• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT Leads TechPowerUp Frontpage Poll for its Price-Performance

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,949 (7.37/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
The mainstream gaming GPU market segment is a jungle, with dozens of graphics card models from NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel fighting for a share of the largest segment of the market. With products priced between $250 and $450, these graphics cards are competing with value-ended gaming consoles such as the Xbox Series S. We drew up a list of graphics cards available in the market, and threw the question up to our readers on which card they'd buy given their pricing. The results are fascinating, and point to AMD getting the price-performance of its Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB graphics card just right. Our survey sample size is 16,333 responses.

Three key products emerge from our survey, with the rest being minor or academic choices. AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB at $370 is a simple-majority winner, with 52.4% or 8.552 responses backing it. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB at $440 is a distant second, with 21.6% or 3,520 votes in its favor. Intel Arc B580 12 GB at $250 is an interesting third place, with 10.1% or 1,648 votes backing it. The rest of the poll options are marginal choices, with none of the entries crossing 3.1%. The results highlight that there are three price-bands driving the 1080p gaming GPU segment—$250, $350, and $450.



$250 is what gamers are willing to pay to enter the segment. We tested the Intel Arc B580, and found it to provide an excellent value proposition for its starting price of $250. It's able to play any of today's games at 1080p with max settings, and has a surprising low performance-hit from enabling ray tracing, due to the generational advances Intel made with its ray tracing hardware.

$440 is as high as buyers are willing to go for a graphics card in this segment, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB scoring twice as many votes as the Arc B580. The RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB from our testing comes across as an aspirational product. While NVIDIA recommends this for 1080p gaming, it is capable of 1440p-class gaming with high to maxed-out settings, if you can get the NVIDIA App to pick the right settings. NVIDIA App tends to be conservative with its choices, so it would help to just use your in-game performance presets for a high setting, and playing with individual settings until you get 60 FPS with some combination, or better yet, take advantage of DLSS 4 with Multi Frame Generation. NVIDIA's new Transformer-based upscaling and frame generation models are, well, transformative. Even the "quality" preset yields excellent results.

The winner of this poll, however, is the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB. This card is being massively favored for its price of $370, which undercuts the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB. We tested the RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB and found it to be heavily compromised at its $380 price point, with its memory size eroding the GPU's aspirational value as a 1440p + RT product. The RX 9060 XT is a well-rounded product from our testing, because not only is it able to max out 1080p gameplay, but also brings some of the same capabilities of RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB in the form of 1440p gameplay with high settings. AMD took major strides in improving the ray tracing performance of RDNA 4 over its previous RDNA 3, with the RX 9060 XT nearly doubling RT-enabled frame-rates over the RX 7600 series. While the RX 9060 XT 16 GB is not as fast as the RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB, its $70 cheaper pricing comes through. Besides ray tracing performance, AMD also significantly improved image quality with FSR 4, which uses ML-based upscaling models. FSR 4 is expected to get additional features later this year.

In conclusion, our readers have done a good job cutting through the clutter of 1080p-class GPUs, and identifying three contemporary choices, with the Radeon RX 9060 XT at $370 emerging the winner, followed by the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB at $440, and the Intel Arc B580 12 GB at $250.

It's also worth noting just how averse our readers are to 8 GB graphics cards, particularly cards priced in the $300-$400 segment that offer 8 GB. These models are found fighting for scraps, with each securing under 3% of the vote. Notice how badly the 8 GB models of the RX 9060 XT and RTX 5060 Ti fare against their 16 GB siblings. Also notice how the Arc B580 with its 12 GB memory crushes the RTX 5050 that's priced on par, but only offering 8 GB. It's curtains for 8 GB.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
I'm wondering how are sales of RX 9060 XT and RX 9070 XT going for AMD. I know they said they were selling like 3x more than any card before in recent years, but still.
 
I'm wondering how are sales of RX 9060 XT and RX 9070 XT going for AMD. I know they said they were selling like 3x more than any card before in recent years, but still.

Im guessing its enough for them to stay in the business, but probably really depressing compared to Nvidia.
And then there is Intel Arc.....
 
