- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Messages
- 9,842 (1.67/day)
- Location
- 04578
System Name | Old reliable |
---|---|
Processor | Intel 8700K @ 4.8 GHz |
Motherboard | MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon AC |
Cooling | Custom Water |
Memory | 32 GB Crucial Ballistix 3666 MHz |
Video Card(s) | MSI RTX 3080 10GB Suprim X |
Storage | 3x SSDs 2x HDDs |
Display(s) | ASUS VG27AQL1A x2 2560x1440 8bit IPS |
Case | Thermaltake Core P3 TG |
Audio Device(s) | Samson Meteor Mic / Generic 2.1 / KRK KNS 6400 headset |
Power Supply | Zalman EBT-1000 |
Mouse | Mionix NAOS 7000 |
Keyboard | Mionix |
the point is that $180 i5 2400 will beat the $999 cpu where as the $130 dual core wont.
fact in todays games coming out the i3 gets trounced by the i5 good examples would be Battlefield Bad Company 2 and Dragon Age origins with Origins showing a full 20-30fps advantage to the i5
fact 9800gt is fine and dandy but get to 1920x1200 or 1920x1080 and it shows its age is a rehashed gpu from 4 to nearly 5 years ago,
the price difference between a 9800gt and a 5850 is tiny compared to the performance and features,
9800gt has lesser quality in HD video vs 5850
9800gt uses more power at idle same power at load as the 5850
for someone building there first PC i would never recommend used parts because if they DO run into trouble there fucked.
the antec is 80+ certified 550w continuous rated with 6+2 and 6pin PCIE power plugs so it will essentially support any single gpu he can get. its also fairly efficient and cheap from the looks so going to a 450w that is only 70% efficient to save $15 dosent make alot of sense in this case.
also he said programming compiling in Visual studio 8 a quadcore i5 2000 will cut compiling time in half compared to the i3 so i3 2100 vs i5 2400 is when compiling is around 45-65% faster on the i5 2400
in terms of gaming the i3 gets left behind in many titles compared to a i5 2400 were talking fps spreads of 30 vs 50 60 vs 90 120 vs 160 these are not small differences, getting a damn quad just makes more sense then a damn dual core for what hes going to pay since he cant overclock the 2100 or the 2400 he can switch to a different mobo and save some money there which makes up the difference. And im not talking buy the cheapest board either theres alot of good H series boards that will do the job nicely and are of good quality
fact in todays games coming out the i3 gets trounced by the i5 good examples would be Battlefield Bad Company 2 and Dragon Age origins with Origins showing a full 20-30fps advantage to the i5
fact 9800gt is fine and dandy but get to 1920x1200 or 1920x1080 and it shows its age is a rehashed gpu from 4 to nearly 5 years ago,
the price difference between a 9800gt and a 5850 is tiny compared to the performance and features,
9800gt has lesser quality in HD video vs 5850
9800gt uses more power at idle same power at load as the 5850
for someone building there first PC i would never recommend used parts because if they DO run into trouble there fucked.
the antec is 80+ certified 550w continuous rated with 6+2 and 6pin PCIE power plugs so it will essentially support any single gpu he can get. its also fairly efficient and cheap from the looks so going to a 450w that is only 70% efficient to save $15 dosent make alot of sense in this case.
also he said programming compiling in Visual studio 8 a quadcore i5 2000 will cut compiling time in half compared to the i3 so i3 2100 vs i5 2400 is when compiling is around 45-65% faster on the i5 2400
in terms of gaming the i3 gets left behind in many titles compared to a i5 2400 were talking fps spreads of 30 vs 50 60 vs 90 120 vs 160 these are not small differences, getting a damn quad just makes more sense then a damn dual core for what hes going to pay since he cant overclock the 2100 or the 2400 he can switch to a different mobo and save some money there which makes up the difference. And im not talking buy the cheapest board either theres alot of good H series boards that will do the job nicely and are of good quality
Last edited: