• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Brings Faster Performance and Advanced Features to Strange Brigade

Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
2,991 (1.03/day)
System Name Zimmer Frame Rates
Processor Intel i7 920 @ Stock speeds baby
Motherboard EVGA X58 3X SLI
Cooling True 120
Memory Corsair Vengeance 12GB
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 980 Ti Super JetStream
Storage Of course
Display(s) Crossover 27Q 27" 2560x1440
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Don't be silly
Power Supply XFX 650W Core
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Epic
Exactly.

To put it simply:

AMD pushes AMD's strong points
nVidia pushes AMD's low points

That about sums it up, no?
So what is wrong with nVidia pushing their strong points too? Or does the world revolve around AMD?
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
3,183 (3.85/day)
System Name Grunt
Processor Intel i7-7820x
Motherboard MSI X299 Raider
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory Corsair LPX 3600 32GB (4x8GB)
Video Card(s) Powercolor Vega 64
Storage Intel 900p 280GB, 660p 2TB, Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2457, Samsung NU8000 TV
Case Corsair C70
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Software Win 10 Pro
What are AMD's strong points? :D

Serious question. Seems like their "gimmicky" stuff is fairly neutral (freesync, chill, etc).
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
5,025 (5.84/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
Actually: the video is referring Maxwell VS Kepler and not Pascal VS Maxwell, but the point stands.
No,the point does not stand if the video is showing maxwell vs kepler,not pascal vs maxwell.I told you,lay off adoredtv stuff, it makes you see things that are not there.

So what is wrong with nVidia pushing their strong points too? Or does the world revolve around AMD?
Exactly, I don't get it.

AMD pushes AMD's strong points - well,duuuhhhh

nVidia pushes AMD's low points-ummm..... cause they're competitors ? btw gameworks is pretty easily disabled and amd has a driver trick to reduce tesselation.

Also,it wouldn't hurt you do do some reading once in a while rather than base the entirety of your knowledge on a video that red-leaning adoredtv did years ago, GW performance is fine on radeon





AMD sure would love to push "nvidia's low points" either. But what low points do they have ? Dx12 and async performance was improved a long time ago, to the point that 1080 outperforms V64 in Hitman and matches it in DOOM.You can see it here, new dx12 game with async comes out,1080 matches Vega LC right since launch,980Ti faster than Fury X ans even ahead of 1070.
 
Last edited:

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,735 (0.87/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
No,the point does not stand if the video is showing maxwell vs kepler,not pascal vs maxwell.I told you,lay off adoredtv stuff, it makes you see things that are not there.
My whole point is shown in the video, which you refuse to see: how nVidia is hurting their own previous arch to showcase their newer arch.

Here's a thought: has it occurred to you that, if nVidia focused itself on their own strong points, they might become even better then they already are?
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2006
Messages
887 (0.17/day)
Location
Ireland
System Name Cubed
Processor R7 1800X
Motherboard ASRock X370 Gaming Pro
Cooling Custom 3 radiator loop for CPU and GPUs, D5 pump
Memory 32GB (4 x 8GB) Team 4000MHz @ 3200MHz
Video Card(s) 2 x Vega 64 with single slot full cover blocks
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 512GB NVMe
Display(s) BenQ BL3200
Case Corsair Carbide 540
Audio Device(s) On board
Power Supply Corsair HX1200i
Mouse Roccat Leadr
Keyboard K95 RGB
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores #1 worldwide on 3D Mark 99 or 2000 or one of those, at one point back in the day. :)
What are AMD's strong points? :D

Serious question. Seems like their "gimmicky" stuff is fairly neutral (freesync, chill, etc).
How are Freesync and Chill "gimmicky"? They both provide very useful benefits.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
3,183 (3.85/day)
System Name Grunt
Processor Intel i7-7820x
Motherboard MSI X299 Raider
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory Corsair LPX 3600 32GB (4x8GB)
Video Card(s) Powercolor Vega 64
Storage Intel 900p 280GB, 660p 2TB, Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2457, Samsung NU8000 TV
Case Corsair C70
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Software Win 10 Pro
How are Freesync and Chill "gimmicky"? They both provide very useful benefits.
I never said they weren't useful (I'm a Vega owner myself). I just meant unique features outside raw number crunching (like Nvidia's Hairworks, etc.. AMD's "gimmicks" are neutral in that don't require third parties/game developers to be in on the deal).
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,735 (0.87/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
How are Freesync and Chill "gimmicky"? They both provide very useful benefits.
Tbh, Chill actually is because only some games benefit from it. Freesync on the other hand is far from "gimmicky".

