• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Will Not Endorse SYSmark 2012 Benchmark, Separates from Association with BAPCo


Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Oct 9, 2007
34,476 (9.19/day)
Hyderabad, India
AMD today announced that it will not endorse the SYSmark 2012 Benchmark (SM2012), which is published by BAPCo (Business Applications Performance Corporation). Along with the withdrawal of support, AMD has resigned from the BAPCo organization.

“Technology is evolving at an incredible pace, and customers need clear and reliable measurements to understand the expected performance and value of their systems,” said Nigel Dessau, senior vice president and Chief Marketing Officer at AMD. “AMD does not believe SM2012 achieves this objective. Hence AMD cannot endorse or support SM2012 or remain part of the BAPCo consortium.”

AMD will only endorse benchmarks based on real-world computing models and software applications, and which provide useful and relevant information. AMD believes benchmarks should be constructed to provide unbiased results and be transparent to customers making decisions based on those results. Currently, AMD is evaluating other benchmarking alternatives, including encouraging the creation of an industry consortium to establish an open benchmark to measure overall system performance.

AMD encourages anyone wanting more details about the construction and scoring methodology of the SM2012 benchmark to contact BAPCo. For more details on AMD’s decision to exit BAPCo, please read AMD’s Executive Blog authored by Nigel Dessau.
Mar 26, 2010
7,680 (2.69/day)
Jakarta, Indonesia
System Name micropage7
Processor Intel G4400
Motherboard MSI B150M Bazooka D3
Cooling Stock ( Lapped )
Memory 16 Gb Team Xtreem DDR3
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX460
Storage Seagate 1 TB, 5oo Gb and SSD A-Data 128 Gb
Display(s) LG 19 inch LCD Wide Screen
Case HP dx6120 MT
Audio Device(s) Stock
Power Supply Be Quiet 600 Watt
Software Windows 7 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Classified
yeah performance not always counted with benchmark. benchmark is important but more important how its performance in real world


News Editor
Oct 13, 2010
764 (0.29/day)
System Name BAH! - - tHE ECo FReAK
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 1.15V
Motherboard ASUS 785G EVO
Cooling Stock
Memory Corsair Titanium 4GB DDR3 1600MHz C9
Video Card(s) Sapphire HD5850 @ 1.049v
Storage Seagate 7200.12 500GB
Display(s) BenQ G2220HD
Case Cooler Master Elite 334
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VX550W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Because Bulldozer flops in this benchmark?
Oct 12, 2009
283 (0.09/day)
Zagreb, Croatia
Processor Phenom II X3 720 BE @ 3.15 GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte MA790X-UD4
Cooling Zalman CNPS10X Optima
Memory Corsair XMS2, 2x2 GB DDR2, 800 MHz, CL5
Video Card(s) Asus R9 270X DirectCu II
Storage Caviar Black 500 GB & Caviar Green 1 TB
Display(s) Dell U2311H (23'' IPS)
Case Gigabyte GZ-X5
Power Supply Corsair VX550
Software Win 7 Pro 64-bit
Because Bulldozer flops in this benchmark?
Because the benchmark fails to account for GPU performance.

Both Nvidia and VIA left BAPCo too
Oct 2, 2004
12,572 (2.59/day)
System Name Dark Silence 2
Processor Intel Core i7 5820K @ 4.5 GHz (1.15V)
Motherboard MSI X99A Gaming 7
Cooling Cooler Master Nepton 120XL
Memory 32 GB DDR4 Kingston HyperX Fury 2400 MHz @ 2666 MHz
Video Card(s) AORUS GeForce GTX 1080Ti 11GB (1950/11000 OC Mode)
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 2TB SSD (3D V-NAND)
Display(s) ASUS VG248QE 144Hz 1ms (DisplayPort)
Case Corsair Carbide 330R Titanium
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5 + Altec Lansing MX5021 (HiFi capacitors and OPAMP upgrade)
Power Supply BeQuiet! Dark Power Pro 11 750W
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard Cherry Stream XT Black
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Fall Creators Update)
Besides, we all know AMD processors are awful in for exampel SuperPi but in real world they are not much different than Intel processors.


