- Joined
- May 15, 2007
- Messages
- 773 (0.12/day)
System Name | Daedalus | O'Neill | ZPM Hive | |
---|---|
Processor | M3 Pro (11/14) | Epyc 7402p | i5 12400F | |
Motherboard | Apple M3 Pro | SM H11SSL-i | TUF B660M-E D4 | |
Cooling | Pure Silence | Noctua NH-U12S TR4 | Noctua NH-D14 | |
Memory | 18GB Unified | 128GB DDR4 | 16GB DDR4 | |
Video Card(s) | M3 Pro | RTX 4070FE (VM) | ARC A750 LE | |
Storage | 512GB NVME | ALOT of SSD's | 1TB NVME | |
Display(s) | 14" 3024x1964 | IPMI | 1440p UW | |
Case | Macbook Pro 14" | NZXT H510 Flow| BC1 Test Bench | |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard | None | Onboard | |
Power Supply | ~ 77w Magsafe | EVGA 750w G3 | HX1000i | |
Mouse | Razer Basilisk |
Keyboard | Logitech G915 TKL |
Software | MacOS Sonoma | Proxmox 8 | Win 11 x64 | |
eh, 2560 to 2816 that's only a ~9.1% difference, not 25%. just thought i'd clarify. I suppose if you take into account lower clocks i could see that tho. maybe, but they have the same memory and 50mhz down clock isn't really that much imo, plus you know vendors are going to release custom PCB and OC'd out of the box. We'll just have to wait, but i think performance between those two is going to be very close.
EDIT: also how does the dual-gpu card fit into AMD's new naming-scheme? R9 295X? 290XT(X)?
I think he means the difference between the 290 (non X) - 2560SP and the R280X - 2048SP.