• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD to Launch FX-9590 Refresh Package

Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
1,902 (0.75/day)
Location
CZ
System Name TITAN Slayer / CPUCannon / MassFX
Processor i7 5960X @ 4.6Ghz / i7 3960x @5.0Ghz / FX6350 @ 4.?Ghz
Motherboard Rampage V Extreme / Rampage IV Extreme / MSI 970 Gaming
Cooling Phanteks PHTC14PE 2.5K 145mm TRs / Custom waterloop / Phanteks PHTC14PE + 3K 140mm Noctuas
Memory Crucial 2666 11-13-13-25 1.45V / G.skill RipjawsX 2400 10-12-12-34 1.7V / Crucial 2133 9-9-9-27 1.7V
Video Card(s) 3 Fury X in CF / R9 Fury 3840 cores 1145/570 1.3V / Nothing ATM
Storage 500GB Crucial SSD and 3TB WD Black / WD 1TB Black(OS) + WD 3TB Green / WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) LG 29UM67 80Hz/Asus mx299q 2560x1080 @ 84Hz / Asus VX239 1920x1080 @60hz
Case Dismatech easy v3.0 / Xigmatek Alfar (Open side panel)
Audio Device(s) M-audio M-track / realtek ALC 1150
Power Supply EVGA G2 1600W / CoolerMaster V1000 / Seasonic 620 M12-II
Mouse Mouse in review process/Razer Naga Epic 2011/Razer Naga 2014
Keyboard Keyboard in review process / Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2014/Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2011
Software Windows 7 Ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate
Benchmark Scores cinebench 15.41 3960x @ 5.3ghz Wprime32m 3.352 3960x @ 5.25ghz Super PI 32m: 6m 42s 472ms @5.25ghz
Well now I'm just gonna go buy an FX4350(it clocks sooo high and I don't really need that many cores on my secondary rig) like I wanted to in the first place. If this had been a some how improved 8 core FX I would be all over it but no AMD just releases another FX9590 with the SAME CLOCKS no less.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2011
Messages
689 (0.23/day)
Processor Intel
Motherboard MSI
Cooling Cooler Master
Memory Corsair
Video Card(s) Nvidia
Storage Samsung/Western Digital
Display(s) Samsung
Case Thermaltake
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply EVGA
Mouse A4TECH
Keyboard UniKey
Software Windows 10 x64
AMD plans to deliver 25x APU energy efficiency gains but also plans to deliver 25x CPU energy consumption, heat gains. :roll:

Now compare:
Code:
         i7-4790K - FX-9590
5GHz     air           water
nm       22nm          32nm
price    340$          360$
So you are paying same price for old tech. :rockout:
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
26,434 (5.23/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K@4.8GHz(Quick and dirty)
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix GTX 1080Ti
Storage 500GB Crucial MX500 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 480GB MX200 SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
I know the 28nm nodes are busying pumping out PS4/Xbone APUs, but I think it is time to dedicate a little of that 28nm time to a new AM3+ CPU! Come on AMD!
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
11,357 (4.06/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H100i V2
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) Sapphire AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 SSD Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB, 1x512GB Samsung 960 Pro NVMe
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 18.04 (5.3.0 Mainline Kernel)
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
That is ridiculous. Intel just relaunched its already 1-year-old piece of junk and you all jump around it like small kids...

