Monday, November 14th 2005

NVIDIA 7800GTX 512MB: New World Record in Futuremark

Here it comes as expected. Immediately after press releasing of the "new" NVIDIA 7800GTX 512MB graphic card people at VR-Zone owned the world record in Futuremark's 3DMark05. Default speeds of NVIDIA 512MB 7800GTX are 550Mhz Core and 1700Mhz Memory. Test system for the record is: DFI LAN Party UT NF4 SLI-DR Expert, 2x7800GTX 512MB cards clocked at 810/2000Mhz with homemade extreme cooling of below -90 degrees Celsius. The record is 18236 marks in 3D Mark 05 and the system is 100% CPU limited for bigger scores. More details at VR-Zone.
Source: VR Forums
Add your own comment

7 Comments on NVIDIA 7800GTX 512MB: New World Record in Futuremark

#1
Israar
malwareHere it comes as expected. Immediately after press releasing of the "new" NVIDIA 7800GTX 512MB graphic card people at VR-Zone owned the world record in Futuremark's 3DMark05. Default speeds of NVIDIA 512MB 7800GTX are 550Mhz Core and 1700Mhz Memory. Test system for the record is: DFI LAN Party UT NF4 SLI-DR Expert, 2x7800GTX 512MB cards clocked at 810/2000Mhz with homemade extreme cooling of below -90 degrees Celsius. The record is 18236 marks in 3D Mark 05 and the system is 100% CPU limited for bigger scores. More details at VR-Zone.

Source: VR Forums
By the bloody christ, that's some cooling and that's some tweaking!

I wish I could do that and run my PC at speeds like those, I'd be crying playing my games at full pelt ;)

--Lee
Posted on Reply
#2
XooM
time to break out the FX-60 ESes :)
...assuming they don't have coldbug.
Posted on Reply
#3
zOaib
My GOD O LORD ! :eek:
Posted on Reply
#5
15th Warlock
XooMtime to break out the FX-60 ESes :)
...assuming they don't have coldbug.
I think the FX-57 will get a better score :)
The FX-60 would have a lower score than the FX-57, dunno if 3dMark05 is optimized for dual core use, and a single core in the FX-60 is clocked at about 200 Mhz lower than the FX-57 core...
Posted on Reply
#6
wtf8269
Man that's $1400 in graphics alone. Crazy sh!t.:twitch:
Posted on Reply
#7
XooM
15th WarlockI think the FX-57 will get a better score :)
The FX-60 would have a lower score than the FX-57, dunno if 3dMark05 is optimized for dual core use, and a single core in the FX-60 is clocked at about 200 Mhz lower than the FX-57 core...
i doubt the FX-60 overclocks any worse though... You'll note their FX-57 (assuming) was at ~3800, and if the FX-60s don't coldbug (that would be a godsend) and/or if they overclocked higher for any other reason... That or some 4+ GHz FX-55 or Dothan powah.
Posted on Reply
Apr 26th, 2024 23:33 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts