• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

AMD TressFX Technology Detailed

Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
2,074 (0.95/day)
Likes
1,155
System Name Zimmer Frame Rates
Processor Intel i7 920 @ Stock speeds baby
Motherboard EVGA X58 3X SLI
Cooling True 120
Memory Corsair Vengeance 12GB
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 980 Ti Super JetStream
Storage Of course
Display(s) Crossover 27Q 27" 2560x1440
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Don't be silly
Power Supply XFX 650W Core
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Epic
#51
Its part of DirectX. There is this company called Microsoft. Makes OS for PCs, Phones, Tablets and has a gaming console. It not just helps AMD but Microsoft. It can cross promote games with features that are further enhanced on Games for Windows. Even if its not embrased by PS4 or Wii/U.
Equally I seriously doubt Sony gives a toss about DirectX and who embraces it. Again, there is a wide range of technologies licensed on both sides which developers are free to use, they don't have to be mutually exclusive.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
2,417 (1.18/day)
Likes
1,332
#52
Equally I seriously doubt Sony gives a toss about DirectX and who embraces it. Again, there is a wide range of technologies licensed on both sides which developers are free to use, they don't have to be mutually exclusive.
Sony might not but developers will have a instantly bigger pool of potential buyers for there products and they will want to 1-up each other.

GameCube = ATi Flipper / PS2 = GS / X-Box = Nvidia NV2A

Wii = ATi Hollywood / PS3 = Nvidia SCEI RSX / X-Box 360 = ATi Xenos

Wii U / PS4 / X-Box 720 = AMD Radeon GPUs

Just in numbers alone it opens up and your not hindering yourself as a developer in anyway if you choose to go PC unlike a proprietary API which is dependant on the end user having a certain hardware type.

This might just be in the PC version as of now but the potential to getting adopted and used is much greater then before and has a higher chance given what we currently know of whats going to be in the Next-Gen consoles.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2008
Messages
3,247 (0.89/day)
Likes
396
System Name Thakk
Processor i7 6700k @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte G1 Z170N ITX
Cooling Deepcool Maelstrom 120k / H55
Memory 16GB Corsair LPX DDR4 2400
Video Card(s) GTX1080ti Founders Ed. AIO Cooled
Storage Corsair Force GT 120GB SSD / Intel 250GB SSD / Samsung Pro 512 SSD / 3TB Seagate SV32
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 100hz IPS Gsync / HTC Vive
Case Cougar QBX mini itx
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150 > Creative Gigaworks T40 > AKG Q701
Power Supply Thermaltake 600w 140mm
Mouse Logitech G900
Keyboard Ducky Shine TKL MX Blue + Vortex PBT Doubleshots
Software Windows 10 64bit
Benchmark Scores http://www.3dmark.com/fs/12108888
#53
If this includes realistic boob movement i will sell my two 680s and get two 7970s
Nice. One for each boob I reckon?

Anyways.. didn't Alice Madness Returns had similar hair effects?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,016 (0.37/day)
Likes
224
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
#54
Anyways.. didn't Alice Madness Returns had similar hair effects?
Alice Madness Returns hair is basically the same thing but isn't GPU accelerated or as accurate as Tomb Raiders.
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
5,624 (2.38/day)
Likes
2,986
Processor Intel I7 4790k (stock)
Motherboard ASRock H97M-ITX/ac LGA 1150 Intel H97
Cooling Prolimatech megahalem
Memory Crucial 2x4gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA 1060 3gb
Storage OWC Mercury SSD 240 GB
Display(s) Asus 144hz
Case Raijintek Metis
Power Supply Corsair SF600 600w psu
Software Windows 10 64 Bit
#55
So they sticked some hair on a baldy who was designed to be bald to begin with. Whats next, making Lara hairy where she wasn't intended to be? Pathetic, like they are competing with NVIDIA who will make more retarded post processing physics effects and lock them down to one platform.
F**k that.

It looks patehtic as well. This guy looks like those eggs where you stuff them with cotton and plant some wheat seeds in them so they grow hair. An egg with wheat come over. Nice...
The guy looks better with a bald head. Period.

