• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD RX 9070 XT & RX 9070 non-XT thread (OC, undervolt, benchmarks, ...)

PS: Sorry for the possible spam and off-topic in your thread @LittleBro but would you like to join the club as well? https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/rx-9000-series-gpu-owners-club.333786 Everybody's welcome! :) - Also, I think it can be useful to cross-reference this post also after the list, so ppl can go directly to OC/tuning stuff on the 9070, let me know! :toast:
About that ... I did not know of the club thread. Had I known, I would not have created this thread. Shame on me.

I'd gladly join, unfortunately I am not a RX 9070 (XT) owner yet. I've been desperately waiting for my card to get delivered for almost 3 weeks now. I see Gigabyte RX 9070 XT in stock literally everywhere. No one buys those cards lol. Any other RX 9070 XT is unobtanium here, except Sapphire PURE (I don't want white colored card). So I keep waiting ...
 
About that ... I did not know of the club thread. Had I known, I would not have created this thread. Shame on me.

I'd gladly join, unfortunately I am not a RX 9070 (XT) owner yet. I've been desperately waiting for my card to get delivered for almost 3 weeks now. I see Gigabyte RX 9070 XT in stock literally everywhere. No one buys those cards lol. Any other RX 9070 XT is unobtanium here, except Sapphire PURE (I don't want white colored card). So I keep waiting ...
It's perfectly normal and nothing to worry about, shame on you for what? For not noticing a thread opened just hours ago from yours? Come on!!!

Whenever you have it, please join, hope it's sooner than later :)
 
1743895087454.png


This is my 9070 Pulse score.

My settings are:

-80mV voltage offset, 2650 mem frequency (fast timing) and +10% power limit


It's game stable, not crashed once in any the games I'm playing or testing. Really happy with the cards performance in general.
 
View attachment 393606

This is my 9070 Pulse score.

My settings are:

-80mV voltage offset, 2650 mem frequency (fast timing) and +10% power limit


It's game stable, not crashed once in any the games I'm playing or testing. Really happy with the cards performance in general.
This pulse card has no factory OC right? Nice tuning settings. :cool:
 
Hi everyone,

I got my ASUS Prime Radeon RX 9070 XT OC Edition from Microcenter on a whim the very same day it dropped.

And I just wanna say this is the most finicky card I've ever owned.

I have always purchased Nvidia cards up until now because of all the nonsense going on. Started with the GTX 750 then 1070, 1080, RTX 3070, 3080.

I ran DDU as it is recommended to avoid issues, but I still seem to have them every time I try mess with the settings.

Even disabling "zero RPM" will cause the next boot to revert to default settings.

Sometimes when booting the system the card will not be recognized and I get a black screen. once I reboot, I get the generic driver installed by windows so I've had to reinstall the amd driver twice so far.

I really want to enjoy this card. I'm sick of supporting Nvidia's practices and proprietary BS, but I am seriously thinking of selling this card to get a 5070ti

Is anybody else experiencing this?
 
Hi everyone,

I got my ASUS Prime Radeon RX 9070 XT OC Edition from Microcenter on a whim the very same day it dropped.

And I just wanna say this is the most finicky card I've ever owned.

I have always purchased Nvidia cards up until now because of all the nonsense going on. Started with the GTX 750 then 1070, 1080, RTX 3070, 3080.

I ran DDU as it is recommended to avoid issues, but I still seem to have them every time I try mess with the settings.

Even disabling "zero RPM" will cause the next boot to revert to default settings.

Sometimes when booting the system the card will not be recognized and I get a black screen. once I reboot, I get the generic driver installed by windows so I've had to reinstall the amd driver twice so far.

I really want to enjoy this card. I'm sick of supporting Nvidia's practices and proprietary BS, but I am seriously thinking of selling this card to get a 5070ti

Is anybody else experiencing this?

I have the Prime 9070 OC (non-XT). I've had exactly one crash in approx one month, and that was in a game that's held together with bubblegum (Lords of the Fallen). My previous card was a 3060 Ti, so should be a fairly similar driver situation to you. I did DDU in safemode, then tweaked Windows to prevent it from overwriting the driver. Did you update your motherboard's BIOS, and/or manually set the PCIe generation in the BIOS?
 
