• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Cyberpunk 2077 Benchmark Test & Performance

Its OK to test games with RT but its not the end all of things, it shouldn't be the deciding factor in determining what GPU you need to drive RT. Because Ray Tracing has a long way too go. Even with DLSS2 enabled it just doesn't seem right in most cases from what I've seen on YouTube reviews and in still images.
The most important Benchmarks is RT & DLSS2 Disabled!

se we need the 50 series lol to kill this game ok.
You need the Radeon RX 7800XT and the RTX 4080Ti to kill this game at 4K :laugh:
 
Its OK to test games with RT but its not the end all of things, it shouldn't be the deciding factor in determining what GPU you need to drive RT.
Graphics in games are very important for most gamers, and RT today delivers a next-gen experience.


Even with DLSS2 enabled it just doesn't seem right in most cases from what I've seen on YouTube reviews and in still images.
Yes, you can take out the lenses and see the errors... but with RT and DLSS, is a superior overall experience over no RT.



The most important Benchmarks is RT & DLSS2 Disabled!
Most important benchmarks on many websites are both, because many gamers cares about RT and many other not.

Please, we can avoid fanboys. The game looks great but looks even better with RT on. Stick to anecdotical situations to deny it...
 
I'm tempted to switch to nvidia

 
WTF AMD 2020-12-17 062218.jpg


Can't complain about those avg fps
 
sorry if im late for the party , is anyone actually playing the game , and or if what hardware and what settings ?/
 
sorry if im late for the party , is anyone actually playing the game , and or if what hardware and what settings ?/
What would you like to know? Are your system specs current? If so, you have a solid system for running CP2077.
 
I'm determined to get the most out of my Titan V, the first time a game comes out that could take advantage of all those cores and my cpu is struggling to keep up.

So after trying daily since launch day, I've been able to pick myself up one of 10 Ryzen 5950x CPU's in stock over at OCUK right now.

I'm upgrading from a 12 -15core cpu and with the architectural improvements im hoping this gives me back the 40% gpu im currently losing in windows and OBS. Even after tweaks.

The only way i can get a stable stream without hitching is if i limit my GPU to 60fps with settings on high.

I cant wait to do a side by side comparison. :toast:
This also means i now have an 1800x a 2700x a 3900x and a crosshair vi sat doing nothing. Not to mention the 4790k / 1660ti rig thats just sat there.
Anyway back to the upgrade for cyberpunk, What say ye!!!!
 
I still just can't get over the fact that at 1440P, 6900 XT versus RTX 3090, you spend ~$800 more respectively to get 3 more FPS. I really don't even want to talk about 4K, because neither card is capable of running the game at optimal 60 FPS, but still the difference is 6 FPS.

NVIDIA is completely SCALPING its customers, willingly albeit. Really though, what's changed over the last decade in this regard? Intel did the same until AMD showed true competition. This is truly what happens in a world without competition.
 
Not true. It depends on how you fine-tune your config.

Ultra settings to Ultra settings. I have talked to you about this before. There is no piece of hardware combination on the market that runs Cyberpunk 2077 at max settings (excluding ray tracing, which is even worse) at 60 FPS.

The statement wasn't about are cards capable of X, Y, Z under certain configs.. The statement was about apples to apples under max settings excluding ray tracing (which is what this review tested), Nvidia is truly scalping their customers. I think AMD charging $1000 for a graphics card is still high, but Nvidia is just throwing things out there to see if their customers will keep buying at absurd pricing, for performance gains that are not worth the cost.

6 FPS gain at 4k -> $800 difference/6 FPS = $133 per FPS. The writing is on the wall. Even worse price per frame at 1440p.
 
Cyberpunk runs far better on the V with a 5950x. Its opened up some performance for me. The game runs and streams like butter.

I'll see how much my max fps has improved tomorrow. :toast:
 
Ultra settings to Ultra settings. I have talked to you about this before. There is no piece of hardware combination on the market that runs Cyberpunk 2077 at max settings (excluding ray tracing, which is even worse) at 60 FPS.
You are dead wrong about that and every review of the game made shows such...
The statement wasn't about are cards capable of X, Y, Z under certain configs.. The statement was about apples to apples under max settings excluding ray tracing (which is what this review tested), Nvidia is truly scalping their customers. I think AMD charging $1000 for a graphics card is still high, but Nvidia is just throwing things out there to see if their customers will keep buying at absurd pricing, for performance gains that are not worth the cost.
Except that card prices are exactly half what they were 2 years ago when the RTX2000 series was launched... Did you conveniently forget about that?
 
You are dead wrong about that and every review of the game made shows such...

Except that card prices are exactly half what they were 2 years ago when the RTX2000 series was launched... Did you conveniently forget about that?

There isn't a single metric in this performance review posted that allows Cyberpunk to run at 60 FPS 4k at max settings. o_O
 
I'm having a lot of fun in the game, ive been able to up most of my settings to High with the addition of the 5950x.

Definitely extended the life of my V and i hear we have new CPU's coming again next year. Interesting times ahead. The Heist is in the video so dont watch it if you havnt played the game this far.

The video is mainly to show performance. I have it locked at 60fps...

 

Attachments

  • 1EEB4DA0-71DF-46F3-9D80-09EB11A632B6.png
    1EEB4DA0-71DF-46F3-9D80-09EB11A632B6.png
    2.5 MB · Views: 738
They attached a pic on mobile without posting it. You don't see that?

Apparently you don't see what is right in front of your eyes. It's ok to be wrong from time to time.
 
Back
Top