As I said, give AMD your damn money and they will have the financial resources to move onto new manufacturing processes. God damn it!
I'm a consumer not an investor. If AMD has a good plan they should be able to pitch it to investors to gain confidence in AMD stock so people will actually buy it. The problem is that AMD keeps doing these PR moves instead of focusing on what is important. I'm not going to buy something lesser because I want AMD to do better. They need to have their own plan and they need to say how they're going to achieve that goal so people will be willing to give the money in exchange for a stake in the company. People buy good products as consumers, they don't buy something expecting the next one to be better because you bought their product in the first place, that's not the consumer's job. The consumer's job is to find the best product for their needs, be it performance or cost effectiveness, take your pick. Also given their latest track record, even if I were an investor, I wouldn't invest in AMD as it stands right now. They need to clean up their act first.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,024 (0.38/day)
Location
New Jersey, USA
System Name Current Rig
Processor Intel i7 920 oc to 3.5ghz
Motherboard MSI x58 Platinum
Cooling Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Memory G.Skill 6gb ddr3 1333mhz 7-7-7-18
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 670 OC WindForce 3X GV-N670OC-2GD
Storage Samsung EVO SSD
Display(s) Viewsonic 1440x900 5ms
Case CoolMaster HAF 932
Power Supply Coolmax 950w
Software Win 7 64bit
I can support AMD including water coolers for their top CPUs. It differentiates itself from Intel. Whether they are great CPUs, that's debatable.
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
2,050 (0.59/day)
System Name The Stone that the Builders Refused / iJayo
Processor R5 1600/ R5 1600X
Motherboard Asrock AB350 Pro4 / Gigabyte B450 I Aorus Pro Wifi
Cooling Cryorig M9 / Artic Freexer 33
Memory G skill 16 Gigs ddr4 / 16 gigs PNY ddr4
Video Card(s) MSI r9 270 / MSI RX 570 Armor
Storage 120gig 840 evo, 120gig adata sp900 / 512 Scandisc M.2 ssd 2 x 1tb seagate hdd 120 gig Hyper X ssd
Display(s) 42" Nec retail display monitor/ 42" Nec retail display monitor
Case Pink Enermax Ostrog / NZXT 200i
Audio Device(s) Altec Lansing Expressionist Bass/ M-Audio monitors
Power Supply Corsair450 /Seasonic Focus 650 fx
Mouse corsair vengence M65 / Func Ms3
Keyboard corsair k70 cherry blue /corsair k95 cherry red
Software Window 10 pro / Windows 10 pro
Benchmark Scores meh... feel me on the battle field!
4790K is nothing more than the SAME 4770K factory OCed with better thermal paste. The fact the the thermal paste lowers the cpu's temps doesn't mean that the cpu is something new. The fact that the cpu is running at higher stock speed it doesn't make it something new because the TDP is also higher. It's not a refresh as most of you say, except if you are willing to accept marketing stuff from Intel without question, when on the other hand you can find all the right arguments to point that the new AMD is in fact the old AMD with a new box.

......thats why they call it a refresh its not new.... just updated..... I f D.C. can out and the only difference was a water cooler..... 97% of the comments would be the same. Speaking for myself alone I don't give intel any free passes. ivy-e didn't wow me so i stayed on sandy-e. But this is but a Ford Vs Chevy argument...and i Love my Tahoe as much as I love my Expedition. So its all good. Roy Taylor shouldn't have tweeted the words Something new is coming....

I'm not yelling.....not sure why my font got all whacky......prob that user error thing i keep hearing about......;)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
586 (0.29/day)
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard AsRock 970 PRO3 R2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra120 eXtreme + 2 LED Green fans
Memory 2 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333 A-Data
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE 4096M R9 FURY X 4G D5
Storage ST1000VX000 • SV35.6 Series™ 1000 GB 7200 rpm
Display(s) Acer S277HK wmidpp 27" 4K (3840 x 2160) IPS
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus Black + Red Lights
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply OCZ ProXStream 1000W
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
I'm a consumer not an investor. If AMD has a good plan they should be able to pitch it to investors to gain confidence in AMD stock so people will actually buy it. The problem is that AMD keeps doing these PR moves instead of focusing on what is important. I'm not going to buy something lesser because I want AMD to do better. They need to have their own plan and they need to say how they're going to achieve that goal so people will be willing to give the money in exchange for a stake in the company. People buy good products as consumers, they don't buy something expecting the next one to be better because you bought their product in the first place, that's not the consumer's job. The consumer's job is to find the best product for their needs, be it performance or cost effectiveness, take your pick. Also given their latest track record, even if I were an investor, I wouldn't invest in AMD as it stands right now. They need to clean up their act first.
Yes, the disadvantage of doing what you want and choosing the current fastest is the lack of consciousness and responsibility, and your future choices will suffer because of it. Be it because of resulting very slow evolution of performance (not only by AMD themselves, but you see that Intel is a shit which for three-four years have only marginally improved something if anything), or lack of competition at all, like monopoly.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,397 (0.63/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming/Internet/HTPC
Processor AMD Phenom II 1075T @ 4.0GHz @ 1.42V/Intel i5 4460/Athlon X4 760K
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3/ASRock Z97 Extreme6/ASUS FM2+
Cooling Noctua U12S/Lan Shuo Pure copper/Asetek Microchill
Memory 16GB Adata 2133MHz/16GB Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASUS HD7870 2GB /Intel 4600/Gigabyte GT620
Storage Kingston 240GB, Intel NVMe 500GB + HDDs/Samsung NVMe 250GB+ HDDs/Samsung SSD 120GB
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected)/LG 42''
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12/Sharkoon Rebel 9/Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply 850W Chieftec/560W Chieftec/400W (80+)
Mouse CoolerMaster/Rapoo/Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster/Microsoft/Logitech
Software Windows
......thats why they call it a refresh its not new.... just updated..... I f D.C. can out and the only difference was a water cooler..... 97% of the comments would be the same. Speaking for myself alone I don't give intel any free passes. ivy-e didn't wow me so i stayed on sandy-e. But this is but a Ford Vs Chevy argument...and i Love my Tahoe as much as I love my Expedition. So its all good. Roy Taylor shouldn't have tweeted the words Something new is coming....

I'm not yelling.....not sure why my font got all whacky......prob that user error thing i keep hearing about......;)
You are playing with words, which of course it is a victory for any marketing department.
Let me tell it a little differently. 9590 (this, or the original, it doesn't matter) is NOT a refresh of 8350.
let me go one step further. If 8320 was the top FX processor and one year later AMD was showing 8350 with better thermal paste, no one, but AMD's marketing department, would be calling it a refresh.
If you run cpu-z on 4770K and 4790K you will get identical info with the only difference being in watts and multiplier. I don't call this a refresh. I call it an overclock.



I am kidding with the "not" size :p
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (1.00/day)
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
You are playing with words, which of course it is a victory for any marketing department.
Let me tell it a little differently. 9590 (this, or the original, it doesn't matter) is NOT a refresh of 8350.
let me go one step further. If 8320 was the top FX processor and one year later AMD was showing 8350 with better thermal paste, no one, but AMD's marketing department, would be calling it a refresh.
If you run cpu-z on 4770K and 4790K you will get identical info with the only difference being in watts and multiplier. I don't call this a refresh. I call it an overclock.
To be fair AMD never called it a refresh.

Tech Power Up misquoted HardwareCanucks.com.

Hardware Canucks said "It's interesting and "newish" but not a brand new processor or even a refreshed architecture."

Saying that TPU did say "refreshed packaging". Maybe to stop confusion they should have said "revised packaging" or "updated packaging".
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
2,050 (0.59/day)
System Name The Stone that the Builders Refused / iJayo
Processor R5 1600/ R5 1600X
Motherboard Asrock AB350 Pro4 / Gigabyte B450 I Aorus Pro Wifi
Cooling Cryorig M9 / Artic Freexer 33
Memory G skill 16 Gigs ddr4 / 16 gigs PNY ddr4
Video Card(s) MSI r9 270 / MSI RX 570 Armor
Storage 120gig 840 evo, 120gig adata sp900 / 512 Scandisc M.2 ssd 2 x 1tb seagate hdd 120 gig Hyper X ssd
Display(s) 42" Nec retail display monitor/ 42" Nec retail display monitor
Case Pink Enermax Ostrog / NZXT 200i
Audio Device(s) Altec Lansing Expressionist Bass/ M-Audio monitors
Power Supply Corsair450 /Seasonic Focus 650 fx
Mouse corsair vengence M65 / Func Ms3
Keyboard corsair k70 cherry blue /corsair k95 cherry red
Software Window 10 pro / Windows 10 pro
Benchmark Scores meh... feel me on the battle field!
To be fair AMD never called it a refresh.

Tech Power Up misquoted HardwareCanucks.com.

Hardware Canucks said "It's interesting and "newish" but not a brand new processor or even a refreshed architecture."
The source of my irritation:


Amd employee saying something new when its not.... either intentionally miss leading or clueless to his own products...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 19, 2012
Messages
345 (0.13/day)
System Name Off-Brand PC System
Processor 2990WX
Motherboard X399
Cooling Wraithripper
Video Card(s) Vega 64
Benchmark Scores Less than Intel and Nvidia
I laugh at that price.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
11,357 (4.06/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H100i V2
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) Sapphire AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 SSD Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB, 1x512GB Samsung 960 Pro NVMe
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 18.04 (5.3.0 Mainline Kernel)
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
Yes, the disadvantage of doing what you want and choosing the current fastest is the lack of consciousness and responsibility, and your future choices will suffer because of it. Be it because of resulting very slow evolution of performance (not only by AMD themselves, but you see that Intel is a shit which for three-four years have only marginally improved something if anything), or lack of competition at all, like monopoly.
I hardly think so. I had a Phenom II 940 before my i7 3820 and my rig now at idle and under load consumes less power than it did before. I had already saved money by the simple fact that I've been paying less power for electricity for the last two years and will continue to do so. As a consumer, I'm hardly suffering because I chose Intel. Once again the stuff you're complaining about is up to the company and investors. You don't buy a car in hopes that the safety rating in the future gets better on a car with a poor track record, you buy a car that already has a good safety rating. It's incentive for the business to do better and if the company can't adjust to the needs of the market they go under. It's as simple as that. As for Intel becoming a monopoly, I think that's already inevitable and I'll assume that antitrust laws will keep Intel in line until a company with more competence can give Intel a run for their money.

Also keep in mind if AMD goes under and Intel does become a monopoly in the market, antitrust laws may force them to make changes that would enable other companies to better compete, so I don't buy that argument. It's like saying banks that are doing badly shouldn't be able to fail to make room for ones that won't. It doesn't make any sense. I should reiterate that Intel is based out of the United States and is subject to our antitrust laws and in the past they've worked in AMD's favor.
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (1.00/day)
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
I hardly think so. I had a Phenom II 940 before my i7 3820 and my rig now at idle and under load consumes less power than it did before. I had already saved money by the simple fact that I've been paying less power for electricity for the last two years and will continue to do so .

Unless you're a company running 100+ PCs all day it won't make a dent in your electricity bill.

OK you may save $30 per 5 year upgrade cycle going Intel in electricity. Which is negated by the fact that the Intel rig was likely more than $30 to purchase to begin with.

Yes, the disadvantage of doing what you want and choosing the current fastest is the lack of consciousness and responsibility, and your future choices will suffer because of it. Be it because of resulting very slow evolution of performance (not only by AMD themselves, but you see that Intel is a shit which for three-four years have only marginally improved something if anything), or lack of competition at all, like monopoly.
I disagree, as a consumer I want the fastest for my budget. Whether Intel or AMD.

If Intel and AMD have similar performing CPU within my budget I may opt for with the smaller company, but I'm not obliged to.

Saying that most CPUs from Intel or AMD, whether mainstream, midrange or high end is enough to fulfil and exceed the average user's expectations. So buying the fastest CPU for the sake of it is becoming illogical. Its only us enthusiasts on forums and users with specific specialist needs that worry about the latest i7s and FX ranges
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 3, 2014
Messages
960 (0.49/day)
System Name Sham Pc
Processor i5-2500k @ 4.33
Motherboard INTEL DZ77SL 50K
Cooling 2 bay res. "2L of fluid in loop" 1x480 2x360
Memory 16gb 4x4 kingstone 1600 hyper x fury black
Video Card(s) hfa2 gtx 780 @ 1306/1768 (xspc bloc)
Storage 1tb wd red 120gb kingston on the way os, 1.5Tb wd black, 3tb random WD rebrand
Display(s) cibox something or other 23" 1080p " 23 inch downstairs. 52 inch plasma downstairs 15" tft kitchen
Case 900D
Audio Device(s) on board
Power Supply xion gaming seriese 1000W (non modular) 80+ bronze
Software windows 10 pro x64
i totaly missed this thread, been yacking away in the original..
ok TO ME.. i would get an 8350 rather than this. the money saved could buy either a custom loop, or a good aio and decent board.
either way you could get that 8350 up to these specs and possibly further for the same money.
What benefits you would get running at 5ghz.(+) compared to 4.7 or so is pretty debatable though.
So really its not the aio that would annoy me. nor the fact that this is the same cpu re released. What would annoy me is they ever made the thing to start it..

