• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon RX 590 Built on 12nm FinFET Process, Benchmarked in Final Fantasy XV

crazyeyesreaper

Not a Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
9,536 (2.24/day)
Location
04578
System Name Old reliable
Processor Intel 8700K @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling Custom Water
Memory 32 GB Crucial Ballistix 3666 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X
Storage 3x SSDs 2x HDDs
Display(s) Dell U2412M + Samsung TA350
Case Thermaltake Core P3 TG
Audio Device(s) Samson Meteor Mic / Generic 2.1 / KRK KNS 6400 headset
Power Supply Zalman EBT-1000
Mouse Mionix NAOS 7000
Keyboard Mionix
Thanks to some photographs by Andreas Schilling, of HardwareLuxx, it is now confirmed that AMD's Radeon RX 590 will make use of the 12 nm FinFET process. The change from 14 nm to 12 nm FinFET for the RX 590 brings with it the possibility of both higher clock speeds and better power efficiency. That said, considering it is based on the same Polaris architecture used in the Radeon RX 580 and 570, it remains to be seen how it will impact AMDs pricing in regards to the product stack. Will there be a price drop to compensate, or will the RX 590 be more expensive? Since AMD has already made things confusing enough with its cut down 2048SP version of RX 580 in China, anything goes at this point.




Thanks to the Final Fantasy XV Benchmark being updated with results for the RX 590, we at least have an idea as to the performance on offer. In the 2560x1440 resolution tests, performance has improved by roughly 10% compared to the RX 580. Looking at the 3840x2160 resolution results shows a performance improvement of roughly 10 to 15%. This uplift in performance allows the RX 590 to put some serious pressure on NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB. Keep in mind that while the RX 580 was always close, AMD's latest Polaris offering eliminates the gap and is far more competitive in a title that has always favored its competition, at least when it comes to comparing reference cards.





When manual overclocking is taken into account, AMD's RX 580 can typically see a performance increase of around 5 to 10%. While this is speculation, in theory, it would put it on par or very near the RX 590 in terms of performance. However, no overclock is guaranteed so keeping that in mind, the move to the 12 nm FinFET process delivers a guaranteed performance boost with the possibility of further overclocking headroom. This should allow the RX 590 to further increase its performance advantage over the RX 580 and 570. Only time will tell how things shake out, but at the very least users can expect the AMD Radeon RX 590 to deliver on average 10% more performance over the current crop of RX 580 graphics cards.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,379 (1.16/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL, HTC Vive
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Professional/Linux Mint
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
144 (0.11/day)
Processor i7-4790k 4.6Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97 Sniper.G1
Cooling Thermalright HR-02
Memory G.Skill 2400Mhz @ C10
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RX 580 Aorus
Storage Seagate Barracuda 2TB
Display(s) AOC G2260VWQ6
Audio Device(s) SB Recon 3Di
Power Supply Super Flower Golden Green HX 550w
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Office Keyboard
Software W10 build 17763
And price? I bought a second hand 580 for 170, hmmm
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2015
Messages
471 (0.26/day)
Location
Here
System Name Skypas
Processor Intel Core i7-6700
Motherboard Asus H170 Pro Gaming
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212X Turbo
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 Gaming X 6GB
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB + WD Blue 1TB
Display(s) LG 22EA63V
Case Corsair Carbide 400Q
Power Supply Seasonic SS-460FL2 w/ Deepcool XFan 120
Mouse Logitech B100
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K70
Software Windows 10 Pro

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
30,442 (6.22/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
Ok to shrink an existing arch by 2 nm yields, 10-15% performance increase due to clock speed and power draw being slightly less.

So no reconfiguring the arch. This takes confusion out of the cards unlike greens crippled versions.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
644 (0.36/day)
Location
127.0.0.1, London, UK
System Name Warranty Void Mk.IV
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600 @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Asus X470-I Strix
Cooling Arctic Freezer 240 + 2x Be Quiet! Pure Wings 2 140mm / Silverstone 120mm Slim
Memory Crucial Ballistix Elite 3600MHz 2x8GB CL16 - Tightened Sub-timings
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 2080 XC Ultra / Palit JetStream GTX 1070
Storage Crucial MX300 525GB/MX500/ADATA SP550 250GB
Display(s) LG 29UM69G-B / 2560x1080 + Oculus Rift S
Case Fractal Design Meshify TG/ Silverstone RVZ03-B
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC 1220+SupremeFX
Power Supply Corsair CX550M 550W / Silverstone SX650-G 650W
Mouse A4Tech Bloody V3/SteelSeries Rival 100/Logitech G302/G502
Keyboard Microsoft Comfort 3000 Curve/ CM Masterkeys Pro M
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 - LTSB
Depending on the price, this card could make new retail Vega cards almost a bad choice for the average gamer. Its extremely rare when there's a game that can utilize the raw compute power of Vega. A select few can actually make Polaris/Vega overtake a Pascal equivalent. So there is a chance that in time those cards might become a better buy overall, I mean the RX 580 already is if you are considering using Freesync...

