• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Biostar Readies TA890FXE Motherboard

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
47,778 (7.41/day)
Location
Dublin, Ireland
System Name RBMK-1000
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
Motherboard Gigabyte B550 AORUS Elite V2
Cooling DeepCool Gammax L240 V2
Memory 2x 16GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 4070 Ti EX
Storage Samsung 990 1TB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) ASUS SupremeFX S1220A
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Gamdias Hermes E2
Software Windows 11 Pro
Biostar is readying a mid-range motherboard in its T-Series lineup based on AMD's upcoming 890FX + SB850 chipset. The T-Series TA890FXE was pictured at the ongoing CeBIT event without its cooling assembly. It supports existing and upcoming socket AM3 processors, including Phenom II X6. The CPU is powered by a 5+1 phase VRM, supporting 140W processors. The 890FX chipset gives out four PCI-Express 2.0 x16 slots supporting ATI CrossFireX technology, apart from two legacy PCI slots. The SB850 southbridge gives out six SATA 6 Gb/s ports, of which five are internal, probably one external. An additional storage controller by VIA drives the lone IDE connector. 7.1 channel HD audio, gigabit Ethernet, and FireWire make for the rest of it. The TA890FXE is expected to be out later in April, when AMD unveils its latest processors.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
did someone rob the chipset coolers?

No USB3?

And looks like I've got to but a PSU with a 8pin EPS connector...

Doesn't look good for the X6 chips if all these mobo's have 140watt capacity...
 
gah, weird layout. multi GPU = many useless slots.
 
the only way you could use all four pcie16 slots is by watercooling all your cards, and yeah...lol ...its pretty much just a hey look what i can do motherboard, *claps slowly*
 
did someone rob the chipset coolers?

No USB3?

And looks like I've got to but a PSU with a 8pin EPS connector...

Doesn't look good for the X6 chips if all these mobo's have 140watt capacity...

most demo boards dont have pics of the heatsink. please read the title where it says "Biostar readies..." meaning its not done yet.


eh? thats a standard 8 pin CPU AUX connector, been around for many many years.

140W capacity doesnt mean its just for the x6 chips, could be for OC'ers as well. there are older chips (phenom I/II) that also use over 100W at stock, so it could be for backward compatibility as well.
 
Mussels I think you may of misunderstood the chap...

Also even the latest version of the 965 ( which runs at a much lower wattage) uses 125w.
 
Mussels I think you may of misunderstood the chap...

Also even the latest version of the 965 ( which runs at a much lower wattage) uses 125w.

he was implying that 140W would suck if the 6 core CPU's needed it. they wont, like the previous gen the topmost models will be of higher wattage than the lower ones. at least it gives us OC'ing room.


What i was saying (and you filled the blanks) is that the previous high of 125W moving to 140W, is hardly a bad thing - 15W for 50% more cores? awesome!
 
For some reason I had it in my head that the socket couldn't pull more then 140w .

I blame lack of sleep, woke up at 3am and decided to MAKE my rig work again.
 
I'm worried that X6 will pull 140w standard without overclocking... which will be interesting anyway because of the amount of heat that AMD chips produce anyway...
 
I'm worried that X6 will pull 140w standard without overclocking... which will be interesting anyway because of the amount of heat that AMD chips produce anyway...


A lot less then intels latest chips?
 
ok - I'm being really silly here? I thought that Intel chips were considerably more power efficient than AMD?
 
ok - I'm being really silly here? I thought that Intel chips were considerably more power efficient than AMD?

Well the i7s even with Hyper Threading turned off still run a damn lot hotter then AMDs chips.


With Hyper-threading on many people have had even tripple radiator loops heatsoak with their i7s around 4ghz.

No AMD chip could heat-soak a triple rad set up.
 
that's heat - what about it's power use?
 
Iwhich will be interesting anyway because of the amount of heat that AMD chips produce anyway...


Yeah I was replying to this ;)
 
thanks (I obviously need to sleep)
 
hope it lasts longer than the biostar ta790gx , had 2 die on me in the last 6 months . i wont be getting another biostar mobo (crap built)
 
hope it lasts longer than the biostar ta790gx , had 2 die on me in the last 6 months . i wont be getting another biostar mobo (crap built)


Perchance were you overclocking with the motherboard?

A motherboard with no mosfet cooling?

If yes you were, then my second sentence makes it clear I think why the motherboards may of been breaking ;)
 
did someone rob the chipset coolers?

LOL, sweet.. I always add my own anyways...

What I dont like is the PCI X slots so close together.. Its a bummer as I was hoping to go back to Biostar (always liked them)
 
Perchance were you overclocking with the motherboard?

A motherboard with no mosfet cooling?

If yes you were, then my second sentence makes it clear I think why the motherboards may of been breaking ;)

first one yes second no
 
There you go, only the second one was shoddily made XD
 
Looks pretty good, Biostar has some rock solid boards, that provide good OC features. I guess since this is a middle of the road board, they included the Sata 6 but not USB 3.0
 
Back
Top