As for the "give amd your money so they can make better stuff" quite a few people here do line amd's pockets although not via enthusiast cpu purchaces. Apu's, laptops, consoles. and A LOT of graphics cards all fund amd nicely.
It really isnt our fault that they took that money and said.
"lets make a 5ghz cpu that runs cool. has 8 cores and we will call it bulldozer. Then they said.. well lets not do this by hand, lets cut this corner.. Im sure it will be fine if we do this. No we dont need to just work on the phenom"
And in the end ended up with this..
the bulldozer did more damage to amd than any thing intel could have done. and then this is just a swan song for enthusiast cpu's.
Some one said it as AM3+ is dead.. Well i think and HOPE it is.
Amd should now go concentrate on gpu's and apu's rake some money in from the console monopoly. and then in 3-4 years time come back and do it properly.

p.s
on average we are spending £6 a week less on electricity now with the i5-2500k vs the q6600..
this is entierly down to the cost of electricity where i live and with my provider. but you cant just say you wont notice a difference unless your running 100+ Pc's. not every where has regulated prices with a max cap. i wish we had the same tariff as Ireland does. but we dont we just have them jacking up the price every year.

p.p.s
thats a measly $2649 saved in 5 years after conversion. provided the tariffs dont go up which they will.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
4,335 (1.46/day)
Location
Mexico
System Name STEAMBOX | GAMECUBE | EQC (Everyday Quad Core)
Processor i5 4590@3.7Ghz |i7 3770K@4Ghz -|- Athlon 5350@2.52Ghz
Motherboard GA-B85N PHOENIX | Asrock Z77E-ITX | Asus AM1I-A
Cooling Stock | Antec Kuhler 620 | Reeven Vanxie
Memory 2x4GB ADATA XPG 1600Mhz | 2x4GB Kingston 1866Mhz -|- 2x4GB Crucial Ballistix@1920Mhz
Video Card(s) RX 480 Nitro | Sapphire RX 480 w/Accelero Mono Plus | HD 8400 @ 720Mhz (IGP)
Storage LiteON 128GB mSATA+3TB Seagate | Seagate 1TBxSamung 64GB SSD (Intel RST) | Kingston v300 240GB
Display(s) Daewoo 49" 1080p | ASUS PA248Q 1920x1200 IPS
Case Corsair 250D | CoolerMaster Elite 110 | Acteck Fiji
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Seasonic SS-660XP2 | Silverstone SFX-450 | 200w mini FLEX PSU
Software Windows 10 64bit
FX chips are severely overvolted. I've tuned core voltage down to >1.3v on my 8350s and 1.225v on my 8320s without crashes or any other problem (running Boinc 100% of the time they're on). Heck, at that VCORE, my 8320s run on 95w boards (Asrock 880GM-LE FX) without any problem.

Why do they ship with a 1.4v VCORE? My guess is that some of the worse chips do need the 1.4v and AMD chose to play sure.

Not like that would suddenly turn them into power sipping powerhouses but every bit helps :toast:
 
Last edited:

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
11,357 (4.06/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H100i V2
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) Sapphire AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 SSD Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB, 1x512GB Samsung 960 Pro NVMe
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 18.04 (5.3.0 Mainline Kernel)
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
Assume an 80 watt difference, that's constantly, all the time. It's probably more than that in reality but I'll stick with a conservative value.

That's 80 watt all the time as my tower is typically on all the time.
24 hours in a day, 365 days in a year which is 8760 hours.

We want watt hours because that is how at least I get billed for power.
So 80 Watts * 8760 Hours is 700,800 watt/hours or 700kW/hours. That is almost a month of electricity for me of the course of one year, somewhere around probably 1/15th of my total power consumption and electricity costs me ~130 USD every month. That's me saving over 100 dollars every year, so I've had my tower for 2 years (assuming I lived in the same place, I used to pay almost 50% more for electricity where I used to live) that's around 200 dollars saved over the old tower in 2 years, but if you wanted to factor difference in cost for electricity where I used to live, it would be higher.

