• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

PhysX on Radeon 'Saga': What we Missed

Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Messages
7,180 (1.18/day)
sorry to be of topic but

lol amd used to manufacture intel cpus back 20-30 years ago, then they started to do there own cpus

there was evebn that socket that could accept intel or amd cpus.

i think they were more alike back in the day.

IBM and Motorola were big cpu player years ago, motorola had all sorts of cpus, they did the cpu for the NES
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
40,435 (6.58/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
Acutally there was a Socket that Supported Intel, AMD, Cyrix, IDT, and i believe Sun/Cisco, It is called Socket 7 and the Improvement was Super 7 which introduced many technologies we see on motherboards today and a few years ago.

sorry to be of topic but

lol amd used to manufacture intel cpus back 20-30 years ago, then they started to do there own cpus

there was evebn that socket that could accept intel or amd cpus.

i think they were more alike back in the day.

IBM and Motorola were big cpu player years ago, motorola had all sorts of cpus, they did the cpu for the NES
 
Last edited by a moderator:

imperialreign

New Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2007
Messages
7,043 (1.15/day)
Location
Sector ZZ₉ Plural Z Alpha
System Name УльтраФиолет
Processor Intel Kentsfield Q9650 @ 3.8GHz (4.2GHz highest achieved)
Motherboard ASUS P5E3 Deluxe/WiFi; X38 NSB, ICH9R SSB
Cooling Delta V3 block, XPSC res, 120x3 rad, ST 1/2" pump - 10 fans, SYSTRIN HDD cooler, Antec HDD cooler
Memory Dual channel 8GB OCZ Platinum DDR3 @ 1800MHz @ 7-7-7-20 1T
Video Card(s) Quadfire: (2) Sapphire HD5970
Storage (2) WD VelociRaptor 300GB SATA-300; WD 320GB SATA-300; WD 200GB UATA + WD 160GB UATA
Display(s) Samsung Syncmaster T240 24" (16:10)
Case Cooler Master Stacker 830
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro PCI-E x1
Power Supply Kingwin Mach1 1200W modular
Software Windows XP Home SP3; Vista Ultimate x64 SP2
Benchmark Scores 3m06: 20270 here: http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12313
Acutally there was a Socket that Supported Intel, AMD, Cyrix, IDT, and i believe Sun/Cisco, It is called Socket 7 and the Improvement was Super 7 which introduced many technologies we see on motherboards today and a few years ago.

soeckt 7 was 1337, man, one of the most versatile CPU platforms . . . ever

I've still got a couple of super 7 CPUs laying around here, hell, I've been using an AMD K6-2 sa a paperweight :laugh:
 

InnocentCriminal

Resident Grammar Amender
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
6,477 (0.92/day)
System Name BeeR 6
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K*
Motherboard ASUS Maximus V Gene (1155/Z77)
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 16GB Samsung Green 1600MHz DDR3**
Video Card(s) 4GB MSI Gaming X RX480
Storage 256GB Samsung 840 Pro SSD
Display(s) 27" Samsung C27F591FDU
Case Fractal Design Arc Mini
Power Supply Corsair HX750W
Software 64bit Microsoft Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores *@ 4.6GHz **@ 2133MHz
I said in the other thread(s) that AMD wins out of all of this, as they get support for both technologies (if this goes through).
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2006
Messages
4,378 (0.69/day)
Location
Hurst, Texas
System Name The86
Processor Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard ASROCKS B450 Steel Legend
Cooling AMD Stealth
Memory 2x8gb DDR4 3200 Corsair
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3060 Ti
Storage WD Black 512gb, WD Blue 1TB
Display(s) AOC 24in
Case Raidmax Alpha Prime
Power Supply 700W Thermaltake Smart
Mouse Logitech Mx510
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow 2012
Software Windows 10 Professional
ATI/AMD does hold the chips in the short term. However, if they actually consider this they should make Nvidia re-code all present and future TWIMTBP games to scale better with ATI cards in single and CF mode. Also, force them to support DX10.1 in ALL TWIMTBP games both present and feature. But ATI/AMD should give them a time line to get it done or else the deal is off!

So, if they are in a meeting ATI/AMD does have a short term bargaining chip they can use to get things rolling. In the long term ATI/AMD is in the position to play double agent between PhysX and Havok.

If Nvidia wants to embrace ATI/AMD then it should be a full embrace. Nvidia gets ATI/AMD full support with Cuda, ATI gets Nvidia full advertising support. This IMHO is a even trade! No ifs, ands or buts about it.

seriously what are you smoking, Nvidia is sharing tech with AMD, and AMD is doing the smart thing and accepting it unoffically. Nvidia has no reason to cowtow to what AMD wants though, they still have the strongest card out and the GTX260 at its current pricepoint is well worth it over the 4870. Also your under the impression Nvidia controls TWIMTBP games, they don't, if you want that logo ask Nvidia for the geforce SDK and guess what you get that niffty logo, its free advertising for Nvidia. You need to get a handle on realaity and realize that what you ask is laughable and also realize Nvidia is doing this simply to hurt Intel, not to help AMD, remember AMD doesnt have a dedicated area of its GPU for CUDA like the GT200 does
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2008
Messages
5,250 (0.90/day)
Location
IRAQ-Baghdad
System Name MASTER
Processor Core i7 3930k run at 4.4ghz
Motherboard Asus Rampage IV extreme
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 4x4G kingston hyperx beast 2400mhz
Video Card(s) 2X EVGA GTX680
Storage 2X Crusial M4 256g raid0, 1TbWD g, 2x500 WD B
Display(s) Samsung 27' 1080P LED 3D monitior 2ms
Case CoolerMaster Chosmos II
Audio Device(s) Creative sound blaster X-FI Titanum champion,Creative speakers 7.1 T7900
Power Supply Corsair 1200i, Logitch G500 Mouse, headset Corsair vengeance 1500
Software Win7 64bit Ultimate
Benchmark Scores 3d mark 2011: testing
and it hopes to take Intel down along with itself, then Intel Nvidia merge to create 2 companies one can.


maybe nvidia turn over and go with ati and keep intel alone, cuz nvidia also need gddr5 technology , nvidia don't like intel after release the nehalem without support sli ,
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
850 (0.14/day)
Location
USA
candle_86, I agree.

Nvidia and AMD/ATI are both feeling threatened by Intel. Intel has a lot of money to throw at the graphics market and are doing it. It will only be a matter of time before Intel comes up with a standard and a chipset that performs best with their GPUs.

If ATI and Nvidia go with CUDA/PhysX then at this point it is more likely to be the standard and push Intel that much farther behind. We just need Red and Green to keep from back stabbing each other to make it work. I think if Nvidia is reasonable it won't hurt them ($$) and it won't give them a major advantage/disadvantage, of course I guess AMD would have to be reasonable as well ; P
 
Top