• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

NVIDIA RTX 3080? Time Spy Benchmark Leaked – Blows Away The RTX 2080 Ti

Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
18,584 (2.62/day)
System Name AlderLake
Processor Intel i7 12700K P-Cores @ 5Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme + 5 case fans
Memory 32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 6000MT/s CL36
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Evo 500GB + 850 Pro 512GB + 860 Evo 1TB x2
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window
Audio Device(s) Panasonic SA-PMX94 / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system / Harman Kardon Go + Play / Logitech G533
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 (Single Core) 1936 @ stock Cinebench R23 (Multi Core) 23006 @ stock
An unknown NVIDIA Ampere GPU, likely the RTX 3080, has had its 3DMark Time spy performance leaked courtesy of HardwareLeaks. While the benchmark could be either of the RTX 3080, 3080 Ti/Super or the RTX 3090, we have reason to believe it is the RTX 3080. The gaming performance shown here absolutely blows away the last generation flagship and showcases that NVIDIA is going to have a spectacular RTX 3000 series launch later this year.

NVIDIA RTX 3080 gets Time Spy benchmark score - 31% faster than RTX 2080 Ti FE

The benchmark posted by _rogame shows NVIDIA's Ampere GPU scoring a very impressive 18257 points in Time Spy graphics test which is just under Kingpin's insane 2.38 GHz clocked RTX 2080 Ti variant. A traditional RTX 2080 TI FE variant clocks around 13939 points and the spotted Ampere GPU is roughly 31% faster than this. The question then becomes what exactly are we looking at? The NVIDIA RTX 3080, RTX 3080 Ti/Super or the RTX 3090? Well, I am fairly certain this isn't the RTX 3090/Titan because of several reasons (although I am not a 100% sure, just to be clear).

Capture.PNG


Before we get into why I think that way, let's look at the logged specifications of the benchmark. The GPU clock was detected at 1935 MHz and the memory clock, interestingly was only a meager 6000 Mhz. This is almost certainly a misread by the software due to the fact the card is using brand new GDDR6X memory (as memory clocks shown usually need to be multiplied by 8 to get the actual speeds but this is obviously wrong). This is indicative of an early engineering sample and performance as well as detection will likely improve as things go closer to launch.



 
we don't know what it is.
but if this is 3080 it's even better than 1080-980Ti which was 25% in 3dmark
but again,we have no indication what it is.can be a 3080Ti or fake.
 
Last edited:
Bit down on the 75-400% improvement Huang suggested though isn't it.
I mean ignoring the 4X Rtx performance claim for a moment I don't recall anyone saying 30%.
Wasn't it 50% then slid upto 70%.
Kin rumours.
 
Bit down on the 75-400% improvement Huang suggested though isn't it.
I mean ignoring the 4X Rtx performance claim for a moment I don't recall anyone saying 30%.
Wasn't it 50% then slid upto 70%.
Kin rumours.
there's JHH on record saying anything about a new GF series ? really ?

seriously,all 5 numbers you "quote" :rolleyes: here,where are they from ?

and would you really expect a 75% performance increase from least gen 80ti to new 80 ? I remember best we've had lately was 25% 980Ti-1080
 
Last edited:
there's JHH on record saying anything about a new GF series ? really ?

seriously,all 5 numbers you "quote" :rolleyes: here,where are they from ?

and would you really expect a 75% performance increase from least gen 80ti to new 80 ? I remember best we've had lately was 25% 980Ti-1080
Yep I'll accept might not be Huang, was rumoured though.

And the rumours were saying 50% I'll Hunt them out if you're Google's not working.

Ended with rumours eh didn't I.

Even this is a rumour with one fact In isolation.
 
If this is anything like 7nm, the real deal, not the fake 7nm of NAvi. we should see 2.6x performance increase per die area.
 
OK SO QUICK HUNT




NO ONE SAID 30% BEFORE
 
Last edited:
I wait for > 200% and no / other development than nm.
 
NO ONE SAID 30% BEFORE
did anyone actually know anything before ?
did we get any sort of actual performance leaks before ?
cause iirc this is the first one.

you're quoting some stratospheric 400% numbers you googled and then when an actual leeak hits you're sad about 30% from last gen 80Ti to new gen 80 which is better than the best we've had in a decade with pascal 1080 beating 980Ti by 25%.
 
Great news if true. Then rtx 3000 series might be worth an upgrade over my GTX 1080 TI. But it depends on price as well. Other rumors has claimed that these cards might be fairly expensive and just alone the stock cooler cut cost up towards 150 USD.

Only time can tell what is true and what is just hot air. But I am beginning to be excited for rtx 3000 release.

And i hope RTX 3080/3090 and a AMD ryzen 9 4950X can finally be what will replace my old X58 system and GTX 1080 TI. Well dreams doesn't cost anything at least. If it will be real also, depending on how this covid-19 and my job situation turns out.
 
did anyone actually know anything before ?
did we get any sort of actual performance leaks before ?
cause iirc this is the first one.

you're quoting some stratospheric 400% numbers you googled and then when an actual leeak hits you're sad about 30% from last gen 80Ti to new gen 80 which is better than the best we've had in a decade with pascal 1080 beating 980Ti by 25%.
Sad, that's a stretch.

What I actually alluded to is this.

All prior rumours said more.

The card with this performance is not known, it's core counts etc are not known, just one score and a frequency nothing else, no name or moniker.

So going off all the prior rumours this would fall in line with a 3060-70 not an 80 card.

Nothing says it's an 80.