If anyone bothered to work with some art ANYONE could make some rather realistic har using CPU alone. You wouldn't have 3 billions of hair strands but if anyone would even bother to make clusters of hair taht move based on head movement, freakin CPU Havok could do that. But instead, no one even bothered to do that. Instead pretty much all games used 100% static hair.
So why 100% static or 100% super duper HW accelerated. Like no one knows how to fuckin make something in the middle. They always have to do it on one or another extreme...
I am pretty sure that hair on the bald guy was not done by amd's tressfx.

At least this is a step in the right direction. Of course more physics all around would be better. Isn't that a developers not doing it not amd or nvideas fault?
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
2,734 (0.73/day)
Likes
855
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
#56
So they sticked some hair on a baldy who was designed to be bald to begin with. Whats next, making Lara hairy where she wasn't intended to be? Pathetic, like they are competing with NVIDIA who will make more retarded post processing physics effects and lock them down to one platform.
F**k that.

It looks patehtic as well. This guy looks like those eggs where you stuff them with cotton and plant some wheat seeds in them so they grow hair. An egg with wheat come over. Nice...
The guy looks better with a bald head. Period.

If anyone bothered to work with some art ANYONE could make some rather realistic har using CPU alone. You wouldn't have 3 billions of hair strands but if anyone would even bother to make clusters of hair taht move based on head movement, freakin CPU Havok could do that. But instead, no one even bothered to do that. Instead pretty much all games used 100% static hair.
So why 100% static or 100% super duper HW accelerated. Like no one knows how to fuckin make something in the middle. They always have to do it on one or another extreme...
How dare you allege that physics can be done on the CPU, thereby, defying nvidias fullproof (retarded) plan of forcing their standard to run only on their cards, even though it works perfectly on cpu!
 
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
4,335 (1.87/day)
Likes
3,020
Location
Mexico
System Name STEAMBOX | GAMECUBE | EQC (Everyday Quad Core)
Processor i5 4590@3.7Ghz |i7 3770K@4Ghz -|- Athlon 5350@2.52Ghz
Motherboard GA-B85N PHOENIX | Asrock Z77E-ITX | Asus AM1I-A
Cooling Stock | Antec Kuhler 620 | Reeven Vanxie
Memory 2x4GB ADATA XPG 1600Mhz | 2x4GB Kingston 1866Mhz -|- 2x4GB Crucial Ballistix@1920Mhz
Video Card(s) RX 480 Nitro | Sapphire RX 480 w/Accelero Mono Plus | HD 8400 @ 720Mhz (IGP)
Storage LiteON 128GB mSATA+3TB Seagate | Seagate 1TBxSamung 64GB SSD (Intel RST) | Kingston v300 240GB
Display(s) Daewoo 49" 1080p | ASUS PA248Q 1920x1200 IPS
Case Corsair 250D | CoolerMaster Elite 110 | Acteck Fiji
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Seasonic SS-660XP2 | Silverstone SFX-450 | 200w mini FLEX PSU
Software Windows 10 64bit
#57
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
41 (0.02/day)
Likes
3
#58
Of course it will. But NV cards will take a performance hit. There are a few games out there which use the direct compute ability of GCN not because it's the only way to make the game look good but because they are Gaming Evolved titles.
I'm not programer so I don't really know if it is or it is not the only way or the most efficient way of accomplish a goal, but the results are there. It's not an overly tessellated object with 10k polys instead of a few hundred or a thousand, it's not some invisible ocean underneath the map and it is most definitely not AMD locked.

nVIDIA will most likely catch up with it's future generation of hardware, jut like AMD did with tessellation. After all, they are all part of DX11, so using them in games means using the features that this API has indifferent to the capabilities of each side (hopefully, as efficient as possible). nVIDIA made a bet and perhaps it lost it. Future will tell. At this point, if nVIDIA made some better compute parts from 6xx series, this would not be such a big fuss. But then again, perhaps 680 and the rest would not be as fast as 7970 and their direct contestants.

As far as I'm aware, Dirt Showdown developers put that DC usage into their game long before everyone new nVIDIA was weak in this department.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.22/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
#59
How dare you allege that physics can be done on the CPU, thereby, defying nvidias fullproof (retarded) plan of forcing their standard to run only on their cards, even though it works perfectly on cpu!
Cool story.
PhysX uses both GPU and CPU...and pretty much always has done....if it didn't (as example), why would the 3.0 SDK include multithreaded CPU support?

