• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Socket 2011 Xeon

Pestilence

New Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
587 (0.11/day)
8c/16t Socket 2011 Xeon / Ivy Bridge ES Tests Added..

2011_64.jpg


ME WANT!!!!!!!!!!

http://translate.google.com/transla...://forum.coolaler.com/showthread.php?t=268982

Edit - Thanks Mod
 
Last edited:
low voltage too. Very nice Intel. Hopefully this will push BD out quicker. where there's a will there's a way
 
It's not a consumer part. It says Xeon. Didn't they already release the Intel SB server CPUs yet? Or is this forthcoming?
 
Sold. All I gotta do now is wait. This will be the setup for a new WC-loop prototype I'm working on, same cooling as my external but just as portable as a single case.
 
Meh, AMD already has 12 core CPU's, and soon to be BD cores
 
It's not a consumer part. It says Xeon. Didn't they already release the Intel SB server CPUs yet? Or is this forthcoming?

Just because it says "Xeon" doesn't mean you can't run it at home. 2011 is going to be EPIC
 
Meh, AMD already has 12 core CPU's, and soon to be BD cores

Not that you can use on a desktop platform with overclocking and multi-gpu support.

And that still likely get outperformed clock for clock vs this.

They do have their place tho. 4p server jump to mind immediately.
 
so? its xeon?
 
I'm sorry 5.6GB?

Fake fake.

Sandy Bridge EP will have QUAD channel RAM, so it doesn't add up.

But 150W is a bit too much?
 
I'm sorry 5.6GB?

Fake fake.

Sandy Bridge EP will have QUAD channel RAM, so it doesn't add up.

But 150W is a bit too much?

Probably a miss read from CPU-z & windows?

But the original clock is 1.6Ghz so oc at 3 Ghz must be just about the max you can get?

1.jpg
 
I'm sorry 5.6GB?

Fake fake.

Sandy Bridge EP will have QUAD channel RAM, so it doesn't add up.

But 150W is a bit too much?

5.6GB is possible if you are running a ram disk to improve some benches.

That said, I'll wait for something a little more official.
 
Lots of FUD flying around TPU nowadays..
 
I'm sorry 5.6GB?

Fake fake.

Sandy Bridge EP will have QUAD channel RAM, so it doesn't add up.

But 150W is a bit too much?

Coolaler is not OBR and i take his information to be genuine. He's the guy who leaked the Ivy Bridge pictures and benchmarks as well.
 
It's not a consumer part. It says Xeon. Didn't they already release the Intel SB server CPUs yet? Or is this forthcoming?

Im running a Xeon.
 
It has two processors. Few consumers run a two-way system and if that were on market, it would probably cost $1500-3000 for memory, motherboard, and two octo-core processors.
 
Last edited:
It has two processors. Few consumers run a two-way system and if that were on market, it would probably cost $2000-4000 for memory, motherboard, and two octo-core processors.

2 QPI's? EVGA has a dual Socket 2011 board in development with a rumored price of 599.99 so you just know some nutcase is going to have two of these on a dual board overclocked to 4.4ghz
 
600 ain't bad for a dual socket board could prob run all games maxed w/ 3 30in 2000x1600 monitors w/ two 8 cores and quad sli/cf
 
600 ain't bad for a dual socket board could prob run all games maxed w/ 3 30in 2000x1600 monitors w/ two 8 cores and quad sli/cf

I look forward to seeing 2 of these 8 cores with some exotic Quad SLI setup being benched on LN2.
 
2 QPI's? EVGA has a dual Socket 2011 board in development with a rumored price of 599.99 so you just know some nutcase is going to have two of these on a dual board overclocked to 4.4ghz
Yes, two QPI: one per processor.
 
If this early sample chip stock is 1.8 and can be oc'd to 3 bet the final chip will be in the 2.8-3.5ghz stock and up to 5ghz oc'd
 
I'm assuming cpu-z is mistaken on the 32nm bit.
 
Not that you can use on a desktop platform with overclocking and multi-gpu support.

And that still likely get outperformed clock for clock vs this.

They do have their place tho. 4p server jump to mind immediately.

Correct, this would be overkill for desktop etc, purely made for the servers and intel has to catch up in that area anyway.

We dont know how BD will perform yet, so we can all just guess at this stage.
 
Someone skipped just the price part which will be in 4 digit numbers. Not exactly a Bulldozer killer even with all the awesomeness of the HT cores...
 
Someone skipped just the price part which will be in 4 digit numbers. Not exactly a Bulldozer killer even with all the awesomeness of the HT cores...

Thousand dollars or not bd will not even come close to sbs ipc and 8 cores sb vs 8 cores bd is an easy win for intel
 
Back
Top