I am not disappointed, I don't care enough for that and it's way too early.

But non the less," Rumours eh, what they like eh".

Also I didn't Google until asked for proof, due to watching all tech news like a fiend and remembering approximately 30% the numbers 50% and 4x Rtx performance have slowly been etched into memory over six months, on this occasion no brain fart occurred here, people's rumours are way off ,or just all over the place depending on your outlook.

Regardless rumours are what they are, not something to invest to much belief in or time.
 
Last edited:
Sad, that's a stretch.

What I actually alluded to is this.

All prior rumours said more.

The card with this performance is not known, it's core counts etc are not known, just one score and a frequency nothing else, no name or moniker.

So going off all the prior rumours this would fall in line with a 3060-70 not an 80 card.

Nothing says it's an 80.

I am not disappointed, I don't care enough for that and it's way too early.

But non the less," Rumours eh, what they like eh".
well,I believe their prior launch record more than internet rumors

last time they shrunk a die was a 1080 beating 980Ti by 25%.
we never had a xx70 beat a xx80Ti in recent years,best case - match it,worst case - previous gen still xx80Ti won
xx60 beating prev gen 80Ti - lol.this has to be from a stupid person.

According to a new rumors originating from PCGamer (who picked it up from Moores Law is Dead YT channel)

now that explains it!
 
well,I believe their prior launch record more than internet rumors

last time they shrunk a die was a 1080 beating 980Ti by 25%.
we never had a xx70 beat a xx80Ti in recent years,best case - match it,worst case - previous gen still xx80Ti won
xx60 beating prev gen 80Ti - lol.this has to be from a stupid person.



now that explains it!
Context is missing there, who's that quote from.


I am into speculation, belief is optional though.
And I haven't been spreading rumours so leave the name calling out yes.

Stupid would be to think you know something based on not enough facts, like knowing something from this rumour for example.


TPU themselves reported 50%.

And btw you got involved in the 50% rumour thread and argued it could be valid, so your into speculation too.

If it's 30 well that might be game on between Nvidia and AMD.

Good for affordable prices

I believe reviews. ..
 
Last edited:
nobody "reported" anything yet.
 
If this is anything like 7nm, the real deal, not the fake 7nm of NAvi.

What the hell is the "fake 7nm" ?

Troll or you just don't know what you are talking about ? Man I swear you always think you saw the dumbest things possible and then someone comes along and says something even dumber.
 
Context is missing there, who's that quote from.


I am into speculation, belief is optional though.
And I haven't been spreading rumours so leave the name calling out yes.

Stupid would be to think you know something based on not enough facts, like knowing something from this rumour for example.


TPU themselves reported 50%.

And btw you got involved in the 50% rumour thread and argued it could be valid, so your into speculation too.

If it's 30 well that might be game on between Nvidia and AMD.

Good for affordable prices

I believe reviews. ..
I didn't call you anything
I called hype trains stupid,and mlid is a yt spammer that loves inventing "data"

from you're saying it seems disappointing that nvidia produced a 30% from 80ti to 80 cause of what they never said about performance.

imo we'll see the same 106 die being used for xx70 card as turing but performance jumps will be like pascal or better
 
The card was baked right here, using spatula power...

jensen.png


Although _rogame tends to dig out good information, I wouldn't read to much into the commentary from WCCF, as they don't seem to be able to tell their arse from their elbow at times.

@theoneandonlymrk shouldn't the performance be vs. previous equal SKU though? The graph is comparing x80 vs x80Ti, so it should be more like 50%+ vs the 2080, no?

A bit different commentary here, suggesting it might be a 3080Ti/3090, but I guess we'll have to wait and see.
The graphics card spotted by the leaker has a 1935 MHz boost clock and 6000 MHz memory clock. We are unsure why 3DMark software lists the memory as 6 GHz. For GeForce RTX 2080 Ti the software reads 1750 MHz (multiplied by 8 gives 14 Gbps speed). This 6 GHz entry might confirm that the memory type is not yet properly detected by the software, so it might be the upcoming GDDR6X variant after all. However, no matter if we multiply the value by 2 (12 Gbps) or 4 (24 Gbps), it just does not make sense. Thus, it could be an error.

The result puts the graphics card 31% above stock GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. The 30% upgrade path for the next series is an average performance boost per generation. Hence, it is expected that the model listed is indeed RTX 3080 Ti or how the other leakers call it, the RTX 3090.
 
The card was baked right here, using spatula power...

View attachment 159719

Although _rogame tends to dig out good information, I wouldn't read to much into the commentary from WCCF, as they don't seem to be able to tell their arse from their elbow at times.

@theoneandonlymrk shouldn't the performance be vs. previous equal SKU though? The graph is comparing x80 vs x80Ti, so it should be more like 50%+ vs the 2080, no?

A bit different commentary here, suggesting it might be a 3080Ti/3090, but I guess we'll have to wait and see.

Kind of my point, no real idea which SKU this is so it's not comparable to anything.
Could be good or just ok depending on your own beliefs of what it is.
 
TL DR inevitable thread BS... lol...

We don't know what sku this is. At 31% gain, it may be the flagship or second card down (hoping for the latter). IDGAF what "rumors" said. If the Juang didn't say it.... it's just that.

If it is 31% flagship, I'm a bit disappointed. However i don't think AMD has a chance to be within 10% of that card with theirs...i hope I'm wrong.
 
It's only 30.8%.... Hardly massive.

With the price increase, it should be 70% ahead.
 
Back
Top