Staff member
Nov 29, 2009
9,379 (3.16/day)
System Name Asus K50-X5DAB \\ Orange!
Processor Athlon QL-65 2.2Ghz \\ 3570K
Motherboard Laptop \\ ASRock z77 Extreme4
Cooling Laptop \\ H100i
Memory 1x1GB + 1X2GB \\ 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3
Video Card(s) Mobility Radeon HD4570 512mb \\ Zotac 660Ti OC 2Gb
Storage 250Gb \\ Samsung 840 250Gb + Toshiba DT01ACA300 3Tb
Display(s) 15.6" 1366x768 \\ LG 22EA53VQ
Case Laptop Chassis \\ NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange
Power Supply Power Brick \\ Corsair CXM500w
About time this happens, APU cannot be measured in these "traditional" benchmarking tools.
Mar 18, 2008
4,499 (1.25/day)
System Name Night Rider | Mini LAN PC | Workhorse
Processor AMD FX 8350 | i7 2600 | i7 970
Motherboard GA-990FXA-UD3 AM3+ | GA-H77M-D3H | Gigabyte EX58-UD5
Cooling AMD Wraith cooler| Coolermaster Gemini with Noctua 3000RPM Fan | Big shairkan B
Memory 4x2GB DDR3 G.Skill 1600 6-8-6-24| 2x4GB Corsair 1600 | 6x2GB DDR3 1300 Corsair
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 970 OC in Sli | Gainward GTX 650 TI GS | ASUS 7970 Matrix
Storage 250GB Plextor SSD Por 5 /1TB WD Black | 500GB WD ES/WD Black | WD 320/Seagate 320
Display(s) Samsung 2494hs 24" 1080P| Samsung 20" S20C300L/DELL 15" | 22" DELL/19"DELL
Case LIAN LI PC-18 | Mini ATX Case (custom) | Atrix C4 9001
Audio Device(s) Onboard | Onbaord | Onboard
Power Supply Silverstone 750 | Silverstone Mini 450W | Corsair CX-750
Mouse Gigabyte aivia krypton gaming mouse | Rapoo V900 | Gigabyte 6850X
Keyboard MAX Keyboard Nighthawk X8 | Creative Fatal1ty eluminx | Some POS Logitech
Software Windows 7 Pro 64 | Windows 7 Pro 64 | Windows 7 Pro 64/Windows 10 Home


New Member
Apr 9, 2011
199 (0.08/day)
System Name hazel
Processor phenom II 555 BE unlocked to 4 cores at 3.6ghz
Motherboard asus m4a89gtdpro
Cooling antec kuhler
Memory 8gb corsair
Video Card(s) 2 x 6950 crossfire
Storage ocz ssd 60gb
Display(s) LG 24 inch 1080p
Case nzxt phantom
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply BeQuiet 750w
Mar 28, 2007
2,482 (0.63/day)
Your house.
System Name Jupiter-2
Processor Intel i3-6100
Motherboard H170I-PLUS D3
Cooling Stock
Memory 8GB Mushkin DDR3L-1600
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1050ti
Storage 512GB Corsair SSD
Display(s) BENQ 24in
Case Lian Li PC-Q01B Mini ITX
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair 450W
Mouse Logitech Trackball
Keyboard Custom bamboo job
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Finished Super PI on legendary mode in only 13 hours.
Like they say, if you're consistently bad at golf, play something else.
Or consistently decent, but not as good as the guy who's got $50,000 worth of titanium rocket-powered clubs? I'd say keep at it, as long as you're having fun, and not wasting too much money.


New Member
May 8, 2011
26 (0.01/day)
System Name MyGamingRig
Processor AMD Phenom II X6 1090t @3.7
Motherboard MSI 890GXM-G65
Cooling Corsair H100i - 5x CM Blue LEDs Fan's (on the case)
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1600
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Radeon HD 7850 OC
Storage Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB; OCZ Vertex IV 128GB (OS Only)
Display(s) Soyo 22'' 1680x1050
Case Cooler Master HAF 922 (Black Interior)
Audio Device(s) 7.1 OnBoard
Power Supply Thermaltake EVO_Blue 750W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate x64
Benchmark Scores 3D MArk Vantage P19776 GPU20543 CPU17785
That its ok but...Where is BullDozer??
Apr 26, 2009
414 (0.13/day)
You are here.
System Name Prometheus
Processor Intel i7 4930K
Motherboard Asus P9X79
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory Crucial Ballistix Quad Channel 64GB DDR3 1.35V
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 970 4GB
Storage 2 x Intel 330 240GB RAID0 + 2 x Intel X-25M G2 160GB MIRROR + 4 x 2TB WD Green
Display(s) AMH A409U 4K
Case Intertech AP1
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Audio PCIe
Power Supply Seasonic X660
Mouse Razer Death Adder 2013
Keyboard FILCO Majestouch 2 Ninja
Software Microsoft Windows 10 Pro x64
What is nVidia's reasoning for leaving BAPCo, since they don't have an x86 CPU? What about VIA, with their low power designs?