The simple point is, it doesn't have to be 100s of computers for it to add up. It depends on how much you already use and how often the tower is on and drawing power. You underestimate how much power computers use even more so if it's always on.

I know that crunchers can attest to this as having machines under load 24/7 makes a big impact on your power bill where 100 watts less can be significant on your power bill.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
1,493 (0.47/day)
Location
State College, PA, US
System Name My Surround PC
Processor Intel Core i7 8086K @ 5.1 GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 5
Cooling Swiftech MCP35X / XSPC Rasa CPU / Swiftech MCW82 / Koolance HX-1320 w/ 4 Corsair Fans
Memory 32GB (2 x 16 GB) Team DDR4-3200 CL16-18-18-38
Video Card(s) MSI Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti Armor 2X
Storage Samsung SSD 970 Pro 512GB, 2 x 4TB HGST NAS HDD in RAID 1
Display(s) 3 x Acer K272HUL 27" in Surround 7860x1440
Case NZXT Source 530
Audio Device(s) Integrated ALC1220 + Sony MDR-7506 + Logitech Z-5500 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic X-1250 1.25kW
Mouse Patriot Viper V560
Keyboard Logitech G15
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
p.s
on average we are spending £6 a week less on electricity now with the i5-2500k vs the q6600..
this is entierly down to the cost of electricity where i live and with my provider. but you cant just say you wont notice a difference unless your running 100+ Pc's. not every where has regulated prices with a max cap. i wish we had the same tariff as Ireland does. but we dont we just have them jacking up the price every year.

p.p.s
thats a measly $2649 saved in 5 years after conversion. provided the tariffs dont go up which they will.
I'm calling exaggeration in your calculation. It's not reasonable to save that much with a CPU change alone; something else much have changed either with your computer or something else in your household. To get that type of savings with a CPU change you would not only do you have to have the highest electricity prices in the world but you also must be running your PC at max load 24 hours a day.

Let's use realistic numbers and say there's a 100W difference in platform power consumption (motherboard + CPU + memory) between an overclocked i5-2500 system and an overclocked Q6600 system. Even running your PC 24 hours per day, over 168 hours (one week) you will have only saved 16.8 kWh of electricity. That means you would have to pay at least £0.36/kWh ($0.61/kWh) to save £6 per week. If you even shut off your computer while you are asleep (say 6 hours per night) you need an electricity rate of at least £0.48/kWh ($0.82/kWh) for you to save £6 per week.

I think you changed more than just the processor and that's where you see the power savings. If you change from a CRT to an LCD, use a lower power GPU, use your computer less, or even change some other usage pattern in your household, then the £6/week is possible, but that savings from a CPU change alone seems exaggerated.

Note: I'm not disputing that buying a processor that consumes less electricity can make financial sense, just that saving $2649 over five years from a CPU change alone in unrealistic. Aquinus's scenario of $100/year is much more realistic.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 3, 2014
Messages
960 (0.49/day)
System Name Sham Pc
Processor i5-2500k @ 4.33
Motherboard INTEL DZ77SL 50K
Cooling 2 bay res. "2L of fluid in loop" 1x480 2x360
Memory 16gb 4x4 kingstone 1600 hyper x fury black
Video Card(s) hfa2 gtx 780 @ 1306/1768 (xspc bloc)
Storage 1tb wd red 120gb kingston on the way os, 1.5Tb wd black, 3tb random WD rebrand
Display(s) cibox something or other 23" 1080p " 23 inch downstairs. 52 inch plasma downstairs 15" tft kitchen
Case 900D
Audio Device(s) on board
Power Supply xion gaming seriese 1000W (non modular) 80+ bronze
Software windows 10 pro x64
well hes in the us and not wales which has the highest electricity per unit prices in britain.
with britain being the 4th heighest per unit for electicity in the EU.. whilst the USA is THE least expensive of any oecd nation..

prehaps that has more of a factor than you imagine? also with conversion rates you get almost $2 for £1

also the cheapest tarif i can get is 17.62p p/kwh but thats if i have a anual or quartely paid bill.. For reasons which are obvious to share holders. our provider wont just give you that unless you are A already using it or B have a medical reason for having it..
so we have to go out and buy pre paid cards. and for the benefit of that they also then add on a rental for the meeter..
so i actually have 18.56p p kw/h unit price + an extra payment taken from my electricity credit for meeter rental.

