• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT and Ryzen 7 3800XT Benchmarks Surface

yup.money doesn't grow on trees.it grows in your wallet.
Well lately it goes outta my wallet :P
Either way I'm still waiting for 4000 series desktops CPUs. It is still a good move. The price for these XT's is lower or what is it?
 
Well lately it goes outta my wallet :p
Either way I'm still waiting for 4000 series desktops CPUs. It is still a good move. The price for these XT's is lower or what is it?
Rumors are the 4000 series pricing might be a bit saltier than we have been accustomed, so if this is the case these XT's will remain a decent alternative for the smaller wallets
 
Rumors are the 4000 series pricing might be a bit saltier than we have been accustomed, so if this is the case these XT's will remain a decent alternative for the smaller wallets
Either way, I will wait for the 4000 series. I only hope it will be worth the wait (honestly i do believe it will be worth it) even if the price is slightly higher.
There's always good to have an alternative. AMD has thought about everything I guess.
 
If AMD says July-September, it means September 30th in Cupertino, so October 1st for most of the world, or at least late in the evening.
 
Pretty much. :)


Might be optimistic. Plus, seen referenced around that it's expected that Zen3 models won't be launched all at the same, so some of these refreshed XT models might have a more extended market coverage than others. Still a lot of guessing out there at this point.
 
max 4670mhz ? man,that's not that much over 3900x,even the early batches did that.
That's all-core. 3900X allcore was what? like 4300 something at best?
but did they ? aren't they just new 2020 ryzens they're renaming ?
The 2000Mhz Infinity Fabric clock would disprove that. None of the current ones have been able to go over 1900MHz
is that confirmed ?
Nothing is confirmed. Ever. Not even the day we die. Even if it were confired what would that give you? They could postpone at the last second anyway.
 
That's all-core. 3900X allcore was what? like 4300 something at best?

The 2000Mhz Infinity Fabric clock would disprove that. None of the current mones have been able to go over 1900M

Nothing is confirmed. Ever. Not even the day we die. Even if it were confired what would that give you? They could postpone at the last second anyway.
it says "max turbo core".are you 100% sure this is a stable,sustained all core full load turbo ?
 
it says "max turbo core".are you 100% sure this is a stable,sustained all core full load turbo ?
Not 100% sure but seems to be: https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-3000...7-3800xt-ryzen-5-3600xt-cpu-benchmarks-rumor/
What's really interesting about these benchmarks is not the performance metrics themselves but rather the information listed by CPU-monkey which lists down the all-core boost clock speeds for these Matisse Refresh processors. According to the information, the Ryzen 9 3900XT has an all-core boost clock of up to 4.6 GHz across its 12 cores, the Ryzen 7 3800XT has an all-core boost clock of up to 4.5 GHz across its 8 cores and the Ryzen 5 3600XT has an all-core boost clock of 4.5 GHz too across its 6 cores.
 
Maximum Turbo Core Clock lists highest frequency seen during the benchmark run.
 
Maximum Turbo Core Clock lists highest frequency seen during the benchmark run.
that's what it sounds."max turbo" - highest clock recorded.this is not sustained all core turbo by any means.
 
Maximum Turbo Core Clock lists highest frequency seen during the benchmark run.
If so then why does it list only 4,6.... something if it should be 4,8?
Something does not add up here. Either these are early revisions that do not have the final 4,8Ghz boost or the 4,8Ghz reported max is false. I guess we will see in a few weeks when these are announced.
 
If so then why does it list only 4,6.... something if it should be 4,8?
Something does not add up here. Either these are early revisions that do not have the final 4,8Ghz boost or the 4,8Ghz reported max is false. I guess we will see in a few weeks when these are announced.
Jesus Christ how do you know exactly what it should be ?
 
leaks are no more than rumors like every rumor.
 
Hello? Leaks?

Here, let me circle a few things from your link for you.

1590587297285.png
 
oh here we go with GPP in a ryzen thread :roll:
the hell are you even comparing ? this is a thread about the exact clocks.I'm not sure that amd are 100% sure themselves.
 
oh here we go with GPP in a ryzen thread :roll:
Just an example. I could bring others but what's the point? You don't even believe XT models exist. It's not my duty to convince you or others otherwise. You believe what you want to believe and i believe what i want.
 
Back
Top