• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Browser Bechmark scores

This is with Vivaldi 6.1.3035.75 (Stable channel) with the system listed in the CPU-Z link below
Vivaldi was the fastest of the browsers I tried.

octance2 - Vivaldi 11 June 2023.jpg

 
Let's keep in mind folks that 4 years ago when I first made this thread Octane had already been retired for 2 years. What would be nice is a replacement. Perhaps Octane 3.0 with support for modern browsers.
 
Last edited:
116014-png.295726


12.png

Hardware: Intel i3-3240 + 8GB DDR3 @1600MHz dual-channel + NVIDIA GTX 650 1GB + EVO 850 500GB
Software: ROSA Fresh 12.4 + LXQt + Chrome version 117.0.5911.2 + proprietary Nvidia driver
 
Screenshot (132).png

firefox 118.0.1 privacy
 
screen35.png


Software: ALT Sisyphus -- LXQt -- Chrome (beta version) -- proprietary Nvidia driver
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6000 MHz CL40 -- GTX 650 1GB -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB

Google-Octane-2.0-scaled.jpg


In other words, if I used RAM at 8000 MHz (instead of 6000 MHz) and if I overclocked the CPU the Intel 12600KF should easily score above 110 000.
A result above 110 000 is similar to the fastest CPUs.
 
Screenshot (182).png

Firefox privacy latest version
 
My older i9 9900 on High Performance plan in Windows 10. This is Brave browser, which did almost twice as well as Firefox (32493 :()

brave browser.PNG
 
Chrome latest version: 118.0.5993.89

7950x3d PBO CO
8000MT/s 2133mhz FCLK (crappy IMC)

Octane Score = 109537 points
1698164108479.png
 
Last edited:
Firefox 120.0.1, CPU is Ryzen 7 5800X up to 5GHz. I have only Winamp playing in background
1702352950503.png
 
rDQ6gtj.png


Result: 99 931
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL36 -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Alpine Linux -- Vivaldi Flatpak version -- river wm -- open source GPU driver
 
Vivaldi 6.6.3271.50 (Stable channel)
PC specs as per signature below.

octane2 - Vivaldi 20 March 2024.jpg
 
BsHpQiw.png


Result: 100 879
Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL36 -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Alpine Linux -- Chrome (unstable) Flatpak version -- river wm -- open source GPU driver
 
50ppQIp.png


Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL36 -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Calculate Linux, KDE Plasma, Mesa open-source driver, XFS file system, Chrome unstable

The startup time of Chrome unstable on Calculate Linux is also very fast.
On average it boots up in 0.8xx second.
 
Seems Vivaldi handily beats edge

Vivaldi6.7.3329.24
2024-05-06 03.21.12 chromium.github.io 45ab8817a421.png


Edge
Octane2 in Edge.png
 
The old S22 Ultra. Chrome.

Screenshot_20240506_061727_Chrome.jpg
 
kuOiEPU.png


Hardware: Intel 12600KF (stock) -- Kingston 6200 MHz CL36 -- Sapphire RX 7600 -- BIOSTAR B760MZ-E PRO -- Antec P6 -- Xilence XP550 -- ARCTIC i35 -- EVO 850 500GB
Software: Calculate Linux, KDE Plasma, Mesa open-source driver, XFS file system, Chrome unstable

This is the out-of-the box performance of my setup.
Maybe I can gain a few more percentages of performance by fully optimizing the kernel for performance.

One way to optimize the kernel is to remove what users don't need. For example, if not using KVM, then remove CONFIG_KVM.

And I can combine this with aggressive optimization flags:
make LLVM=1 KCFLAGS="-O3 -march=native -pipe"
 
Back
Top