What i meant earlier with AMD pushing their own strong points is they are pushing both DX12 and asynchronous compute: both of which they are better @ than compared to DX11, due to the way their arch works.

What i mean earlier with nVidia pushing AMD's low points is, for example, tessellation. nVidia is much better @ tessellation then AMD is so they choose to force their sponsored games to have ridiculous amounts of this knowing full well their latest generation is going to take a hit in performance but they'll gladly do it for two reasons:

1 - their previous generation will be hit harder, meaning there will be "an improvement" for going to the newer generation, thus they sell more cards of the newer generation
2 - AMD will be hit even harder, thus "showing" nVidia cards are superior so they sell more cards

By artificially exacerbating the difference (better @ tessellation), they are "showing" their cards are better. I just wish they showed their cards were better without resorting to this sort of crap.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
3,183 (3.85/day)
System Name Grunt
Processor Intel i7-7820x
Motherboard MSI X299 Raider
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A
Memory Corsair LPX 3600 32GB (4x8GB)
Video Card(s) Powercolor Vega 64
Storage Intel 900p 280GB, 660p 2TB, Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2457, Samsung NU8000 TV
Case Corsair C70
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Software Win 10 Pro
Dudes.. I didn't mean gimmicky as a bad thing. lol

Maybe I should have said "perks".

AMD's perks are mostly transparent and work through global settings... They don't require anything from others. In that sense, they're not robust additions like Nvidia's. i.e. "strong features" that makes them stand out (ahem.. and rarely get used). I feel like an AMD card is going to be roughly the same from game to game. There is no RTX or Hairworks feature that drastically changes some games from others.

Even FreeSync is based off the VESA standard. It's not some big addition to displays that requires an extra couple hundred dollars.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
10,453 (5.46/day)
Location
Mars
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
My whole point is shown in the video, which you refuse to see: how nVidia is hurting their own previous arch to showcase their newer arch.

Here's a thought: has it occurred to you that, if nVidia focused itself on their own strong points, they might become even better then they already are?
I'll say it clearly because you seem to have a fat plank in front of your head - LAY OFF THE ADOREDTV drugs. He's a fucking tool. Or don't and join him in his misery.

There is simply no data that backs up what he says, just some silly examples dragged way out of context. Go take a long look at his Turing prediction real quick and even you must see the problems. He just spouts utter nonsense and knows literally nothing. The poor man can't even do math. And your blabber about strong and weak points... generalization that makes no sense in any way shape or form - you're already starting to sound like him.

Referring to the video again really doesn't get your point across either, quite the opposite. Never mind the fact that this entire discussion is grossly offtopic?

If you want to dive deeper into this; google for performance comparisons between driver versions of Kepler > Maxwell versus AMD's GCN from 7970 > Fury. They exist, and they show nothing you speak of. On the contrary. Furthermore, it has usually been AMD who was late to react to performance problems or leave them unattended forever, and they are keen to point a finger at Nvidia to play the underdog card. In the end, its about AMD lacking control of their driver / developer communication versus Nvidia being much better at that - and investing much more into it. Gameworks is only a tiny sliver of this and usually presents a win-win scenario where you CAN use the feature but never really have to.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,927 (1.15/day)
Location
Australia
System Name Night Rider | Mini LAN PC | Workhorse
Processor AMD R7 2700X | i7 2600 | i7 970
Motherboard MSi AM4 Pro Carbon | GA-H77M-D3H | Gigabyte EX58-UD5
Cooling AMD Wraith cooler| Coolermaster Gemini with Noctua 3000RPM Fan | Big shairkan B
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 G.Skill Ripjaws 3600MHz| 2x4GB Corsair 1600 | 6x2GB DDR3 1300 Corsair
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 970 OC in Sli | Gainward GTX 650 TI GS | ASUS 7970 Matrix
Storage 250GB Plextor SSD Por 5 /1TB WD Black | 500GB WD ES/WD Black | WD 320/Seagate 320
Display(s) LG 27" 1440P| Samsung 20" S20C300L/DELL 15" | 22" DELL/19"DELL
Case LIAN LI PC-18 | Mini ATX Case (custom) | Atrix C4 9001
Audio Device(s) Onboard | Onbaord | Onboard
Power Supply Silverstone 750 | Silverstone Mini 450W | Corsair CX-750
Mouse Coolermaster Pro | Rapoo V900 | Gigabyte 6850X
Keyboard MAX Keyboard Nighthawk X8 | Creative Fatal1ty eluminx | Some POS Logitech
Software Windows 7 Pro 64 | Windows 7 Pro 64 | Windows 7 Pro 64/Windows 10 Home

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,735 (0.87/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
I'll say it clearly because you seem to have a fat plank in front of your head - LAY OFF THE ADOREDTV drugs. He's a fucking tool. Or don't and join him in his misery.