Im guessing its enough for them to stay in the business, but probably really depressing compared to Nvidia.
And then there is Intel Arc.....
I wish they'd have about third of market share each so there would be good competition and they'd all be pushing really hard to be competitive. Instead we have NVIDIA just owning entire market share, AMD trying hard to gain at least mid segment and Intel is basically stuck at low end. Which is unfortunate because AMD actually has really good GPUs and tech and same goes for Intel actually. Their XeSS and ray tracing performance has been really good and for a newcomer, they aren't performing bad at all.
 
I wish they'd have about third of market share each so there would be good competition and they'd all be pushing really hard to be competitive. Instead we have NVIDIA just owning entire market share, AMD trying hard to gain at least mid segment and Intel is basically stuck at low end. Which is unfortunate because AMD actually has really good GPUs and tech and same goes for Intel actually. Their XeSS and ray tracing performance has been really good and for a newcomer, they aren't performing bad at all.
Intel has something AMD and Nvidia has not. The A380, which I find perfect for HTPC not meant for gaming. Either 7600 or 4060 are overkill and too expensive. With AV1 support A380 is just right.
 
I wish they'd have about third of market share each so there would be good competition and they'd all be pushing really hard to be competitive. Instead we have NVIDIA just owning entire market share, AMD trying hard to gain at least mid segment and Intel is basically stuck at low end. Which is unfortunate because AMD actually has really good GPUs and tech and same goes for Intel actually. Their XeSS and ray tracing performance has been really good and for a newcomer, they aren't performing bad at all.
How exactly are they trying hard? They are following the same strategy - nvidia -19,99$. They are also offering 8gb gpus that people don't seem to like. They are also doing the usual killing of their older GPUs in the blink of an eye, especially with high end RDNA3 not even supporting the only good upscaling solution amd has ever had. If that's trying hard id really like to see them not trying.

Regarding their RT performance, RT games in UE4 are completely unplayable on RDN4 due to 10 second long stutters, DF made a video about it and there is also a reddit thread with the issue.


 
Last edited:
Intel has something AMD and Nvidia has not. The A380, which I find perfect for HTPC not meant for gaming. Either 7600 or 4060 are overkill and too expensive. With AV1 support A380 is just right.

That's not how it works. AMD has Radeon 890M and Radeon 8060S, both of which support AV1 encode | decode with Video Core Next 4.0.5.

 
I wish they'd have about third of market share each so there would be good competition and they'd all be pushing really hard to be competitive. Instead we have NVIDIA just owning entire market share, AMD trying hard to gain at least mid segment and Intel is basically stuck at low end. Which is unfortunate because AMD actually has really good GPUs and tech and same goes for Intel actually. Their XeSS and ray tracing performance has been really good and for a newcomer, they aren't performing bad at all.
As one who got a B580 two months ago, I'm hoping Intel keeps at it; they've got a solid architecture that needs a bit of sandpaper here and there. Different departments are hanging on a thread, but it would be folly for them to close or sell the Arc division: they'll always need iGPUs. The upcoming B770 might beat the RX 9060 XT 16GB, but the question, as always, will be the price. I wonder what tricks Celestial will have up its sleeves too.
 
How exactly are they trying hard? They are following the same strategy - nvidia -19,99$. They are also offering 8gb gpus that people don't seem to like. They are also doing the usual killing of their older GPUs in the blink of an eye, especially with high end RDNA3 not even supporting the only good upscaling solution amd has ever had. If that's trying hard id really like to see them not trying.

Regarding their RT performance, RT games in UE4 are completely unplayable on RDN4 due to 10 second long stutters, DF made a video about it and there is also a reddit thread with the issue.


Nah, only hellblade has problems, the rest have been long patched by game developers.
People that have stutters are using PIRATED GAMES THAT ARE NOT UPDATED TO LATEST VERSION.
 
Voted personally for 5060 non-ti, based on pricing in my country. 9060 xt 16gb is obviously better, but 25-30% pricier, so no (for now at least).
 
That's not how it works. AMD has Radeon 890M and Radeon 8060S, both of which support AV1 encode | decode with Video Core Next 4.0.5.

You've shown me laptops. I have a HTPC case with R5 3350G Pro and it doesn't handle 4K resolution well, or AV1 YouTube. A380 is cheap and perfect for something to serve as multimedia device. I don't want a laptop.
 