But used a used 56 can be had for a pretty good price now.

I don't regret getting a 1070, but I have a Freesync monitor and I can't use what is already there, it's just not enabled. One of the cons, I had to look over which still haunt me. The state of the market had forced me to pick what was best at the time. Now I wish I had a 56 because I cannot find benchmarks with newer drivers for some older titles which typically favored Pascal, but OC'ing only bring single digit improvements. Maybe Polaris/Vega is overall better right now, it's been ages since launch.

I wouldn't mind a side-grade, but only if I knew for sure I was going to happy with the switch, I got burned with the R9 300 series before. With new Vega cards being rumored, most should probably hold-off on an upgrade until RTG shows what they have next.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
1,134 (0.31/day)
AMD has a contract with glofo or some shit, that it needs to take off current chips. Their fabline adapted to the 12NM proces and it's not really a rebrand. Well it is but not one AMD instigated for i would say. As with performance, this could only come with additional clockspeed increase. Since the 12nm is a better refinement, it would proberly be sitting at 1500Mhz with a TDP of approx 180W as the RX580 does. The RX580 on the other hands blows 200 to 220W of power when running on 1500Mhz.

Most gains when oc'ing was actually increasing the memory timings, and not clockspeeds. I.e straps of 1750Mhz applied on 2000Mhz and look for additional headroom when overclocking memory. This combined would give a nice increase but proberly not near close the 1070. The RX580 is a good mid range card but a Vega 56 is a better choice anyway.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,978 (1.71/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
Ok to shrink an existing arch by 2 nm yields, 10-15% performance increase due to clock speed and power draw being slightly less.

So no reconfiguring the arch. This takes confusion out of the cards unlike greens crippled versions.
Never heard of rebrands with a die shrink. The numbers look good, compared to the 1060 inbreeding. That was the idea behind this card, was it not?
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,900 (0.74/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 3200G
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Stock
Memory 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 470 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage 860Evo SATA 250GB
Display(s) AOC 24G2U
Mouse G703
Keyboard Apex m500 (red)
Software W10
It will be interesting to see how much have clocks improved with the new process. The leaked 3DMark snapshot had 1545MHz, compared to the base clock speed of the 580 which should be 1256.
Also interested to see how much performance/W improved on 12nm.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
30,442 (6.22/day)
Location
Republic of Texas (True Patriot)
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
Never heard of rebrands with a die shrink. The numbers look good, compared to the 1060 inbreeding. That was the idea behind this card, was it not?
To gain a lead yes.
 
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
43 (0.03/day)
Coming from Rebrand Technologies Group
hahaha:laugh::roll:

It will be interesting to see how much have clocks improved with the new process. The leaked 3DMark snapshot had 1545MHz, compared to the base clock speed of the 580 which should be 1256.
Also interested to see how much performance/W improved on 12nm.
exactly around 7.5%
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
1,041 (0.64/day)
Location
Pristina
System Name My PC
Processor 4670K@4.4GHz
Motherboard Gryphon Z87
Cooling CM 212
Memory 2x8GB+2x4GB @2400GHz
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1425MHz OC+, 8GB
Storage Intel 530 SSD 480GB + Intel 510 SSD 120GB + 2x500GB hdd raid 1
Display(s) HP envy 32 1440p
Case CM Mastercase 5
Audio Device(s) Sbz ZXR
Power Supply Antec 620W
Mouse G502
Keyboard G910
Software Win 10 pro
Naming is wrong they should name it 580X.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (6.15/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
I told you it's gonna be 590. Misleading naming again. But it's good they're releasing it, though just 7.5% increase is pretty measly,it technically makes it faster than 1060, but it's just a placeholder for Navi really and still very much nothing special as far as competing in the mid-range goes. Tell me when a $300 card can outperform the 1070.
It's techically not a rebrand, but it very much feels that way, this is 480/580 with just a very minor die shrink. As for power savings, do you really think they can bump clocks and save a noticeable amounts of power at the same time going from 14 to 12 ?
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
1,134 (0.31/day)
I told you it's gonna be 590. Misleading naming again. But it's good they're releasing it, though just 7.5% increase is pretty measly,it technically makes it faster than 1060, but it's just a placeholder for Navi really and still very much nothing special as far as competing in the mid-range goes. Tell me when a $300 card can outperform the 1070.
It's techically not a rebrand, but it very much feels that way, this is 480/580 with just a very minor die shrink. As for power savings, do you really think they can bump clocks and save a noticeable amounts of power at the same time going from 14 to 12 ?
Depends on what the real improvement on 12NM is compared to 14NM. If we're looking at the RX580 it's a 180W power enveloppe. So in order to archieve that same enveloppe with clocks of approx 1500Mhz it's only a 120Mhz increase. Perhaps AMD does a better job at binning now and the chips actually require a lower voltage compared to the RX580 which needed 1150mv in general. I can get mines working on 1090Mv and shaves off a few watts here and there on full load.

