• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

AMD A10 "Kaveri" APU Pictured, Battlefield 4 Bundles Planned

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,277 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,367
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#28
Look at the 2nd image. The APU was running @848 MHZ.
Your point? According to CPU-Z my 6800k will drop down to an 8x multiplier too when idle. Though it only seems to ever go down to a 20x multiplier, maybe AMD finally fixed that bug with Kaveri. The CPU-Z shot was taken when the CPU is idle, so it will show the clock speed of the power saving state. This has been a common thing for ages now.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
84 (0.05/day)
Likes
10
#29
Look closely, he has the benchmark set to show single core performance. The fact that a single Kaveri core at 3.7GHz is scoring right about half of a single Haswell core at 4.4GHz is a pretty decent improvement.
Look closer. The Cinebench "screenshot" shows a multi-threaded score of 311 CB, as well as the single-threaded score of 88 CB. Not only would both of those be pathetic showings, but the fact that the multi-threaded score is only 3.53x the single-threaded score (that's the "MP Ratio") would mean that the CMT penalty we see on Bulldozer and Piledriver architectures is still in full force. Since Steamroller's architectural changes are largely about getting rid of that penalty, these results make no sense. In the unlikely event that these screenshots were accurate, it would mean that Steamroller is essentially no advance over Piledriver at all. That doesn't make sense, given that we know that Steamroller has independent decoding units for each core (BD and PD had to share within modules) and that there are various other improvements to the cache, branch prediction, and so forth.

It's fake.
 
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,715 (1.22/day)
Likes
354
Location
Tennessee
System Name AM3+
Processor AMD FX-8350 @ 4715.73 MHz (23.5*200.63 MHz)
Motherboard ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z AM3+ AMD 990FX SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Motherboard
Cooling AMD 8150 Factory Water Cooler
Memory Corsair XMS3 16 GB 1333 MHz PC3-10666 240-Pin DDR3
Video Card(s) ASUS ROG MATRIX-R9290X-P-4GD5 Radeon R9 290X 4GB 512-Bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0
Storage SanDisk Ultra II 480GB, INTEL SS DSC2BW240A4, Western Digital WDC WD50 00AAKX-003CA0
Display(s) Acer S211HL bd 21.5-Inch Widescreen Ultra-Slim LED Display - Black
Case COOLER MASTER Elite 335 Upgraded RC-335U-KKN1 Black Steel / Plastic ATX Mid Tower Computer Case
Power Supply Corsair RM Series 850 Watt ATX/EPS 80PLUS Gold-Certified Power Supply - CP-9020056-NA RM850
Software Windows 10.0 Pro 64 Bit
#30
They're using the newest Steamroller CPU and Radeon GCN cores from the R7 series and are capable of running BF4 at a usable rate of 25-35FPS.

Why they'd supply BF4 with this I don't know.
You can pair these processors with a dedicated GPU in hybrid crossfire and get great performance.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
615 (0.32/day)
Likes
75
System Name [WIP]
Processor Intel Pentium G3420 [i7-4790K SOON(tm)]
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling [Corsair H100i]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 2x8GB-2400-CL10 DDR3
Video Card(s) [MSI AMD Radeon R9-290 Gaming]
Storage Seagate 2TB Desktop SSHD / [Samsung 256GB 840 PRO]
Display(s) [BenQ XL2420Z]
Case [Corsair Obsidian 750D]
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro / Linux Mint 15 / SteamOS
#31
What are you talking about bullshit? APUs are NOT for enthusiasts, period. You don't see All-In-One (monitor+pc in one) setups being touted as enthusiast platforms; stock cars are not enthusiast until you modify just about everything under the hood to make it top-notch ready for racing or for whatever reason; I can go on all day w/ examples, but I won't.

The point is that APUs are designed with simplicity in mind. Simplicity mixed with a bit of power, enough to do most tasks and then some (light gaming). Yes it addresses the paradigm shift in CPU computing, but it doesn't mean that there's going to be a high-end APU capable of playing BF4 w/ all settings maxed and high resolution, at least not anytime soon. Every product has it's place. If you convince yourself otherwise, then your just lying to yourself.
Computing =! Graphics
Modern iGPUs =/= Graphics Only

Okay, let's take this another way, just to prove how clueless you people are, I'm gonna ask you guys what does APU stand for and why does it stand for that.

To be fair, APUs, at least in AMD's true "vision", don't really exist yet, Kaveri should change that. But AMD is doing a pretty good job at explaining what they are (that CGI video was awesome), but not as good a job in showing it, yet.


The images are fake, as stated before, the multiplier is weird (measures of 0,5? Really? What is is this, Athlon 64?), the trademark/copyright sign is not where it's supposed to be, scores makes zero sense (A10 6800K/DDR3-2133 gets 328 points) and a lot of other shady stuff that I won't bother going into.

Not really, Richland in single threaded performance was way behind IvyBridge.
He never said Richland is faster in IPC than Ivy Bridge... he said Richland lost to a smaller margin in IPC (to whatever) than those images make out Kaveri to. Read again.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
1,066 (0.24/day)
Likes
193
Location
Look behind you!!
System Name NEW
Processor Intel 4770 non-K
Motherboard Gigabyte H81M-DS2V
Cooling CM Hyper 212 plus
Memory 16gb Muskin
Video Card(s) XFX 380X 4gb
Storage Sandisk 120gb plus WD blue 1tb
Display(s) AOC 23.5 LED bl
Case XIGMATEK
Audio Device(s) motherboard
Power Supply Cooler Master 500
#32
2 cores 4 threads?

Is that right?
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,277 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,367
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#33
So you mean to tell me kaveri gets beat by a 1.7ghz ivy bridge I3 in single thread? That's not right, even Richland did better than that
He never said Richland is faster in IPC than Ivy Bridge... he said Richland lost to a smaller margin in IPC (to whatever) than those images make out Kaveri to. Read again.
I never even came close to saying Richland was faster in IPC than IvyBridge. I know exactly what he was saying and I'm saying Kaveri looses by a smaller margin than Richland. Richland wasn't even half as fast as Ivybridge in single threaded performance. Kaveri is now right about half of Haswell, that is a significant gain.

2 cores 4 threads? Is that right?
Cinibench reads the "module" as a core for some reason. It does this with all of AMD's recent CPUs.

Look closer. The Cinebench "screenshot" shows a multi-threaded score of 311 CB, as well as the single-threaded score of 88 CB. Not only would both of those be pathetic showings, but the fact that the multi-threaded score is only 3.53x the single-threaded score (that's the "MP Ratio") would mean that the CMT penalty we see on Bulldozer and Piledriver architectures is still in full force. Since Steamroller's architectural changes are largely about getting rid of that penalty, these results make no sense. In the unlikely event that these screenshots were accurate, it would mean that Steamroller is essentially no advance over Piledriver at all. That doesn't make sense, given that we know that Steamroller has independent decoding units for each core (BD and PD had to share within modules) and that there are various other improvements to the cache, branch prediction, and so forth.
I'm aware of that, however there definitely has been an significant improvement over Piledriver and Bulldozer. The MP Ratio on my Piledriver 6800K is 3.20x. So going up to 3.53x is a pretty significant jump. And remember, with a 4T processor the best you can really expect is 4.0x, so 3.53x is decent.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
343 (0.16/day)
Likes
34
Location
Ft Stewart
System Name Queen Bee
Processor 3570k @ 4.0GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte UD3 Z77
Cooling Water Loop by EK
Memory 8GB Corsair 1600 DDR3
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 970 Gaming WaterCooled
Storage 1x Western Digital 500GB Black 1x Intel 20GB 311 SSD
Display(s) BenQ XL2420G
Case CoolTek W2
Power Supply Corsair 650Watt
Software Windows 7 Pro
#34
2 cores 4 threads?

Is that right?
Yes, Cinebench is reading it how it is, mostly. There are 2 modules 4 cores, but since it's just 4 integer cores, not 4 complete cores Cinebench for that probability posted it as such.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,213 (5.03/day)
Likes
4,804
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
#35
I really want to see how this fares against the 5800K, 6800K, FX 4350, 6300/6350, 8300/8350, 9000 series.

im pretty split between this and a AM3+ CPU
 
Joined
Apr 3, 2012
Messages
3,488 (1.68/day)
Likes
7,377
Location
St. Paul, MN
System Name LappyTop/ Bay2- Lowerbay/Opticon As of 6/21/17
Processor i5 1.7GHz/ i3 2120's/i5 2400
Motherboard ASUStek/ HP mini/Dell
Cooling Air/air/air
Memory 8GB Kingston HyperX 1600/ 2GB/ 4GB samsung
Video Card(s) intel HD4000/ HD2000's/ HD2000
Storage 256GB Crucial Mx100 SSD/ couple of spinners/500GB WD
Display(s) 1366x768/ one acer x223w between the rest
Case ALU, beauty!/ HP SFF/ Dell Mini
Audio Device(s) Sonic Master/ onboard's/ onboard
Power Supply ASUS brick, 17W i5/ 19.5 volt bricks/ Dell 265W
Mouse cheap GigaWire930, CMStorm Havoc and a Logitech M510 wireless
Keyboard eMachines serial and a Dynex usb
Software WIN8.1-64bit/ Mint 18 Sarah/Mint 18
Benchmark Scores 6.9 processes per second!/ cruncher's!!
#36
I have a 3317U i5, It truly is impressive. I ran a program, a few weeks ago, that showed me the current wattage, as I was doing tasks.

I was Crunching WCG at 100% cores and 100% CPU. 9W...9!

I have 8 Watts to play with that Crunching at 100% hasn't even touched!!

Now, I see that r15 where my little i5 beats the bestest A10? Wild.

I have a couple AMD desktops, in storage. One is an old Socket A, another is a dual core 64, don't remember. I also have a P4 intel, 2.8 GHz that crunches well. The Dual core puts up decent numbers but, is a wattage whore. The Socket A? That's my toy. It crunches a bit but mostly just a fun thing to OC and check Facebook on. :p

Sorry, kinda wandered off topic. Sorry, I seem to do that sometimes...:rolleyes:
 
Joined
Aug 23, 2013
Messages
197 (0.13/day)
Likes
67
#37
I'm sure they expect Mantle to make the APU capable of running BF4 well enough and since Mantle is going to be pushing APU's in a big way, I'd expect this is a wise play.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
615 (0.32/day)
Likes
75
System Name [WIP]
Processor Intel Pentium G3420 [i7-4790K SOON(tm)]
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling [Corsair H100i]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 2x8GB-2400-CL10 DDR3
Video Card(s) [MSI AMD Radeon R9-290 Gaming]
Storage Seagate 2TB Desktop SSHD / [Samsung 256GB 840 PRO]
Display(s) [BenQ XL2420Z]
Case [Corsair Obsidian 750D]
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro / Linux Mint 15 / SteamOS
#38
I never even came close to saying Richland was faster in IPC than IvyBridge. I know exactly what he was saying and I'm saying Kaveri looses by a smaller margin than Richland. Richland wasn't even half as fast as Ivybridge in single threaded performance. Kaveri is now right about half of Haswell, that is a significant gain.



Cinibench reads the "module" as a core for some reason. It does this with all of AMD's recent CPUs.



I'm aware of that, however there definitely has been an significant improvement over Piledriver and Bulldozer. The MP Ratio on my Piledriver 6800K is 3.20x. So going up to 3.53x is a pretty significant jump. And remember, with a 4T processor the best you can really expect is 4.0x, so 3.53x is decent.
Then what was the point of contradicting him if you know what he meant and believe so as well.
Anyway, how do you know how Kaveri performs? LOL

If by any chance any of you are doing the math in relation to this "article", I gotta ask you to do a reality check and notice it's fake and to urge you to stop wasting your time.
Also, Cinebench is a pretty piss-poor measurement of performance between Intel and AMD (to begin with), as are all other ICC compiled software.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,277 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,367
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#39
Then what was the point of contradicting him if you know what he meant and believe so as well. Anyway, how do you know how Kaveri performs? LOL
Umm...Do you even read?

His claim was that Kaveri is worse than Richland.

My points:

Richland isn't even half as fast as IvyBridge.
Kaveri is now half as fast as Haswell.

How do you get that I believe what the same thing he does from that?
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
825 (0.46/day)
Likes
306
#40
I was impressed...until I realized the i5-3317U is an Ivy Bridge processor for notebooks.
a sub 2 GHz, 15 watt part at that. cpu performance is what killed trinity in notebooks. it always held back the graphics part of the apu is pretty much any game.
 
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
772 (0.38/day)
Likes
737
Location
Denmark
System Name Waterfall | Iris
Processor Athlon X4 860K @ 4,4 GHz | i3-6157U
Motherboard ASUS A88X Pro | Acer laptop
Cooling Custom Watercooling | Stock laptop with cooling pad
Memory 2*8GB Avexir Core Blue 2400Hz@1600 DDR3| 2+4GB 2133MHz DDR4
Video Card(s) 2*R9 380 with WC blocks | Iris 550
Storage Crucial BX100 500GB | SK Hynix 256GB SSD + 640GB WD Blue
Display(s) U24E850R+U2515H | Internal 15,6"
Case Fractal Design Define R5 | Laptop
Audio Device(s) Xenyx Q802USB | Realtek
Power Supply SilverStone Strider Gold 850W | 65W 19V Power brick
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion Brown
Software Windows 7 Professional | Fedora
#41
A sub 2GHz part with turbo up to 2,6 in a single threaded test...