I have the Prime 9070 OC (non-XT). I've had exactly one crash in approx one month, and that was in a game that's held together with bubblegum (Lords of the Fallen). My previous card was a 3060 Ti, so should be a fairly similar driver situation to you. I did DDU in safemode, then tweaked Windows to prevent it from overwriting the driver. Did you update your motherboard's BIOS, and/or manually set the PCIe generation in the BIOS?
I followed these steps as well. Every instruction video on yt regarding DDU recommended this. My motherboard bios is up to date, but I’m not sure if the PCIe generation is set. I may have to look at my mobo’s manual about how to do it. (Asus Z590-p prime)

at any event, it really is frustrating to go through all this trouble just to game on this card. I might just do a full windows re install since I cant even keep the overclock option on without the system resetting the drivers or going back to default settings upon reboot.
 
I followed these steps as well. Every instruction video on yt regarding DDU recommended this. My motherboard bios is up to date, but I’m not sure if the PCIe generation is set. I may have to look at my mobo’s manual about how to do it. (Asus Z590-p prime)

at any event, it really is frustrating to go through all this trouble just to game on this card. I might just do a full windows re install since I cant even keep the overclock option on without the system resetting the drivers or going back to default settings upon reboot.

That really sucks. A clean Windows install shouldn't be needed but it's not a bad idea. Re-seating the card could also help. Adrenaline will reset OC settings if it detects a crash. Check Windows Reliability History or Event Viewer to figure out what's crashing and why. When I first got my 3060 Ti (at launch), it would randomly hard crash in No Man's Sky, and nothing that I tried helped until they finally fixed it months later.
 
Hi everyone,

I got my ASUS Prime Radeon RX 9070 XT OC Edition from Microcenter on a whim the very same day it dropped.

And I just wanna say this is the most finicky card I've ever owned.

I have always purchased Nvidia cards up until now because of all the nonsense going on. Started with the GTX 750 then 1070, 1080, RTX 3070, 3080.

I ran DDU as it is recommended to avoid issues, but I still seem to have them every time I try mess with the settings.

Even disabling "zero RPM" will cause the next boot to revert to default settings.

Sometimes when booting the system the card will not be recognized and I get a black screen. once I reboot, I get the generic driver installed by windows so I've had to reinstall the amd driver twice so far.

I really want to enjoy this card. I'm sick of supporting Nvidia's practices and proprietary BS, but I am seriously thinking of selling this card to get a 5070ti

Is anybody else experiencing this?

Any CPU or RAM tuning?
 
nothing crazy... just the regular XMP profile and bios aitunerOC
what cpu? I would suggest try turning the aitunerOC off.
 
Hi everyone,

I got my ASUS Prime Radeon RX 9070 XT OC Edition from Microcenter on a whim the very same day it dropped.

And I just wanna say this is the most finicky card I've ever owned.

I have always purchased Nvidia cards up until now because of all the nonsense going on. Started with the GTX 750 then 1070, 1080, RTX 3070, 3080.

I ran DDU as it is recommended to avoid issues, but I still seem to have them every time I try mess with the settings.

Even disabling "zero RPM" will cause the next boot to revert to default settings.

Sometimes when booting the system the card will not be recognized and I get a black screen. once I reboot, I get the generic driver installed by windows so I've had to reinstall the amd driver twice so far.

I really want to enjoy this card. I'm sick of supporting Nvidia's practices and proprietary BS, but I am seriously thinking of selling this card to get a 5070ti

Is anybody else experiencing this?
Had this happen on NVIDIA cards too. Check Windows Reliability History, and / or Event Viewer. Have you tried reseating the GPU?

If you want, you could try reinstalling windows. I'd also make sure that you do not have any graphics drivers leftover from your other cards. This (not this issue in particular but just issues in general) tend to happen when you switch from AMD to NVIDIA, or vice versa. Not necessarily either parties fault.
 
View attachment 393606

This is my 9070 Pulse score.