I will however conceed that i have changed from crt tv to a lcd in the living room which could well help impact on the bill..
but the wife told me we on avarage now spend £6 less per week on electricity.
and the pc is on 24/7
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
1,212 (0.49/day)
And here I thought AMD would do something cool, like putting four Kaveri modules in a cpu for sale on the am3+ or fm2 platform, rather than taking the same outdated piledriver cpu and giving it a watercooler. ivy core i7 chips are already faster overall than the FX, the haswell i7 is faster than that, and devils canyon will be great for overclocking., there is NO way the fx will catch the devil chips, unless it could do 8 ghz on a standard water cooler.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
11,357 (4.06/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H100i V2
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) Sapphire AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 SSD Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB, 1x512GB Samsung 960 Pro NVMe
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 18.04 (5.3.0 Mainline Kernel)
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
well hes in the us and not wales which has the highest electricity per unit prices in britain.
with britain being the 4th heighest per unit for electicity in the EU.. whilst the USA is THE least expensive of any oecd nation..

prehaps that has more of a factor than you imagine? also with conversion rates you get almost $2 for £1

also the cheapest tarif i can get is 17.62p p/kwh but thats if i have a anual or quartely paid bill.. For reasons which are obvious to share holders. our provider wont just give you that unless you are A already using it or B have a medical reason for having it..
so we have to go out and buy pre paid cards. and for the benefit of that they also then add on a rental for the meeter..
so i actually have 18.56p p kw/h unit price + an extra payment taken from my electricity credit for meeter rental.

I will however conceed that i have changed from crt tv to a lcd in the living room which could well help impact on the bill..
but the wife told me we on avarage now spend £6 less per week on electricity.
and the pc is on 24/7
Ditching a CRT for a modern day LCD alone could save you up to 200 watts whenever it is on. That probably had a bigger impact than the computer did.

Also you exaggerate again. The exchange rate is 1.7 USD to 1£.
 
Joined
May 3, 2014
Messages
960 (0.49/day)
System Name Sham Pc
Processor i5-2500k @ 4.33
Motherboard INTEL DZ77SL 50K
Cooling 2 bay res. "2L of fluid in loop" 1x480 2x360
Memory 16gb 4x4 kingstone 1600 hyper x fury black
Video Card(s) hfa2 gtx 780 @ 1306/1768 (xspc bloc)
Storage 1tb wd red 120gb kingston on the way os, 1.5Tb wd black, 3tb random WD rebrand
Display(s) cibox something or other 23" 1080p " 23 inch downstairs. 52 inch plasma downstairs 15" tft kitchen
Case 900D
Audio Device(s) on board
Power Supply xion gaming seriese 1000W (non modular) 80+ bronze
Software windows 10 pro x64
just went to dig out my payment plan..
and my actuall tarif is...

25.060 p/pkwh with a 24.950 p Per day rental charge..
i think this all factors in a bit.

so i am certain that a lower power cpu will make a prety substantial annual difference to me lol.
that would work out at the equivalent of 43.48c p/kwh if the usa had to pay that..

(i would call $1.70 for £1 almost $2 lol. i wasnt going to go check the actual rates but knew it was close to it)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,311 (0.74/day)
Location
Essex Jct, VT
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard Gigabyte B450 Aurorus Elite
Cooling Stock
Memory 16GB (2x8GB) Corsair Vengence LPX DDR4
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1060 Windforce OC 6GB
Storage Samsung EVO 850 256GB / Samsung EVO 860 500GB / WD Caviar Black 1TB
Display(s) AOC G2590FX
Case NZXT H500 Mid-Tower
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM650x 650W Fully Modular
Software Windows 10
AMD has basicaly abandoned AM3+, which isn't surprising since Intel has pretty consistantly trounced them since Sandy Bridge.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (0.95/day)
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
Yes, the disadvantage of doing what you want and choosing the current fastest is the lack of consciousness and responsibility, and your future choices will suffer because of it.
Arguably, the consumers future suffered more from AMD's mismanagement than consumers turning away from the company.
AMD was recording record revenue - i.e. plenty of people buying their CPUs and chipsets, and what did they do with those revenues?
Pay twice the book value for ATI when they were the only interested buyer.
Realize, after spending $2.7 billion too much, that they had better try to balance the books, by
Selling their mobile IP for a paltry $65m to Qualcomm. $65 million + some R&D = Adreno (shuffle the letters around and you get...Radeon).
Not content to toss money away like a drunk Dallas Cowboy at a strip club, they then get themselves into a position where they have to pay their former OWN foundry business to NOT make chips for them.

