- Joined
- Nov 20, 2013
- Messages
- 5,475 (1.44/day)
- Location
- Kyiv, Ukraine
System Name | WS#1337 |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen 7 3800X |
Motherboard | ASUS X570-PLUS TUF Gaming |
Cooling | Xigmatek Scylla 240mm AIO |
Memory | 4x8GB Samsung DDR4 ECC UDIMM |
Video Card(s) | Inno3D RTX 3070 Ti iChill |
Storage | ADATA Legend 2TB + ADATA SX8200 Pro 1TB |
Display(s) | Samsung U24E590D (4K/UHD) |
Case | ghetto CM Cosmos RC-1000 |
Audio Device(s) | ALC1220 |
Power Supply | SeaSonic SSR-550FX (80+ GOLD) |
Mouse | Logitech G603 |
Keyboard | Modecom Volcano Blade (Kailh choc LP) |
VR HMD | Google dreamview headset(aka fancy cardboard) |
Software | Windows 11, Ubuntu 20.04 LTS |
I only consider today's graphics cards, so more accurately: some Low-mid-range AMD GPUs and low-end NVidia GPUs only in comparison to high-end APUs.To be fair the AMD APU's are as fast as midrange GPU's considering that's the entire reason for this thread it is reasonably pertinent.
Basically, an A10-7850K / 7870K contains an equivalent of R7 240, but through extensive overclocking can get quite close to R7 250.
A newer revision of GT730 (64-bit DDR5) is just slightly slower than R7 250 in most benchmarks (except some very specific synthetics) and is still considered a low-end videocard.
Cheaper APUs (A6/A8 7000-series) can only be compared to R5 230/240 in 3D graphics performance.
I haven't found that many comparative benchmarks, but here are some numbers from a review of A10-7870K:
http://www.overclockers.ua/cpu/amd-apu-godavari-a10-7870k/all/
I am not saying that APUs suck, all I'm saying is that modern low-end GPUs are also quite capable, otherwise there would be no reason to manufacture those (beyond upgrading old C2D rigs).
Also, the definition of low-end GPU is a bit blurred, since AMD and NVidia have a bit different approach to that classification.