As for the whole she-done-me-wrong wailing, some of us remember the posturing from both sides:
June 2006: ATI start posturing against Ageia
September 2007: Intel cuts AMD off at the knees by acquiring Havok
November 2007: AMD look into acquiring Ageia
Three months later Nvidia acquires Ageia
June 2008: AMD bigs up Havok FX (Number of Havok FX games produced : 0 )
Around the same time, Nvidia offered PhysX licence to AMD. AMD not interested and immediately begin a public thrashdown of PhysX via messrs Huddy, Cheng and Robison while promoting OpenCL Havok FX. Nvidia reply by locking AMD/ATi out of PhysX...AMD reply by telling world+dog that PhysX is irrelevant.

Personally, I'd say that having watched the whole thing unfolding its a case of handbags at ten paces. AMD dithering twice on entering the GPU physics market and losing out...twice, then coming on strong with the "we didn't want it anyway" gambit, Nvidia playing hardball in response to trash talk. Neither of the companies covers themselves in glory, but strangely enough, a whole bunch of people forgetting that the bitch-slapping involved both camps.
As far as I'm aware, Dirt Showdown developers put that DC usage into their game long before everyone new nVIDIA was weak in this department.
From the timelines, this must have been the case. There is no way, short of an educated guess, that AMD would have expected Nvidia to pare down GK104 with respect to compute- especially given Nvidia's previous GPUs since G80. Having said that, I doubt that AMD wouldn't capitalize on the fact now that they are aware of it. From this PoV, Titan's entry into the market makes a convenient backstop (for Nvidia) should AMD look to code endless compute loops into future titles. It might have crippled the performance of pre-GK110 Nvidia (and VLIW4/5 AMD) at the expense of GCN, but Titan's appearance would probably convince AMD that massive compute additions might not be the PR boon they could have been.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,355 (1.91/day)
Likes
1,074
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#60
Last edited:
Joined
May 13, 2006
Messages
1,550 (0.37/day)
Likes
291
Location
City 17, California, U.S.A.
Processor AMD FX 8300 @ stock.//AMD 5350 AM1 APU.
Motherboard Biostar TA970.//ASUS AM1M-A.
Cooling AMD vanilla Wraith.//APU oem.//80mm Arctic Cooling fans both cases.
Memory 16G G.Skill TridentX @ 1866mhz.//8G low/low Crucial 1600mhz.
Video Card(s) Sapphire 8G RX 580 Pulse @ stock.//APU.
Storage Seagate 1T SSHD.//WD 500g Black.
Display(s) Dell S2309W 23" 1080p, shared.
Case Blue Chenming 301KB. (Vintage beauty).//Antec NSK 1300.
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Fatal1ty Xtreme Gamer.//Onboard Realtek.//Shared Logitech 2.1's.
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling Silencer 610.//Antec NSK 1380 psu.
Mouse Logitech MX518, shared.
Keyboard Logitech K310, shared.
Software Windows 10 Pro x64.//Windows 10 Home x64, XP Pro x86 dual boot.
Benchmark Scores FX rig is the gamer.//AM1 rig is the daily driver.
#61
Guys, when to refer to Lara Croft, they are breasts not boobs.
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
46,096 (9.57/day)
Likes
13,525
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name Daddy Long Legs
Processor Ryzen R7 1700, 3.9GHz 1.375v
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming PRO carbon
Cooling Fractal Celsius S24 (Silent fans, meh pump)
Memory 16GB 2133 generic @ 2800
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS modded to Gaming Z - faster and solved black screen bugs!)
Storage 1TB Intel SSD Pro 6000p (60TB USB3 storage)
Display(s) Samsung 4K 40" HDTV (UA40KU6000WXXY) / 27" Qnix 2K 110Hz
Case Fractal Design R5. So much room, so quiet...
Audio Device(s) Pioneer VSX-519V + Yamaha YHT-270 / sennheiser HD595/518 + bob marley zion's
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G403 + KKmoon desk-sized mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
#62
Cool story.
PhysX uses both GPU and CPU...and pretty much always has done....if it didn't (as example), why would the 3.0 SDK include multithreaded CPU support?
physX has always disabled most of its 'features' if ran on a CPU. it ran on CPU for the consoles, but on PC it would always turn off or reduce effects drastically for CPU use (yes, even when sufficient CPU power was provided). it was deliberately sabotaged to make it 'better' when GPU accelerated.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,355 (1.91/day)
Likes
1,074
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#63
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
605 (0.20/day)
Likes
139
Processor Intel i7-940 @ 3.5Ghz
Motherboard Asus P6X58D-E
Cooling Corsair H70
Memory 12GB OCZ Platinum XTC DDR3 1600mhz CL7
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 780ti
Storage Revodrive X2 240GB, 5TB HDD storage
Display(s) Asus PB278Q 27''
Case Antec Lanboy Air
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D2X
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Software Windows 7 x64
#64
I hope this realistic hair trend doesn't spiral into a hairy Lara Croft

With nude mods portraying her realistic and glistening pubic hair
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
46,096 (9.57/day)
Likes
13,525
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name Daddy Long Legs
Processor Ryzen R7 1700, 3.9GHz 1.375v
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming PRO carbon
Cooling Fractal Celsius S24 (Silent fans, meh pump)
Memory 16GB 2133 generic @ 2800
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS modded to Gaming Z - faster and solved black screen bugs!)
Storage 1TB Intel SSD Pro 6000p (60TB USB3 storage)
Display(s) Samsung 4K 40" HDTV (UA40KU6000WXXY) / 27" Qnix 2K 110Hz
Case Fractal Design R5. So much room, so quiet...
Audio Device(s) Pioneer VSX-519V + Yamaha YHT-270 / sennheiser HD595/518 + bob marley zion's
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G403 + KKmoon desk-sized mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
#65
I hope this realistic hair trend doesn't spiral into a hairy Lara Croft

With nude mods portraying her realistic and glistening pubic hair
larry croft and the chest hair of doom
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
1,874 (0.53/day)
Likes
334
Location
Cobourg,Ontario
System Name FX CrossFireX
Processor AMD FX™ 8370 @Stock
Motherboard GA-990FXA-UD5 (rev. 3.1
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 the BEAST
Memory AMD Radeon™ R5 Entertainment Series 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3-1600 MHz CL11 Part Number: R5316G1601U2K-G T
Video Card(s) MSI Gaming R9 390
Storage x3 Seagates 1Terabyte X1 Seagate 2Terabyte <Steam Install
Display(s) 40 Inch Samsung HDTV (monitor)
Case HAF-X:)
Audio Device(s) AMD/HDMI to Onkyo HT-R508 Receiver
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA 1000 G2 Power Supply
Software Windows 10 Pro X64
#66
Imagine the Nude patch for Skyrim will be downloaded one trillion times just to see the full bushy ladies.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,355 (1.91/day)
Likes
1,074
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#67
perverts!
 
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
4,527 (1.12/day)
Likes
6,075
Location
Washington, US
System Name Lappy
Processor i7 6700k
Motherboard Sager NP9870
Cooling A lot smaller than I'd like
Memory Samsung 4x8GB DDR4-2133 SO-DIMM
Video Card(s) GTX 980 (MXM)
Storage 2xSamsung 950 Pro 256GB | 2xHGST 1TB 7.2K
Display(s) 17.3" IPS 1080p G-SYNC
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster X-FI MB 5, Foster 2.1 channel integrated
Mouse Razer Deathadder
Keyboard 3-zone RGB integrated
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Not slow
#68
How dare you allege that physics can be done on the CPU, thereby, defying nvidias fullproof (retarded) plan of forcing their standard to run only on their cards, even though it works perfectly on cpu!
Cool story.
PhysX uses both GPU and CPU...and pretty much always has done....if it didn't (as example), why would the 3.0 SDK include multithreaded CPU support?