As for AMD, I think they're full of it. If their CPU's were in fact close (or better) to their main competitor's CPU's in regard to pure CPU (ALU/INT) performance we wouldn't be having this discussion.

And to address the poor excuse they presented here: http://blogs.amd.com/nigel-dessau/2011/06/21/1006/

All the HTML5 and JS is only used in demo sites or other benchmarks and seldom in real life. I for one have not used any service built on these technologies.

GPU acceleration to do what? Is the actual application GPU accelerated, or is it just a small thing, one little menu entry that does something we're not really using that often. If AMD supports OpenCL so vigorously where are my OpenCL applications? Why is he hiding behind OpenCL when there isn't anyone out there using it in their application development process?

I think for now the "integrated" GPU doesn't have that much importance compared to the CPU. It might in the future, but not now. Today, the real world, the business world is very much CPU centric.

He states:

SM2012 doesn’t represent the evolution of computer processing and how that evolution is influencing average users’ experience. SM2012 focuses only on the serial processing performance of the CPU, and virtually ignores the parallel processing performance of the GPU. In particular, SM2012 scores do not take into account GPU-accelerated applications that are widely used in today’s business environments.
...Where? What applications? Does he think we all stay at our desks encoding pr0n with our GPUs? And I think Sandy Bridge might be faster there...

Most of us have real jobs. I have not seen many GPU accelerated applications (business or otherwise). The only exceptions are some of Adobe's CS applications and those require discrete GPU's. Yes there are these boring movie encoders, but in the business world, they're only good for previews and not the actual final print, because quality suffers when there's a GPU involved.

Office 2011? Oh yeah, businesses are at 2007. It's the way they work, slow.

Maybe he's talking about CAD/CAM? Oh yeah, there is a real example of where you can really make use of an APU. They're idiots for buying Tesla/Quadro/FirePro... Or am I to understand that the APU is here to replace the FirePro?

That doesn't seem to "widely used in today's business environments" in my opinion... is playing shitty games at shitty levels of detail on shitty resolution screens in your bedroom 24/7 a sustainable business model? He needs to come up with a REAL list with these applications and their intended use, the ratio of CPU/GPU integrated functionality, and not just crafted words.

I understand what they are trying to do... I really do. But the world isn't there. And lying about it can't really help their APU business, can it?

I will end my rant now... Not because there isn't anything else to rant about, but because I don't think anyone at AMD actually gives a cookie.
Nov 4, 2005
9,968 (2.24/day)
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
IE and windows interfaces are GPU accelerated, videos are GPU accelerated and enhanced, OpenCL is a up and coming development (3D mark is using it as a more fair comparison than the crappy Physx comparison that has all but flopped) that Adobe is starting to use as is other companies that make good video rendering software.


All products that supported Stream software will be supported AFAIK, and soon Nvidia will implement full cross platform support with CUDA.


New Member
Jan 24, 2011
25 (0.01/day)
Sihastru you are reasoning why not to use GPU acceleration in this soft because not many applications use it but do you even know what they use to measure the performance in this soft? For example one thing they use is some excel processing with 35,000 row spreadsheet, are you saying that is a real word situation? And using outdated parts in this soft to measure is kinda funny, don't you think.