There is simply no data that backs up what he says, just some silly examples dragged way out of context. Go take a long look at his Turing prediction real quick and even you must see the problems. He just spouts utter nonsense and knows literally nothing. The poor man can't even do math. And your blabber about strong and weak points... generalization that makes no sense in any way shape or form - you're already starting to sound like him.
Have you checked the source of his claims? That GameGPU site? It took a bit (link no longer works) but i managed to track it down:

Here's what it looked like in original review:

2560_2.jpg

And here's after patch 1.3:

fall4_2560_s_1dot3.jpg

Here's the original review in full (in Russian): https://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/fallout-4-test-gpu-2015.html

And here's the full review of the 1.3 patch (in Russian): https://gamegpu.com/rpg/rollevye/fallout-4-beta-patch-1-3-test-gpu.html
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
10,453 (5.46/day)
Location
Mars
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
Have you checked the source of his claims? That GameGPU site? It took a bit (link no longer works) but i managed to track it down:

Here's what it looked like in original review:

View attachment 106173

And here's after patch 1.3:

View attachment 106174

Here's the original review in full (in Russian): https://gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/fallout-4-test-gpu-2015.html

And here's the full review of the 1.3 patch (in Russian): https://gamegpu.com/rpg/rollevye/fallout-4-beta-patch-1-3-test-gpu.html
All I see here is a notoriously badly optimized game on a dated engine that runs into CPU bottlenecks a lot.

As I said, out of context. FO4 barely rewards fast GPUs.
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,735 (0.87/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
All I see here is a notoriously badly optimized game on a dated engine that runs into CPU bottlenecks a lot.

As I said, out of context. FO4 barely rewards fast GPUs.
Really?

Then, and as Adored pointed out, how come the 960, which is miles behind the 780 Ti before the patch suddenly get's on par with it after the patch?

According to TPU's GTX 960 OC review, the 780 TI is 57% faster then this particular OCed 960 @ this resolution:

perfrel_2560.gif

With the 1.3 patch and AMD cards, the opposite happened, with all gaining FPS. Why? Because the patch broke the functionality of gameworks and the game was "forced" to render without it. As such, and "suddenly", what was crippling AMD's cards disappeared while nVidia's were "hurt" with the loss of it, since the game's drivers were optimized for it's use.

Referring to the video again really doesn't get your point across either, quite the opposite. Never mind the fact that this entire discussion is grossly offtopic?
You are right, and i here by apologize for my role in derailing this topic. If anyone else wishes to further discuss this off-topic part, feel free to use conversations.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
5,025 (5.84/day)
Location
Poland
System Name skurwiel szatan
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
If anyone else wishes to further discuss this off-topic part, feel free to use conversations.
:roll:no one wants that with the exception of you forcing us to see some outdated videos

anyone knows using fo4 as a reference for any analysis is not only flawed but dumb and a waste of time for people who approach the topic seriously. anyone except adorkedtv cause the only one that plays out according to his narrative ran and still runs like garbage.


If you want to get the truth I suggest you start using actual tech reviewers and journalist known as trusted sources, not a tool.crippling kepler is a myth, it just didn't get bette with time since it was already optimized on launch, it was the second itenaration of kepler architecture after gtx 6 series. Mawxell was a new and changed architecture, it got better over time cause it was designed that way,no gpu manufacturer will design an architecture without looking into the future.

 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
10,453 (5.46/day)
Location
Mars
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
:roll:no one wants that with the exception of you forcing us to see some outdated videos

anyone knows using fo4 as a reference for any analysis is not only flawed but dumb and a waste of time for people who approach the topic seriously. anyone except adorkedtv cause the only one that plays out according to his narrative ran and still runs like garbage.


If you want to get the truth I suggest you start using actual tech reviewers and journalist known as trusted sources, not a tool.crippling kepler is a myth, it just didn't get bette with time since it was already optimized on launch, it was the second itenaration of kepler architecture after gtx 6 series. Mawxell was a new and changed architecture, it got better over time cause it was designed that way,no gpu manufacturer will design an architecture without looking into the future.

That graph is precisely one of the sources I was getting at earlier. Thx
 
Top