As for the whole she-done-me-wrong wailing, some of us remember the posturing from both sides:
June 2006: ATI start posturing against Ageia
September 2007: Intel cuts AMD off at the knees by acquiring Havok
November 2007: AMD look into acquiring Ageia
Three months later Nvidia acquires Ageia
June 2008: AMD bigs up Havok FX (Number of Havok FX games produced : 0 )
Around the same time, Nvidia offered PhysX licence to AMD. AMD not interested and immediately begin a public thrashdown of PhysX via messrs Huddy, Cheng and Robison while promoting OpenCL Havok FX. Nvidia reply by locking AMD/ATi out of PhysX...AMD reply by telling world+dog that PhysX is irrelevant.

Personally, I'd say that having watched the whole thing unfolding its a case of handbags at ten paces. AMD dithering twice on entering the GPU physics market and losing out...twice, then coming on strong with the "we didn't want it anyway" gambit, Nvidia playing hardball in response to trash talk. Neither of the companies covers themselves in glory, but strangely enough, a whole bunch of people forgetting that the bitch-slapping involved both camps.

From the timelines, this must have been the case. There is no way, short of an educated guess, that AMD would have expected Nvidia to pare down GK104 with respect to compute- especially given Nvidia's previous GPUs since G80. Having said that, I doubt that AMD wouldn't capitalize on the fact now that they are aware of it. From this PoV, Titan's entry into the market makes a convenient backstop (for Nvidia) should AMD look to code endless compute loops into future titles. It might have crippled the performance of pre-GK110 Nvidia (and VLIW4/5 AMD) at the expense of GCN, but Titan's appearance would probably convince AMD that massive compute additions might not be the PR boon they could have been.
I think you missed the


So they sticked some hair on a baldy who was designed to be bald to begin with. Whats next, making Lara hairy where she wasn't intended to be? Pathetic, like they are competing with NVIDIA who will make more retarded post processing physics effects and lock them down to one platform.
F**k that.
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2007
Messages
4,815 (1.26/day)
Likes
639
Location
Wangas, New Zealand
System Name Darth Obsidious
Processor Intel i5 2500K
Motherboard ASUS P8Z68-V/Gen3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212+ in Push Pull
Memory 2X4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) ASUS R9 270x TOP
Storage 128GB Samsung 830 SSD, 1TB WD Black, 2TB WD Green
Display(s) LG IPS234V-PN
Case Corsair Obsidian 650D
Audio Device(s) Infrasonic Quartet
Power Supply Corsair HX650w
Software Windows 7 64bit and Windows XP Home
Benchmark Scores 2cm mark on bench with a razor blade.
#69
I hope this realistic hair trend doesn't spiral into a hairy Lara Croft

With nude mods portraying her realistic and glistening pubic hair
There will indeed be a demand.
Although I would expect Lara would have to be mighty hairy down there to get any sort of hair movement going.

It maybe a good idea for Square Enix to make some DLC hairs for Lara or add it to new DLC to promote TressFX if they want more money.
 
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
4,527 (1.12/day)
Likes
6,075
Location
Washington, US
System Name Lappy
Processor i7 6700k
Motherboard Sager NP9870
Cooling A lot smaller than I'd like
Memory Samsung 4x8GB DDR4-2133 SO-DIMM
Video Card(s) GTX 980 (MXM)
Storage 2xSamsung 950 Pro 256GB | 2xHGST 1TB 7.2K
Display(s) 17.3" IPS 1080p G-SYNC
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster X-FI MB 5, Foster 2.1 channel integrated
Mouse Razer Deathadder
Keyboard 3-zone RGB integrated
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Not slow
#70
There will indeed be a demand.
Although I would expect Lara would have to be mighty hairy down there to get any sort of hair movement going.

It maybe a good idea for Square Enix to make some DLC hairs for Lara or add it to new DLC to promote TressFX if they want more money.
Leisure Suit Laura?
 

XNine

CaseLabs Rep
Joined
Mar 9, 2012
Messages
172 (0.08/day)
Likes
86
Location
Los Angeles
System Name Project 14
Processor Intel 4770K
Motherboard Asus Impact
Cooling MIPS Waterblock
Memory 16GB
Video Card(s) GTX 780 with AquaComputer block
Storage 256GB Samsung Pro 850, 2TB Western Digital HDD
Display(s) 27" Acer 1440P
Case CaseLabs Mercury S3
Power Supply Silverstone 700w Sleeved with MDPCX
Mouse Mionix Castor
Keyboard Code with Cherry Clears
Software Windows 10
#71
Btw it made me thought, that old Lara had BIGGER boobs - damn it...