I'm wondering how are sales of RX 9060 XT and RX 9070 XT going for AMD. I know they said they were selling like 3x more than any card before in recent years, but still.

Neither of them even show up on the June Steam hardware survey, unlike the Nvidia counterparts. The 5070 is shockingly high on those charts for such a new product, already at 0.99%.

This survey tells a lot more about the brand preferences of TPU regulars than it does about the wider market.
 
Nah, only hellblade has problems, the rest have been long patched by game developers.
People that have stutters are using PIRATED GAMES THAT ARE NOT UPDATED TO LATEST VERSION.
Digital foundry is using pirated games? Really?
 
Bought this card only 2 weeks ago when my 2060 Super gave up the ghost.
Techspot had just come up with its price/performance charts, and I couldn't/didn't want to afford the 9070 and above.

Full AMD system now, feels snappier in daily usage, able to turn on rebar/SAM easily, undervolting is a no-brainer.

How exactly are they trying hard? They are following the same strategy - nvidia -19,99$. They are also offering 8gb gpus that people don't seem to like. They are also doing the usual killing of their older GPUs in the blink of an eye, especially with high end RDNA3 not even supporting the only good upscaling solution amd has ever had. If that's trying hard id really like to see them not trying.
Why undercut themselves by significant margins for no reason when they are closing the gap in speed, function and features?
If people wanna fanboy, let them fanboy.
 
The only cards worth buying this generation, if you could buy them at msrp, is the B580, the 9060 XT 16 GB, and the 9070 XT.

Everything else sucks!
 
Digital foundry is using pirated games? Really?
Digital foundry is Nvidia biased, they jump at the opportunity to trash AMD and they know how things work, the usual cyberpunk 2077/Alan wake 2 ray tracing benchmarks and the obvious conclusion, AMD sucks at ray tracing, they know AMD has no hardware denoiser and AI denoiser but they still test this shit knowing AMD will lose.
I known this since i bought 9070 xt, i loved Callisto Protocol and i wanted to play Final Transmission DLC but 15$ for 2 hours of gameplay was a bit much, so i downloaded a cracked one, all maxed out and the game had random crashes, long freezes and sometimes missing textures.
Then i tried the payed one i have in steam library, no problems, everything worked fine.
Returnal is the same, cracked one doesn't work, payed one updated to latest version has some fixes that solves this problem.
Only Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice (Enhanced Edition) has the problem, wonder why ? last patch was in 2021, not even RDNA3 existed at that time.
 
Why are all y'all buying Nvidia at 1080p, its a waste. You need high performance for upscaling and frame generation. A GPU at 1080p has neither, you're being fed lies. Buy the best performance per dollar, stop buying by brand.
 
Digital foundry is Nvidia biased, they jump at the opportunity to trash AMD and they know how things work, the usual cyberpunk 2077/Alan wake 2 ray tracing benchmarks and the obvious conclusion, AMD sucks at ray tracing, they know AMD has no hardware denoiser and AI denoiser but they still test this shit knowing AMD will lose.
I known this since i bought 9070 xt, i loved Callisto Protocol and i wanted to play Final Transmission DLC but 15$ for 2 hours of gameplay was a bit much, so i downloaded a cracked one, all maxed out and the game had random crashes, long freezes and sometimes missing textures.
Then i tried the payed one i have in steam library, no problems, everything worked fine.
Returnal is the same, cracked one doesn't work, payed one updated to latest version has some fixes that solves this problem.
Only Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice (Enhanced Edition) has the problem, wonder why ? last patch was in 2021, not even RDNA3 existed at that time.
So you are saying digital foundry is using pirated software because they hate amd. What about ancient gameplay, he noticed the exact same thing as digital foundry while all of his content is about amd. Is he using pirated games too?

If last patch was in 2021 then it should be having issues on nvidia cards as well. It doesnt. Its only rdna4.
 
Im guessing its enough for them to stay in the business, but probably really depressing compared to Nvidia.
And then there is Intel Arc.....
Well, it's enough that half the 9070xts are out of stock perpetually, so if the numbers are disappointing that is entirely on AMD for not supplying sufficient GPU stock.