My settings are:

-80mV voltage offset, 2650 mem frequency (fast timing) and +10% power limit


It's game stable, not crashed once in any the games I'm playing or testing. Really happy with the cards performance in general.

So, you going to be the guinea pig, or what? :D (I know, I know...kidding...most people don't have one of those things laying around, but it'll be supported by the software at some point soon, I'm sure).


This is like my most favorite type of thing, so I'm really looking forward to whatever results people get. I bet the Pulse->Pulse works, for instance.
I might have to dig around and see which cards are compatible and which has the highest PL, unless somebody else out there is doing that already.

...and sorry for highjacking your thread. I was just happy to see Dawid on it so quick. Those results really do take me back to the days before the scene died. :clap:
 
So, you going to be the guinea pig, or what? :D (I know, I know...kidding...most people don't have one of those things laying around, but it'll be supported by the software at some point soon, I'm sure).


This is like my most favorite type of thing, so I'm really looking forward to whatever results people get. I bet the Pulse->Pulse works, for instance.
I might have to dig around and see which cards are compatible and which has the highest PL, unless somebody else out there is doing that already.

...and sorry for highjacking your thread. I was just happy to see Dawid on it so quick. Those results really do take me back to the days before the scene died. :clap:
As far as I can remember, ATI/AMD has done this from time to time. Here I thought the 9070 was overpriced in order for AMD to make up for the XT variant.
 
As far as I can remember, ATI/AMD has done this from time to time. Here I thought the 9070 was overpriced in order for AMD to make up for the XT variant.

They have, but not for a while. They also didn't used to set power levels or voltage limits at all (until long after nvidia), and after they did clock limits often more for safety than [extreme] product separation.
So this takes me back to a happier time when things like that separated the companies. And sometimes their clientele. The AMD/ATi users were often the informed nerds; sometimes more time and/or less money.
This is why 9070 is priced so close; IYKYK and those that don't can buy the 'better' (stock) thing and be none the wiser. As I've said before, I think it always should have been (allowed to overclock to) this level.
I don't like what they did with the stock 9070 bios (PL) at all, and was VERY out of character for them to cut overclockers out of tangible performance gains. Again, IYKYK, but it's why I don't like the stock 9070.
This is why I clapped back so hard; they're not taking it from (us) without me dying on this hill. nVIDIA can straight fuck themselves for doing what they do, and I'm not going to let AMD become like nVIDIA.
THEY know what I'm talking about, even if most people do not. The community used to be a much better place when this was how AMD/ATi operated, and some (quietly) knew; sharing it on forums etc.
Huang literally said you shouldn't know how things work; you don't need to...and this is why you do. AMD, through things like this, implores people to learn/understand req perf (and find/use these bioses, etc).
Because then you don't get taken advantage of (in ways such as Huang does with products he doesn't want you to understand) and are able to get exactly what you need, sometimes cheaper (if more envolved.)

It's made that fun little line where you had your Paul Walkers/Vin Diesels of the scene, which actually made the hobby fun. For contrast to (sometimes uninformed) people that own something like a stock 5080/Ferrari.
Sure, some could just buy equal/better stock, but this is more fun/interesting. And not all people can, nor do they necessarily care about power usage (as much) rather than absolute perf/$. Now that option exists.
It's a lot more accessible (in a monetary sense); just requires a little bit of knowledge, or willingness to learn, and maybe a little bit of courage at first. I'm sure the bios nerds will make some new friends.
Maybe acquire some long-term help in that section of the forum if those people stick around, and I think that's exactly what we need. The Airman probably doesn't want to do it until they're 90, but glad still here.
...and is probably going to see a lot more business relatively soon. That may make them excited (as I think they like to help), but also nervous...I don't want to speak for them...but hopefully you understand.
We're the type of people that like to teach/help, but it can get repetative, so we appreciate it when somebody else can learn and also help with that same knowledge base and/or general intent.
The people that notice/appreciate the real-world gains from this will be the type that do.

As I've said, how many out there can't afford a $600/700+ card now, and even a $500 or maybe even $400 card even later. Probably a lot of people. But they could do this, and IMO be quite happy.
It's for those same people that used to buy the 120hz+ 1440p Korean monitors back in the day (and maybe even still something similar now). Maybe the type with the best bang-for-buck 1080p/1440p monitor.

This is for them, and the world needs more of not only those (informed) people, but things for them. I used to be that kid/guy; I bet many of us were. I also had a 9500pro->9700pro, and many other things.
I also still appreciate these things, even if relatively-speaking I aim for a higher-end market. Maybe I'll be the guy overclocking a 24GB next-gen card so it's 'good-enough' vs a stock 32GB card in next-gen games.
Who knows?

To me, this is a gift (from AMD). For that person that can barely afford that 1080p/1440p monitor, and maybe eventually barely scrape together the money for the 9070 they've been eyeing, even if down the road.
From somebody that maybe didn't know it could do that, but is buying something better anyway.
I truly am thankful for things like this whenever they occur. Not only to help those people, but also for the community to perhaps gain more people with that (eventual) knowledge and mindset long-term.

As you can see, the mod does exactly what I thought it would. The results take something like this and make the mins ~48+ [VRR]. For other games ~50fps at stock, it should be ~60+. That's perfect for many people.
And likely (especially if they're the type where this might be a big/long-term purchase to them) might last them through the whole next console generation, even if not at the highest settings forever.
I'm thinking of that kid with his first job or maybe some B-day/holiday money that eventually sees one for <$400 on a forum/ebay when the newer (3nm) gen launches and similar performance costs that.
Or maybe someone that could afford that card, or received it, but cannot afford an upgrade later; this may allow them to have a decent experience that much longer. Maybe a hand-me-down for a kid/friend.

This makes the 9070 not e-waste or an upsell; they could potentially go from one person to another as the first buys something better, and potentially become legendary (especially once price drops over time).

I think if you start using my mindset, or at least try to be understanding of it, you'll begin to understand why these things are so special/important to me.
This is why I want to see results; I want to see those people that the 9070 was a big deal for them have a great(er) experience; now staying in the VRR window and/or keep 60fps at high settings.
I also want to see those people learn how to flash a bios (and/or quietly e-mail the company reps for bioses [shh] and/or the creators of the bios-flashing software to implement it.) Welcome to my (former) life!
Mb some people screw up and they realize that's what OCing used to be; it's not the companies fault (and don't blame them for your choices) but some 'risks' are worth it...and some are not as big as you think.
Maybe someone discovers some weird relatively amazing bios works where it 'shouldnt'...and that person should be proud of themselves.
I hope many-a new relationship/appreciation for what people do is formed, and along the way people learn skills they never thought they would (and hopefully eventually share them in some productive way).

This is kind of my goal; that more people start to 'get' it. Hopefully without having to literally explain it ever again. There's a reason why this is usually 'quiet', but hey, reward those companies that allow it.
I want you to just look at AMD overclocking results (and/or these bios things) and understand; just see the performance and extrapolate "Huh, that looks like it would be good-enough for ____" vs something more-expensive. Because this is literally what they do. Most just don't talk about it. I only did because it's pretty clear (with CPUs, not just GPUs) they've been trying to take it away.
And I am not going to let them without making a scene, because I care about everyone having the best they can regardless if from knowledge/time (from things like this) or money (buying a better thing stock).

I don't like talking about this stuff, bc then may cost more defeating the actual purpose, and only did because I thought stock 9070 took what AMD has been trending towards too far ($ per not attainable perf).
Just like 7900GRE at first (which needed that 10% from overclocking the memory).

Just like...well, I'm not going to go and screw up all of AMD's entire product lines explaining why things are the way they are. But let's just say this; to some people (or maybe just me) it's incredibly obvious.
And sometimes they take it too far (and are like nVIDIA making sure certain products do not infringe on other/certain future products). And I will let you know when I see they do, one way or another. :)
 
Last edited:
Resultados.
 

Attachments

  • Captura de pantalla 2025-04-11 144822.png
    Captura de pantalla 2025-04-11 144822.png
    795.7 KB · Views: 83
Hello everyone,

A couple of weeks ago I was lucky enough to get myself a Sapphire Pulse RX 9070 XT @ MSRP.

I'm still fiddling with it, but it's safe to say that I wasn't lucky with the silicon lottery, which is expected, since it is a base model.

I've seen many cases where a -100 or at least a -80 mV undervolt is possible, so I'm gradually testing stability on a variety of games, to find my sweet spot with this card.

Below are the settings I'm currently running at:

1745429738097.png


Haven't touched memory clocks yet, but I'd be glad to hear from you what is an average safe memory OC achievable with this model.

Thx.
 
Anything that does not burn your card is safe. Some people can reach 2750, some not even 2700.
I still wonder why to further torture VRAM when it's temps are already quite high enough.
 
My final daily OC of my 9070XT Hellhound.
-100mv is unstable, 2830 Fast Timings starts to break apart.
Core Clock Offsets are useless because the stock boost cap is already 3450MHz out of the box.


2025-04-24_10-39.png

2025-04-24_10-38.png

2025-04-24_10-33_1.png

2025-04-24_10-33.png
 
My final daily OC of my 9070XT Hellhound.
-100mv is unstable, 2830 Fast Timings starts to break apart.
Core Clock Offsets are useless because the stock boost cap is already 3450MHz out of the box.


View attachment 396603
View attachment 396604
View attachment 396605
View attachment 396606

Just to clarify as I have the last 4 gens of Radeon OCing in my head and am trying to understand the 90xx series before getting one:

With your settings as displayed, you don't need to move the Maximum Clock Frequency setting because it will already boost to 3450 MHz in some (lighter load) situations? Moving it up higher does nothing to the clocks because they're already constrained by other factors.
 
I suspect something may be wrong with driver 25.3.1. I had a very hard time to stabilize my undervolt. I had occasional crashes even at only -20mV. I DDU'ed my PC and jumped straight to 25.3.2 (now on 25.4.1) and the problem to stabilize was gone. I run -60mV since then.

If you have unexpected behavior when undervolting or raising the power limit, I strongly recommend that you use DDU and jump straight to drivers v25.4.1. It could help, it worked for me so it's worth a try.

I still wonder why to further torture VRAM when it's temps are already quite high enough.
I don't see why not, I ran FurMark until temps stabilized. VRAM stabilized at 82°C. I then OC'ed VRAM to 2820MHz and activated Fast Timing (FurMark was still running) and waited 10 minutes and temp was still 82°C. In my case what make VRAM temp fluctuate is the temp of the hot spot. When hot spot raise, VRAM temp raise as well.
 
Last edited:
With your settings as displayed, you don't need to move the Maximum Clock Frequency setting because it will already boost to 3450 MHz in some (lighter load) situations? Moving it up higher does nothing to the clocks because they're already constrained by other factors.
a 9070 XT will never reach 3450MHz at all.
The Stock boost limit is fused into the card just like a 7900XTX has a boost cap of around 3200MHz Out of the Box if you don't touch the core clock slider.
RDNA4 no longer has a core clock slider where you decide at what clockspeed it runs, you can just offset the 3450MHz boost clock cap by either -500 or +1000MHz.
Underclocking is impossible (2950MHz is the lowest you can get) and overclocking the card with it is impossible too since you can't reach the stock boost at all.
 
Last edited:
a 9070 XT will never reach 3450MHz at all.
The Stock boost limit is fused into the card just like a 7900XTX has a boost cap of around 3200MHz Out of the Box if you don't touch the core clock slider.
RDNA4 no longer has a core clock slider where you decide at what clockspeed it runs, you can just offset the 3450MHz boost clock cap by either -500 or +1000MHz.
Underclocking is impossible (2950MHz is the lowest you can get) and overclocking the card with it is impossible since you can't reach the stock boost at all.

Thanks for that info! That makes me quite unhappy as underclocking is simply part of using a video card for me, it's one aspect of the fun of PC gaming. However I underclock for efficiency reasons and based on W1zz's VSync tests, the 9070 and XT are excellent at managing their power use in low demand situations, better than the RTX 5K series which is a notable role reversal. Almost like AMD said "We got this" while Nvidia said "Who cares?", though the 5060 Ti finally broke the trend of Nv power wasting this gen.

This is good info to ponder...
 
Back
Top