A PATCH, we demand a game PATCH :roll:
But they were triangular, which was pretty disgusting.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
2,417 (1.18/day)
Likes
1,332
#72
Cool story.
PhysX uses both GPU and CPU...and pretty much always has done....if it didn't (as example), why would the 3.0 SDK include multithreaded CPU support?

As for the whole she-done-me-wrong wailing, some of us remember the posturing from both sides:
June 2006: ATI start posturing against Ageia
September 2007: Intel cuts AMD off at the knees by acquiring Havok
November 2007: AMD look into acquiring Ageia
Three months later Nvidia acquires Ageia
June 2008: AMD bigs up Havok FX (Number of Havok FX games produced : 0 )
Around the same time, Nvidia offered PhysX licence to AMD. AMD not interested and immediately begin a public thrashdown of PhysX via messrs Huddy, Cheng and Robison while promoting OpenCL Havok FX. Nvidia reply by locking AMD/ATi out of PhysX...AMD reply by telling world+dog that PhysX is irrelevant.
You kind of left the most important part out. Aegia developed it for CPUs (remember the short lived PPU craze) and when Nvidia bought them they pretty much only developed it for there GPU. It wasnt after pressure that it was "crippled" for CPU instruction code which Nvidia didnt care for cause it wouldnt distinguish them from Havok.
It was more of a I got the shiny ball and i'll make it work for my hardware and I dont care as much if it works with yours so buy our products.

Nvidia was its own worst enemy and it was well documented in articles. It took Nvidia 3yrs to recognize there selfish mistake but by that time it was too late.
Not to mention they are doing it again with Tegra, Tegra optimize games sold at the Tegra Zone.

If you were to beleive Nvidia statement it was tossing PhysX at the developers and there were rejecting it. Not to mention that PhysX seamed to be a PS3 priority and PCs were taking a backseat so they were content to only update PhysX for the GPU and leave CPU behind.
After all why update it if developers arent asking for it and you can use it to your advantage to sell your GPUs as an added feature. Makes the buying of Aegia pointless if your not.

Thats why they are only how many titles that support PhysX in 5yrs ?:confused:

Games using Havok doesnt look like 0 :ohwell:
Havok FX was cancelled for that very same reason why PhysX had been failing. Hardware dependant and limits developers potential customer base. Intel probably had sense and decided not every pc will have the same GPU or a Nvidia/AMD GPU but most will have a CPU and that would be the best going forward.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
3,831 (1.48/day)
Likes
2,220
Location
Rīga, Latvia
System Name HELLSTAR
Processor Intel 5820K @ 4.6GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3
Cooling Custom Loop. 360+240 rads.
Memory 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200MHz 15-17-17-35
Video Card(s) ASUS 1080 Ti FE + water block
Storage Optane 32GB + Samsung 950Pro 256GB NVMe + 750 EVO 500GB
Display(s) Philips PHL BDM3270
Case Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ATX Tempered Glass
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10 insider
#73
But they were triangular, which was pretty disgusting.
Nope, they weren't they allowed more precious polygons being spent on her, for a saint cause of course :D

Despite it was PSX and that did tax a lot... :D
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,355 (1.91/day)
Likes
1,074
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#74
You kind of left the most important part out. Aegia developed it for CPUs (remember the short lived PPU craze) and when Nvidia bought them they pretty much only developed it for there GPU.
Ageia had 2 PCI-ex add-on cards with big PPUs dedicated only for physics. Only after nvidia bought them and develop for CUDA, psysx could have be run in software mode... :eek:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
2,417 (1.18/day)
Likes
1,332
#75
Ageia had 2 PCI-ex add-on cards with big PPUs dedicated only for physics. Only after nvidia bought them and develop for CUDA, psysx could have be run in software mode... :eek:
Nope. Ageia ran NovodeX (PhysX) in software mode as far back as 2005 in all 3 consoles just not accelerated through GPUs.
 
Last edited: