• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

FinalWire AIDA64 Extreme Now 50% Off in Cyber Monday Sale

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,670 (7.43/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
FinalWire AIDA64 is possibly the most feature-packed system diagnostics and benchmarking utility, which has been a staple at TechPowerUp labs since way back when it was called AIDA32 and later Lavalys Everest, and have built great working ties with its author. We'd like to share with you a great sale they have going on. As part of Cyber Monday, FinalWire has AIDA64 Extreme listed for a 50% discount. This is the edition most PC enthusiasts, overclockers, and gamers would want; but there are more editions for those of you with white collars, such as the AIDA64 Engineer, and AIDA64 Network Audit for large enterprises. The utility provides an all-encompassing overview of your machine's hardware and operating environment, along with a nice suite of performance benchmarks. Normally priced at $59.95 for a year's updates, or about the price of a game, AIDA64 Extreme can be yours for just $29.97!

Please use the coupon code BLACK2023 at Checkout. Buy FinalWire AIDA64 at $29.97



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Id pay $10 at most for that.
 
Earlier this year i posted about their pricing on their forums. Here's the post: https://forums.aida64.com/topic/11974-aida64-pricing-needs-update
I feel like AIDA64 pricing is all over the place right now.
The cheapest edition for home users is $60 annually. That's way too expensive for a monitoring software. Much more complex software (that is native 64bit and has dark mode) costs less. Also the fact the the cheapest edition is named Extreme. Should there not be a Basic edition for $20 and with a longer lasting license?

Also the Engineer and Business edition pricing makes no sense. Why is Engineer priced the same as Business, when Business is a superset of Engineer in terms of features?
Why would ANYONE buy Engineer edition when they can buy the Business edition for the same money and get a superior version with what seems very similar licensing terms?
Engineer edition should cost less.
Here are my proposed prices:

Basic: $20 annually or $60 3-Year license. Cuts benchmarking and stress testing features from Extreme. Also limits license to 1 PC instead of 3 like Extreme.
Extreme: $60. Stays the same as now.
Network: $130. Stays the same as now.
Engineer: $180. Price lowered to reflect inferior feature set.
Business: $220. Stays the same as now.
You can read the developers responses from the link above. Basically they feel that since they kept the same price for a long time they are justified in asking for a higher price right now and they feel like supporting a cheaper, basic edition is too much work somehow.

Also the irony is that they have 64 in the name but the program lacks 64bit version, much less being native 64bit that should be the norm these days with Windows itself dumping 32bit versions of Win11. Thank god the WoW64 emulation is this good but i feel like some developers are using it as a crutch not to move on from 32bit.
 
Hi,
I'm sure ebay has some for 2,us
 
How sad, mine is the extreme version and it's not the best. The extreme version should be superior to everything, next time I'll wait for the ultimate platinum+ version.:D
 
Also the irony is that they have 64 in the name but the program lacks 64bit version, much less being native 64bit that should be the norm these days with Windows itself dumping 32bit versions of Win11. Thank god the WoW64 emulation is this good but i feel like some developers are using it as a crutch not to move on from 32bit.
Umm. Its been 64bit for a whole long time now.
 
Hi,
Actually the irony is I got more out of using cmd and winsat mem than aida64 ever put out :laugh:

And of course free benchmarks
 
Umm. Its been 64bit for a whole long time now.
Has it?

Then why does it install to Program Files (x86) and not Program Files?
Also then why does it show (32 bit) behind the program name in Task Manager?

Smells like 32bit to me. There is also no separate 64bit exe in the install directory either.
What you see running on 64bit Windows is the 32bit running trough the WoW64 emulation layer. That does not make it a 64bit program.
 
It's a great tool much better than that imo crap sandra.
 
@Tomorrow I just googled AIDA64 64bit. Apparently 64bit version exists.
I dont use Google. I use DuckDuckGo and the first result is the download page.
Go ahead and download the trial version, portable ZIP package and run aida64.exe
It's not a 64bit program.

So im not sure where you found this supposed 64bit version, because to the best of my knowledge such a thing does not exist.
Putting 64 in the name does not make it 64bit but judging from your posts it does seem to work in convincing people that it's a 64bit program lol.
 
I dont use Google. I use DuckDuckGo and the first result is the download page.
Go ahead and download the trial version, portable ZIP package and run aida64.exe
It's not a 64bit program.

So im not sure where you found this supposed 64bit version, because to the best of my knowledge such a thing does not exist.
Putting 64 in the name does not make it 64bit but judging from your posts it does seem to work in convincing people that it's a 64bit program lol.
I've just tested the portable version in Windows 7 64-bit. Actually aida64.exe is a 32-bit process but it spawns another process for benchmarking, aida_bench64.dll, and that one is 64-bit.

Sometimes you need some tricks to make the same EXE run on everything, from Windows Ninetyfive and NTFour all the way to Eleven. WTH are they using to compile the whole thing?

There are some files with funny names present as well, namely:
kerneld.ia64 (wait, what??)
kerneld.v64 (what??)
kerneld.w9x
kerneld.x32
kerneld.x64

And while I'm at that, it's unclear if AIDA64 works with Windows on Arm. Microsoft Store says it does, is that true?
 
It's a great tool but I can't imagine the benchmarks/stresstest features warrant a paid service for the majority of enthusiasts. Especially since it's a subscription :laugh:
 
It's a great tool but I can't imagine the benchmarks/stresstest features warrant a paid service for the majority of enthusiasts. Especially since it's a subscription :laugh:
But can it be called "subscription" when you can stop paying and legally use the version you have installed for the next ~30 years?
Notably, the latest version of the product will remain fully functional even after the maintenance period expires.
 
And while I'm at that, it's unclear if AIDA64 works with Windows on Arm. Microsoft Store says it does, is that true?

yeah here is a screen shot from my dev kit.

1701123183857.png
 
Thats another thing. The paid versions shouldnt have any ads at the bottom of the software. Thats just BS. and it's literally 1/4 of the window.

I miss the free version from like 20 years ago.
 
Thats another thing. The paid versions shouldnt have any ads at the bottom of the software. Thats just BS. and it's literally 1/4 of the window.

I miss the free version from like 20 years ago.

That isnt the paid version.
 
"AIDA64 implements full support for 64-bit systems, including 64-bit version of all its benchmark methods. Benchmarks are backwards compatible with legacy 32-bit processors."

Supporting 64bit systems is not the same as running 64bit program natively. Yes i see the benchmark module is 64bit - i guess they had no choice but to implement 64bit there to fully leverage newest hardware.
 
Supporting 64bit systems is not the same as running 64bit program natively. Yes i see the benchmark module is 64bit - i guess they had no choice but to implement 64bit there to fully leverage newest hardware.
Im finding articles all way back to 2010 that it had 64bit extension. So it's not a new development like I said in the first post.

Why limit a program to just 32bit or make two programs when one does them both? Seems like smart programing to me.
 
Im finding articles all way back to 2010 that it had 64bit extension. So it's not a new development like I said in the first post.
That is for built-in benchmarks specifically, not the entire program.
 
Then why does it install to Program Files (x86) and not Program Files?
A lot of 64-bit native programs still do this if the installer is 32-bit, just FYI. Even steam does.
 
The core files of AIDA64 are 32-bit.

64-bit is used, needed for testing/benchmarking.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top