• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.
  • The forums have been upgraded with support for dark mode. By default it will follow the setting on your system/browser. You may override it by scrolling to the end of the page and clicking the gears icon.

Fritz Chess Benchmark - AMD vs. Intel vs. VIA

Dan, I dont understand why your results are so low. That's not much better than your old Xeon 54xx's. CONFUSED. Are you running JUST ONE E5506. No cant be from your second screenshot. How are your results from other benchmarks? Are you happy with the setup?

Only 2.0 GHz, no HTT , and I don't own any 5400's, just 5300's and 5100's.

As it currently stands, overlocking options are non existent. I can change the BCLK by like 5mhz, that's it. Seems to be the same issue as with early i7's. Apart from that not a single BIOS option, have to wait for some way to unlock something. Be it memory clock, strap or whatever. Either way, I'll wait for some company to make some overclockable motherboard or eventually replace the CPU's with something faster. So far performance is about the same as my previous setup minus the memory bottleneck.
 
MoonPig | Intel Core2 Q9550 | 3825MHz | Score: 21.82 | 5.7045 | DDR2 @ 5-5-5-15 900MHz - First Run ;)

Fritz.png
 
^I'm quite impressed with the C7 score. Is it passive or active cooled at that speed?

Who has got a VIA Nano to test? :D

Active. I wish VIA would get off their butts and roll out the Nano processor to more of their products.
 
Last edited:
^ no, no. It's already slow enough and at the bottom of the list. What was quite impressive was the performance per Ghz... which was up there with P4.

I'll take a passive, faster, Atom over a C7 anyday. But a Nano? WHO KNOWS: WHERE ARE THEY? Talk about product launch fail.
 
oops, looks like you read my post before the edit! actually I don't have that option, I misread the manual on that one (only just got this board 2 days ago)

For sure Atom is better than C7. I mean C7 still stuck at 90nm for fucks sake! make it at 32nm you probably wouldn't need a heatsink. sort your shit out via.
 
here's my run
BarbaricSoul | Intel Core2 Q9650 | 4050MHz | Score: 22.68 | 10887 | DDR2 @ 5-5-5-15 900MHz


fritz.jpg
 
Barbaric, you need to fix your scoreboard post. Please read OP for what each box needs to contain. :)
 
dcf-joe | Core i7 920 | 3.82 GHz | 29.09 | 7.6151 | HT On, Vista 64

Untitled.jpg
 
Capture343.png
Capture344.png

lemonadesoda | 2x Xeon E5472| 3.00 Ghz | 27.65 | 9.22 | FB-DIMM DDR2 800
 
Fritz chess

liviuttn, amd FX8350 default 4 ghz, 16 gb ram ddr3 1600 mhz, 25,92, 4,87.
 

Attachments

  • Fritz Chess.jpg
    Fritz Chess.jpg
    94.4 KB · Views: 1,400
Last edited:
Krazy Owl | E2180 | 2.0GHz | 5.26 | 2.524 | Stock + DDR2-800
 
HammerON | i7 970 | 4.0 GHz | 29.52 | 7.43 |Win7
Capture076732.jpg
 
Here is the Atom you requested...

rickss69 | Atom N270 | 1.6 Ghz | 1.55 (Relative) | 0.96875|Acer netbook

FritzAtom_zps7c5691ca.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
rickss69 | 980X | 4.0 Ghz | 30.64 (Relative) | 7.66 |gamer


FritzGulftown_zpsae4ddc72.jpg
 
uuuaaaaaa | AMD Phenom II X6 1100T | 4.013GHz | 29.23 | 7.284 |
 

Attachments

  • fritz.png
    fritz.png
    122.8 KB · Views: 800
Melvis | AMD FX 8350 | 4.0GHz | 26.42 | 6.605 |
 

Attachments

  • Fritz.jpg
    Fritz.jpg
    149.1 KB · Views: 711
Fritz2-10-13.jpg


Arctucas | i7 950 | 4273 MHz | 32.52 | 7.61
 
Durvelle27 | AMD FX 4100 | 4.6Ghz | 15.72 | | Dual Channel DDR3 1600MHz

26462235.jpg
 
Lets see some new CPUs in this list!
 
I tested my i5-3570: (at 3.8 Ghz)
 

Attachments

  • FritzTest.jpg
    FritzTest.jpg
    132.9 KB · Views: 2,201
Last edited:
It's been quite a while but I also ran this on the new server. It'll be nice to have some new systems in here anyways as there's not a whole lot :(.

Compgeke| 2x Xeon X5472 | 3.2 GHz | 25.73 | 3860 | Dell Poweredge R510

o6dg.png
 
Capture.PNG

micropage7 | pentium G2020 | 2.90 Ghz | 8.89 | win 7 ultimate
 
Back
Top