- Joined
- Jul 2, 2008
- Messages
- 8,069 (1.39/day)
- Location
- Hillsboro, OR
System Name | Main/DC |
---|---|
Processor | i7-3770K/i7-2600K |
Motherboard | MSI Z77A-GD55/GA-P67A-UD4-B3 |
Cooling | Phanteks PH-TC14CS/H80 |
Memory | Crucial Ballistix Sport 16GB (2 x 8GB) LP /4GB Kingston DDR3 1600 |
Video Card(s) | Asus GTX 660 Ti/MSI HD7770 |
Storage | Crucial MX100 256GB/120GB Samsung 830 & Seagate 2TB(died) |
Display(s) | Asus 24' LED/Samsung SyncMaster B1940 |
Case | P100/Antec P280 It's huge! |
Audio Device(s) | on board |
Power Supply | SeaSonic SS-660XP2/Seasonic SS-760XP2 |
Software | Win 7 Home Premiun 64 Bit |
I wouldn't be surprised if they come out about the same, with a slight edge to the Xeon, PPD wise. You could go to boincstats and search by system, but that could take a long time. They're both going to get the same run time per day. The 6174 is most likely about 40% slower clock/clock, but it has 100% more actual cores.Now I have a next question, it's about crunch.
what would be better option, this cpu with 12 cores or a xeon with 6 cores 12 threads?
A 6174 is Magny-Cours. 12 real cores.The Xeon will beat it. Benchmark wise my pair of 12 core bulldozer based chips hold about even with my single 5820k.