Why are all y'all buying Nvidia at 1080p, its a waste. You need high performance for upscaling and frame generation. A GPU at 1080p has neither, you're being fed lies. Buy the best performance per dollar, stop buying by brand.
You're assuming other people's needs are the same as your own.

Digital foundry is Nvidia biased, they jump at the opportunity to trash AMD and they know how things work, the usual cyberpunk 2077/Alan wake 2 ray tracing benchmarks and the obvious conclusion, AMD sucks at ray tracing, they know AMD has no hardware denoiser and AI denoiser but they still test this shit knowing AMD will lose.
I known this since i bought 9070 xt, i loved Callisto Protocol and i wanted to play Final Transmission DLC but 15$ for 2 hours of gameplay was a bit much, so i downloaded a cracked one, all maxed out and the game had random crashes, long freezes and sometimes missing textures.
Then i tried the payed one i have in steam library, no problems, everything worked fine.
Returnal is the same, cracked one doesn't work, payed one updated to latest version has some fixes that solves this problem.
Only Hellblade: Senua’s Sacrifice (Enhanced Edition) has the problem, wonder why ? last patch was in 2021, not even RDNA3 existed at that time.
LMFAO. Talk about massive assumptions.
 
Here in the states the cheapest 5060ti 16G is $110 more than the 9060XT 16 GB

And all the 8GB cards are hot garbage so not really a surprise in the US anyways.

It's not that it's good it's that everything it's competing with is bad or terribly priced.

5060ti is better just not $110 better.

 
I'm interested to revisit this and compare the divide in sales/ownership in the long term vs these poll results. We know in the enthusiast space that Radeon is disproportionately more popular than what their sales and market share amount to, perhaps even an order of magnitude more so.

As with most of these polls, they're purely hypothetical in nature with no onus to put money where your mouth is, or burden of proof to own pre-requisite hardware to answer certain questions, and so on (depending on the question). So to a hypothetical question, all you really get is a hypothetical answer, especially with hypothetical pricing that is guaranteed to vary wildly depending on location.
 
I'm interested to revisit this and compare the divide in sales/ownership in the long term vs these poll results. We know in the enthusiast space that Radeon is disproportionately more popular than what their sales and market share amount to, perhaps even an order of magnitude more so.

As with most of these polls, they're purely hypothetical in nature with no onus to put money where your mouth is, or burden of proof to own pre-requisite hardware to answer certain questions, and so on (depending on the question). So to a hypothetical question, all you really get is a hypothetical answer, especially with hypothetical pricing that is guaranteed to vary wildly depending on location.

Also nvidia is insanely strong in prebuilts where the average consumer doesn't even know what they are actually getting.

I would be more interested in the split in the diy only market where people actually know what they are buying at least a larger % of them do anyways.

The only place I can see comparatively list of that is amazon and newegg and amd seems to be doing much better than previous generations been watching weekly amd would be lucky to have 1 card in the top ten previous generations.



 
Last edited:
AMD is doing well!
it’s made the best-sellers list several times, which wasn’t as common with RDNA 3.

I hope UDNA continues the trend RDNA 4 started: decent architectural leaps and, who knows, maybe even a flagship that’s finally worth the price.
1753660908920.png
 
I would be more interested in the split in the diy only market where people actually know what they are buying at least a larger % of them do anyways.
Absolutely I'd love a look at that too, but I don't think we'll ever get a true look at DIY only market share/sales globally, or even enough stores to give an accurate indication overall, just a handful of stores that have views for the popular products or share sales reports. Has Mindfactory been wheeled out yet? :rolleyes:

I certainly believe they're doing better this generation compared to RDNA3 sales, maybe about the same as RDNA2 at an educated guess, maybe slightly better even with a less comprehensive product stack.
 
Here in the states the cheapest 5060ti 16G is $110 more than the 9060XT 16 GB

And all the 8GB cards are hot garbage so not really a surprise in the US anyways.

It's not that it's good it's that everything it's competing with is bad or terribly priced.

5060ti is better just not $110 better.


Just show how HUB cherry picked the game when doing launch review.
1% difference with cherry picked game, 8% difference when games cannot be cherry picked (must support both FSR4/DLSS4) LOL.

Their data is just not very reliable with all that biases.
 
Back
Top