I'm all for supporting the underdog ( How about VIA?), but giving money to the financially irresponsible is called "enabling" not "supporting". I'd like to think that AMD have turned over a new leaf, but then I look at the BoD and note how many of that group still draw a salary despite presiding over the financial clusterf_ck that caused AMD's present problems.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
551 (0.17/day)
System Name Salamander
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.9ghz 1.418v
Motherboard Asrock X370 Taichi
Cooling EK Supremacy Evo | Black Ice Nemesis 360GTS XFlow | 120 GTS | P/P Cougar Vortex - Noiseblockers
Memory Team T-Force Xtreem 2x8GB DDR4 3733 @ 3400mhz 14-14-14-30-52 1T
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 Mini 8GB GDDR5X @ stock
Storage Galax Gamer L 240GB SSD | Crucial M4 128GB SSD | WD Blue 1TB HDD
Display(s) LG 27MP68VQ 27" 1920x1080 75hz IPS Freesync monitor
Case Fractal Design Define C
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Gold 650w
Mouse Steelseries Kana White
Keyboard Steelseries 6GV2 Cherry MX Black
Software Windows 10 Pro N
I hardly think so. I had a Phenom II 940 before my i7 3820 and my rig now at idle and under load consumes less power than it did before. I had already saved money by the simple fact that I've been paying less power for electricity for the last two years and will continue to do so. As a consumer, I'm hardly suffering because I chose Intel. Once again the stuff you're complaining about is up to the company and investors. You don't buy a car in hopes that the safety rating in the future gets better on a car with a poor track record, you buy a car that already has a good safety rating. It's incentive for the business to do better and if the company can't adjust to the needs of the market they go under. It's as simple as that. As for Intel becoming a monopoly, I think that's already inevitable and I'll assume that antitrust laws will keep Intel in line until a company with more competence can give Intel a run for their money.

Also keep in mind if AMD goes under and Intel does become a monopoly in the market, antitrust laws may force them to make changes that would enable other companies to better compete, so I don't buy that argument. It's like saying banks that are doing badly shouldn't be able to fail to make room for ones that won't. It doesn't make any sense. I should reiterate that Intel is based out of the United States and is subject to our antitrust laws and in the past they've worked in AMD's favor.
this got me intrigued cause any reviews I looked at, the i7-3820 seems to consume more power than the old 940



it is understandable that 940 consumes around what 10-15w? more than the 945? But even if we add it up that would still fit in the not negligible bracket between the i7-3820 so I'm curious where you pulled that 80w difference.
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2014
Messages
11 (0.01/day)
System Name main rig
Processor fx-9590
Motherboard Asrock 990fx fat1ty pro
Cooling reserator xt
Memory g.skil ddr3 1600 8gb x 4
Video Card(s) dual xfx 7990s
Storage samsung 840 128gb ssd other hgst drives
Display(s) asus 2k monitor
Case Corsair
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply antec 1200w
Software win 7
Benchmark Scores have two asus ROG laptops 1 modded dell 1520 lol and a core i3 server/htpc with 14+ tb storage
I know amd doesn't try to compete with the high end intel chips but these are great chips. I have the original fx9590 that came with the liquid cooler before it was d/c and its a great system fast though because I have 7990's the stock cooler is not enough for it to reach 5ghz the system gets to hot with the dual 7990's since there bad design just blows hot air all around the damn case. im sure if i kept my resirator xt and water cooled the 7990's it be different but to see the thermal rating is unchanged etc its kind of pointless id rather see amd spend the cash in r&d though r&d has defiantly been hit or miss with amd
 
Top