solid State Drive) for laptops. Mtron's new SSD with Single Level Cell (SLC) Flash memory supports PATA (ZIF-type) interface and has a maximum reading speed of 120MB/s and writing speed of 100MB/s, which is more than 6 times faster than the current 1.8-inch HDDs. Mtron expects to ship the new SSD in capacity of up to 128GB. Worldwide premiere for these drives is set for April this year.
Sources: Mtron, Electronista
Add your own comment

27 Comments on Mtron Develops New 128GB 1.8-inch High Capacity SSD

#1
Ravenas
Starting to look like SSDs are the wave of the future.
Posted on Reply
#2
EastCoasthandle
Yeah, it's all that and a bag of chips but how much :shadedshu. This is where the rubber mets the road.
Posted on Reply
#3
Unregistered
Pity their still so expensive.Mebbe in 5yrs we'll all have large ssd's.
Posted on Edit | Reply
#4
Unregistered
SSDs Are the Future!
In 2Years the price's are lower and the drives larger!

The future are laptop/sub laptop format's with no moving part's!
With instant boot ups (Like my PSP)

Like Asus EEEPC
Posted on Edit | Reply
#5
jothy
man, that's a fast drive.
Posted on Reply
#6
Darksaber
Senior Editor & Case Reviewer
See if the Macbook Air would simply use a 64GB variant of this drive, than the halfass one available now for a whooping price...then I would have bought one already...

cheers
DS
Posted on Reply
#7
Darkrealms
But how is the reliability? I'm not too keen on a lot of these companies that are coming out with this technology. I've never heard of a lot of them. There is also the possibility that these could quit after so many writes, there are so many companies that don't have history (“assurance of quality”).
Posted on Reply
#8
PVTCaboose1337
Graphical Hacker
DarksaberSee if the Macbook Air would simply use a 64GB variant of this drive, than the halfass one available now for a whooping price...then I would have bought one already...

cheers
DS
Apple would still charge the same though. They would not lower the price cause they are evil. :D
Posted on Reply
#9
Nitro-Max
I said this a while ago lol these things will take over and will be reliable because theres no moving parts.Bring it on i cant wait!!.
Posted on Reply
#10
Darkrealms
Nitro-MaxI said this a while ago lol these things will take over and will be reliable because theres no moving parts.Bring it on i cant wait!!.
The problem with a lot of low end cheap chips is that they are limited on the number of writes they can handle. Thats why I had a comment about quality and unknown companies. Harddrives are constantly being accessed for both read and write.
Posted on Reply
#11
Nemesis881
Nitro-MaxI said this a while ago lol these things will take over and will be reliable because theres no moving parts.
good point and big companies will make them even better.

no moving parts means obviously less noise but does that mean less power/heat as well?
Posted on Reply
#12
hat
Enthusiast
This renders RAID0 obsolete. RAID0 increaces performacne so much because the drive is limited by moving parts... one of these, no moving parts... RAID0 wouldn't yeild much of a performance increace, I imagine.
Posted on Reply
#13
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
hatThis renders RAID0 obsolete. RAID0 increaces performacne so much because the drive is limited by moving parts... one of these, no moving parts... RAID0 wouldn't yeild much of a performance increace, I imagine.
it makes raid 0 godly :)

no moving parts means no delay, just more bandwidth - if one does 100MB/s, four will do 400MB/s - its quite attractive if you need the speed.

Shock resistant, no heat concerns, defragmentation is no longer an issue...
Posted on Reply
#14
beyond_amusia
DarkrealmsThe problem with a lot of low end cheap chips is that they are limited on the number of writes they can handle. Thats why I had a comment about quality and unknown companies. Harddrives are constantly being accessed for both read and write.
That's true. If I remeber correctly, some people's older USB thumb drives are starting to fail because they only have a 10,000 read\write lifetime. Let's hope that will improve a lot before SSDs replace hard drives.
Posted on Reply
#15
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
beyond_amusiaThat's true. If I remeber correctly, some people's older USB thumb drives are starting to fail because they only have a 10,000 read\write lifetime. Let's hope that will improve a lot before SSDs replace hard drives.
i saw it mentioned a while back, that was related more to the chipset of the drive than the memory units themselves, and that SSD's were updated to support longer lifetimes - it was a few months ago when reports of SSD drives started coming out that i saw it here.
Posted on Reply
#16
beyond_amusia
Musselsi saw it mentioned a while back, that was related more to the chipset of the drive than the memory units themselves, and that SSD's were updated to support longer lifetimes - it was a few months ago when reports of SSD drives started coming out that i saw it here.
I think it should mandatory that companies put the expected lifespan of flash products on the package. I know that if my flashdrive died I'd be pissed.
Posted on Reply
#17
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
beyond_amusiaI think it should mandatory that companies put the expected lifespan of flash products on the package. I know that if my flashdrive died I'd be pissed.
Yeah. I've never had one die yet, so the amount of use is pretty high for a flash drive - but hard drives are another matter.
Posted on Reply
#18
kwchang007
I think it should have a counter, but think of it you use the writes less because of no defrag. Also I believe it's writes that are counted, not reads, but I'm not 100% sure. Good step in the right direction though.
Posted on Reply
#19
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
i'm not sure an exact number would help, but wouldnt that be in SMART data anyway? Seems like a good place to throw a counter, i think mechanical drives have 'hours of operation' in there.
Posted on Reply
#20
largon
Most SSDs have a built-in algorithm that divides the writes ~ evenly on the chips so that no cell get's hammered all the time and they also tag the dead cells thus the life-expectancy of the device is infact several years under heavy usage.
And yes, it's just the writes that count on flash reads don't cause wear-down.
Posted on Reply
#21
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
largonMost SSDs have a built-in algorithm that divides the writes ~ evenly on the chips so that no cell get's hammered all the time and they also tag the dead cells thus the life-expectancy of the device is infact several years under heavy usage.
And yes, it's just the writes that count on flash reads don't cause wear-down.
So its like good old fat32, where bad sectors merely get disabled. That works well, imo - as the files would be in ram while being written, an error would simply write it somewhere else. While the drive could get smaller over time, the odds of data loss are practically none.
Posted on Reply
#22
Nitro-Max
You cant really compare this to what you get in a small thumbnail size flash usb drive.

On somthing like this were size isnt resticted as much they can use bigger and better quality chips.

Ok nothing lasts forever and its life will come to a end one day but i can see these lasting a lot longer than the average pen drive and harddrive.

and the speed over the avarage HD should be blisteringly fast.
Posted on Reply
#23
hat
Enthusiast
beyond_amusiaThat's true. If I remeber correctly, some people's older USB thumb drives are starting to fail because they only have a 10,000 read\write lifetime. Let's hope that will improve a lot before SSDs replace hard drives.
lol the pagefile would be rape
Posted on Reply
#24
1c3d0g
Amazing they could squeeze all that tech into a 1.8" form factor. This should go over well with the ultra-portable crowd... :)
Posted on Reply
#25
Mussels
Freshwater Moderator
1c3d0gAmazing they could squeeze all that tech into a 1.8" form factor. This should go over well with the ultra-portable crowd... :)
imagine a 3.5" sized drive with 6 of these packed in :P Mmmm raid.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 26th, 2024 06:22 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts