Radeon Fury X Outperforms GeForce GTX Titan X, Fury to GTX 980 Ti: 3DMark Bench

[btarunr]

AMD's upcoming $650 Radeon R9 Fury X could have what it takes to beat NVIDIA's $999 GeForce GTX Titan X, while the $550 Radeon Fury (non-X) performs close to the $650 GeForce GTX 980 Ti, according to leaked 3DMark 11 and 3DMark (2013) benches by Korean tech publication ITCM.co.kr. The benches see the R9 Fury X score higher than the GTX Titan X in all three tests, while the R9 Fury is almost as fast as the GTX 980 Ti. The cards maintain their winning streak over NVIDIA even with memory-intensive tests such as 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (4K), but buckle with 5K. These two cards, which are bound for the market within the next 30 days, were tested alongside the R9 390X, which is not too far behind the GTX 980, in the same graphs. The R9 Nano, however, isn't circulated among industry partners, yet. It could still launch in Summer 2015.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site

 

[haswrong]

factory clocks?

 

[ironcerealbox]

If this is accurate (still too early to tell until more benchmarks are released), then Nvidia might look like this:

 

[HumanSmoke]

Encouraging, but I think I'd still like to see the actual screenshots of the benchmark runs

If this is accurate (still too early to tell until more benchmarks are released), then Nvidia might look like this:

Aye, and if they turn out to the usual pre-release FUD, then Nvidia might be all...

/Only wanted an excuse to post another Werewolf Rob Ryan gif, so +1 drug fuelled Tijuana binge to you @ironcerealbox

 

[Deleted member 67555]

Looks like Nvidia is still kicking ass in resolutions that 12 people use....

 

[Lou007]

So is that 4gb of ram kicking 12gb of rams butt It also looks like (If these are to be believed) that the R9 390X is more than just a rebrand.

 

[Basard]

Looks like Nvidia is still kicking ass in resolutions that 12 people use....

Lol... I'm still at 1680x1050.... I'll probably upgrade to 1440 in a few years. But, yeah, I'm sure plenty of people are running 4k monitors, but the majority are still happily using 1080....

I'll maybe pick up a Nano after their prices drop a bit... after that (years from now) I'll buy a better monitor.... then after my Nano gets old, I'll upgrade to another card that doesn't suck 200+ watts of power.

The only reason I'm using this RIDICULOUS Asus 5870 is because a friend gave it to me for free. It's a fucking nice card, but shit, it was expensive when new and it uses a ton of power.

 

[haswrong]

Looks like Nvidia is still kicking ass in resolutions that 12 people use....

i wonder if the dual chip 2x 4GB card would behave as 8GB with no choke point, full throughput in the 5k and 8k firestrike benchmark in dx12 environment. thatd be a nice future-proof feat..

 

[ironcerealbox]

Encouraging, but I think I'd still like to see the actual screenshots of the benchmark runs

Aye, and if they turn out to the usual pre-release FUD, then Nvidia might be all...

/Only wanted an excuse to post another Werewolf Rob Ryan gif, so +1 drug fuelled Tijuana binge to you @ironcerealbox

Aye, very true and good ol' Ryan brothers...always get a laugh out of those two.

 

[v12dock]

I just wanna see some benchmarks... It's significantly cheaper than expected im almost considering getting two.

 

[HumanSmoke]

So is that 4gb of ram kicking 12gb of rams butt It also looks like (If these are to be believed) that the R9 390X is more than just a rebrand.

These benchmark " leaks" are by the same DG Lee who leaked this time last year, the info that the Hawaii die used in the 290X actually had 3072 cores/192 TAUs/48 CU when everyone else on the planet including AMD was (and still is) under the impression that the die contains 2816 / 176 / 44.
The guy has intense love of working out performance mathematically from known data points, which is why I wanted to see screenshots to allay suspicions that these are actual benchmark runs rather than mathematical extrapolation.

 

[haswrong]

I just wanna see some benchmarks... It's significantly cheaper than expected im almost considering getting two.

i wanna see a new poll too..

 

[xenocide]

i wonder if the dual chip 2x 4GB card would behave as 8GB with no choke point, full throughput in the 5k and 8k firestrike benchmark in dx12 environment. thatd be a nice future-proof feat..

In DX12 it would, but I wouldn't hold your breath for an abundance of DX12 games. Developers probably won't release games that fully support DX12 until 2018.

 

[fullinfusion]

$650 hmm

Well thats going to be $849-$879 here in Canada..

Oh well ya gota pay to play

 

[Deleted member 67555]

LOL..I normally avoid these types of threads because they are poop...LOL
And I have a hard time not posting poop on threads like this....

 

[qubit]

Real competition, that's what I like to see. Let's hope these benchmarks are accurate.

I can just see NVIDIA having to release something like a "GTX 980 Ti+" with the full, ungimped GPU and with higher clocks in order to get back on top. Oh and maybe a price cut too.

 

[Black]

We will see but I think AMD finally on the right road

 

[HM_Actua1]

Apples to Oranges...... Maxwell is not Pascal. Wait until Pascal drops... As for this E3 Hype. I'll believe it after real testers get their hands on them and run some real world game testing.

 

[Mathragh]

These benchmark " leaks" are by the same DG Lee who leaked this time last year, the info that the Hawaii die used in the 290X actually had 3072 cores/192 TAUs/48 CU when everyone else on the planet including AMD was (and still is) under the impression that the die contains 2816 / 176 / 44.
The guy has intense love of working out performance mathematically from known data points, which is why I wanted to see screenshots to allay suspicions that these are actual benchmark runs rather than mathematical extrapolation.

Ironically, those specs he quoted would actually cause hawaii to roughly perfoms as it does in its 390x form in those leaked benchies...

Slighty offtopic,: with the official launch being the 24th it atleast makes a bit more sense that reviewers didnt get any cards last week (Ryan Shrout anyone?). I bet they were handed out/sent to reviewers after this event today.

 

[xvi]

Too bad the Nano isn't in the list too.

 

[Xzibit]

Instead of spending $999 for single digit 8k gaming I can get it for $429. SOLD!!!!

LG where is that 8k monitor you talked about.

/sarcasm

 

[Batou1986]

If this is real how did they can get a hold of 8gb HBM card that AMD says is still in dev ?

nevermind for a second there I forgot the 390x is a 290x with 8gb of ram

 

[btarunr]

So is that 4gb of ram kicking 12gb of rams butt It also looks like (If these are to be believed) that the R9 390X is more than just a rebrand.

Would you choose 4 GB DDR3 over 1 GB GDDR5? The choice between HBM and GDDR5 will be similar.

Too bad the Nano isn't in the list too.

R9 Nano will launch towards the end of summer (mid/late August?). Hence nobody has even engineering samples.

 

[Hood]

If true, I'm still not buying AMD, just happy that 980 Ti prices will probably drop $50-$100.

 

[bpgt64]

As a long standing member of Green Team, very kool....love it when AMD punches Nvidia in the balls on price/perf.