Lets await benches and OC results. We know that AMD already pushes the chips pretty much beyond. There is not much high OC headroom without giving into huge power requirements. (i.e Vega 56 on 400Watts / 1700Mhz core)
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2008
Messages
864 (0.19/day)
Location
Montreal
System Name Ryzen / Sairikiki / Tesseract
Processor 3600 / i7 920@3.73 / i5 4690k@4.2
Motherboard Steel Legend B450M / GB EX58-UDP4 / GB Z97MX-G5
Cooling Mugen 5 / Pure Rock / LQ-310
Memory Corsair Something 16 / Corsair Something 12 / Corsair 16
Video Card(s) Devil Vega 56 / Devil 480 / Aorus 580
Storage Way too many drives...
Display(s) LG 32GK850F / something / Sony w800b
Case EVOLV / AzzA 1000 / Carbide 240
Audio Device(s) Auzen Forte + GSP 500 / board / Yamaha RX-V475 + Pioneer AJ + Senn 6XX
Power Supply EVGA 750P2 / Corsair HX750 / Dark Power PRO10
Mouse G700
Keyboard G910
Software w10 64
Benchmark Scores I don't play benchmarks...
I told you it's gonna be 590. Misleading naming again. But it's good they're releasing it, though just 7.5% increase is pretty measly,it technically makes it faster than 1060, but it's just a placeholder for Navi really and still very much nothing special as far as competing in the mid-range goes. Tell me when a $300 card can outperform the 1070.
The 580 is already faster than the 1060. But yeah, the 590 would need to hit well over 1700GHz to beat a 1070... and that's not happening.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
3,113 (2.39/day)
Location
Lund, Sweden
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
A refresh with increased performance is always nice, but I'm very wary that this will come with an added cost as well, which... well, isn't really acceptable. The entirely broken current GPU market notwithstanding, the 480/580 4/8GB launched at $200/230 several years ago. Sure, DRAM prices have increased significantly since then, but if this launches above $200, I'll be very disappointed. The fact that they're naming it 590 instead of 580+ or something (580X would be consistent, but a bit too many X-es in one name) makes me worried that they'll be pricing this at a premium. Hardware refresh cycles extending as process improvements slow is unavoidable, and as such we can't keep expecting the dramatic perf/$ drops year over year that we've been used to - but paying more for a 10% increase several years down the line is still not good enough. This needs to be at $200 MSRP. Period.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2018
Messages
30 (0.04/day)
You can't have too much of an improvement on just a minor die shrink (the 12nm it's not a full node shrink).
If they chose to raise the clocks, you can't also expect lower power consumption. It will be the same of RX580.
Expect the same price of the RX580 (or a bit higher). They have no reasons to lower it (it's already lower than GTX1060's one).
Remaining RX580s will be discounted, of course. Good luck in finding one (they are waiting for supplies to end before introducing this RX590).
And that's all for 2018's AMD VGAs.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,978 (1.71/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
3,113 (2.39/day)
Location
Lund, Sweden
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,900 (0.74/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 3200G
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Stock
Memory 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 470 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage 860Evo SATA 250GB
Display(s) AOC 24G2U
Mouse G703
Keyboard Apex m500 (red)
Software W10
580 XT, just like in the old days :D
 

rtwjunkie

PC Gaming Enthusiast
Supporter
Joined
Jul 25, 2008
Messages
13,485 (2.99/day)
Location
Louisiana -Laissez les bons temps rouler!
System Name Bayou Phantom
Processor Core i7-8700k 4.4Ghz @ 1.18v
Motherboard ASRock Z390 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling All air: 2x140mm Fractal exhaust; 3x 140mm Cougar Intake; Enermax T40F Black CPU cooler
Memory 2x 16GB Mushkin Redline DDR-4 3200
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 2080 Ti Xc
Storage 1x 500 MX500 SSD; 1x 6TB WD Black; 2x 4TB WD Black; 1x400GB VelRptr; 1x 3TB WD Blue storage (eSATA)
Display(s) HP 27q 27" IPS @ 2560 x 1440
Case Fractal Design Define R4 Black w/Titanium front -windowed
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster Z
Power Supply Seasonic X-850
Mouse Coolermaster Sentinel III (large palm grip!)
Keyboard Logitech G610 Orion mechanical (Cherry Brown switches)
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Start10 & Fences 3.0 installed)
I don’t really see a die shrink as a rebrand. Yes the name sucks, but that alone doesn’t dictate any level of suckage. If the FF benchmark is to be believed, this could put AMD atop the middle tier. That’s not a bad place to be, assuming there is anybody left to buy this as an upgrade.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
11,852 (3.68/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech G602
Software MacOS 10.15.6
Am I the only person who finds it weird that the graphs show the Vega 56 being faster than the Vega 64? Don't get me wrong, if this has Vega 56/64 performance then that's great but, the numbers look weird to me.
 
Top