But the main problem would be with the totally biased score this soft generates.
Intel is by 7% faster but gets a score higher by 40% despite the fact the AMD system is much much cheaper, I thought this soft was used to decide PC's for government so the price should be a major deciding factor. It would be different if this chart wasn't true but that would just bite AMD back so I think its true.
The best part was when I red the statement from BAPco, where they said they voted 100% for all AMD's proposals but AMD only for about 80% from others, like hell thats true then why the GPU acceleration doesn't have any say in the score or why the score generation is so biased shown in the chart, stop kidding.
Sep 24, 2008
2,473 (0.73/day)
Hillsboro, Oregon, USA
System Name Dire Wolf II
Processor Intel Core i7 7820HQ (2.9Ghz, up to 3.9Ghz)
Motherboard HP 8275
Memory 32GB DDR4 2400Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro OC 4GB (Thunderbolt3 eGPU), nVidia Quadro M1200 (GTX750Ti) 4GB GDDR5
Storage HP NVMe 256GB
Display(s) HP Z27q (5120x2880) + Dell P2715Q (3840x2160)
Case HP ZBook 15 G4
Audio Device(s) Musiland Monitor 02 US, Skullcandy SLYR
Power Supply 150W HP PSU (for Laptop) + Corsair RM550x (for eGPU)
Mouse Logitech G400
Keyboard Corsair K95 RGB
Software Windows 10 Enterprise 64-bit
About time this happens, APU cannot be measured in these "traditional" benchmarking tools.
An APU is nothing more than a CPU and a GPU together with a fancy name, at least for now.


New Member
Jun 29, 2011
7 (0.00/day)
GPU not important..

You wrote: "I think for now the "integrated" GPU doesn't have that much importance compared to the CPU. It might in the future, but not now. Today, the real world, the business world is very much CPU centric."
[ * ]

I would personally give that statement a big asterisk (isn't that the wingless bird with hairy feathers?). Well, no matter. I can only speak to my own situation, where I am getting ready to run the Adobe Production Premium CS5.5, and they provide a complete list of GPU's that they have on their "recommended list" if one wishes that GPU to have a part in accelerating the graphics.

Interesting enough, they are ALL nVidia chipsets (470GTX, 570GTX and 580GTX on the consumer/gaming side).. on the "workstation side, they recommend the quite a few models of the "Quadro" series, where the cost starts at around $1100USD and goes up to roughly $5400USD. They might be kick-butt, butt they are definately out of my neighborhood!

I've also collected over the years a special effects generator, titler and even a telestrator.. that's the thing the sportsguys use on TV to draw the lines over the direct video. It was one of those $2500USD selling for $200 that I tested and just couldn't allow to get away from my "toy collection." I figure I'll get $200 worth of annoyance out of the family drawing on faces, pointing where things SHOULD have gone, etc.. It's just part of my "gadget fetish." Anything with an ON/OFF switch makes me drool.. (grin)

Prior to loading the Adobe software, I'm doing the upgrade of all the various components first, and then also being sure to try to stay on the "Adobe recommends.." as far as my pocketbook will take me.

Their "minimum system" as described by the "Videoguys" is quite an upgrade for the standard user. Win7/Pro/64, three hard drives (software/working/archive), Bluray BD drive, min 8 GB RAM, fastest CPU you're credit card will allow without sobbing, plus that CPU addressed above.

Also, I was directed the other day to a PSC calculator or two and inserted the "guts" of the new computer after upgrading, and the calculators came within 10W each of 858W as a consensus.

It will be interesting to see how this turns out. ORIGINALLY, it was running 13 cans of 400' of 8mm family film, but has grown to this behemoth. I've got the chromakey hardware here, special effects generator, titler, and even a telestrator (the thing John Madden used to draw lines on the US Football plays). Why a telestrator? It was originally $2900USD and the guy was selling it for $200USD. I'm quite sure I can get enough "annoyance" value out of it..

It will be interesting to see what STARTED OUT as a little "found some 8mm film, lets make a DVD out of it" project, and has blossomed into this equipment bath.

Fortunately, I price Photoshop and Premiere Pro over at the teacher store (I qualify for the discount), and just those two items run $550USD, BUT after the salesperson strongarmed me into switching over to the Production Premium CS5.5, the cost wound DOWN to $404, including:

Flash Pro
Premiere Pro

.. and 5 or 6 other add-ons, so at least I felt I got my $$ worth at THAT end.

Meanwhile, time to look at the little 3RU 5 monitor hookup I picked up (2 x 2" monitors one side, 7" monitor the other), and a Sony "three monitor setup, so I should have enough room to produce just about anything on the Fox network..


Last edited: