• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Ad blockers

Ah, well, something is definitely better than nothing in this case. Just note if some site does not let you in, you may have disable your blocker for that site. If a legit site you need access too (your bank for example) you will have to live with their ads. If not a site you really truly need access to, I say, move on.
 
yeah, it needs a few settings to be changed, like I turn off TOR browser mode in private windows for example, and I make a few other changes as well. I recommend if you use Brave or switch to Brave, to make sure you go through all the settings and just customize it how you like/prefer. I turn off all the AI crap, luckily all the crypto options are off by default, i hate that crap, but it doesn't take long to setup, i have had 0 issues with brave so far.

i like firefox with ublock origin still too, but it was causing me some issues recently so i went back to brave.
for the first time i installed brave browser couple of days ago, my first impression was good, similarly i was also facing some issues but i was able to fix them and lag on chatgpt is gone too so uninstalled it as i prefer firefox for customization, i didn't notice much difference in memory usage infact firefox seems to be consuming less ram in my case. Brave does has some quirks which i dislike despite faster loading times.
 
I use the paid version of AdGuard because I managed to snag a lifetime license for ten machines at a drastically reduced price. Every so often, you'll find one of those deals. I encourage anyone that if they find the deal, grab it.

I vote for AdGuard myself. With AdGuard for Windows and AdGuard DNS working in tandem, I see no ads. Like... none! And I use several known DNS blacklists to block known ad sites along with known phishing, malware, and other such bad sites.

These are the blocklists I use... AdGuard DNS Filter, HaGeZi’s Pro Blocklist, OISD Blocklist Small, Phishing URL Blocklist (PhishTank and OpenPhish), HaGeZi’s Badware Hoster Blocklist, HaGeZi’s The World’s Most Abused TLDs, HaGeZi’s Threat Inteligence Feeds, Phishing Army, Scam Blocklist by DurableNapkin, ShadowWhisper’s Malware List, The Big List of Hacked Malware Web Sites, uBlock Filters — Badware risks, Malicious URL Blocklist (URLHaus), and finally HaGeZi’s Allowlist Referral.
 
Last edited:
You need multi layer approach

Ublock origin
hosts file
Router/firewall based - ubiquiti, meraki routers/firewalls and alternative firmware for a lot of other brands like ddwrt, openwrt, etc have that too.
 
hosts file

Most hostile webbrowsers like google-chrome ignore the host file

they call it secure dns or dns over https or doh.

librewolf may be a way to go. those website owners are free to use picture ads which are hosted on their own webservers. they are still shown. the ads i see on windows 11 pro or on my android tablet on e.g. pcgameshardware.de are disgusting and sexually offensive.

Ads are not bad but the ad content itself like computerbase.de or pcgameshardware.de had two weeks ago are very awful

I do browse some websites on purpose now with my unpatched, untained hostile webbrowser on android or windows 11 pro. Website owner should do something. even on a new samsung android tablet with 8gib dram some websites have massive lag of loading the page. When i see very disgusting ads like health products, sexually products or something else which really upsets me I won't visit that webpage again with such browsers.
 
they call it secure dns or dns over https or doh
That’s why I suggested using NextDNS or AdGuard DNS which both offer DoH (DNS over HTTPS) support.

And I wouldn’t say that DoH is bad or malicious, it’s in fact a good thing since it can bypass even ISPs that like to intercept standard DNS requests to their DNS servers for better tracking.
 
While you're at it, maybe install SponsorBlock for Youtube. It skips over those sponsored sections where the Youtuber drones on about a product you will never buy. You may choose to whitelist your favorite creators, but it's really nice for channels that do not respect your time and have as much ad time as they have content.
 
For those that might be interested, there’s this deal.
Get it while it’s hot. Use coupon code FAMPLAN at checkout to get this product for an additional $24 off which brings the price down to just $16.

No, there’s no referral link at all. I DO NOT make any money off that link.
 
Last edited:
Most hostile webbrowsers like google-chrome ignore the host file

they call it secure dns or dns over https or doh.

librewolf may be a way to go. those website owners are free to use picture ads which are hosted on their own webservers. they are still shown. the ads i see on windows 11 pro or on my android tablet on e.g. pcgameshardware.de are disgusting and sexually offensive.

Ads are not bad but the ad content itself like computerbase.de or pcgameshardware.de had two weeks ago are very awful

I do browse some websites on purpose now with my unpatched, untained hostile webbrowser on android or windows 11 pro. Website owner should do something. even on a new samsung android tablet with 8gib dram some websites have massive lag of loading the page. When i see very disgusting ads like health products, sexually products or something else which really upsets me I won't visit that webpage again with such browsers.
Chrome can go mop a lake

It inhales vigorously


And on my new firewall i can block DoH servers
 
And on my new firewall i can block DoH servers
But DoH is the most secure way of doing DNS. It's the only way you can be sure that your intended DNS server is the one that receives your DNS request and not one that can be hijacked via a Man-In-The-Middle attack like some ISPs have been known to do in hopes to track what web sites you go to.

If you value any kind of privacy, you would do well to not use standard DNS which can be hijacked by your ISP, but instead use DNS-over-HTTPS or DNS-over-TLS.

Cloudflare has a write up on why one should not be using standard DNS if you value security and privacy.
DNS over TLS vs. DNS over HTTPS | Secure DNS

And then there's this... Understanding DoT and DoH (DNS over TLS vs. DNS over HTTPS)
 
Don't forget to turn it off for TPU.. lol Ads help make our site better. :D I have used Pi-hole in the past but I have found out that my router has a pretty good adblocker. I also have ublock and Ghostery. I also have a lifetime AGuard that I picked up for 9 bucks. I do take my Pi-hole when I travel now.
I sometimes wish TPU had more ads. I see four small, unobtrusive ads on the front page, but only ever one in the forums. Don't get me wrong, everyone hates ads, but ads pay the bills and nobody wants to see TPU go away like SharkyExtreme, Techreport, JonnyGuru, Anandtech, to name a few...

Or maybe banner ads don't pay the bills? I have no idea how TPU is funded - perhaps the sponsored articles on the front page pay the bills these days?
 
I sometimes wish TPU had more ads. I see four small, unobtrusive ads on the front page, but only ever one in the forums. Don't get me wrong, everyone hates ads, but ads pay the bills and nobody wants to see TPU go away like SharkyExtreme, Techreport, JonnyGuru, Anandtech, to name a few...

Or maybe banner ads don't pay the bills? I have no idea how TPU is funded - perhaps the sponsored articles on the front page pay the bills these days?
You wish there were more ads? Let me introduce you to BetterHelp
 
But DoH is the most secure way of doing DNS. It's the only way you can be sure that your intended DNS server is the one that receives your DNS request and not one that can be hijacked via a Man-In-The-Middle attack like some ISPs have been known to do in hopes to track what web sites you go to.

If you value any kind of privacy, you would do well to not use standard DNS which can be hijacked by your ISP, but instead use DNS-over-HTTPS or DNS-over-TLS.

Cloudflare has a write up on why one should not be using standard DNS if you value security and privacy.
DNS over TLS vs. DNS over HTTPS | Secure DNS

And then there's this... Understanding DoT and DoH (DNS over TLS vs. DNS over HTTPS)
I use a different approach w it and block malicious doh. Or whitelist a few good ones

That's what I meant I'm in pain bear w me
 
I use a different approach w it and block malicious doh. Or whitelist a few good ones
OK, maybe blocking some malicious ones might be a good idea. However, I stand by the statement that using DNS-over-HTTPS or even DNS-over-TLS is a much more secure way of doing DNS and many security and privacy experts agree.
 
You wish there were more ads? Let me introduce you to BetterHelp
I'll take more ads over the site going belly-up any day of the week.
Given the choice of an ad-supported free website, a paywalled website, or the site being shut down, ads are the least bad option.
 
I'll take more ads over the site going belly-up any day of the week.
Given the choice of an ad-supported free website, a paywalled website, or the site being shut down, ads are the least bad option.
Yeah I don't mind ads that I want to see. I mean take me back to the 70's and 80's toy ads.. haha
 
I'll take more ads over the site going belly-up any day of the week.
Given the choice of an ad-supported free website, a paywalled website, or the site being shut down, ads are the least bad option.
There was supposed to be a tongue-sticking-out emoji but it didn't translate. I was mostly joking. (BetterHelp itself is kind-of a joke)
 
I got serious about blocking ads over 20 years ago, overwhelmingly for security reasons. Today's Internet is far more dangerous than the early 2000s so there is absolutely no way I'd disregard any opportunity to improve my own security.

Windows has always been especially vulnerable, I started blocking ads using the Internet Junkbuster tool back in the late 90s.

Web browser extensions aren't enough. There are plenty of apps, etc. that serve ads these days beyond the web browser. For well over a decade I've been using a combination of a browser extension plus DNS-based ad blocking. And browser based extensions all need to be updated individually. I use uBlock Origin Lite on my Chrome-based browsers, Adguard on my Firefox browsers; I use Wipr on my Mac and iDevices which solely targets the native Safari browser. The system administration load is *NOT* invisible.

For a while I was content using a host file on my Linux-based router (with the custom Polarcloud kernel) to block (most) of this stuff on my home network. But about 15 years ago, it became crystal clear that ad blocking needed to be device specific once regular people started taking Internet-connected devices out of the house: smartphones, tablets, whatever. For Joe Consumer, Internet connectivity moved beyond the computer in the early 2010s.

Today I use some sort of ad blocking extension on my web browsers: Adguard, uBlock, Wipr (for Apple devices) whatever. But those don't protect from in-app ads so there's DNS-level blocking that must be considered. Today I'm using Adguard DNS DoH profiles on my Apple devices.


I wish I had these sort of ad-blocking tools for other devices like my printer, Nintendo Switch, various streaming sticks, etc. I miss the days of having router-based hostfile blocklists but the world has moved on from that.

If you care about online security, you should be using at least two forms of online protection on every device: one system-wide, another browser-focused. There is nothing new about this. Thoughtful people have been doing this for 15-20 years.

I don't whitelist any site's ads. It's not the site that serves up vulnerabilities, it's a compromised ad network. A legitimate site itself has no interest in exploiting end users. TPU self-hosts a handful of ads and I'm okay letting those creep through since the source has proven to be non-malicious to date. But I will not let any of this site's (or any other site) third-party ad networks to serve up content.

I am not that stupid. I've been on the WWW for 30+ years (since the NCSA Mosaic days), I am not blind to the risks of the modern Internet. And basic protection against these security threats is pretty easy. It takes about a minute to install the Adguard DNS DoH profile on my phone (and no refreshing afterwards). In fact, computer web browser extensions are far more needy of user interaction.

First line of defense should be at the device network level, not at the application level (like a web browser). Sure, add another level of security at your router but know that it does nothing once you walk out the front door (I know some people don't actually leave their moms' basements).
 
Last edited:
Windows has always been especially vulnerable
Not sure "vulnerable" is the right, or even fair word here. The problem is the vast majority of ads are 100% legitimate, safe and more importantly, totally legal!

No doubt if Microsoft coded Windows to block all ads (and I am totally sure they could), Amazon, Apple, Meta/Facebook, Google and every other $trillon company, right down through the $billion and $million dollar companies to the local Mom and Pop stores would have massive herds of cows.

And then all those companies would stop lining the pockets of their local representatives who need that money to do their primary jobs - get re-elected. :( :mad:

So the problem is not that Windows is vulnerable. The problem is Microsoft cannot legally block these ads.

So again, not sure vulnerable is the right word, though I confess, not sure what the right word is here since Microsoft's hands are tied, yet they push out ads too.
 
Not sure "vulnerable" is the right, or even fair word here.
Agreed.
The problem is the vast majority of ads are 100% legitimate, safe and more importantly, totally legal!
Disagree. There is a huge difference between what qualifies as "safe" and "secure" between various groups of people. For many, anything that violates a users privacy is what many would describe as unsafe, an intrusion and not secure. Collecting data on user activities is what some consider abhorrent and unacceptable. And there are worse example of what some consider safe which are anything but.

While not everyone agrees, it ALWAYS better to be safe than sorry.

Adblockers are absolutely still vital for a truly safe and secure computing experience.
 
Back
Top