Also, this is only 1 benchmark, which is too small a test set to give reliable information about performance
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
4,984 (1.76/day)
Likes
1,551
Location
Manchester uk
System Name Quad GT evo V
Processor FX8350 @ 4.8ghz1.525c NB2.64ghz Ht2.84ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990X Gaming
Cooling 360EK extreme 360Tt rad all push/pull, cpu,NB/Vrm blocks all EK
Memory Corsair vengeance 32Gb @1333 cas9
Video Card(s) Rx vega 64 waterblockedEK + Rx580 waterblockedEK
Storage samsung 840(250), WD 1Tb+2Tb +3Tbgrn 1tb hybrid
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, samsung 40" 1080p
Case Custom(modded) thermaltake Kandalf
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup
Power Supply corsair 1000Rmx
Mouse CM optane
Keyboard CM optane
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15.69K best overall sandra so far
#42
Not a great move IMO. If AMD was trying to tout it's new APU as being able to run BF4, people who don't know any better will expect it to run "good". AMD should've put a little more umph into it's graphics portion of the APU in order to make it more appealing at a smaller price bump which I'm sure some people wouldn't mind paying.
Its likely that demo video is not using Mantle, If Mantle does what they believe it will ,then they wont need more oomph just more mantle compatible games.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
825 (0.46/day)
Likes
306
#43
A sub 2GHz part with turbo up to 2,6 in a single threaded test...

Also, this is only 1 benchmark, which is too small a test set to give reliable information about performance
and the richland a10 has a turbo rating of 3.5 GHz in single thread testing. this chip is probably clocked even higher. clock rate isnt everything.
 
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
359 (0.17/day)
Likes
61
#44
Look at the 2nd image. The APU was running @848 MHZ.
Then you mean to tell me kaveri is twice as fast as ivy bridge? Lol

On a more serious note don't forget turbo, as those ivy cores when one core is running end up running well over 2.6-2.7ghz which is what they probably were running the test at, and the fact that a haswell clocked at 4.4ghz is not more than twice as fast as the ivy 1.7ghz is proof of that
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
615 (0.32/day)
Likes
75
System Name [WIP]
Processor Intel Pentium G3420 [i7-4790K SOON(tm)]
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling [Corsair H100i]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 2x8GB-2400-CL10 DDR3
Video Card(s) [MSI AMD Radeon R9-290 Gaming]
Storage Seagate 2TB Desktop SSHD / [Samsung 256GB 840 PRO]
Display(s) [BenQ XL2420Z]
Case [Corsair Obsidian 750D]
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro / Linux Mint 15 / SteamOS
#45
Then you mean to tell me kaveri is twice as fast as ivy bridge? Lol

On a more serious note don't forget turbo, as those ivy cores when one core is running end up running well over 2.6-2.7ghz which is what they probably were running the test at, and the fact that a haswell clocked at 4.4ghz is not more than twice as fast as the ivy 1.7ghz is proof of that
You mean Richland?

Anyway, good point, low power Intel CPUs do turbo very high on one core especially.

But it's irrelevant, since the screeshots are 99% fake.

LMAO, all three of us are saying pretty much the same thing, just that he started by saying the scores in the images can't be right, and they aren't, since they are made up.

Can we STFU about this now?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 13, 2012
Messages
359 (0.17/day)
Likes
61
#46
You mean Richland?

Anyway, good point, low power Intel CPUs do turbo very high on one core especially.

But it's irrelevant, since the screeshots are 99% fake.



LMAO, all three of us are saying pretty much the same thing, just that he started by saying the scores in the images can't be right, and they aren't, since they are made up.

Can we STFU about this now?
Well it's a rumor which like u say is most likely fake, but I'm.hypothetically speaking assuming this is real. so according to this we can say a 3.7ghz single steamroller core matches a 2.8ghz ivy bridge core which is reasonable if you think about it. And those bulldozer derived badboys do clock much higher at the same tdp than the Intel counterparts so amd might be on to something If they can clock the mobile parts like Richland or even higher then they can be much closer to Intel with the added benefit of better multithreaded performance since most Intel mobile is dual core.
but then again that multicore score is almost exactly what Richland scores if not less if I remember correctly, I can check reviews but I'm too lazy right now lol. And I'm using my cellphone to write this